Biomedical subjects

R Hebisch

Publications and source records attributed to R Hebisch.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2002

Sampling and analysis of carbon in diesel exhaust particulates--an international comparison.

OBJECTIVES: The European Co-ordination on Diesel Soot Exposure (ECDSE) working group organised a laboratory inter-comparison which integrated both the sampling and the analytical determination. The aim was to gain more information on the performance of the methods for the determination of diesel particulate matter at workplaces and on their comparability, and to also confirm that the requirements of the European standard EN 482 are fulfilled for this analytical procedure. METHODS: Sampling was carried out in a diesel aerosol test chamber where participants used their own sampling devices. Overall, ten sampling exercises at two different concentration levels were performed and both personal air sampling systems and stationary samplers were used. The analytical determination was performed according to the laboratory's own standard procedure. RESULTS: There was good agreement between the laboratories for the determination of organic carbon (OC), elemental carbon (EC) and total carbon (TC). Almost all the results when expressed as a coefficient of variation were in the range +/-30% of the overall means. The results also showed that the coefficient of variation for OC was approximately twice the coefficient of variation for EC. This is not too critical, because existing occupational exposure levels (OELs) are based on the measurement of EC. CONCLUSIONS: The inter-comparison showed that existing analytical procedures for the determination of diesel particulate matter at workplaces fulfil the requirements of European standard EN 482. Both personal air samplers and stationary samplers give comparable results. The parameters for the analytical determination are not critical within the range of parameter values presented in this article. Additionally, it may be concluded that the diesel aerosol test chamber used in this exercise is well suited for producing an atmosphere containing a constant and reproducible level of diesel particulate matter.

Atmosphere Exposure Chambers↗

PubMed2001

Further round-robin tests to improve the comparability between laboratories of the measurement of carbon in diesel soot and in environmental samples.

OBJECTIVES: An informal European coordination group organized two round-robin tests on filters collected from environmental, workplace and diluted diesel emissions. Previous inter-laboratory comparisons have shown that experimental samples give reasonably good results in terms of the dispersion around the mean, from all the participating laboratories. However, there were significant differences between the laboratories owing to a narrow distribution of the results within a single laboratory. In order to gain a better understanding of the differences obtained between the laboratories, it was decided to carry out more round-robin tests and to investigate further the possible factors which may influence the results. METHODS: The first round-robin (RRT3) was performed on six different samples (eight replicates) analyzed by ten laboratories. The range of loading was 40 to 138 micrograms cm-2 of total carbon (TC). Laboratories used their own thermal procedure parameters. The second round-robin test (RRT4) was performed on three different diluted diesel emissions (two replicates) samples analyzed by 13 laboratories. The range of loading was 21 to 37 micrograms cm-2 TC. Laboratories analyzed samples using imposed temperatures (500, 650 and 800 degrees C) and imposed duration (12 min). RESULTS: Inter-laboratory coefficients of variation for diluted diesel emission samples were 10% for RRT3 and ranged from 6 to 19% for RRT4. The influence of the desorption temperature was clearly demonstrated and the results tended to show that a desorption temperature of 650 degrees C could be an acceptable compromise. The influence of the organic carbon/elemental carbon (OC/EC) ratio was shown to be insignificant with pure diesel soot samples. CONCLUSIONS: It was expected that a significant improvement would be seen in the inter-laboratory dispersion by the use of a common standardized thermal desorption program, but the objectives of these RRTs were only partly reached. This paper provides new information that will be useful in the elaboration of a standardized procedure for the European Normalisation Centre (CEN TC 137 WG2--General requirements for measuring procedures).

Carbon↗

PubMed2001

Dermal exposure: how to get information.

Risk assessment of chemical substances at the workplace requires information about intrinsic hazards and workers' exposure. At many workplaces health risks from both inhalative and dermal exposure to hazardous substances may occur. Exposure assessment therefore must include both modes of exposure. Very often, qualitative and quantitative information about dermal exposure is lacking. Measurement methods are of questionable quality when applied to monitoring dermal exposure at workplaces and the results are difficult to interpret. A questionnaire was designed for the description of dermal exposure situations taking into account the different factors influencing dermal exposure. In conjunction with an air monitoring survey in German car repair shops the questionnaire was applied by a hygienist. The hands of car mechanics are the most exposed parts of their bodies. The typical duration of tasks (and dermal exposure) was from either 5-10 minutes or up to about 1 hour. This corresponds to typical jobs in car repair shops like inspection and repair, respectively. In some cases other parts of the body are also exposed, for example, the face and forearms. Parts of the body may be covered by wetted or greasy clothes. Only in a few cases do mechanics clean their hands immediately after finishing a task. Normally, hands are cleaned at the end of a shift. The questionnaire was further developed for general application making use of multiple choice entries together with an explanatory manual. The questionnaire is still under development to be applied for a qualitative survey of dermal exposure as part of the European project RISKOFDERM.

Automobiles↗

PubMed1997

International round robin tests on the measurement of carbon in diesel exhaust particulates.

OBJECT: Diesel soot has been recognized as probably carcinogenic to humans. Elemental carbon (also called black carbon) in soot is considered at the moment as the most significant surrogate to be measured for assessing the exposure to this pollutant. Its analysis is done by combustion in an oven and determination of the CO2 formed, after elimination of the organic fraction of the soot by heating and/or by solvent extraction. The analysis allows determination of both fractions of the soot: "elemental carbon" (EC) and organic carbon (OC). The sum of EC and OC is called TC (total carbon). METHOD: An informal European coordination group organized two round robin tests on filter samples collected from diluted diesel emissions. The first round (RRT1) was performed on 13 different samples analyzed by ten laboratories. The range of loading was 2.5 to 150 micrograms/cm2 of EC. No evaluation of the precision within laboratories could be made since each laboratory gave only one result per sample. Therefore a second round (RRT2) was organized with two samples and a blank filter sent in several portions to 11 laboratories. It should be stressed that each laboratory used its own method and that no standardization was planned at this stage. RESULTS: Results of RRT1 showed that the coefficient of variation between laboratories decreased with higher loading and was around 10% to 15% for EC above about 20 micrograms/cm2. Dispersion of the results varied and it appeared that the way OC is removed from the soot is probably the most important factor of influence. The correlation between the laboratories was good as a whole but some systematic differences could be detected. Besides the different techniques to remove the organic carbon, the pretreatment of the filter by HCl (either as a vapor or as a solution) to remove the inorganic carbonates (potential interference sources), is probably also a significant factor of influence in the dispersion of the results between laboratories. It is not yet clear from these results whether the "environmental" laboratories give different results from the "occupational" laboratories, but it is clear that their objectives differ since for the "environmentalists", EC is not a specific marker of diesel emmissions, in contrast to the "occupationalists". CONCLUSION: It can be concluded that, although significant differences exist between laboratories they can be attributed mainly to the narrow distribution of the results within a single laboratory, and that the overall agreement of the results for EC and TC is fairly good. These results obtained with pure diesel engine emissions, should be complemented by field samples, but they have already achieved relevant findings in the performance of the procedures used to assess exposure to diesel soot.

Air Pollutants↗