PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R H Wiesner

Publications and source records attributed to R H Wiesner.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources
PubMed1998

Age and liver transplantation: a report of the Liver Transplantation Database.

BACKGROUND: The average age of liver transplant recipients has increased steadily during the last decade. The effects of recipient age on outcome of liver transplantation were evaluated in a large prospective database. METHODS: A total of 735 adult recipients of single-organ liver transplants for nonfulminant liver disease enrolled in a large prospective database between 1990 and 1994 were analyzed for associations of patient age with outcomes. Patients were categorized into two groups: younger being <60 and older being > or = 60 years of age. RESULTS: Older liver transplant recipients were more likely to be female, white, and have the diagnoses of primary biliary cirrhosis or cryptogenic cirrhosis than younger recipients, who were more likely to have the diagnosis of alcoholic liver disease. Disease severity was similar between the two groups. After transplantation, the durations of stay in the intensive care unit and hospital were longer for older than for younger transplant recipients, but episodes of acute rejection were less frequent. The quality of life at 1 year was similar among older and younger recipients. Patient survival was lower for older than for younger recipients (81% vs. 90% at 1 year; P=0.004), whereas graft survival was not different (80% vs. 85% at 1 year; P=0.163). The excess mortality among older recipients was largely due to nonhepatic causes, including infectious, cardiac, and neurological diseases occurring within 6 months after transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Although patient survival was significantly lower among liver transplant recipients above the age of 60 years, the excess mortality was due to nonhepatic, largely age-related problems. The overall success of liver transplantation and improvement in quality of life for older recipients is excellent.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Cytomegalovirus and its association with hepatic artery thrombosis after liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) is a cause of morbidity and graft loss in approximately 7% of patients after an orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Although technical problems are often thought to be the cause of HAT, in general the etiology remains unclear. Because cytomegalovirus (CMV) can infect endothelial cells in vitro and lead to a rapid procoagulant response, it can be hypothesized that, in the absence of CMV antibodies, latent CMV in an allograft may become activated and promote or contribute to vascular thrombosis. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between CMV serology of the donor and recipient with the development of HAT after OLT. METHODS: Between July 1988 and November 1995 (University of Wisconsin era), 490 OLTs were performed in 413 patients. Subsequently, four patients were excluded in whom the CMV serology results of the donor were not available. Sixteen of the 409 patients developed HAT within 30 days after liver transplantation. The control group consisted of the other 393 patients. RESULTS: The incidence of HAT was 12.5% in 64 CMV D+R- patients and 0% in 52 CMV D-R- patients. However, in the other combinations (D+R+ and D-R+), the incidence was only 2.8% (P = 0.005). Eight of the 16 patients with HAT belonged to the CMV D+R- group. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that CMV-seronegative patients receiving a seropositive allograft may be at risk for early HAT. Seropositivity of the donor alone and of the recipient alone was not significantly related to the incidence of HAT. Prophylactic treatment with ganciclovir and/or anticoagulation should be evaluated to prevent this complication.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Hepatitis G virus infection in patients transplanted for cryptogenic cirrhosis: red flag or red herring?

BACKGROUND: The significance of hepatitis G (HGV) infection in liver transplant recipients is not known. We set out to determine the pre-orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) prevalence, the pre- and postoperative viral titers of HGV, and the allograft histology in patients infected with HGV who underwent OLT for cryptogenic cirrhosis. METHODS: HGV RNA was measured using a research-based branched DNA assay. The assay used a target-specific probe set that was based on the 5'-untranslated region of the HGV genome. Allograft histology was assessed with protocol liver biopsies in all patients who survived longer than 6 months. RESULTS: The preoperative prevalence of HGV infection in recipients transplanted for cryptogenic cirrhosis was 26%. Thirty-seven percent (12 of 33) of recipients who had serum available in the first postoperative month had HGV infection. Mean HGV RNA levels were 9.8 (+/-4.2) (viral molecular equivalents/ml x 10[6]) before OLT and 37.5 (+/-10.7) at 1 year after OLT. In 4 of the 11 cryptogenic recipients in whom HGV RNA was detectable in the first postoperative month, HGV RNA fell to undetectable levels at the most recent follow-up (mean 70 months). Of the five cryptogenic recipients who continue to have measurable HGV RNA, three have unexplained hepatitis histologically. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest the following: 1) The prevalence of HGV infection in patients undergoing OLT for cryptogenic cirrhosis is about 25%. 2) In recipients persistently infected with HGV, mean HGV RNA titers increase after OLT. 3) HGV RNA becomes undetectable in about one third of recipients who had detectable HGV RNA in the first month after OLT. 4) Hepatitis of uncertain etiology occurs in 60% (3 of 5) of persistently HGV-infected cryptogenic recipients.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Risk of colorectal neoplasia in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis and ulcerative colitis following orthotopic liver transplantation.

Several centers have identified colorectal cancer in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and ulcerative colitis (UC) who have undergone orthotopic liver transplantation. Increased frequency of surveillance colonoscopy and prophylactic colectomy has been recommended. To address these concerns, we reviewed the posttransplantation experience with colorectal neoplasia in patients with PSC and UC at our institution. All patients with PSC and UC who underwent liver transplantation at Mayo Clinic between April 1985 and December 1993 were followed up through their complete history for colorectal dysplasia, cancer, or death. Eighty-one of 108 patients with PSC (75%) had concomitant inflammatory bowel disease (all but 1 had UC). Proctocolectomy had been performed before transplantation in 24 (30%). Median follow-up after transplantation was 4.2 years. Among the 57 patients with intact colons, 3 developed colorectal cancer, an incidence of approximately 1% per person per year. The cumulative incidence of dysplasia was 15% at 5 years and 21% at 8 years. Overall actuarial survival stratified by presence or absence of an intact colon at transplantation was similar (86% and 86%, respectively, at 5 years). The risk of carcinoma after transplantation compared with that expected for patients during a comparable (pretransplantation) period was increased fourfold but was not statistically significant. The risk of colorectal neoplasia (dysplasia and cancer) after liver transplantation in patients with PSC and UC is clinically important. However, this risk had no impact on patient survival. Prophylactic proctocolectomy does not appear necessary, but annual surveillance colonoscopy is recommended.

Cholangitis, Sclerosing↗
PubMed1998

Optimal timing of liver transplantation for primary biliary cirrhosis.

In 1989, we reported on the efficacy of liver transplantation in primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) by demonstrating that the actual patient survival following transplantation was significantly better than without transplantation as predicted by a mathematical survival model ("Mayo natural history model"). Our aim in this investigation was to determine an optimal time to perform liver transplantation in PBC. One hundred forty-three patients with PBC undergoing liver transplantation were followed prospectively. Disease severity was measured immediately before transplantation by a summary score ("risk score") used in the Mayo natural history model, namely age, bilirubin, albumin, prothrombin time, and the presence or absence of edema. Proportional hazards analyses were performed assessing patient survival following transplantation. The influence of disease severity immediately pretransplantation on resource utilization for liver transplantation was assessed. Compared with our report in 1989, liver transplantation was performed at an earlier stage of disease (e.g., median risk score: 7.5 vs. 8.3; P < .01). Following transplantation, patient survival probabilities at 1, 2, and 5 years were 93%, 90%, and 88%, respectively. In the proportional hazards analysis, the risk of death following transplantation remained low until reaching a risk score of 7.8. In contrast, risk scores greater than 7.8 were associated with a progressively increased mortality. Resource utilization measured by the days in the intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital and the requirement for intraoperative blood transfusions was significantly greater in recipients who had higher risk scores before transplantation. Our data suggest that an optimal timing for liver transplantation, as determined by patient survival and resource utilization, appears to be at a risk score around 7.8 in patients with PBC.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Acute hepatic allograft rejection: incidence, risk factors, and impact on outcome.

Hepatic allograft rejection remains an important problem following liver transplantation, and, indeed, complications related to the administration of immunosuppressive therapy remain a predominant cause of posttransplantation morbidity and mortality. The Liver Transplantation Database (LTD) was used to study a cohort of 762 consecutive adult liver transplantation recipients and determined the incidence, timing, and risk factors for acute rejection. We also evaluated the impact of histological severity of rejection on the need for additional immunosuppressive therapy and on patient and graft survival. Four hundred ninety (64%) of the 762 adult liver transplantation recipients developed at least one episode of rejection during a median follow-up period of 1,042 days (range, 336-1,896 days), most of which occurred during the first 6 weeks after transplantation. Multivariate analysis revealed that recipient age, serum creatinine, aspartate transaminase (AST) level, presence of edema, donor/recipient HLA-DR mismatch, cold ischemic time, and donor age were independently associated with the time to acute rejection. An interesting observation was that the histological severity of rejection was an important prognosticator: the use of antilymphocyte preparations was higher, and the time to death or retransplantation was shorter, for patients with severe rejection. Findings from this study will assist in decision-making for the use of immunosuppressive regimens and call into question whether complete elimination of all rejection or alloreactivity is a desirable goal in liver transplantation.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Increased risk of chronic liver failure in adults with heterozygous alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency.

Controversy exists whether patients who are genetically heterozygous for 1-antitrypsin deficiency (1ATD), carrying a single PI*Z allele, are at increased risk of developing chronic liver disease. In these investigations, we determined the prevalence of heterozygous 1AT phenotypes (PI MZ, PI SZ) in a well-characterized cohort of patients presenting with chronic liver failure before orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). We analyzed data collected from all adult patients (n = 641) who underwent OLT at our tertiary referral center between March 1985 and December 1996. Study patients entered a prospective protocol designed to test for all known etiologies of liver disease. Complete testing including 1AT phenotyping was successfully performed in 599 adults. We compared the overall number of heterozygous PI*Z carriers in our OLT cohort with established prevalence figures for general and regional American populations, and examined their distribution among various liver disease subgroups. Fifty-one patients were found to be heterozygous carriers of a single PI*Z allele for 1AT. The predominant phenotype in our transplantation cohort was PI MZ, identified in 49 patients (8.2%), which is a significantly higher prevalence than that reported from previous American population studies (2%-4%). Additionally, a significantly greater number of PI MZ carriers existed in patients with cryptogenic cirrhosis compared with other liver disease categories (26.9%; P < .001). These data suggest that individuals carrying a single PI*Z allele for 1AT may be at increased risk of developing cirrhosis and liver failure, even in the absence of an identifiable coexisting liver disease.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

The impact of cyclosporine dose and level on acute rejection and patient and graft survival in liver transplant recipients.

A multicenter, retrospective analysis of 623 liver transplant recipients was performed to define safe and effective cyclosporine doses and blood levels at various times after transplantation. Patient and graft survival were assessed as efficacy parameters, and serum creatinine and cholesterol levels as safety parameters. The mean daily cyclosporine dose was 12.1 mg/kg/d at 1 month posttransplantation and 5.5 mg/kg/d after 1 year. After 4 years, the mean cyclosporine dose was maintained at 4.0 mg/kg/d. Mean cyclosporine blood levels showed a similar trend. Patient and graft survival after 4 years of cyclosporine maintenance therapy were 72% and 67%, respectively. Both serum creatinine and cholesterol levels were stable over the study period, and neither correlated with cyclosporine dose. The cumulative incidence of biopsy-proven acute cellular rejection was 59% for early (< 6 months) episodes and 21% for late (> or = 6 months) episodes. Patient and graft survival did not differ significantly between patients experiencing early or late acute rejection episodes and those who did using univariate analysis. The high patient and graft survival, low rejection rates, and lack of significant renal dysfunction or hypercholesterolemia suggest that the cyclosporine doses and blood levels described are safe and therapeutically effective.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Weight change and obesity after liver transplantation: incidence and risk factors.

Obesity is a concern in the long-term management of patients following liver transplantation, yet the risk of obesity and the factors that influence its development have not been well defined. We evaluated posttransplantation weight change among a cohort of 774 adults who had their height and weight recorded before liver transplantation at three major centers. Obesity was defined as a body mass index (BMI) of at least 30 kg/m2. Weight at transplantation was adjusted by the amount of ascites removed. Mean BMI increased from 24.8 kg/m2 pretransplantation to 27.0 kg/m2 in the first posttransplantation year, to 28.1 kg/m2 in the second year, and very little with subsequent observation. Among 320 patients who were not obese before transplantation, 21.6% became obese within 2 years after transplantation. On evaluation of numerous potential donor and pretransplantation risk factors, greater recipient BMI, greater donor BMI, and being married were found to be predictors of subsequent obesity (P < .05). Posttransplantation predictors of obesity included absence of acute cellular rejection, higher cumulative prednisone dose in the second year, and cyclosporine-based immunosuppression, although only rejection and prednisone dose remained predictors on multivariate analysis. Despite the marked weight gain after transplantation, prevalence of obesity at 2 years was only slightly greater than in the general US population. Obesity occurred commonly after liver transplantation, sometimes with a striking gain in weight. In addition to BMI at transplantation, donor BMI, marital status, occurrence of acute rejection, and prednisone dose affected the incidence of obesity.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Late hypertension after liver transplantation: a comparison of cyclosporine and tacrolimus (FK 506).

Hypertension frequently develops early after liver transplantation when cyclosporine-based immunosuppression is used. However, initial experience with tacrolimus has suggested that its use leads to a lower early incidence of hypertension. In this study, the blood pressure status of patients treated with cyclosporine (n = 131) and those treated with tacrolimus (n = 28) was compared 24 months after liver transplantation. At this time interval, the prevalence of hypertension in the cyclosporine and tacrolimus groups were 82% and 64%, respectively (P < .05). For those patients who were hypertensive by 24 months, onset was delayed in the tacrolimus group compared with the cyclosporine group: 40% versus 71% and 73% versus 93% at 1 and 12 months, respectively (P < .05). Within the cyclosporine group, patients with hypertension were heavier than those with normal blood pressure, 84.7 +/- 1.8 versus 73.4 +/- 4.0 kg, respectively (P < .05). Within the tacrolimus group, hypertensive patients had lower glomerular filtration rates and higher renal vascular resistances compared with normotensive patients, 74 +/- 12 versus 47 +/- 6 mL/min and 15,711 +/- 2,445 versus 28,830 +/- 4,310 dyne/s/cm5/m2, respectively (P < .05). There were no within-group differences for age, gender, pretransplant history of hypertension, family history of hypertension, graft function, or daily doses of prednisone, cyclosporine, or tacrolimus. These results indicate that, compared with cyclosporine, the onset of hypertension after liver transplantation is delayed and less prevalent with tacrolimus. Additionally, hypertension is associated with increased body weight in cyclosporine-treated patients and with more severe renal dysfunction in patients receiving tacrolimus. The relationships of these findings to the development of posttransplant hypertension requires further study.

Blood Pressure↗
PubMed1998

An open-label study of the safety and tolerability of converting stable liver transplant recipients to neoral.

Neoral is a new formulation of cyclosporine based on microemulsion technology, designed to provide increased and more reliable absorption of the medication. The aim of this study was to assess whether conversion from Sandimmune to Neoral provides safe and effective oral immunosuppression in stable liver transplant recipients. We studied 59 stable liver transplant recipients (being treated with prednisone, azathioprine, and Sandimmune). All patients were enrolled in an open-label study in which they were converted from Sandimmune to Neoral therapy at a dose ratio of 1:1. Thirty-nine patients underwent duct-to-duct bile duct anastomoses, and 20 underwent Roux-en-Y bile duct anastomoses. After conversion, the Neoral dosage was adjusted on the basis of trough levels measured at weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 12. To assess safety and tolerability, we prospectively obtained serial information, including laboratory data and information on side effects. Standard statistical methodology was used. A total of 59 patients (23 men, 36 women; mean age, 55 years; mean follow-up after liver transplantation, 5.7 years) completed 3 months of follow-up after conversion from Sandimmune to Neoral. There were 32 dosage changes; 22 (69%) required reduction of the Neoral dose. Mean cyclosporine trough levels remained above 100 ng/mL during the follow-up period. There were no significant differences between cyclosporine levels in patients with duct-to-duct or Roux-en-Y bile duct anastomoses. There were no episodes of rejection during the 3-month follow-up period. The side effect profile was similar in both groups, except for a significant reduction in the number of patients with headaches after Neoral conversion. Liver transplant recipients can safely be converted from Sandimmune to Neoral. Neoral was well tolerated in this population.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction fails to detect peripheral-blood hepatitis C RNA in formalin-fixed liver tissue.

Currently, one of the major indications for liver transplantation is infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV). Many studies have suggested that recurrent infection with HCV is universal after transplantation. Fastidious techniques, such as reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), have proved to be highly sensitive for detecting HCV RNA in serum and in fresh-frozen and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) liver tissue. In this study, we wanted to determine whether the identification of HCV RNA in liver tissue by RT-PCR might reflect the detection of circulating HCV RNA in blood within the tissue, rather than implying true tissue infection. We performed RT-PCR for HCV RNA in FFPE liver biopsy specimens taken from 14 donor allografts shortly before and immediately after implantation into recipients. The recipients were known to have HCV RNA in serum and explanted liver tissue, as determined by RT-PCR. We were unable to detect HCV RNA in any of the study samples, either before or after transplantation. In a related study, qualitative and quantitative HCV RNA analyses were performed by RT-PCR and branched DNA (bDNA) amplification, respectively, on serum samples collected pretransplantation and immediately posttransplantation from 10 other patients who underwent transplantation for hepatitis C. HCV RNA was detected in all serum samples before and after transplantation by RT-PCR; however, the bDNA assay detected HCV RNA in only 6 of 10 samples pre-orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) and in none of the immediately post-OLT samples. In our system, despite the RT-PCR detection of HCV RNA in serum before and after the transplantation, HCV RNA is not detectable in the peripheral blood that accompanies formalin-fixed liver tissue. This implies that RT-PCR detection of HCV RNA in tissue reflects true liver infection, rather than contamination by HCV RNA in accompanying peripheral blood.

Formaldehyde↗
PubMed1998

Prolonged anuria complicating primary sclerosing cholangitis: successful outcome following orthotopic liver transplantation.

A 49-year-old man with progressive obstructive jaundice secondary to primary sclerosing cholangitis developed acute, anuric renal failure requiring prolonged hemodialysis. Renal biopsy showed evidence of tubular epithelial toxicity, pigmented casts, interstitial fibrosis, and ischemic glomerular changes. After orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT), there was an immediate return of urine output. The introduction of tacrolimus (FK506) was delayed for 3 weeks after transplantation, during which time a gradual improvement in renal function occurred. Renal function remained stable 1 year later at a level of moderate impairment with good hepatic function.

Acute Kidney Injury↗
PubMed1998

Liver transplantation for primary biliary cirrhosis and primary sclerosing cholangitis: predicting outcomes with natural history models.

In patients with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), risk score models that reflect disease severity have been developed and can serve as an objective measurement to assess and evaluate the effect of the severity of liver disease on the outcome of liver transplantation. Thus, using the established Mayo risk scores for PBC and PSC, one not only can estimate survival for the individual patient but can measure disease activity as well. Indeed, several studies have suggested that the optimal timing of liver transplantation with use of the Mayo PBC model may be an important tool to improve survival, decrease morbidity, and decrease overall related costs. Likewise, studies in patients with PSC have yielded similar results. This review explores how prognostic mathematical survival models for PBC and PSC might be applied to individual patients in need of liver transplantation. The following question is addressed: How can the timing of liver transplantation be optimized to increase survival, decrease postoperative morbidity, and ultimately, decrease the overall resource utilization involved in this procedure?

Cholangitis, Sclerosing↗
PubMed1997

Increased waiting time for liver transplantation results in higher mortality.

BACKGROUND: Waiting time to liver transplantation (LTx) has dramatically lengthened, but the proportion of candidates who die awaiting transplantation has not increased. We evaluated whether longer waiting time for LTx candidates increases mortality. METHODS: A cohort of candidates listed for LTx between 1990 and 1993 by three large transplantation programs was followed for 2 years. The exposure measure was ABO blood type, which is not inherently related to outcome, but is a major determinant of waiting time. The main outcome measure was 2-year mortality, as evaluated by logistic regression analysis that controlled for differences in clinical status at the time of evaluation for LTx. RESULTS: The 308 candidates with type O blood waited longer for LTx (median 109 days) than the 399 candidates with other blood types (median 58 days) (P=0.001). Candidates listed for LTx with type O blood had better clinical status at evaluation, but then had higher pretransplantation mortality (13.3%) than other candidates (7.0%) (P=0.005). Blood group O candidates had higher 2-year mortality (26.6%) than other candidates (22.1%), which on multivariate analysis resulted in a mortality odds ratio at 2 years of 1.52 (95% confidence interval=1.04-2.23). With the difference in median waiting time between blood groups increasing from 44 days in the first year to 108 days in the third year, the 2-year mortality odds ratio also rose from 0.94 to 1.97. CONCLUSIONS: When compared with LTx candidates with other blood types, blood type O candidates have longer waiting times and higher pretransplantation mortality, which results in higher 2-year mortality.

ABO Blood-Group System↗
PubMed1997

Neoral compared to Sandimmune is associated with a decrease in histologic severity of rejection in patients undergoing primary liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: In a randomized, controlled study we investigated the clinical efficacy of the microemulsion formulation of cyclosporine (Neoral) in comparison with Sandimmune (SIM) in the treatment of patients who underwent primary orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). METHODS: In total, 33 patients were randomized in a double-blind fashion before undergoing primary OLT to receive either Neoral or SIM. All 33 patients initially received intravenous cyclosporine, but as soon as it was tolerated, the oral study drug was initiated (median time, 3.6 days) and 17 patients received Neoral and 16 SIM (for both drugs, 10 mg/kg/day). Both groups were comparable with regard to age, sex, etiology of chronic liver disease, and hepatic biochemical profile. Episodes of rejection were diagnosed histologically and characterized as mild, moderate, or severe using criteria from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. RESULTS: Patients were followed for 1 year. Four patients in each group were discontinued prematurely. The reason for discontinuation of cyclosporine was drug-related complications in two of the NEO patients and in three of the SIM group; the other three were non-drug-related. Rejection episodes occurred in 9 of 17 patients (52.90%) in the Neoral group and in 9 of 16 patients (56.3%) in the SIM group. The total number of rejection episodes in each group was 14. However, in evaluating the severity of rejection histologically, nine episodes of rejection were characterized as moderate/ severe in the SIM group compared with only three in the Neoral group (P=0.027). Five of the nine moderate/severe rejection episodes in the SIM group occurred within the first 2 weeks after transplant. In contrast, moderate/severe rejection did not occur in the Neoral group in this early period. Two patients in the SIM group and no patients in the Neoral group required treatment with OKT3 for steroid-resistant rejection. There were no differences in mean doses or trough levels when comparing the two study groups. The incidence of adverse effects was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Neoral is a safe and efficacious drug in the treatment of primary OLT patients. Given comparable doses of cyclosporine in each group over 1 year, there was no significant difference in the total number of rejection episodes between study groups. However, patients treated with Neoral had a lower incidence of moderate/severe histologic rejection and were free of steroid-resistant rejection when compared with SIM-treated patients.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Efficacy of tacrolimus as rescue therapy for chronic rejection in orthotopic liver transplantation: a report of the U.S. Multicenter Liver Study Group.

BACKGROUND: A study was performed by 17 different U.S. liver transplantation centers to determine the safety and efficacy of conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus for chronic allograft rejection. METHODS: Ninety-one patients were converted to tacrolimus a mean of 319 days after liver transplantation. The indication for conversion was ongoing chronic rejection confirmed by biochemical and histologic criteria. Patients were followed for a mean of 251 days until the end of the study. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients (70.3%) were alive with their initial hepatic allograft at the conclusion of the study period and were defined as the responder group. Twenty-seven patients (29.7%) failed to respond to treatment, and 20 of them required a second liver graft. The actuarial graft survival for the total patient group was 69.9% and 48.5% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. The actuarial patient survival at 1 and 2 years was 84.4% and 81.2%, respectively. Two significant positive prognostic factors were identified. Patients with a total bilirubin of < or = 10 mg/dl at the time of conversion had a significantly better graft and patient survival than patients converted with a total bilirubin > 10 mg/dl (P=0.00002 and P=0.00125, respectively). The time between liver transplantation and conversion also affected graft and patient survival. Patients converted to tacrolimus < or = 90 days after transplantation had a 1-year actuarial graft and patient survival of 51.9% and 65.9%, respectively, compared with 73.2% and 87.7% for those converted > 90 days after transplantation. The mean total bilirubin level for the responder group was 7.1 mg/dl at the time of conversion and decreased significantly to a mean of 3.4 mg/dl at the end of the study (P=0.0018). Thirteen patients (14.3%) died during the study. Sepsis was the major contributing cause of death in most of these patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that conversion to tacrolimus for chronic rejection after orthotopic liver transplantation represents an effective therapeutic option. Conversion to tacrolimus before development of elevated total bilirubin levels showed a significant impact on long-term outcome.

Adolescent↗