PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R J Emery

Publications and source records attributed to R J Emery.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Reported events of stolen radioactive sources in Texas from 1956 to 2000.

Incident reports describing stolen source events in Texas from the years 1956 to 2000 were obtained from the Texas Department of Health-Bureau of Radiation Control and recorded into a computerized database using a pre-established set of codes. The data were then analyzed for the identification and characterization of trends. Over the 45-y period of analysis, 113 sources were reported as stolen. The radionuclides most commonly reported in theft events were Am, Cs, and Ir. The proportion of sources including Am as the sole source or Am combined with Be, or as a companion source with Cs, represented 56% of the total reported as stolen. Key risk factors identified as associated with source theft appear to include portability status, transportation status, transporter status, and radionuclide type. Based on the observations noted, suggested improved security measures are postulated including additional permitting controls, enhanced inspections, improved locking and storage procedures, and steps for communication to the public to enhance the prospects for recovery. Suggested enhancements to further improve data collection are proposed so that crime prevention information can be derived in future research.

Americium↗
PubMed2006

An analysis of 20 years of radiation-related health care complaints in Texas for the purposes of quality improvement.

In an effort to reveal the possible underlying causes of radiation-related health care complaints in the State of Texas, complaint data were evaluated using historical Texas Department of Health-Bureau of Radiation Control (TDH-BRC) reports. A major aim of the study was to generate a summary of the most commonly reported complaints that might be generalized to health care providers using sources of radiation across Texas. A generalizable list of common complaints would be a valuable tool for education and prevention programs, serving to possibly reduce the overall incidence of radiation-related medical complaints. Descriptive text summary reports of complaints were obtained from the TDH-BRC for the 20-y period inclusive of 1981 to 2001. The information was systematically coded into a computerized database. During the 20-y period of study, 481 health care-related complaints were identified, with approximately 74% consisting of claims of an "uncredentialed technician" (39%), "overexposure" (21%), or "regulatory violation" (14%). The most common categories of complaints imply some patient understanding or knowledge of the credentialing requirements of workers, the applicable dose limits, or the regulatory requirements associated with medical procedures. Since it is unlikely that an average patient would be aware of such issues, the findings suggest the complaints are not actually indications of the inappropriate uses of radiation, but are rather based on the patient's broader perception of services rendered. Most of the complaints levied during the period of study were done so anonymously (58%) and were levied against a generic facility (61%) rather than a specific technician (5%), doctor (4%), or student (1%). Approximately 61% of the complaints resulted in the issuance of a notice of violation upon investigation by the TDH-BRC, but the available data did not permit definitive linkage between the initial complaint and the violation issued. Taken in aggregate, the analysis suggests that improved communications between health care providers and the patients they serve could possibly serve to prevent future complaints. Although the analysis was limited to the data from a single state, the results may be of use to quality assurance programs on a broader scale because of the objective identification of likely common issues. Possible options for improving the means of systematically collecting initial compliant data in the future are also discussed.

Accidents, Occupational↗
PubMed2006

A security vulnerabilities assessment tool for interim storage facilities of low-level radioactive wastes.

Limited permanent low-level radioactive waste (LLRW) disposal capacity and correspondingly high disposal costs have resulted in the creation of numerous interim storage facilities for either decay-in-storage operations or longer term accumulation efforts. These facilities, which may be near the site of waste generation or in distal locations, often were not originally designed for the purpose of LLRW storage, particularly with regard to security. Facility security has become particularly important in light of the domestic terrorist acts of 2001, wherein LLRW, along with many other sources of radioactivity, became recognized commodities to those wishing to create disruption through the purposeful dissemination of radioactive materials. Since some LLRW materials may be in facilities that may exhibit varying degrees of security control sophistication, a security vulnerabilities assessment tool grounded in accepted criminal justice theory and security practice has been developed. The tool, which includes dedicated sections on general security, target hardening, criminalization benefits, and the presence of guardians, can be used by those not formally schooled in the security profession to assess the level of protection afforded to their respective facilities. The tool equips radiation safety practitioners with the ability to methodically and systematically assess the presence or relative status of various facility security aspects, many of which may not be considered by individuals from outside the security profession. For example, radiation safety professionals might not ordinarily consider facility lighting aspects, which is a staple for the security profession since it is widely known that crime disproportionately occurs more frequently at night or in poorly lit circumstances. Likewise, the means and associated time dimensions for detecting inventory discrepancies may not be commonly considered. The tool provides a simple means for radiation safety professionals to assess, and perhaps enhance in a reasonable fashion, the security of their interim storage operations. Aspects of the assessment tool can also be applied to other activities involving the protection of sources of radiation as well.

Criminal Law↗
PubMed2005

An analysis of variables influencing the number of radiation overexposure events in Texas from 1970 to 2000.

Sources of radiation are used in a variety of modern work settings, including industrial, medical, research, and agricultural applications. Although regulatory controls exist to limit radiation exposures in these different settings, instances of radiation doses in excess of acceptable limits (referred to as overexposures) do occur. A unique study examined overexposure events in Texas over a 45-y period from 1956 to 2001. The primary purpose of the study was to characterize the factors associated with overexposure events. As part of this characterization, an interesting trend in the number of overexposures by year was observed, but not completely explained. The data revealed a dramatic increase in the number of overexposure events, followed by three apparent phases of decline. These declines are of particular interest because, while the increase and subsequent decrease in overexposures occurred, the number of permits to possess radiation sources in Texas generally increased over the same time period. This study focused on the identification of the factors that led to the trends in overexposure events. Data describing the reported overexposure events in Texas from 1970 to 2000 were obtained from the Texas Department of Health Bureau of Radiation Control (TDH BRC) and entered into a computerized database. With the assistance of senior members of the TDH BRC, the three primary factors influencing the number of overexposures were identified. These included domestic oil and gas exploration and production from 1970 to 2000, wherein sources of radiation are employed in various operations; the establishment of a training and certification requirement for industrial radiographers during the period of 1986 to 1988; and modification of the applicable regulations between 1992 and 1994. The generally accepted indicator of oil and gas exploration and production activity, known as "rig count," is the measure of the number of active oil and gas exploration and production platforms at any given time. Rig count is a parameter of particular interest in Texas because the state's economy is significantly tied to the market value of this important natural resource. The rig count parameter was shown to have a strong correlation with overexposure events (Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.82, p < 0.0001). Interestingly, the sources causing the overexposures indicate that the events stem primarily not from the oil and gas exploration activity itself, but rather from support activities in the form of industrial radiographic procedures. The number of overexposure events was also determined to be influenced by the imposition of the training requirement for radiographers and the modification of the applicable regulations (e.g., the elimination of the quarterly dose limit). The relative magnitude of these influences, however, was far overshadowed by the identified predominant predictor of rig count. The determination of rig count as the significant influencing factor in overexposure events is useful in possibly recognizing the potential for future occurrences of the same nature. This assessment also serves to highlight an apparent significant public health success story, as the number of overexposures per radioactive material licensee is shown to have declined significantly over the 30-y period of study. The factors contributing to this phenomenon are described to serve as a model for use in other settings.

Accidents, Occupational↗
PubMed2005

Characterization and geographic location of sources of radioactivity lost downhole in the course of oil and gas exploration and production activities in Texas, 1956 to 2001.

Case reports describing sources of radioactivity lost downhole in Texas from 1956 to 2001 were obtained from the Texas Department of Health Bureau of Radiation Control and entered into a computerized database. The events of the 45-y period of analysis were characterized, examining aspects such as source type, amount of activity, location of loss, depth, and date of occurrence. Results of the study found that 316 downhole source incidents were reported to the agency during this period of time, representing a total of 426 distinct sources of radioactivity lost downhole within the boundaries of the State of Texas. The sources lost were predominantly AmBe, accounting for 74 TBq of radioactivity at the time of loss, and Cs, accounting for 16.3 TBq of radioactivity. A longitudinal analysis of the data showed the average loss per active oil and gas rig in Texas (known as "rig count") at approximately 24 losses per 1,000 rigs. Specific geographic information was largely missing from many of the records, which prevented the geolocation of wells described to contain lost radioactive sources. As a result, most wells could only be located to the county level, and no comprehensive geographical information system (GIS) map could be accurately created from the data. However, when available, source location information was standardized to permit the characterization of the sources reported as lost. This effort produced the first dedicated compendium of lost downhole sources for the State of Texas and provides an important source of information for regulatory agencies. The ability to provide prompt information about the fate and location of sources of radioactivity is important to regulatory officials, given the recent concerns about radiation source inventory control in the post 9/11 world as it relates to the possible creation of radiological dispersal devices.

Fuel Oils↗
PubMed2004

An analysis of 45 years of reported overexposure incidents in Texas, 1956 to 2001.

Sources of ionizing radiation are commonly encountered in a wide variety of modern work settings. The controls in place to ensure the safe use of these sources have proven to be quite effective, as events involving occupational doses in excess of established limits are quite rare. Nonetheless, instances of doses in excess of established limits, commonly referred to as "overexposures," do occur, but the rarity of such events has resulted in a body of scientific knowledge that consists essentially of sporadic case reports. In this study, incident reports describing radiation overexposure events recorded in Texas from the years 1956 to 2001 were obtained and recorded into a computerized database using a pre-established set of codes. The data were then analyzed for the identification of possible trends or commonalties. During the 45-y period of study, overexposure events accounted for 50% (n = 3,796) of all the radiation-related incidents recorded in Texas for the time period (n = 7,534). Of the overexposure events, 65% (n = 2,342) resulted in the actual deposition of energy in the individual exposed. The remainder were determined to be doses recorded only by a personal dosimetry device. In most of the cases where doses were actually delivered to an individual, the doses were less than 0.05 Sv (5 rem). In only 0.5% of the cases (n = 13) were doses greater than 1 Sv (100 rem). The predominant sources reported as involved in the events included 192Ir, 60Co, and 137Cs. The information derived from the analysis may serve as a basis for a variety of interventions, such as preventative education activities, regulatory modifications, and the possible re-design of equipment identified as commonly associated with such events. The results of the study can also assist in the training of health care providers, as the recognition of common causes and sources of overexposures and subsequent treatments can be forecasted and summary treatment protocols developed.

Accidents, Occupational↗
PubMed2004

A comparison of the results of regulatory compliance inspections in 1999 by the states of Texas, Maine, and Washington.

Inspection outcome data provided by the state of Washington Department of Health, Division of Radiation Protection, for licensees of radioactive materials was encoded according to a system established by the Texas Department of Health, Bureau of Radiation Control. The data, representing calendar year 1999 inspection activities, were then analyzed and the results compared to previously published studies for the same year in the states of Texas and Maine. Despite significant differences in regulatory program size, age, and geographic proximity, the most frequently cited violation for radioactive materials licensees were shown to be similar for all three states. Of particular note were the violations that were identified to be consistently issued in all three states. These included physical inventories and utilization logs not performed, not available, or incomplete; leak testing not performed or not performed on schedule; inadequate or unapproved operating and safety procedures; radiation survey and disposal records not available or incomplete; detection or measurement instrument calibration not performed or records not available; and radiation surveys or sampling not performed or performed with a noncalibrated instrument. Comparisons were made in an attempt to generate a summary of the most commonly issued violations that could be generalized to users of radioactive materials across the United States. A generalized list of common violations would be an invaluable tool for radiation protection programs, serving to aid in the reduction of the overall instance of program non-compliance. Any reduction in instances of non-compliance would result in the conservation of finite public health resources that might then be directed to other pressing public health matters.

Government Regulation↗
PubMed2003

Sonochemical degradation of phenolic pollutants in aqueous solutions.

The sonochemical degradation of phenol, 2-chlorophenol and 3,4-dichlorophenol in aqueous solutions as a function of several operating conditions has been investigated. Experiments were performed at initial substrate concentrations of 0.1, 0.5 and 1 g l(-1), liquid phase volumes of 0.05, 0.07 and 0.08 l, electric power outputs of 125, 187.5 and 250 W, liquid bulk temperatures of 20, 35, 50 and 70 degrees C and an ultrasound frequency of 20 kHz. Substrate concentration was determined as a function of time by means of high performance liquid chromatography. At the conditions under consideration, the rate of degradation follows first order kinetics with respect to the substrate concentration and increases with increasing electric power and decreasing liquid volume. The relative reactivity appears to decrease in the order: 2-chlorophenol > 3,4-dichlorophenol > phenol. Measurements of liquid phase total organic carbon content showed that degradation by-products are more recalcitrant than the original substrate. The rate of 2-chlorophenol degradation was also found to decrease with decreasing liquid bulk temperature and increasing initial concentration. Addition of t-butanol as a hydroxyl radical scavenger only partially inhibited degradation, thus implying that degradation is likely to proceed via both radical-induced and thermal reactions. Addition of Fe2+ ions at concentrations as low as about 0.2 x 10(3) g l(-1) resulted in increased degradation rates; this is attributed to iron being capable of readily decomposing hydrogen peroxide (generated by water sonolysis) in a Fenton-like process to form hydroxyl radicals as well as being an effective oxidation catalyst. The implications of the use of ultrasound in wastewater treatment are also discussed.

Kinetics↗
PubMed2003

Statistical validation of a commonly used method for personnel dosimetry issuance determinations.

In 1992, the federal requirements for personnel monitoring of occupational radiation doses were modified, making monitoring compulsory only for individuals "likely" to exceed 10% of the applicable annual dose limits. This regulatory change served as a catalyst for many radiation protection programs to re-evaluate their personnel monitoring issuance criteria to determine if some monitoring services might be reduced or eliminated. But in the absence of any clear definition of the term "likely," radiation protection programs relied on adjustments largely based on reviews of previous monitoring results and professional judgment. Although such semi-quantitative assessments may have been appropriate, the approach was not without inherent programmatic risks, as radiation dosimetry programs have been shown to be a consistent source of regulatory non-compliance upon inspection and serve as essential elements in defense against litigation efforts purporting workplace-related radiation injury. The objective of this study was to subject this commonly used method for post-regulatory change dosimetry issuance determinations to statistical validation. Personnel monitoring data from The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Radiation Safety Program pre- and post-1992 regulatory changes were accessed and descriptively analyzed. The dynamic nature of the institutional environment made direct comparisons of individuals between years impractical, so 1990 mean dose levels for various independent variables were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric ANOVA test at a significance level of alpha = 0.05. The data from 1998 were then analyzed to ascertain if the groupings identified as statistically different in 1990 were still being monitored. The analyses statistically validated the monitoring program reductions made by the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston radiation protection program. In addition, statistical support for further monitoring program reductions were identified, if such reductions were deemed to be necessary in the future.

Government Agencies↗
PubMed2002

An evaluation and comparison of compliance inspection outcomes data for radiation protection programs in Maine and Texas.

The coding system used by the State of Texas Department of Health Bureau of Radiation Control to categorize regulatory violations resulting from compliance inspections was applied to the results of similar activities performed by the State of Maine Radiation Control Program for licensees of radioactive materials in calendar year 1999. The coded results from the Maine inspections (n = 37) were then summarized and compared to the data from Texas inspection activities for similar radiation licenses (n = 1,350). Despite significant differences in program size, age, and geographic proximity, the list of most commonly issued violations was almost identical. Other program outcome analogies were also noted, such as similar violation frequency distributions and similar identified root causes of non-compliance. These comparisons mark the first step towards the possible creation of a generalizable list of common items of non-compliance, which could serve to greatly enhance radiation safety preventive education and training programs. The utility of the Texas coding system as the basis for interstate program comparisons is also demonstrated, since the system is based upon categories of non-compliance rather than locally-unique regulatory codes or citations.

Humans↗
PubMed2001

The intra- and inter-observer reliability of the Samilson and Prieto grading system of glenohumeral arthropathy.

Severity of glenohumeral arthropathy following shoulder instability is often graded radiologically on the basis of osteophyte size according to Samilson and Prieto. Intra- and inter-observer reliability of this popular grading system was determined using standard radiographs of 20 arthritic cadaveric humeri. Using two observers on two occasions, reliability of the grading system using the antero-posterior radiograph varied between fair and poor (kappa coefficients 0.07-0.33). This study shows that the Samilson and Prieto grading of glenohumeral arthropathy is unreliable and, in clinical use, when magnification and rotation is less easy to control, it is likely to be even more so. Another validated classification system must therefore be found.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed2001

An analysis of reported incidents involving radiopharmaceuticals for the development of intervention strategies.

Misadministrations and dose irregularities of radiopharmaceuticals are among the most common incidents reported to the Texas Department of Health Bureau of Radiation Control. In an effort to minimize future incidents, utility and process variable trends were evaluated using historical Texas Department of Health Bureau of Radiation Control incident data. An analysis of misapplication events (e.g., misadministration or dose irregularity) was performed by obtaining the quarterly incident summaries from the Texas Department of Health Bureau of Radiation Control for the study period 1988 to 1997. The misapplication data accounted for 355 out of 2,126 (16.7%) incidents during this period. The results indicate 94% of radiation source misapplications involved unsealed sources of radiation (e.g., radiopharmaceuticals). Additionally, 73% of all self-reported events involved 99Tc radiopharmaceuticals. The most frequent radiation source process variable involved in the misapplication was injecting an incorrect compound. The most widely utilized intervention to resolve the incident was training for the individuals responsible for drawing or administering the radiopharmaceutical. Universal application of these results are cautioned due to the bias associated with a single-state study, changes in radiopharmaceutical use during the study period, and state-specific regulations which may vary in other study populations.

Humans↗
PubMed2001

Using fault tree analysis to identify causes of non-compliance: enhancing violation outcome data for the purposes of education and prevention.

An enhanced coding system for the characterization of notices of violation (NOV's) issued to radiation permit holders in the State of Texas was developed based on a series of fault tree analyses serving to identify a set of common causes. The coding system enhancement was retroactively applied to a representative sample (n = 185) of NOV's issued to specific licensees of radioactive materials in Texas during calendar year 1999. The results obtained were then compared to the currently available summary NOV information for the same year. In addition to identifying the most common NOV's, the enhanced coding system revealed that approximately 70% of the sampled NOV's were issued for non-compliance with a specific regulation as opposed to a permit condition. Furthermore, an underlying cause of 94% of the NOV's was the failure on the part of the licensee to execute a specific task. The findings suggest that opportunities exist to improve permit holder compliance through various means, including the creation of summaries which detail specific tasks to be completed, and revising training programs with more focus on the identification and scheduling of permit-related requirements. Broad application of these results is cautioned due to the bias associated with the restricted scope of the project.

Health Physics↗
PubMed2000

Radiation safety program outcomes as indicated by regulatory compliance activities from 1988 to 1997 in Texas.

Occupational radiation protection programs rarely encounter readily observable workplace injuries or illnesses, so upper management must rely on different indicators of relative performance. In many cases, the number of violations, complaints, and reported incidents is used. As with reported workplace injury and illness data, violation, complaint, and incident data provide only a crude indication of a radiation protection program's overall effectiveness. Even so, it is important to recognize that tangible program outcome measures such as these often dictate management decisions. Hence, safety professionals should have access to baseline violation, complaint, and incident trend data so that more informed preventive strategies can be put into place where possible. To assess the outcomes of radiation protection programs in Texas, data from regulatory compliance activities for a 10-y period, inclusive of calendar years 1988 to 1997, were assembled, summarized, and independently verified. For licensees of radioactive material, the ten most frequently cited violations represented 64% of the total issued during the study period. For registrants of radiation producing devices, the ten most frequently cited violations accounted for 73% of the total. A particular emphasis on proper recordkeeping is evident, and should be noted by any internal radiation protection quality assurance programs. Regardless of the permit type, the vast majority of violations issued were classified as low severity. Licensees were found to be involved in approximately 73% of the incidents recorded, with overexposures and badge overexposures representing the largest identifiable types. Registrants were found to be involved in approximately 57% of the complaints recorded, with the largest identifiable issue being concerns about health care provider qualifications or performance. Although this study was limited to a single state, the results can be of benefit to both quality assurance programs and professional health physics training courses by objectively identifying the areas commonly found to be deficient.

Humans↗
PubMed2000

Estimating the administrative cost of regulatory noncompliance: a pilot method for quantifying the value of prevention.

Routine regulatory inspections provide a valuable independent quality assurance review of radiation protection programs that ultimately serves to improve overall program performance. But when an item of non-compliance is noted, regardless of its significance or severity the ensuing notice of violation (NOV) results in an added cost to both the permit holder and the regulatory authority. Such added costs may be tangible, in the form of added work to process and resolve the NOV, or intangible, in the form of damage to organizational reputation or worker morale. If the portion of the tangible costs incurred by a regulatory agency for issuing NOVs could be quantified, the analysis could aid in the identification of agency resources that might be dedicated to other areas such as prevention. Ideally, any prevention activities would reduce the overall number of NOVs issued without impacting the routine inspection process. In this study, the administrative costs of NOV issuance and resolution was estimated by obtaining data from the professional staff of the Texas Department of Health, Bureau of Radiation Control (TDH-BRC). Based a focus group model, the data indicate that approximately $106,000 in TDH-BRC personnel resources were expended to process and resolve the 6,800 NOVs issued in Texas during 1997 inspection activities. The study's findings imply that an incremental decrease in the number of NOVs issued would result in corresponding savings of agency resources. Suggested prevention activities that might be financed through any resource savings include the dissemination of common violation data to permit holders or training for improving correspondence with regulatory agencies. The significance of this exercise is that any savings experienced by an agency could enhance permittee compliance without impacting the routine inspection process.

Costs and Cost Analysis↗