PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R K McKinley

Publications and source records attributed to R K McKinley.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2003

Breathing retraining for dysfunctional breathing in asthma: a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Functional breathing disorders may complicate asthma and impair quality of life. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of physiotherapy based breathing retraining for patients treated for asthma in the community who have symptoms suggestive of dysfunctional breathing. METHODS: 33 adult patients aged 17-65 with diagnosed and currently treated asthma and Nijmegen questionnaire scores > or =23 were recruited to a randomised controlled trial comparing short physiotherapy breathing retraining and an asthma nurse education control. The main outcome measures were asthma specific health status (Asthma Quality of Life questionnaire) and Nijmegen questionnaire scores RESULTS: Of the 33 who entered the study, data were available on 31 after 1 month and 28 at 6 months. The median (interquartile range) changes in overall asthma quality of life score at 1 month were 0.6 (0.05-1.12) and 0.09 (-0.25-0.26) for the breathing retraining and education groups, respectively (p=0.018), 0.42 (0.11-1.17) and 0.09 (-0.58-0.5) for the symptoms domain (p=0.042), 0.52 (0.09-1.25) and 0 (-0.45-0.45) for the activities domain (p=0.007), and 0.50 (0-1.50) and -0.25 (-0.75-0.75) for the environment domain (p=0.018). Only the change in the activities domain remained significant at 6 months (0.83 (-0.10-1.71) and -0.05 (-0.74-0.34), p=0.018), although trends to improvement were seen in the overall score (p=0.065), the symptoms domain (p=0.059), and the environment domain (p=0.065). There was a correlation between changes in quality of life scores and Nijmegen questionnaire scores at 1 month and at 6 months. The number needed to treat to produce a clinically important improvement in health status was 1.96 and 3.57 at 1 and 6 months. CONCLUSION: Over half the patients treated for asthma in the community who have symptoms suggestive of dysfunctional breathing show a clinically relevant improvement in quality of life following a brief physiotherapy intervention. This improvement is maintained in over 25% 6 months after the intervention.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed2002

Meeting patient expectations of care: the major determinant of satisfaction with out-of-hours primary medical care?

BACKGROUND: Client or consumer expectation is considered to influence their satisfaction with the service provided, but its importance has not been quantified in health care. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of "patient expectations of care" on satisfaction with care provided by out-of-hours services. METHODS: We surveyed 3457 patients who requested out-of-hours care from five practices, two general practice out-of-hours co-operatives and a deputizing service in an English health authority during late 1997. The independent variables were: the service providing the care (service type), where out-of-hours care was given (location of care) and whether the care met the patient's expectations. The independent variable was overall patient satisfaction with out-of-hours care. RESULTS: Patients who received the care they hoped for (their idealized expectation was met) were more satisfied than those who did not. Patients who attended centres were more satisfied with the care received than those who had had home visits. Patients were more satisfied if they received care from the co-operative which did not employ assistants than from the deputizing service. Idealized expectation (care which was hoped for) match, location of care and service type explained 34, 2 and 4% of the variance, respectively. Age, sex, ethnicity, access to a car, normative/comparative expectation (care which was expected) and whether patients expected and received telephone advice, a home visit or domiciliary care, and the delay between request for care and care provision were not independently associated with satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: Meeting or failing to meet the care patients hoped for is an important predictor of patient satisfaction with out-of-hours care. Purchasers and providers of out-of-hours care should consider whether and how patient expectation of service can be managed. This may reduce patient dissatisfaction with the service they provide. These findings also have important implications for the design of studies which use patient satisfaction as an outcome variable.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Prevalence of dysfunctional breathing in patients treated for asthma in primary care: cross sectional survey.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the prevalence of dysfunctional breathing in adults with asthma treated in the community. DESIGN: Postal questionnaire survey using Nijmegen questionnaire. SETTING: One general practice with 7033 patients. PARTICIPANTS: All adult patients aged 17-65 with diagnosed asthma who were receiving treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Score >/=23 on Nijmegen questionnaire. RESULTS: 227/307 patients returned completed questionnaires; 219 (71.3%) questionnaires were suitable for analysis. 63 participants scored >/=23. Those scoring >/=23 were more likely to be female than male (46/132 (35%) v 17/87 (20%), P=0.016) and were younger (mean (SD) age 44.8 (14.7) v 49.0 (13.8, (P=0.05). Patients at different treatment steps of the British Thoracic Society asthma guidelines were affected equally. CONCLUSIONS: About a third of women and a fifth of men had scores suggestive of dysfunctional breathing. Although further studies are needed to confirm the validity of this screening tool and these findings, these prevalences suggest scope for therapeutic intervention and may explain the anecdotal success of the Buteyko method of treating asthma.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

GP stress and patient dissatisfaction with nights on call: an exploratory study. GP stress and patient satisfaction.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the relative effects of being on or off duty at night on general practitioners' (GPs') levels of stress, and the satisfaction of their patients with daytime consultations surrounding these nights. DESIGN: A within-subjects, counterbalanced design was used. Two "on-call" and two "off-duty" nights were studied per GP over 4 weeks. SETTING: Primary health care in the UK. PARTICIPANTS: 26 GPs and their patients seen in consultations either side of nights studied. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: GPs completed validated stress questionnaires at the beginning and end of the consultation sessions immediately before and after nights on call and off duty. RESULTS: GPs experienced elevated levels of stress when on call, compared to when they were off duty. Patients seen in the consultation sessions before and after a night on call were less satisfied than patients seen before and after a night off duty. CONCLUSION: Being on call at night raised GP stress levels from at least the start of the afternoon consultation session before until the end of the morning consultation after the night on call. Daytime patient satisfaction is also reduced in periods surrounding nights on call.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Audit in general practice: how much and how complete? Frequency of audit in general practice.

The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of audit and the proportion completed in a group of practices. Data obtained by interviewing a member of each practice and inspecting practice records were independently coded by researchers. Practices initiated an average of 3.5 (range 1-7) audits in 2 years, of which an average of 0.9 (range 0-3) were completed. Ten of 16 completed audits were externally funded or facilitated. Few audits are completed in general practice and practices require continuing support for audit.

Abstracting and Indexing↗
PubMed2001

Patient satisfaction with out of hours primary medical care.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the relationship between patient satisfaction with out of hours care provided by deputising and practice doctors in four urban areas in England and characteristics of the service provided and patients, the care given, and health outcomes. SETTING: -Fourteen general practices in four urban areas in England. PARTICIPANTS: People who requested out of hours care. DESIGN: Analysis of data from a study of out of hours care. Patients were interviewed within 5 days of their request for out of hours care. Data on the service provided were obtained from medical records and all other data were collected at interview. Satisfaction was measured using a valid reliable instrument. RESULTS: 2152 patients were recruited to the study and 1466 were interviewed. Satisfaction data were available on 1402 patients. "Overall satisfaction" was associated with age, doctor type, lack of access to a car at the time of the request, and health outcome. The relationships between satisfaction subscales and patient characteristics (age, sex, ethnicity, and access to a car at the time of the request), service characteristics (doctor type and delay between the request and visit), whether a prescription was given, and health outcome were variable. If an expected home visit was not received, "overall satisfaction" and satisfaction with "communication and management", "doctor's attitude", and "initial contact person" were reduced. CONCLUSION: Patient satisfaction is dependent on many factors. Mismatch between patient expectation and the service received is related to decreased satisfaction. This may increase as general practitioners delegate more out of hours care to cooperatives and deputising services.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Student perceptions of a new integrated course in clinical methods for medical undergraduates.

CONTEXT: In line with recent General Medical Council recommendations a new, 8-week integrated course in clinical methods has been introduced into the undergraduate curriculum at Leicester University. OBJECTIVES: To describe student perceptions of the course and to identify areas for improvement. DESIGN: A questionnaire survey. SETTINGS: These were 50 general practices, three teaching hospitals and the academic Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care. SUBJECTS: A total of 180 third- and fourth-year medical students. RESULTS: The questionnaires were completed by 93% of students. The latter expressed higher satisfaction with practice teaching compared with hospital teaching, on a 5-point scale, with regard to questions on 'teaching content' (4.0 vs. 2.7, P < 0.0001) and 'teaching process' (4.1 vs. 2.7 P < 0.0001), which was reinforced by free text comments. Of the respondents, 92% agreed that their teaching practice had satisfied the required teaching timetable and 87% of students found their departmental tutor enthusiastic and stimulating. CONCLUSION: It is possible to deliver an integrated course in clinical methods, teaching generic clinical skills, in a mix of hospital and practice settings. Nevertheless there were substantial differences in student perceptions of the relative quality and impact of teaching in the two settings. This may be related to the more detailed programme of preparation of practice teachers and the greater extent to which practice teachers were required, and able, to create protected time for the teaching task. These differences should be minimized if hospital teachers undergo similar preparation for the teaching task and have similar levels of protected teaching time.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed2000

Formative assessment of the consultation performance of medical students in the setting of general practice using a modified version of the leicester assessment package.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of a modified version of the Leicester Assessment Package (LAP) in the formative assessment of the consultation performance of medical students with particular reference to validity, inter-assessor reliability, acceptability, feasibility and educational impact. DESIGN: 180 third and fourth year Leicester medical students were directly observed consulting with six general practice patients and independently assessed by a pair of assessors. A total of 70 practice and 16 departmental assessors took part. Performance scores were subjected to generalizability analysis and students' views of the assessment were gathered by questionnaire. RESULTS: Four of the five categories of consultation performance (Interviewing and history taking, Patient management, Problem solving and Behaviour and relationship with patients) were assessed in over 99% of consultations and Physical examination was assessed in 94%. Seventy-six percent of assessors reported that the case mix was 'satisfactory' and 20% that it was 'borderline'; 85% of students believed it to have been satisfactory. Generalizability analysis indicates that two independent assessors assessing the performance of students across six consultations would achieve a reliability of 0.94 in making pass or fail decisions. Ninety-eight percent of students perceived that their particular strengths and weaknesses were correctly identified, 99% that they were given specific advice on how to improve their performance and 98% believed that the feedback they had received would have long-term benefit. CONCLUSIONS: The modified version of the LAP is valid, reliable and feasible in formative assessment of the consultation performance of medical students. Furthermore, almost all students found the process fair and believed it was likely to lead to improvements in their consultation performance. This approach may also be applicable to regulatory assessment as it accurately identifies students at the pass/fail margin.

Clinical Competence↗
PubMed1999

Simulated surgery.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Clinical Competence↗
PubMed1999

What do patients want from doctors? Content analysis of written patient agendas for the consultation.

BACKGROUND: Although much has been written about what patients want when they contact their general practitioner (GP), there are no published data from large cohort studies of what patients expect. AIM: To describe the expectations of a large group of patients who consulted with their GPs. METHOD: A GP and a social sciences graduate carried out a content analysis of written agenda forms completed by 819 patients who consulted 46 randomly selected GPs. Inter- and intra-rater reliabilities were confirmed. RESULTS: A total of 756 (92%) agenda forms were returned. Inter-rater reliability was satisfactory (kappa > 0.6 for all but two main themes). Almost all patients had requests they wished to make of their doctor, 60% had their own ideas about what was wrong, and 38% had considered explanations about why they were unwell. Forty-two per cent and 24% of patients had consulted because they had reached the limit of their anxiety or tolerance respectively. Seven per cent, 4%, and 2% had comments, which were usually negative, to make about previous management, communication with doctors, or time in the consultation. CONCLUSION: These data demonstrate that most patients come to the consultation with a particular agenda. Failure to address this agenda is likely to adversely affect the outcome of many consultations.

Family Practice↗
PubMed1997

Comparison of out of hours care provided by patients' own general practitioners and commercial deputising services: a randomised controlled trial. I: The process of care.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the process of out of hours care provided by general practitioners from patients' own practices and by commercial deputising services. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Four urban areas in Manchester, Salford, Stockport, and Leicester. SUBJECTS: 2152 patients who requested out of hours care, and 49 practice doctors and 183 deputising doctors (61% local principals) who responded to those requests. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Response to call, time to visit, prescribing, and hospital admissions. RESULTS: 1046 calls were dealt with by practice doctors and 1106 by deputising doctors. Practice doctors were more likely to give telephone advice (20.2% v 0.72% of calls) and to visit more quickly than deputising doctors (median delay 35 minutes v 52 minutes). Practice doctors were less likely than deputising doctors to issue a prescription (56.1% v 63.2% of patients) or to prescribe an antibiotic (43.7% v 61.3% of prescriptions issued) and more likely to prescribe genetic drugs (58.4% v 32.1% of drugs prescribed), cheaper drugs (mean cost per prescription pounds 3.28 v pounds 5.04), and drugs in a predefined out of hours formulary (49.8% v 41.1% of drugs prescribed). There was no significant difference in the number of hospital admissions. CONCLUSIONS: By contrast with practice doctors, deputising doctors providing out of hours care less readily give telephone advice, take longer to visit at home, and have patterns of prescribing that may be less discriminating.

Appointments and Schedules↗
PubMed1997

Comparison of out of hours care provided by patients' own general practitioners and commercial deputising services: a randomised controlled trial. II: The outcome of care.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcome of out of hours care given by general practitioners from patients' own practices and by commercial deputising services. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Four urban areas in Manchester, Salford, Stockport, and Leicester. SUBJECTS: 2152 patients who requested out of hours care, and 49 practice doctors and 183 deputising doctors (61% local principals in general practice) who responded to the requests. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Health status outcome, patient satisfaction, and subsequent health service use. RESULTS: Patients seen by deputising doctors were less satisfied with the care they received. The mean overall satisfaction score for practice doctors was 70.7 (95% confidence interval 68.1 to 73.2) and for deputising doctors 61.8 (59.9 to 63.7). The greatest difference in satisfaction was with the delay in visiting. There were no differences in the change in health or overall health status measured 24 to 120 hours after the out of hours call or subsequent use of the health service in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients are more satisfied with the out of hours care provided by practice doctors than that provided by deputising doctors. Organisation of doctors into large groups may produce lower levels of patient satisfaction, especially when associated with increased delays in the time taken to visit. There seem to be no appreciable differences in health outcome between the two types of service.

Appointments and Schedules↗
PubMed1997

Reliability and validity of a new measure of patient satisfaction with out of hours primary medical care in the United Kingdom: development of a patient questionnaire.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a reliable, valid measure of patient satisfaction with out of hours care suitable for large scale service evaluation. DESIGN: Focus group meetings and semistructured interviews with patients to identify issues of importance to patients and possible questionnaire items; interviews and two pilot studies to test and identify new questionnaire items; modification or removal of items to eliminate ambiguity and reduce non-response and skewed responses; questionnaire survey of out of hours care. SETTING: Greater Manchester and Leicester. SUBJECTS: 11 general practice patients participated in the focus groups and 28 in the semistructured interviews; 41 in the preliminary interviews; 41 and 378 in the postal pilots; and 1466 in the survey of out of hours care. RESULTS: A 32 item questionnaire was developed. Component analysis indicated seven scales (satisfaction with communication and management, doctor's attitude, continuity of care, delay until visit, access to out of hours care, initial contact person, telephone advice) related to overall satisfaction and containing issues identified as important to patients. Levels of reliability were satisfactory, Cronbach's alpha correlation coefficient exceeding 0.60 for all scales. CONCLUSION: A reliable, valid measure of patient satisfaction has been developed, suitable for large scale evaluation of out of hours care.

Adolescent↗