Low-dose radiotherapy for macular degeneration.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to R H Sagerman.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Members of the Society of Chairmen of Academic Radiation Oncology Programs (SCAROP) were surveyed in November 1997 to evaluate the current status of radiation oncology training in the United States and to help determine how it should be carried out in the coming decade. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A detailed questionnaire was sent to all members of SCAROP; 68 of 82 questionnaires were returned, for a response rate of 83%. RESULTS: The responses to the survey show a serious shortage of radiation oncologists in university settings, despite an apparent surplus in private practice. Although recent changes in health care have added additional clinical responsibilities for radiation oncologists in university practices, approximately 75% of the chairpersons answering the survey continue to give their faculty protected time for research. Even with additional research and teaching responsibilities, the average radiation oncologist in university practice saw 206 patients per year in 1997, a number similar to that reported by the Patterns of Care Study for radiation oncologists overall. Approximately two-thirds of respondents believe that academic chairs should strive to have all clinical faculty members participating in research. Nevertheless, most think that basic research is better performed by dedicated researchers with PhD degrees rather than radiologists with MD degrees. Most respondents believe that the training programs adequately prepare radiation oncologists for a career in academic medicine but do not provide good training in research. Eighty-four percent agreed that resident performance on the American Board of Radiology examination should be considered in the accreditation of residency programs in radiation oncology but should not be the major criterion. CONCLUSION: There is a shortage of academic radiation oncologists in the United States despite the large number of radiation oncologists completing training. This probably is due to a variety of factors, including a relatively small pool of candidates for academic positions, increasing demands for performance from academic physicians (to see more patients, perform research, publish, write grants, and teach), and competition from the private sector for recruitment of these individuals.
With the progress of modern multimodality cancer treatment, retreatment of late recurrences or second tumors became more commonly encountered in management of patients with cancer. Spinal cord retreatment with radiation is a common problem in this regard. Because radiation myelopathy may result in functional deficits, many oncologists are concerned about radiation-induced myelopathy when retreating tumors located within or immediately adjacent to the previous radiation portal. The treatment decision is complicated because it requires a pertinent assessment of prognostic factors with and without reirradiation, radiobiologic estimation of recovery of occult spinal cord damage from the previous treatment, as well as interactions because of multimodality treatment. Recent studies regarding reirradiation of spinal cord in animals using limb paralysis as an endpoint have shown substantial and almost complete recovery of spinal cord injury after a sufficient time after the initial radiotherapy. We report a case of "full" dose reirradiation of the entire cervical spinal cord in a patient who has not developed clinically detectable radiation-induced myelopathy on long-term follow-up of 17 years after the first radiotherapy and 5 years after the second radiotherapy.
Malignancy spread throughout a hemithorax without distant metastasis poses a difficult therapeutic challenge. Irradiation is often not considered because of the risk of pulmonary and cardiac toxicity. We report on a patient with thymoma recurrent throughout the left pleural cavity. Disease progressed despite chemotherapy, and subsequently a radical course of radiotherapy (6,600 cGy) was delivered to the entire hemithorax. Tumor regressed markedly by the completion of radiotherapy. Although tumor regrowth was noted 1 year after radiotherapy, the patient remained markedly improved symptomatically until shortly before her death 2 years after radiotherapy. Pulmonary function tests at 1 year (forced expiratory volume of the first second and forced vital capacity) were similar to pretreatment values, and cardiac function at 2 years remained essentially normal. High-dose hemithorax irradiation may be a consideration in select cases.
PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to assess the toxicity and possible benefits from the administration of low-dose external-beam irradiation for Age-Related Macular Degeneration (ARMD). The premise of the treatment is that radiation induces regression and/or promotes inactivation of the subretinal neo-vasculature, resulting in reabsorption of fluid and blood thus reducing the risk for further leakage or bleeding, as well as subretinal fibrosis. Clinically, the beneficial effect could be translated into stabilization of visual acuity and prevention of progression of the wet type of ARMD with the possibility for some visual improvement. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Allegheny University Hospitals, Hahnemann, Department of Radiation Oncology, treated 278 patients prospectively beginning in January 1995 with low-dose irradiation for wet-type macular degeneration. Two hundred forty-nine patients were treated with a total dose of 14.40 Gy in eight fractions of 1.80 Gy over 10-13 elapsed days, and 27 patients with 20 Gy at 2 Gy per fraction over 12-15 days. The first two patients were treated to a total dose of 10.00 Gy in five fractions of 2.00 Gy. Patients were evaluated at 2-3 weeks and 2-3 months. A percentage (36.7%) of the patients had previously received laser treatments in the study eye, 21.9% once, 5% twice, 9.7% three or more. Subjective visual acuity and toxicity data was collected on all patients. RESULTS: At 2-3 weeks after treatment 195 patients (70%) retained their visual acuity without change, 68 patients (24.5%) stated they had improved vision, and 15 patients (4.8%) stated their vision continued to decrease. Two to 3 months after treatment, 183 patients (65.8%) had no change in their vision, 75 patients (27%) had an improvement in their vision, and 20 patients (7.2%) had a decrease in visual acuity. Transient acute reactions occurred in 14 of the 278 patients treated. CONCLUSION: Our observations in this group of 278 patients support the conclusion that many patients will have improved or stable vision after treatment with low-dose irradiation for age related wet type macular degeneration.
PURPOSE: Second malignancies have been reported among patients who were treated by radiation therapy or chemotherapy alone or in combination. Studies have implied an increased risk of breast cancer in women who received radiotherapy as part of their treatment for Hodgkin's disease. This review was performed to determine if there is an association between splenectomy and subsequent breast cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: One hundred and thirty-six female patients with histologically proven Hodgkin's disease were seen in the Division of Radiation Oncology between 1962 and 1985. All patients received mantle or mediastinal irradiation as part of their therapy. The risk of breast cancer was assessed and multiple linear regression analysis was performed on the following variables: patient age, stage, dose and extent of radiation field, time after completing radiation therapy, splenectomy, and chemotherapy. RESULTS: Breast cancer was observed in 11 of 74 splenectomized patients and in none of 62 patients not splenectomized. The mean follow-up was 13 years in splenectomized patients and 16 years, 7 months in nonsplenectomized patients. Nine patients developed invasive breast cancer and two developed ductal carcinoma in situ. Splenectomy was the only variable independently associated with an increased risk of breast cancer (p < 0.005) in multiple linear regression analysis; age, latency, and splenectomy considered together were also associated with an increased risk of breast cancer (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Our data show an increased risk of breast cancer in splenectomized patients who had treatment for Hodgkin's disease. A multiinstitutional survey may better define the influence of splenectomy relative to developing breast cancer in patients treated for Hodgkin's disease. The risk of breast cancer should be considered when recommending staging laparotomy, and we recommend close follow-up examination including routine mammograms for female patients successfully treated for Hodgkin's disease.
PURPOSE: To determine survival, long-term tumor control, and the effects of irradiation for stage II seminoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-five patients with stage II testicular seminoma were treated between 1966 and 1989. There were 31 patients with stage IIA disease and 14 with stage IIB disease. All patients underwent orchiectomy followed by iliac and paraaortic irradiation (median dose: 30 Gy), with 37 patients receiving prophylactic mediastinal and supraclavicular irradiation (median dose: 30 Gy). Follow-up ranged from 6 months to 20.6 years, with a median of 9.4 years. RESULTS: Uncorrected survival was 98% at 5 years, 84% at 10 years, and 79% at 15 years. Survival corrected for intercurrent disease was 98% at 5, 10, and 15 years. Five patients developed recurrences with four successfully salvaged by chemotherapy and/or irradiation. There were no serious acute toxicities, and no late complications have developed from infradiaphragmatic irradiation. Supradiaphragmatic irradiation was associated with an increased risk of coronary artery disease compared to the age-matched general population. CONCLUSION: Radiotherapy remains an effective treatment for stage II testicular seminoma, with a 98% adjusted survival rate at 15 years, without serious acute toxicity. Supradiaphragmatic irradiation should not be used in stage IIB patients for whom salvage chemotherapy is an option.
A clinically useful classification system is suggested that can be used in prospective trials to evaluate the effects of radiation on the visual system. We review radiation-induced pathophysiological and clinical changes of the various ocular structures as well as dose-response data and management of ocular complications. The rationale for the classification scheme chosen is also discussed.
In 1972, the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study standardized the classification and treatment of orbital rhabdomyosarcoma. It established chemotherapy with external beam radiotherapy as the standard of treatment, yet there was no comparison to treatment with external beam radiotherapy alone. We retrospectively examined the charts of patients with orbital rhabdomyosarcoma treated solely with external beam radiotherapy for the following data: age at diagnosis, gender, tumor recurrence, and tumor-related mortality. We followed 24 patients (mean follow-up 7.9 years) treated with external beam radiotherapy alone. The average age at diagnosis was 5.5 years; there were 15 males and 9 females. Three patients (12.5%) suffered tumor recurrence and there was one (4.2%) tumor-related death. When compared to the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study, results suggest that chemotherapy with external beam radiotherapy may offer no advantage to external beam radiotherapy alone for the treatment of orbital rhabdomyosarcoma.
PURPOSE: Tumors of the lacrimal sac are rare and have traditionally been treated surgically. We investigated the use of irradiation for treatment. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Three consecutive patients with primary epithelial cancer of the nasolacrimal apparatus were treated with irradiation. A tumor dose of 52-66 Gy was delivered with conventional fractionation to fields limited to the primary site and immediately surrounding tissues. RESULTS: Local tumor control was achieved in all three patients. Two patients subsequently developed metastatic cervical adenopathy; both were controlled with irradiation to the neck. One of these two died of distant metastases. Two patients are alive and well at 13 years and at 26 months. CONCLUSION: We conclude that epithelial lacrimal sac tumors are controllable by radiation therapy and with a good cosmetic result. Poorly differentiated lesions require elective cervical nodal irradiation.
PURPOSE: To determine the late clinical effects of irradiation in stage I seminoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 1966 to 1991, 104 patients with stage I seminoma were treated and followed up. After inguinal orchiectomy, all underwent megavoltage infradiaphragmatic irradiation through a "hockey stick" field encompassing the periaortic and ipsilateral iliac lymph nodes (30 Gy in 1.5-Gy fractions). RESULTS: There were no serious, acute toxic effects or late complications. Three patients developed tumor recurrence at 9, 10, and 17 months; two had no evident disease 5 and 25 years after salvage chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Six patients developed second malignancies a mean of 10 years after treatment. None were considered to be radiation induced, and five of these patients had no evident disease after appropriate treatment. CONCLUSION: The first course of postorchiectomy irradiation controls stage I seminoma in most patients (101 of 104 [97.1%]) and causes no serious, acute toxic effects or late complications.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Induction and repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) was measured using a pulsed-field gel electrophoresis system. A cell line of methotrexate-resistant EMT-6 cells that contain numerous double-minutes (DMs) 3 million base pairs in size was employed. The electrophoretic mobility of these DMs depends on whether they have zero, one, or more than one DSB. With no DSBs the DMs remain as circles and are trapped in the origin of electrophoresis, but with one DSB the DMs migrate as a discrete band and can be detected easily through hybridization with a gene-specific probe. Using a clamped homogeneous electrical field apparatus, the induction of DSBs in the 1.5 to 12 Gy X-ray dose range is studied and is shown to be linear. Double-strand break repair following 7.5 Gy is studied, and is shown to be exponential. The kinetics of both induction and repair of DSBs induced in DM DNA was compared to the induction and repair of DSBs in chromosomal DNA and is shown to be similar. The kinetics of repair of DSBs following 7.5 Gy for cells embedded in agarose and cells in suspension is shown to be similar.
Of 34 evaluated patients with primary spinal cord tumors, 32 were irradiated at our institutions between 1969 and 1983. The results are reported of 32 patients, 16 with ependymoma and 16 with astrocytoma, who were treated with postoperative external beam radiotherapy following biopsy or subtotal resection. Twenty-nine patients received 45-55 Gy megavoltage beam irradiation in five to six weeks, and the remaining three patients received less than 40 Gy. The minimum follow-up was five years. Five- and ten-year actuarial survival rates for the entire group of patients were 73% (22/30) and 50% (8/16), respectively, including three patients who were salvaged by surgery after radiotherapy failures. Corresponding five- and ten-year relapse-free survival rates were 60% (18/30) and 32% (6/19), respectively. Of the 29 patients who received more than 45 Gy, relapse-free survival at five years was 63% (17/27). Treatment failed in 13 patients, and all of those failures were within the irradiated portals. Patients with ependymomas have significantly better relapse free survival than those with astrocytomas, 80% vs. 40% (p less than 0.05). There was a significant difference in survival between patients with tumors involving the cervical spine and those with tumors in the other locations, 45% vs. 89% (p less than 0.05). There was no significant difference in survival between patients with cauda equina tumors and those with tumors of the spinal cord, 100% vs. 68% (p less than 0.05). No radiotherapy-related neurological deficit was noted with a maximum 20 year follow-up. This study confirms that external beam radiotherapy is a safe and effective treatment modality for primary spinal cord tumors.
Five hundred nineteen patients with prostate cancer were seen in the Radiation Oncology Division of the State University of New York (SUNY) Health Science Center, Syracuse, New York, between 1969 and 1981. The results for the 239 patients treated with radical intent are reported here. All patients received 60 to 70 Gy to the prostate with megavoltage beam irradiation; 142 with a small field (10 X 10 cm) 360 degrees rotational technique for Stage A, B, or C disease and 69 with a four-field pelvic brick technique (followed by a boost to the prostate) for Stage A through C and D1 disease. Twenty-eight patients were treated postoperatively for residual disease after radical prostatectomy or for recurrent tumor. The minimum follow-up time was 5 years. Actuarial 5-year and 7-year survival rates for Stage A (n = 34), B (n = 100), C (n = 63), and D1 (n = 14) were 91% and 76%, 86% and 75%, 67% and 40%, and 46% and 36%, respectively. The corresponding 5-year and 7-year relapse-free survival rates were 72% and 65%, 77% and 60%, 46% and 28%, and 38% and 25%. The local tumor control rates at 5 years were 91%, 85%, 77%, and 62% for Stage A, B, C, and D1, respectively. In our experience, there was no significant difference in relapse-free survival rates for patients who underwent transurethral resection (TURP) versus those who did not (67% versus 78% for Stage B [P greater than 0.25] and 38% versus 47% for Stage C [P greater than 0.25], respectively). Also there was no significant difference in relapse-free survival rates between large and small field techniques (64% versus 77% for Stage B [P greater than 0.25] and 56% versus 41% for Stage C [P greater than 0.25], respectively). The 5-year and 7-year actuarial survival rates were 90% and 71%, respectively, for the 15 patients with residual tumor and 58% and 33%, respectively, for the 13 patients treated for postprostatectomy recurrence. Severe complications were documented in only nine patients (3.7%) and mild to moderate complications in 53 patients (22%). Larger fields did not cause a higher rate of complications, although small fields were tolerated better than large fields; the significant acute reaction rate was 27% for large field techniques versus 11% for small field techniques (P greater than 0.01). These results confirm that external beam irradiation is an effective treatment for prostate cancer.