Biomedical subjects

R J Vandebriel

Publications and source records attributed to R J Vandebriel.

23 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed1989

Two specific T cell factors that initiate immune responses in murine allograft systems. A comparison of biologic functions.

It has been suggested that Ag-specific T cell factors play a role in the early phase of cellular immune responses. Two of these factors are studied in this paper. The first factor is specific macrophage arming factor (SMAF), that binds to (arms) macrophages and renders them specifically cytotoxic against tumor cells. The second factor is involved in the induction of an early (2 h) mast cell-dependent hypersensitivity reaction, that precedes the delayed-type hypersensitivity response (mast cell arming T cell factor; MTCF). In this study we compare both factors in an allogeneic murine tumor system (C57BL (H-2b) mice sensitized against SL2 (H-2d) lymphoma cells), both factors were: 1) dependent on T lymphocytes for their production, 2) detectable in serum 2 to 3 days after immunization, and 3) MHC (H-2)-Ag specific. Immunochemical studies showed that both factors have a molecular mass between 45 and 90 kDa and bind to the mAb 14-30 (directed against specific T cell factors), but not to anti-kappa/lambda L chain antibodies. Furthermore, it was shown that SMAF produced in vitro could induce a mast cell-dependent early 2-h hypersensitivity reaction against SL2 tumor cells, and resembled in this way MTCF. We concluded that the biologic activities and immunochemical characteristics of SMAF and MTCF are similar. Both factors are produced during the early stages of the immune response and seem to play a role in the initiation of the cell-mediated immune response.

Animals↗

PubMed1989

Initial immunochemical characterization of specific macrophage-arming factor.

This paper describes the initial immunochemical characterization of specific macrophage-arming factor (SMAF). SMAF is an antigen-specific factor that is released by (sensitized) T lymphocytes after contact with the specific antigen. It renders macrophages specifically cytotoxic. The specificity is dependent on the tumor-mouse combination. In allogeneic systems the specificity is H-2-directed, whereas in the syngeneic systems the specificity is tumor-specific. SMAF has a molecular mass of 65-85 kDa (established by gel filtration). By affinity chromatography SMAF could not be adsorbed with anti-(kappa + lambda light chain) immunoglobulins or anti-IgG from SMAF-containing supernatants. SMAF could be adsorbed with the monoclonal antibody 14-30 (directed against specific T-cell factors), and could be eluted from columns containing the latter. Furthermore, SMAF could also be adsorbed with and eluted from affinity chromatography columns to which specific tumor cell membranes or KCl extracts of these tumor cell membranes were coupled. Other tumor cell membranes could not adsorb SMAF. Together these data show that SMAF is not an antibody but a T-cell factor with an antigen-specific recognition site.

Animals↗

PubMed1989

Production of specific macrophage-arming factor precedes cytotoxic T lymphocyte activity in vivo during tumor rejection.

Recently we published a hypothesis on the immunological events occurring during tumor rejection. One of the implications of this hypothesis is that specific macrophage-arming factor (SMAF) is produced early during the initiation of the immune response, whereas the "classical" cell-mediated immune response components, such as cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL), are produced later, that is, during the amplifier-effector phase. In this paper we establish the kinetics of the induction of (a) lymphocytes producing SMAF and (b) CTL. Groups of DBA/2 mice were injected i.p. once, twice or three times with irradiated and/or non-irradiated syngeneic SL2 tumor cells, the injections being given at intervals of 10 days. After each of these injections the production of SMAF and the expression of CTL activity were established. The results showed that in the peritoneal cavity SMAF-producing lymphocytes appeared earlier than cytotoxic lymphocytes (CTL). In addition, it was shown (a) that SMAF does not interfere with the in vitro cytotoxicity expressed by CTL and (b) that in addition to CTL memory cells, SMAF-producing memory cells were also induced after injection of syngeneic tumor cells. These data support the hypothesis that SMAF is involved in the early phase of the cellular immune response against tumors, whereas CTL are induced later.

Animals↗

PubMed1989

Differences in the induction of macrophage cytotoxicity by the specific T lymphocyte factor, specific macrophage arming factor (SMAF), and the lymphokine, macrophage activating factor (MAF).

Specific T cell factors, such as specific macrophage arming factor (SMAF), are involved in the initiation of the immune response. Induction of SMAF-producing T lymphocytes in vivo and of SMAF production by T lymphocytes in vitro is dependent on the presence of intact tumor cells, and is independent of antigen presentation by macrophages. SMAF renders peritoneal macrophages cytotoxic for tumor cells. The armed peritoneal macrophages expressed a specific cytotoxicity. However, antigen-presenting cells can trigger lymphokine-producing T lymphocytes. These T lymphocytes produce lymphokines (e.g. macrophage activating factor (MAF] that activate macrophages. The MAF-activated macrophages express a non-specific tumoricidal activity. In the present study, we investigated the difference in the induction of macrophage cytotoxicity by SMAF and MAF. The following differences were found: 1) SMAF renders peritoneal resident macrophages cytotoxic, whereas MAF could only render peritoneal exudate macrophages cytotoxic. 2) SMAF requires only a 4-h incubation with macrophages, whereas MAF activates macrophages optimally after 12 h. 3) SMAF-armed macrophages recognize only the specific target cell(s), and thus, the cytotoxicity is specific in its expression. MAF activated macrophages were non-specifically cytotoxic. 4) Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in the culture medium did not enhance the cytotoxicity of SMAF-armed macrophages. In contrast, MAF induced tumoricidal activity was enhanced by adding LPS to the culture medium. 5) After adsorption chromatography with anti-murine interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma), the arming capacity of SMAF supernatant was not reduced, whereas the activating capacity of the MAF supernatant was significantly reduced or abrogated. After immunization of mice with allogeneic tumor cells, SMAF-producing lymphocytes were detected in the draining lymph nodes already 4 days after immunization and up to 12 days. Lymphocytes with the capacity to produce MAF were present in the draining lymph nodes 14-24 days after immunization. Our data indicate that the T cell factors SMAF and MAF can both render macrophages cytotoxic, but act in a different way and during different stages of the cellular immune response against allogeneic tumor cells.

Animals↗

PubMed1989

Sequential activity of gamma-delta T-cell receptor bearing lymphocytes, specific T-cell factors, and alpha-beta T-cell receptor bearing T-cells: a hypothesis.

The cell-mediated immune response against cell-bound antigens are biphasic responses. The 'classical' components of cell-mediated immunity such as delayed type hypersensitivity (DTH) and cytotoxic T-cells, are preceded by antigen-specific T-cell factor production. These antigen-specific T-cell factors can be detected in the serum 1-2 days after immunization, which suggests that these antigen-specific T-cell factors play an important role in the initiation of cell-mediated immune responses. Factor-producing lymphocytes can be detected already 1 day after immunization at the site of the antigen challenge, and at first 4-5 days after immunization in the peripheral lymphoid organs. The phenotype of these factor-producing lymphocytes is Thy-1+, CD3+, L3T4 (CD4)-, Lyt2 (CD8)-, whereas the T-lymphocytes inducing the DTH response are Thy 1+, CD3+, L3T4 (CD4)+, Lyt2 (CD8)-. This suggests that these factor-producing lymphocytes are gamma-delta bearing T-lymphocytes. gamma-delta TCR bearing T-cells can develop independently of the thymus, and are present in athymic nude mice. Immunization of athymic (nude) mice induces antigen-specific T-cell factor production as well. This suggests that the gamma-delta bearing T lymphocytes present in nude mice can react to cell-bound antigens and produce these factors.

Animals↗