PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R Hafner

Publications and source records attributed to R Hafner.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Emergence of resistance to fluconazole as a cause of failure during treatment of histoplasmosis in patients with acquired immunodeficiency disease syndrome.

In sequential clinical trials of treatment for histoplasmosis in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, therapy with fluconazole failed in a higher proportion of patients than did therapy with itraconazole. To determine the cause for failure with fluconazole, antifungal susceptibility testing that used modified National Committee on Clinical Laboratory Standards procedures was performed on all baseline and failure isolates. Failure occurred more frequently in patients with baseline isolates with fluconazole minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) > or =5 microg/mL versus lower MICs; 29% versus 3%, respectively. There was at least a 4-fold increase in fluconazole MIC in the isolates from 10 (59%) of 17 patients for whom paired pretreatment and failure or relapse isolates were available. Cross-resistance to itraconazole was not seen. In conclusion, fluconazole is less active than itraconazole for Histoplasma capsulatum and induces resistance during therapy, which accounted for treatment failure in some patients.

AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections↗
PubMed2001

A prospective study of discontinuing primary and secondary Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia prophylaxis after CD4 cell count increase to > 200 x 106 /l.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the incidence of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) after discontinuation of either primary or secondary prophylaxis. DESIGN: This was a prospective, non-randomized, non-blinded study. SETTING: Twenty-five University-based AIDS Clinical Trials Group units. PARTICIPANTS: Participants either had a CD4 cell count < or = 100 x 106/l at any time in the past and no history of confirmed PCP (group I; n = 144), or had a confirmed episode of PCP > or = 6 months prior to study entry (group II; n = 129). All subjects had sustained CD4 cell counts > 200 x 106/l in response to antiretroviral therapy. INTERVENTIONS: Subjects discontinued PCP prophylaxis within 3 months or at the time of study entry. Evaluations for symptoms of PCP and CD4 cell counts were performed every 8 weeks. Prophylaxis was resumed if two consecutive CD4 cell counts were < 200 x 106/l. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The main outcome was development of PCP. RESULTS: No cases of PCP occurred in 144 subjects (median follow-up, 82 weeks) in group I or in the 129 subjects (median follow-up, 63 weeks) in group II (95% upper confidence limits on the rates of 1.3 per 100 person-years and 1.96 per 100 person-years for groups I and II, respectively). Eight subjects (five in group I and three in group II) resumed PCP prophylaxis after two consecutive CD4 cell counts < 200 x 106/l. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of developing initial or recurrent PCP after discontinuing prophylaxis is low in HIV-infected individuals who have sustained CD4 cell count increases in response to antiretroviral therapy. Neither lifelong primary nor secondary PCP prophylaxis is necessary.

AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections↗
PubMed2001

Dose-escalation, phase I/II study of azithromycin and pyrimethamine for the treatment of toxoplasmic encephalitis in AIDS.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety, tolerance and activity of increasing doses of azithromycin in combination with pyrimethamine for the treatment of toxoplasmic encephalitis (TE) in patients with AIDS. DESIGN: A phase I/II dose-escalation study of oral azithromycin in combination with pyrimethamine. SETTING: Eight clinical sites in the United States. PATIENTS: Forty-two adult HIV-infected patients with confirmed or presumed acute TE. METHODS: Patients were enrolled into three successive cohorts receiving azithromycin 900, 1200 and 1500 mg a day with pyrimethamine as induction therapy. The induction period was 6 weeks followed by 24 weeks of maintenance therapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient response was evaluated clinically and radiologically. RESULTS: Of the 30 evaluable patients, 20 (67%) responded to therapy during the induction period. Ten experienced disease progression. Of the 15 patients who received maintenance therapy, seven (47%) relapsed. Six patients discontinued treatment during the induction period as a result of reversible toxicities. Treatment-terminating adverse events occurred most frequently among the patients receiving the 1500 mg dose. CONCLUSION: The combination of azithromycin (900-1200 mg a day) and pyrimethamine may be useful as an alternative therapy for TE among patients intolerant of sulfonamides and clindamycin, but maintenance therapy with this combination was associated with a high relapse rate. The combination was safe, but low-grade adverse events were common.

AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections↗
PubMed2001

Tolerance and pharmacokinetic interactions of rifabutin and azithromycin.

This multicenter study evaluated the tolerance and potential pharmacokinetic interactions between azithromycin and rifabutin in volunteers with or without human immunodeficiency virus infection. Daily dosing with the combination of azithromycin and rifabutin was poorly tolerated, primarily because of gastrointestinal symptoms and neutropenia. No significant pharmacokinetic interactions were found between these drugs.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Clearance of fungal burden during treatment of disseminated histoplasmosis with liposomal amphotericin B versus itraconazole.

Animal studies have shown that fungal burden correlates with survival during treatment with new antifungal therapies for histoplasmosis. The purpose of this report is to compare the clearance of fungal burden in patients with histoplasmosis treated with liposomal amphotericin B versus itraconazole. In two separate closed clinical trials that evaluated the efficacy of liposomal amphotericin B and itraconazole treatment of disseminated histoplasmosis in patients with AIDS, blood was cultured for fungus and blood and urine were tested for Histoplasma antigen. The clinical response rates were similar; 86% with liposomal amphotericin B (n = 51) versus 85% with itraconazole (n = 59). Of the patients with positive blood cultures at enrollment, after 2 weeks of therapy cultures were negative in over 85% of the liposomal amphotericin B group versus 53% of the itraconazole group (P = 0.0008). Furthermore, after 2 weeks, median antigen levels in serum fell by 1.6 U in the liposomal amphotericin B group versus 0.1 U in the itraconazole group (P = 0.02), and those in urine fell by 2.1 U in the liposomal amphotericin B group and 0.2 U in the itraconazole group (P = 0.0005). The more rapid clearance of fungemia supports the use of liposomal amphotericin B rather than itraconazole for initial treatment of moderately severe or severe histoplasmosis.

AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections↗
PubMed2000

Discontinuation of Mycobacterium avium complex prophylaxis in patients with antiretroviral therapy-induced increases in CD4+ cell count. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. AIDS Clinical Trials Group 362 Study Team.

BACKGROUND: Patients infected with HIV who experience increases in CD4(+) cell counts are at reduced risk for opportunistic infections. However, the safety of discontinuing prophylaxis against Mycobacterium avium complex has been uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To compare the rate of M. avium complex infection in patients with increased CD4(+) cell counts who receive azithromycin and those receiving placebo. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: 29 university-based clinical centers in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: 643 HIV-1-infected patients with a previous CD4(+) cell count less than 0.05 x 10(9) cells/L and a sustained increase to greater than 0.10 x 10(9) cells/L during antiretroviral therapy. INTERVENTION: Azithromycin, 1200 mg once weekly (n = 321), or matching placebo (n = 322). MEASUREMENTS: Mycobacterium avium complex cultures, CD4(+) cell counts, and clinical evaluations for AIDS-defining illnesses and bacterial infections were done every 8 weeks. Plasma HIV-1 RNA levels were measured at 16-week intervals. RESULTS: During follow-up (median, 16 months), 2 cases of M. avium complex infection were reported among the 321 patients assigned to placebo (incidence rate, 0.5 event per 100 person-years [95% CI, 0.06 to 1.83 events per 100 person-years]) compared with no cases among the 322 patients assigned to azithromycin (CI, 0 to 0.92 events per 100 person-years), resulting in a treatment difference of 0.5 event per 100 person-years (CI, -0.20 to 1.21 events per 100 person-years) for placebo versus azithromycin. Both cases were atypical in that M. avium complex was localized to the vertebral spine. Patients receiving azithromycin were more likely than those receiving placebo to discontinue treatment with the study drug permanently because of adverse events (8% vs. 2%; hazard ratio, 0.24 [CI, 0.10 to 0.57]). CONCLUSIONS: Prophylaxis against Mycobacterium avium complex can safely be withdrawn or withheld in adults with HIV infection who experience increases in CD4(+) cell count while receiving antiretroviral therapy.

AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections↗
PubMed2000

Discontinuation of prophylaxis against Mycobacterium avium complex disease in HIV-infected patients who have a response to antiretroviral therapy. Terry Beirn Community Programs for Clinical Research on AIDS.

BACKGROUND: Several agents are effective in preventing Mycobacterium avium complex disease in patients with advanced human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. However, there is uncertainty about whether prophylaxis should be continued in patients whose CD4+ cell counts have increased substantially with antiviral therapy. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, double-blind, randomized trial of treatment with azithromycin (1200 mg weekly) as compared with placebo in HIV-infected patients whose CD4+ cell counts had increased from less than 50 to more than 100 per cubic millimeter in response to antiretroviral therapy. The primary end point was M. avium complex disease or bacterial pneumonia. RESULTS: A total of 520 patients entered the study; the median CD4+ cell count at entry was 230 per cubic millimeter. In 48 percent of the patients, the HIV RNA value was below the level of quantification. The median prior nadir CD4+ cell count was 23 per cubic millimeter, and 65 percent of the patients had had an acquired immunodeficiency syndrome-defining illness. During follow-up over a median period of 12 months, there were no episodes of confirmed M. avium complex disease in either group (95 percent confidence interval for the rate of disease in each group, 0 to 1.5 episodes per 100 person-years). Three patients in the azithromycin group (1.2 percent) and five in the placebo group (1.9 percent) had bacterial pneumonia (relative risk in the azithromycin group, 0.60; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.14 to 2.50; P=0.48). Neither the rate of progression of HIV disease nor the mortality rate differed significantly between the two groups. Adverse effects led to discontinuation of the study drug in 19 patients assigned to receive azithromycin (7.4 percent) and in 3 assigned to receive placebo (1.1 percent; relative risk, 6.6; P=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Azithromycin prophylaxis can safely be withheld in HIV-infected patients whose CD4+ cell counts have increased to more than 100 cells per cubic millimeter in response to antiretroviral therapy.

AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections↗
PubMed2000

Clarithromycin or rifabutin alone or in combination for primary prophylaxis of Mycobacterium avium complex disease in patients with AIDS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The AIDS Clinical Trials Group 196/Terry Beirn Community Programs for Clinical Research on AIDS 009 Protocol Team.

The efficacy and safety of clarithromycin and rifabutin alone and in combination for prevention of Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) disease were compared in 1178 patients with AIDS who had < or =100 CD4 T cells/microL in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. MAC disease occurred in 9%, 15%, and 7% of those randomized to clarithromycin or rifabutin alone or in combination, respectively; time-adjusted event rates per 100 patient-years (95% confidence interval [CI]) were 6.3 (4.2-8.3), 10.5 (7.8-13.2), and 4. 7 (2.9-6.5). Risk of MAC disease was reduced by 44% with clarithromycin (risk ratio [RR], 0.56; 95% CI, 0.37-0.84; P=.005) and by 57% with combination therapy (RR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.27-0.69; P=. 0003), versus rifabutin. Combination therapy was not more effective than clarithromycin (RR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.48-1.31; P=.36). Of those in whom clarithromycin or combination therapy failed, 29% and 27% of MAC isolates, respectively, were resistant to clarithromycin. There were no survival differences. Clarithromycin and combination therapy were more effective than rifabutin for prevention of MAC disease, but combination therapy was associated with more adverse effects (31%; P<.001).

AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections↗
PubMed2000

Rifampin and pyrazinamide vs isoniazid for prevention of tuberculosis in HIV-infected persons: an international randomized trial. Terry Beirn Community Programs for Clinical Research on AIDS, the Adult AIDS Clinical Trials Group, the Pan American Health Organization, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Study Group.

CONTEXT: Because of problems with adherence, toxicity, and increasing resistance associated with 6- to 12-month isoniazid regimens, an alternative short-course tuberculosis preventive regimen is needed. OBJECTIVE: To compare a 2-month regimen of daily rifampin and pyrazinamide with a 12-month regimen of daily isoniazid in preventing tuberculosis in persons with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. DESIGN: Randomized, open-label controlled trial conducted from September 1991 to May 1996, with follow-up through October 1997. SETTING: Outpatient clinics in the United States, Mexico, Haiti, and Brazil. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1583 HIV-positive persons aged 13 years or older with a positive tuberculin skin test result. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to isoniazid, 300 mg/d, with pyridoxine hydrochloride for 12 months (n = 792) or rifampin, 600 mg/d, and pyrazinamide, 20 mg/kg per day, for 2 months (n = 791). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end point was culture-confirmed tuberculosis; secondary end points were proven or probable tuberculosis, adverse events, and death, compared by treatment group. RESULTS: Of patients assigned to rifampin and pyrazinamide, 80% completed the regimen compared with 69% assigned to isoniazid (P<.001). After a mean follow-up of 37 months, 19 patients (2.4%) assigned to rifampin and pyrazinamide and 26 (3.3%) assigned to isoniazid developed confirmed tuberculosis at rates of 0.8 and 1.1 per 100 person-years, respectively (risk ratio, 0.72 [95% confidence interval, 0.40-1.31]; P = .28). In multivariate analysis, there were no significant differences in rates for confirmed or probable tuberculosis (P = .83), HIV progression and/or death (P = .09), or overall adverse events (P = .27), although drug discontinuation was slightly higher in the rifampin and pyrazinamide group (P = .01). Neither regimen appeared to lead to the development of drug-resistant tuberculosis. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that for preventing tuberculosis in HIV-infected patients, a daily 2-month regimen of rifampin and pyrazinamide is similar in safety and efficacy to a daily 12-month regimen of isoniazid. This shorter regimen offers practical advantages to both patients and tuberculosis control programs.

AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections↗
PubMed2000

[Effect of dapsone on survival in HIV infected patients: a meta- analysis of finished trials].

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to estimate the effect of dapsone on survival in HIVinfected patients. METHOD: The method was a metaanalysis. Data searches used MEDLINE, AIDS TRIALS, and AIDS DRUGS databases from 1983 to January 1996, clinical trials registries of appropriate collaborative research groups, abstract books of International Conferences on AIDS and infectious diseases between 1988 and 1996, references listed within selected articles and active experts in HIV infection. Were considered as eligible: randomized clinical trials, conducted in adults, with one arm evaluating dapsone as prophylactic agent for Pneumocystis Carinii Pneumonia (PCP). Each primary investigator was asked to provide the most recent aggregated study data by completing a standardized questionnaire and to provide files of individual patient data whenever possible. RESULTS: Overall, 17 trials (4343 patients) were eligible for the metaanalysis. The analysis of all available aggregated data included 16 trials (4267 patients) and showed no deleterious effect of dapsone on survival: OR=1.11, 95% Confidence Interval (CI)=0.961.29. There was no evidence of heterogeneity among studies (p=0.50). The analysis of individual data included 10 trials (3115 patients) (OR for aggregated data from those trials=1.10, CI=0. 931.29) and confirmed the absence of deleterious effect of dapsone on survival: stratified Hazard Ratio=1.12, CI=0.991.27 (logrank test: p=0.08). In this subsample, there was evidence of a deleterious effect of dapsone used as secondary prophylaxis. However, this result did not remain when the trial reporting the greatest negative effect of dapsone on survival was omitted. CONCLUSION: Dapsone may be used safely as a primary prophylactic regimen for PCP or toxoplasmosis. However, no definitive recommendation can be made for the use of dapsone as secondary PCP prophylaxis.

AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections↗
PubMed1999

Escalating multiple-dose safety and tolerance study of oral WR 6026 in HIV-infected subjects: AIDS clinical trials group 173.

WR 6026 is an 8-aminoquinoline with activity against Pneumocystis carinii in vitro and in an animal model of P. carinii pneumonia that has predicted the clinical utility of related compounds. This study was conducted to assess the safety and tolerance of WR 6026 given once daily for 21 days to HIV-infected subjects with CD4 counts <500 cells/microl. This double-blind, placebo-controlled study employed WR 6026 doses starting at 30 mg once daily and increasing to 60, 90, 120, or 150 mg once daily. Weekly visits for clinical and laboratory monitoring were conducted. Forty-nine study subjects, including 25 subjects with CD4 counts <200 cells/microl and 12 subjects with CD4 counts <100 cells/microl, entered the study. The maximum tolerated dose was 120 mg/day. Dose-limiting methemoglobinemia (>20%) was seen in 3 of 6 study subjects who received 150 mg/day for > or =19 days. Methemoglobin level was correlated with peak plasma WR 6026 concentrations. Three other study subjects developed skin rashes that may have been drug-related, and two developed asymptomatic serum triglyceride levels >1000 mg/dl. We conclude that WR 6026 is well tolerated at doses up to 120 mg/day for 21 days in HIV-infected volunteers including those with CD4 counts <200 cells/microl. Methemoglobinemia appears to be the primary dose-limiting toxicity.

AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections↗
PubMed1999

Correlation of quantitative bone marrow and blood cultures in AIDS patients with disseminated Mycobacterium avium complex infection.

The relationship between Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) infection of blood and bone marrow was studied in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients before and during treatment. Quantitative cultures were obtained at baseline from 17 persons with newly detected MAC bacteremia. Serial blood cultures were obtained, and a second bone marrow sample was obtained at 4 or 8 weeks. At baseline, the median MAC load in bone marrow core samples was 3 log10 higher than in blood. Bone marrow MAC loads ranged widely (866-847,315 cfu/g), and no significant correlation was found between MAC load in blood and that in bone marrow core samples. MAC loads in bilateral bone marrow biopsy samples from 7 subjects were highly correlated. MAC loads declined in blood and bone marrow at similar rates during therapy, but blood was sterilized before bone marrow. Length of survival was inversely associated with initial bone marrow core MAC load but not with blood MAC load. Initiation of treatment when tissue MAC load is low may increase the likelihood of favorable clinical outcome.

AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections↗
PubMed1999

A comparison of itraconazole versus fluconazole as maintenance therapy for AIDS-associated cryptococcal meningitis. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group.

This study was designed to compare the effectiveness of fluconazole vs. itraconazole as maintenance therapy for AIDS-associated cryptococcal meningitis. HIV-infected patients who had been successfully treated (achieved negative culture of CSF) for a first episode of cryptococcal meningitis were randomized to receive fluconazole or itraconazole, both at 200 mg/d, for 12 months. The study was stopped prematurely on the recommendation of an independent Data Safety and Monitoring Board. At the time, 13 (23%) of 57 itraconazole recipients had experienced culture-positive relapse, compared with 2 relapses (4%) noted among 51 fluconazole recipients (P = .006). The factor best associated with relapse was the patient having not received flucytosine during the initial 2 weeks of primary treatment for cryptococcal disease (relative risk = 5.88; 95% confidence interval, 1.27-27.14; P = .04). Fluconazole remains the treatment of choice for maintenance therapy for AIDS-associated cryptococcal disease. Flucytosine may contribute to the prevention of relapse if used during the first 2 weeks of primary therapy.

AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections↗
PubMed1999

A prospective randomized trial of four three-drug regimens in the treatment of disseminated Mycobacterium avium complex disease in AIDS patients: excess mortality associated with high-dose clarithromycin. Terry Beirn Community Programs for Clinical Research on AIDS.

The optimal regimen for treatment of Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) disease has not been established. Eighty-five AIDS patients with disseminated MAC disease were randomized to receive a three-drug regimen of clarithromycin, rifabutin or clofazimine, and ethambutol. Two dosages of clarithromycin, 500 or 1,000 mg twice daily (b.i.d.), were compared. The Data and Safety Monitoring Board recommended discontinuation of the clarithromycin dosage comparison and continuation of the rifabutin vs. clofazimine comparison. After a mean follow-up of 4.5 months, 10 (22%) of 45 patients receiving clarithromycin at 500 mg b.i.d. had died (70 deaths per 100 person-years) compared with 17 (43%) of 40 patients receiving clarithromycin at 1,000 mg b.i.d. (158 deaths per 100 person-years) (relative risk, 2.43; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-5.34; P = .02). After 10.4 months, 20 (49%) of 41 patients receiving rifabutin had died (81 deaths per 100 person-years) compared with 23 (52%) of 44 patients receiving clofazimine (94 deaths per 100 person-years) (relative risk, 1.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.65-2.19; P = .56). Bacteriologic outcomes were similar among treatment groups. In treating MAC disease in AIDS patients, the maximum dose of clarithromycin should be 500 mg b.i.d.

AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections↗
PubMed1999

A randomized trial of daily and thrice-weekly trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for the prevention of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in human immunodeficiency virus-infected persons. Terry Beirn Community Programs for Clinical Research on AIDS (CPCRA)

We enrolled 2,625 human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients into a randomized trial to assess the efficacy and tolerability of daily vs. thrice-weekly trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (160 mg/800 mg) for prophylaxis of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP). The rate of PCP was 3.5 and 4.1 per 100 person-years in the daily and thrice-weekly groups, respectively, with a relative risk (RR) of 0.82 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61-1.09; P = .16) (RR of <1.0 favors daily trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole). The RR for PCP determined by on-treatment analysis was 0.59 (P = .03). The RR for death was 0.91 (P = .12); for bacterial pneumonia, 0.82 (P = .06); and for combined PCP and bacterial pneumonia, 0.84 (P = .04). Discontinuation due to adverse events occurred more commonly in the daily trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole group (RR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.73-2.66; P < .001). Overall estimates for efficacy end points favored daily trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, although rates of intolerance were higher among patients receiving that dose. Daily trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole may offer advantages as a first choice for PCP prophylaxis; thrice-weekly dosing is an appropriate option for patients intolerant of the daily dose.

AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections↗
PubMed1998

Atovaquone compared with dapsone for the prevention of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in patients with HIV infection who cannot tolerate trimethoprim, sulfonamides, or both. Community Program for Clinical Research on AIDS and the AIDS Clinical Trials Group.

BACKGROUND: Although trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole is the drug of choice for the prevention of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia, many patients cannot tolerate it and must switch to an alternative agent. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, open-label, randomized trial comparing daily atovaquone (1500-mg suspension) with daily dapsone (100 mg) for the prevention of P. carinii pneumonia among patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus who could not tolerate trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. The median follow-up period was 27 months. RESULTS: Of 1057 patients enrolled, 298 had a history of P. carinii pneumonia. P. carinii pneumonia developed in 122 of 536 patients assigned to atovaquone (15.7 cases per 100 person-years), as compared with 135 of 521 in the dapsone group (18.4 cases per 100 person-years; relative risk for atovaquone vs. dapsone, 0.85; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.67 to 1.09; P=0.20). The relative risk of death was 1.07 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.89 to 1.30; P=0.45), and the relative risk of discontinuation of the assigned medication because of adverse events was 0.94 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.74 to 1.19; P=0.59). Among the 546 patients who were receiving dapsone at base line, the relative risk of discontinuation because of adverse events was 3.78 for atovaquone as compared with dapsone (95 percent confidence interval, 2.37 to 6.01; P<0.001); among those not receiving dapsone at base line, it was 0.42 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.30 to 0.58; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients who cannot tolerate trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, atovaquone and dapsone are similarly effective for the prevention of P. carinii pneumonia. Our results support the continuation of dapsone prophylaxis among patients who are already receiving it. However, among those not receiving dapsone, atovaquone is better tolerated and may be the preferred choice for prophylaxis against P. carinii pneumonia.

AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections↗
PubMed1998

A phase II/III trial of antimicrobial therapy with or without amikacin in the treatment of disseminated Mycobacterium avium infection in HIV-infected individuals. AIDS Clinical Trials Group Protocol 135 Study Team.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the clinical and microbiologic benefit of adding amikacin to a four-drug oral regimen for treatment of disseminated Mycobacterium avium infection in HIV-infected patients. DESIGN: A randomized, open-labeled, comparative trial. SETTING: Outpatient clinics. PATIENTS: Seventy-four patients with HIV and symptomatic bacteremic M. avium infection. INTERVENTIONS: Rifampin 10 mg/kg daily, ciprofloxacin 500 mg twice daily, clofazimine 100 mg every day, and ethambutol 15 mg/kg orally daily for 24 weeks, with or without amikacin 10 mg/kg intravenously or intramuscularly 5 days weekly for the first 4 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Clinical and microbiologic response at 4 weeks; quantitative level of bacteremia with M. avium. RESULTS: No difference in clinical response was noted with the addition of amikacin to the four-drug oral regimen, and only 25% in either group had a complete or partial response at 4 weeks. A comparable quantitative decrease in bacteremia was noted in both treatment groups, with 16% of patients being culture-negative at 4 weeks and 38% at 12 weeks. Toxicities were mainly gastrointestinal. Amikacin was well tolerated. Median survival was 30 weeks in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of amikacin to a four-drug oral regimen of rifampin, ciprofloxacin, clofazimine, and ethambutol did not provide clinical or microbiologic benefit.

AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections↗