PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R J Stratta

Publications and source records attributed to R J Stratta.

At least 127 records · Page 7Linked to original sources

Pancreas transplantation for type I diabetes mellitus. Do the benefits offset the risks and cost?

Combined pancreas-kidney transplantation is becoming increasingly acceptable as the preferred procedure for selected patients with insulin-dependent (type I) diabetes who are being considered for kidney transplantation. This is because the combined procedure has the added benefit of superior glycemic control and improved quality of life with greater potential for rehabilitation. Neither patient mortality nor kidney-graft survival is significantly altered by adding a pancreas to a kidney transplantation. However, overall morbidity after the combined operation is greater than that after kidney transplantation alone. This increase in morbidity and the higher total cost must be balanced against the extra benefits to the patient. These benefits include (1) attainment of normal glucose concentrations without the use of exogenous insulin and despite the use of corticosteroids, (2) greater improvement in lipid profiles, and (3) heightened quality of life. It is hoped that continued advances in immunosuppressive strategies and diagnostic technology will enhance the already good results achieved with pancreas transplantation. Other strategies for treatment of type I diabetes are being actively investigated, including islet-cell and fetal pancreas transplants, gene therapy, implanted insulin pumps, and artificial pancreas units. Although any or all of these methods may have a role in the treatment of diabetes mellitus in the future, it will be difficult for any technique to improve on the quality of glucose metabolism already achieved by vascularized pancreas transplantation.

Combined Modality Therapy↗

Cyclosporine challenge in the decision of combined kidney-pancreas versus solitary pancreas transplantation.

Combined kidney-pancreas transplantation has become the treatment of choice for many patients with end-stage diabetic nephropathy. Pancreas transplantation (PTx) alone is an option for type I diabetic patients without end-stage diabetic nephropathy. Knowledge of factors contributing to or predicting the rate of renal deterioration (including the effect of CsA on the patient's renal function before transplantation) is necessary to determine candidacy for either kidney-pancreas transplantation or PTx alone. To address this issue, we selected 12 pre-uremic patients with creatinine clearances (CrCl) above 40 ml/min and less than 100 ml/min to participate in a 6-week oral CsA challenge test. Serum chemistries, including serum creatinine (SCr) and CsA level, were measured weekly. Urinary protein and CrCl were measured at 0, 2, 4, and 6 weeks. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (by 125I-sodium iothalamate clearance) was measured at 0, 3, and 6 weeks. All patients initially received oral CsA at 10 mg/kg/day in 2 divided doses. Doses were adjusted to maintain a 12-hr trough level of 500-1000 ng/ml using a whole blood polyclonal TDX assay. Data are presented as mean +/- SEM and as box-plot graphs. One patient was a CsA challenge test failure because SCr exceeded 3.0 mg/dl despite a reduction in CsA dose and level. Therefore, this patient was not a candidate for PTx alone and was excluded from further analysis. Among the 11 nonfailures, the mean CsA level at 6 weeks was 640 +/- 76 ng/ml. SCr increased from 1.2 +/- 0.1 mg/dl to 1.6 +/- 0.1 mg/dl (33% increase) (P = 0.0001). CrCl decreased from 82 +/- 9 ml/min to 63 +/- 8 ml/min (24% decrease) (P = 0.03). GFR decreased from 95 +/- 15 ml/min to 70 +/- 10 ml/min (26% decrease) (P = 0.009). CrCl and GFR did not differ from one another at 0 and 6 weeks (r = 0.77 and 0.98; P = 0.3 and 0.7, respectively). Urinary protein decreased from 1.0 +/- 0.3 g/day to 0.7 +/- 0.3 g/day at both 4 and 6 weeks (P = 0.03 and 0.06, respectively). Three of the 11 patients have not yet received transplants. Eight patients subsequently received PTx alone and were followed prospectively. Two allografts were lost early to rejection. Six were followed from 5 to 19 months after PTx alone. Serum creatinine and CrCL measurements during the CsA challenge test predicted post-PTx levels: SCr 1.6 +/- 0.1 vs. 1.7 +/- 0.3 mg/dl, P = 0.48, and CrCl 68 +/- 10 vs. 53 +/- 3 ml/min, P = 0.17, respectively.

Adult↗

Viral prophylaxis in combined pancreas-kidney transplant recipients.

The purpose of this study was to analyze different regimens of viral prophylaxis after combined pancreas-kidney transplantation (PKT). Over a 4-year period, we performed 82 PKTs with quadruple immunosuppression with OKT3 induction. Four regimens of prophylaxis were studied. The first 30 patients received standard intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG; 0.5 g/kg) for 6 doses and oral acyclovir for 3 months. The next 34 recipients received intravenous ganciclovir (2.5 mg/kg) twice daily for 2 weeks followed by oral acyclovir for 3 months. In the third group, patients were randomized to 5 doses over 2 months of either standard IVIG (n = 9) or CMV hyperimmune globulin (Cytogam; n = 9; 100-150 mg/kg) plus 2 weeks of i.v. ganciclovir followed by 3 months of oral acyclovir. The 4 groups were similar with respect to clinical, demographic, and immunologic variables, including donor and recipient CMV serologic status and blood transfusions. All patients were monitored for viral infections in the first 6 months after PKT. The regimens of prophylaxis resulted in (1) no major non-CMV (including no EBV) viral infections; (2) 3 cases of minor non-CMV viral infections (shingles); and (3) no differences in the incidence, timing, or severity of symptomatic CMV infections in the 4 groups. No death or graft loss was due to viral infection. Prophylaxis is effective in reducing the incidence of non-CMV viral infections and may reduce the severity of symptomatic CMV infection. However, we could not show any added benefit of either Cytogam or standard IVIG when used in combination with other antiviral agents. For economic as well as efficacy reasons, we recommended that IVIG preparations not be used routinely with antilymphocyte therapy but only in high-risk situations such as primary CMV exposure.

Adult↗

Gender differences in lipid alterations following combined pancreas-kidney transplantation.

We have previously demonstrated that the lipid profile improves following successful combined pancreas-kidney transplantation (PKT). In this study, we examined whether changes in the lipid profile were different in men than in women following PKT. Fasting total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL), and the TC to HDL ratio (TC/HDL) were evaluated in 47 patients (27 men and 20 women) with normal graft function following PKT. Lipids were evaluated at regular intervals 3.5 months to 2.2 years post-PKT (a total of 317 observations). After PKT, TC/HDL decreased (P < .05), TC was unchanged, and HDL increased (P < .05) in both men and women. Although TG decreased in both men and women, it reached statistical significance in men only (P < .05). There were no significant differences in any lipid parameters between men and women before PKT, but after PKT, TC, TG, and HDL were higher in women (240 +/- 11, 183 +/- 17, and 64 +/- 19 mg/dL, respectively) than in men (207 +/- 6, 143 +/- 11, and 53 +/- 2 mg/dL, P < .05 for each). When post-PKT values were analyzed for trends over time, both TC and TG decreased (P < .05 for both) without any significant difference in trends between men and women. When six individuals who had received lovastatin at any time during their postoperative course were removed from analysis, the gender differences in TG post-PKT and the decrease in TG over time were no longer statistically significant (P > .05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗

Surgical treatment of diabetes mellitus with pancreas transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: The authors compared results and morbidity in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) patients undergoing preemptive pancreas transplantation (PTx) either before dialysis or before the need for a kidney transplant with IDDM patients undergoing conventional combined pancreas-kidney transplantation (PKT) after the initiation of dialysis therapy. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Combined PKT has become accepted generally as the best treatment option in carefully selected IDDM patients who either are dependent on dialysis or for whom dialysis is imminent. With improving results, the timing of PKT relative to the degree of nephropathy is evolving. However, it is not well established that the advantages of preemptive PTx can be achieved without incurring a detrimental effect on graft function or survival. METHODS: Over a 4-year study period, data on the following 3 recipient groups were collected prospectively and analyzed retrospectively: 1) 38 IDDM patients undergoing combined PKT while on dialysis (PKT:D); 2) 44 IDDM patients undergoing preemptive PKT before dialysis (PKT:ND); and 3) 20 IDDM patients undergoing solitary PTx. All patients underwent whole organ PTx with bladder drainage and were treated with quadruple immunosuppression. RESULTS: Actuarial 1-year patient survival is 100%, 98%, and 93%, respectively. One-year actuarial PTx survival (insulin-independence) is 92%, 95%, and 78%, respectively. The incidence of rejection, infection, operative complications, readmissions, and total hospital days was similar in the three groups. Long-term renal and pancreas allograft function and quality of life were similarly comparable. Rehabilitation potential favored the solitary PTx and PKT:ND groups. CONCLUSIONS: Preemptive PKT or solitary PTx performed earlier in the course of diabetes is associated with good results, facilitated rehabilitation, and may prevent further diabetic complications.

Actuarial Analysis↗

Pancreas transplants: efficacy of US-guided cystoscopic biopsy.

Between December 1991 and June 1993, the authors performed cystoscopic transduodenal biopsy of pancreas transplants in 35 consecutive patients (18 men and 17 women, aged 22-48 years [mean, 34 years]). The first 12 biopsies were performed under direct visualization and the last 23 were performed with ultrasonographic (US) guidance. Specimens were adequate for pathologic diagnosis in nine of 12 (75%) and in 22 of 23 (96%) biopsies, respectively. US-guided biopsy of pancreas transplants is safe and effective and gives increased diagnostic yield.

Adult↗

Anti-insulin antibodies are a cause of hypoglycemia following pancreas transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: Hypoglycemic symptoms have been reported by more than half of pancreas transplantation (PTX) recipients. To better understand the mechanism for the hypoglycemia documented in some of these patients, we studied the glucose and pancreatic hormone response to Sustacal in patients with and without hypoglycemia following PTX. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Twelve patients with established, repeated episodes of hypoglycemia following PTX (hypo) were case-matched to PTX recipients without hypoglycemic symptoms (control; n = 7). On the day of the study, fasting glucose, free and total immunoreactive insulin (IRI), C-peptide, proinsulin, and glucagon were drawn (time 0); Sustacal was administered; and glucose, free and total IRI, and C-peptide were assayed at 15, 30, 45, 75, 120, 150, 180, and 240 min. Based on the glucose response to Sustacal, the hypo group was further divided into those whose glucose rose after Sustacal (hypo-high; n = 7) and those with no increase in glucose from baseline concentration (hypo-flat; n = 5). RESULTS: Before the administration of Sustacal, the hypo-high group had a lower fasting free/total IRI (0.26 +/- 0.06, mean +/- SE) than the hypo-flat (0.51 +/- 0.02) or control (0.52 +/- 0.04) groups (both P < 0.05 compared with hypo-high). The glucose response to Sustacal was greatest in the hypo-high group as defined. Area under the curve (AUC) for total IRI following Sustacal was also greatest in the hypo-high group (P < 0.05 compared with both control and hypo-flat groups), but there was no significant difference in free IRI AUC following Sustacal between the three groups. Two individuals developed hypoglycemia during the Sustacal challenge, both in the hypo-high group. CONCLUSIONS: The lower fasting free/total IRI ratio and greater increase in glucose and total IRI in response to Sustacal in the hypo-high group compared with either the hypo-flat or control groups are consistent with the presence of significant quantities of anti-insulin antibodies in the hypo-high group. Because anti-insulin antibodies are, in turn, an established cause of episodic hypoglycemia, this study provides the first data to support the hypothesis that significant quantities of anti-insulin antibodies are a cause of symptomatic hypoglycemia following PTX in some recipients.

Adult↗

Pancreas transplantation: the Nebraska experience.

In summary, we believe that combined PKT can be performed safely and effectively in the absence of uremia, thereby providing the potential for arresting the progression of diabetic complications prior to the development of ESRD. Furthermore, performing solitary PTx prior to the need for a kidney transplant can be accomplished with morbidity and results comparable to PKT. Rehabilitation potential tends to favor patients undergoing either solitary PTx or preemptive PKT. In selected IDDM patients without end-stage diabetic nephropathy, we believe that solitary PTx or PKT are effective treatment options and need not be considered as preemptive, especially in view of increasing waiting times and the variable progressive nature of diabetic complications. As results continue to improve, solitary PTx may offer a potential solution to the growing number of IDDM patients awaiting kidney transplantation in the United States. Ultimately, the role of solitary PTx in the treatment of IDDM will be determined by long-term studies documenting the prevention or arrest of secondary diabetic complications. In the short-term, improvement in quality of life and rehabilitation potential makes preemptive PKT or solitary PTx important therapeutic alternatives for consideration.

Actuarial Analysis↗

Epstein-Barr virus hepatitis after liver transplantation.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to review our experience with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) hepatitis after liver transplantation. METHODS: During a 68-month period, we performed 668 liver transplants and 585 patients. We identified 11 patients (2 percent), including 5 adults and 6 children with EBV hepatitis after liver transplantation. The diagnosis of EBV hepatitis was established by evaluating allograft biopsies. The histology was confirmed by the use of polymerase chain reaction technology. RESULTS: The average time of diagnosis after liver transplantation was 45 days. Eight of eleven cases occurred within the first six months after transplantation. After the diagnosis of EBV hepatitis, treatment consisted of a decrease in immunosuppression plus antiviral therapy and intravenous immunoglobulin. The one-year actuarial survival for patients with EBV hepatitis, was 73 percent (8 of 11). Two patients died of progressive multi-organ EBV involvement. To determine the risk of developing EBV hepatitis, we reviewed our experience with the administration of antilymphocyte preparations in 585 patients. The patients found to have a significantly greater risk of developing EBV hepatitis included those receiving more than one course of antilymphocyte therapy or greater than a total dose of 70 milligrams of OKT3 in a single course. CONCLUSIONS: EBV hepatitis after liver transplantation is an infrequent event, which may be treated successfully. The occurrence of EBV hepatitis appears closely linked to the use of antilymphocyte preparations.

Adult↗

Orthotopic hepatic transplantation in patients with type I diabetes mellitus.

Six transplantations of the liver were performed over a period of six years in five adult patients with Type I diabetes mellitus (DM). The diabetic group included two males and three females with a mean age of 36 years and a mean duration of DM of 20 years. Primary diseases of the liver included two instances of primary biliary cirrhosis, two instances of sclerosing cholangitis and one instance of autoimmune chronic hepatitis. Three patients also received a simultaneous whole organ pancreatic transplant. All patients were managed with cyclosporine and prednisone immunosuppression with selective OKT3 induction. Patient and hepatic allograft survival rates were 80 and 67 percent, respectively, after a mean follow-up period of 4.7 years. One of the three pancreatic grafts was successful and resulted in euglycemia for two years. Three patients have subsequently undergone successful renal transplantation at one, two and one-half, and six and one-half years after hepatic transplantation. Although transplantation of the liver can be performed safely in carefully selected patients with Type I DM, these patients are still at risk for the development of progressive nephropathy. Renal transplantation is an acceptable therapeutic alternative when this occurs.

Adult↗