PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R J Backes

Publications and source records attributed to R J Backes.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Are coronary-care unit changes in therapy associated with improved survival of elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction?

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether changes in coronary-care unit therapy for elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction have been associated with improved survival. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of all patients 70 years of age or older from Olmsted County, Minnesota, who were hospitalized in a coronary-care unit in this county for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction during one of three periods: 1976 through 1978, 1987 through 1989, and 1991. The effect of aspirin, heparin, beta-blockers, thrombolysis, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, and coronary artery bypass grafting on these elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction was assessed. RESULTS: Improvement in 30-day survival was significant for patients 80 years of age or older (45%, 69%, and 78% in 1976 through 1978, 1987 through 1989, and 1991, respectively; P = 0.01 for the trend) but not for patients 70 to 79 years of age (77%, 76%, and 81% for the three time periods, respectively; P = 0.65 for the trend). The opposite pattern was observed for survival in the period more than 30 days after the event. More intensive treatment in the hospital was associated with better 30-day survival (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The improved survival of the elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction in these cohorts can be accounted for by changes in the therapy they received in the coronary-care units.

Age Factors↗

Cardiomyopathies in the elderly.

Cardiomyopathies are an important cause of congestive heart failure in the elderly, and the magnitude of the problem is compounded by changing population demographics and the frequency of congestive heart failure in the elderly. Although the data are far from complete, differences in the clinical presentations and natural history of the cardiomyopathies in older and younger patients are becoming more clearly appreciated. Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is clearly more common than previously appreciated, and elderly patients have a worse prognosis than their younger counterparts with this disease. The medical management of DCM is often more difficult in the elderly, and the problem is compounded by the relatively infrequent use of cardiac transplantation as a therapeutic option. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is also more common than previously appreciated, and changes in left ventricular structure often create difficulties in differentiating pathologic states from physiologic. Fortunately, the prognosis for HOCM is more favorable in the elderly than in younger patients and may be partly accounted for by the different structure of the left ventricle. If needed, surgery is an option for elderly patients with medically refractory HOCM, but particular attention must be paid to the presence and severity of associated cardiovascular disease. Restrictive cardiomyopathy with diastolic dysfunction is increasingly recognized as a cause of congestive heart failure. The differentiation from systolic dysfunction is crucial, because the treatments are so markedly different. Age-related changes in diastolic function are becoming more apparent and better characterized, but standardization of age-related "normal" values is still not available. The diagnosis of restrictive heart disease should stimulate a search for an underlying cause, inasmuch as restrictive cardiomyopathy remains a diagnosis of exclusion. Advances in noninvasive imaging have led to a resurgence of interest and have enhanced our knowledge of the cardiomyopathies. Further investigation should proceed in conjunction with studies aimed at defining the characteristics and variables of "normal" aging. For the present, the enigmatic, poorly identified "cardiomyopathies" remain a problem for both young and old.

Age Factors↗

Stress echocardiography.

Stress echocardiography is a relatively new imaging modality that is rapidly becoming the preferred technique to evaluate patients for and with coronary artery disease. This article will review how the procedure is performed, its diagnostic accuracy, its clinical role, and its advantages and disadvantages as compared to other imaging modalities.

Coronary Disease↗

The treatment of coronary artery disease in the elderly.

Changing population demographics dictate that in the next decade physicians will be increasingly faced with treating coronary artery disease in the elderly. Despite this, there is a paucity of data to guide management decisions in this population. Currently, it appears that "low-risk" or mild coronary artery disease can be treated medically so long as appropriate adjustments are made for aging changes in renal function, hepatic metabolism, noncompliance, multisystem disease, etc. Unfortunately, most elderly patients have "high-risk" or severe coronary artery disease. Balloon dilatation can yield excellent results in certain highly selected "high-risk" patients, but its role in the frequently encountered multivessel disease patient is unclear until current studies are completed. Coronary bypass grafting in selected patients clearly prolongs survival, but careful patient selection and meticulous preoperative and postoperative is required. Finally, the importance of issues such as quality of life, function independence, and cost must be addressed in more detail if physicians are to make rational decisions in treating this expanding population.

Aged↗

Activity of penicillin combined with an aminoglycoside against group B streptococci in vitro and in experimental endocarditis.

Group B streptococci were less susceptible in vitro to penicillin and to aminoglycosides with an inoculum size of 10(7)-10(8) cfu/ml than with an inoculum size of 5.5 X 10(5)-10(6) cfu/ml. With a rabbit model of experimental group B streptococcal endocarditis, after one or three days of therapy with procaine penicillin alone, the mean log10 cfu/g of valve vegetation was significantly lower (P less than 0.01) than that of the control groups. After one day of therapy, procaine penicillin combined with streptomycin was significantly more effective (P less than 0.01) than was treatment with procaine penicillin alone. There was no significant difference (P greater than 0.05) in the results of treatment of animals for one day with procaine penicillin combined with streptomycin compared with those of animals treated for three days with procaine penicillin alone.

Aminoglycosides↗

Group B streptococcal infective endocarditis.

From 1970 to 1983, five patients with group B streptococcal endocarditis were treated at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn. The minimal inhibitory concentration and the minimal bactericidal concentration of penicillin were 0.09 microgram/mL or less and 1.56 micrograms/mL or less, respectively. The in vitro activity of cefazolin against group B streptococci was similar to that of penicillin. In three of the five cases, penicillin and streptomycin acted synergistically in vitro against group B streptococci. Four of the five patients were cured, three by use of an aminoglycoside combined with penicillin, ampicillin, or vancomycin. Three of the five patients had multiple large systemic emboli, and one of the three died of brain-stem infarct. Penicillin alone or in combination with an aminoglycoside is effective therapy for group B streptococcal endocarditis. Patients unable to tolerate penicillin may be treated with cefazolin or vancomycin. Clindamycin therapy should be avoided in patients with endocarditis caused by strains that are tolerant in vitro to clindamycin.

Adolescent↗