PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R J Boskma

Publications and source records attributed to R J Boskma.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Evaluation of five immunological methods for the assay of serum netilmicin.

Three specific immunological methods for the determination of netilmicin and two enzyme immunoassays for gentamicin were compared for assaying serum netilmicin. The commercial kits we used were Radioimmunoassay (RIA), Substrate Labelled Fluorescence Immunoassay (gentamicin) ( SLFIA ), Homogeneous Enzyme Immunoassay (gentamicin and netilmicin) (EMIT) and Fluorescence Polarization Immunoassay ( FPIA ). After analysing spiked calf serum samples in the range of 0-15.8 mg X 1(-1) netilmicin, extensive statistical analysis was performed. The Performance Index was used to qualify the different methods. Results show that the SLFIA (gentamicin) kit is a very acceptable method for the determination of serum netilmicin levels, well comparable with the EMIT (gentamicin) kit and the EMIT (netilmicin) kit. FPIA and RIA require expensive specialized apparatus so it is only economically feasible when other drugs or substances are also determined on the same apparatus. The abilities and specific needs of each laboratory will play an important role in the choice of a method, because the tested kits are all within the range we need from a clinical point of view.

Analysis of Variance↗

Comparison of an HPLC method with a RIA, EMIT and FIA method for the assay of serum gentamicin with extensive statistical evaluation.

A high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) assay, a radioimmunoassay (RIA), an enzyme immunoassay (EMIT) and a fluorescence immunoassay (FIA) method for assaying serum gentamicin were compared in terms of accuracy and precision. Spiked human serum samples in the range of 0-11.6 mg.1(-1) gentamicin were used in all the tests. Regression analysis and analysis of variance were performed. The Performance Index (PI) was used to qualify the different methods. Other aspects of performance were also compared: simplicity, speed, cost, application in relation to workload. After extensive statistical evaluation the FIA method gives the best results.

Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid↗