PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R I Desai

Publications and source records attributed to R I Desai.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Comparison of the discriminative-stimulus effects of SKF 38393 with those of other dopamine receptor agonists.

The dopamine D(1)-like receptor agonists have traditionally been defined molecularly by their efficacy in stimulating adenylyl cyclase. However, evidence correlating the effectiveness of these drugs in behavioral assays and their effectiveness biochemically has not been forthcoming. The present study compared the discriminative-stimulus effects of the D(1)-like partial agonist SKF 38393 with several other D(1)-like agonists, an indirect agonist, cocaine, and a D(2)-like agonist, quinpirole. Rats were trained under a fixed-ratio 30-response schedule to discriminate SKF 38393 (5.6 mg/kg) from vehicle. Under this schedule, 30 consecutive responses on one of two keys were reinforced with food presentation after a pre-session injection of 5.6 mg/kg SKF 38393, and 30 consecutive responses on the alternative key were reinforced after saline injection. When daily performances were stable, substitution patterns for several compounds were assessed during test sessions in which 30 consecutive responses on either key were reinforced. Quinpirole and cocaine each produced saline-appropriate responding. In contrast, the D(1)-like agonists, SKF 75670 and SKF 77434, fully substituted for SKF 38393. Curiously, SKF 82958, which is considered a full agonist based on adenylyl cyclase assays, was less effective in substituting for SKF 38393 (maximum drug-appropriate responding 66%) than was the partial agonist SKF 75670. The present results suggest that second messenger effects other than stimulation of adenylyl cyclase may play an important role in the behavioral effects of dopamine D(1)-like agonists.

2,3,4,5-Tetrahydro-7,8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-1H-3-ben↗

Amyloid goiter--a case report.

Microscopic infiltration of the thyroid gland by amyloid is an uncommon but well recognized phenomenon and significant enlargement of the thyroid due to deposition of amyloid is rarely seen. This condition has to be distinguished from other types of goiters and at times from malignancy. In spite of extensive involvement of the gland by amyloid, thyroid function usually remains normal. Here, we describe a rare case of amyloid goiter without amyloid deposits in any other organs of the body. The case presented in an unusual clinical settings of relatively rapid enlargement of thyroid with pressure symptoms and was unassociated with any immuno-proliferative or chronic diseases.

Amyloidosis↗

Asymmetric generalization between the discriminative stimulus effects of nicotine and cocaine.

The discriminative stimulus effects of nicotine and cocaine were studied, alone and in combination, in rats. Two sets of rats were trained to press one lever when injected intraperitoneally (i.p.) with either nicotine (0.1 mg/kg = 0.6 micromol/kg, Set 1) or cocaine (8.9 mg/kg base = 29.4 micromol/kg, Set 2), and another lever when injected with saline. Rats learned to discriminate drug from saline, and maintained discriminative control throughout the study (at > 85% drug-appropriate responding). In accordance with most previous findings, cocaine only partially substituted for nicotine (maximum = 41% nicotine-lever responding). The nicotinic agonist, nornicotine, produced dose-related, near-full substitution for nicotine (maximum = 76% nicotine-lever responding), whereas the peripherally acting nicotinic agonist, methylcarbamylcholine, did not substitute for nicotine. The muscarinic receptor agonist pilocarpine also failed to substitute for nicotine. However, in the cocaine-trained rats, nicotine substituted fully for cocaine in a dose-dependent manner, demonstrating that cross-generalization between the two drugs is not symmetrical. Finally, administration of each drug as a pre-treatment to the other yielded inconsistent increases in each drug's discriminative stimulus effects. The results are congruent with the view that the discriminative stimulus effects of nicotine and cocaine share common features, but the asymmetric pattern of cross-generalization and the interactions revealed in the combination tests also suggest that there are important differences between them.

Animals↗