PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R L Beaudet

Publications and source records attributed to R L Beaudet.

8 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1988

Medtronic-Hall prosthesis: valve related deaths and complications.

The purpose of this retrospective study was to assess the clinical performance of the Medtronic-Hall prosthesis based on a review of all valve related complications over a period of nine years. From January 1978 until December 1986, 502 prostheses were implanted in 450 patients. There were 200 aortic valve replacements, 198 mitral valve replacements and 52 double valve replacements. There were 234 associated procedures performed, the most frequent being coronary grafting in 129 patients and tricuspid annuloplasty in 35 patients. The mean age of the patients (230 men and 220 women) was 54.08 +/- 11.7 years. Preoperatively, 92.2% were in NYHA class III or IV. Early mortality was 7.1% and late mortality 16.7%. The follow-up totalled 1733 patient-years (mean 49.8 +/- 31.7 months). Over a period of nine years, the valve related complication rate was 4.4% per patient-year. Thromboembolic events occurred in 37 patients (2.1% per patient-year), anticoagulant related hemorrhage in 23 patients (1.3% per patient-year), endocarditis in 11 patients (0.6% per patient-year), perivalvular leak in six patients (0.3% per patient-year) and death and reoperation in 28 patients (1.6% per patient-year). At eight and one-half years, the survival rate was 71.28 +/- 2.7% for the whole group. The actuarial rate of patients free from all valve related complications was 75.92 +/- 2.7%, rate of freedom from thromboembolism was 86.01 +/- 2.4%, freedom from anticoagulant related hemorrhage was 92.7 +/- 1.6%, freedom from endocarditis was 97.17 +/- 0.8%, freedom from perivalvular leak was 98.27 +/- 0.7% and freedom from death and reoperation was 90.70 +/- 1.9%.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1986

The Medtronic-Hall cardiac valve: 7 1/2 years' clinical experience.

Clinical information on the Medtronic-Hall valve prosthesis was obtained by reviewing the records of 379 patients, 164 of whom had aortic valve replacement (AVR), 163 of whom had mitral valve replacement (MVR), and 52 of whom had double valve replacement over 90 months (1,225 patient-years) (mean follow-up, 42.01 +/- 1.3 months [+/- standard error]). Mean age was 53.8 +/- 12 years. One hundred ninety-three patients (50.9%) had some type of concomitant operation, such as tricuspid annuloplasty, coronary artery bypass grafting, or resection of ascending aortic aneurysm. Ninety-one percent were in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class III or IV preoperatively. Early mortality and late mortality were 7.7% (29 patients) and 13.5% (51 patients), respectively. The actuarial survival at 7 1/2 years was 74.1 +/- 2.7% for the total group and 69.0 +/- 4.5% for those having AVR, 81.0 +/- 3.2% for those having MVR, and 67.0 +/- 8.9% for those having double valve replacement. All patients but 2 were maintained on a regimen of chronic anticoagulation with warfarin sodium. Twenty-six thromboembolic episodes occurred (2.1/100 patient-years): 13 after MVR (2.3/100 patient-years), 11 after AVR (2.1/100 patient-years), and 2 after double valve replacement (1.4/100 patient-years). Four thromboembolic episodes were fatal; no valve thrombosis occurred. There were no structural failures. Of the 350 late survivors, 92% were in NYHA Functional Classes I and II. Total valve-related complications have been minimal.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Aortic Valve↗
PubMed1983

Fifty-four months' experience with an improved tilting disk valve (Medtronic-Hall).

Between 1978 and 1982, 230 consecutive patients underwent valve replacement with the Medtronic-Hall valve prosthesis. There were 95 patients with aortic valve replacement (AVR), 107 with mitral valve replacement (MVR) and 28 with aortic and mitral valve replacement (DVR). Operative mortality was 7.8%. Follow-up studies included 212 patients with a mean follow-up time of 26.5 months. Incidence of thromboembolism was 1.2%/patient year after AVR, 2.4%/patient year after MVR and 0 after DVR. Freedom from any kind of complications was 80% at 3 years. Recatheterization showed mean pressure gradients of between 0.0 and 6.0 mmHg in aortic prostheses and between 0.0 and 3.5 mmHg in mitral prostheses. It is concluded that the Medtronic-Hall valve prosthesis is a durable substitute with a low complication rate and good hemodynamic performance.

Adult↗