Delayed implanting blastocysts recovered from both ovariectomized and lactating pregnant mice were examined for the presence of primitive endoderm. One or more of three different criteria were used to identify this tissue which was found to be present in nearly all such blastocysts, regardless of the length of time for which their implantation had been delayed. Furthermore, the tissue appeared to differentiate in blastocysts from ovariectomized females at approximately the same postcoital stage as in those from sham-operated controls. Formation of the parietal endoderm layer was not observed in a single instance during delay, but began approximately 10 h after it had been terminated by injecting ovariectomized females with oestradiol benzoate. Cells in mitosis were found both at longer intervals after the onset of implantation delay and at shorter intervals after its termination than reported previously. It is concluded that, contrary to what might have been anticipated from certain earlier studies, there seem to be no obvious advantages in using delayed implanting rather than nondelayed blastocysts for investigating initial steps in differentiation of the primitive endoderm. Delayed blastocysts may, nevertheless, be of value in elucidating factors controlling the differentiation or onset of migration of parietal endoderm cells.

Animals↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Use of triple tissue blastocyst reconstitution to study the development of diploid parthenogenetic primitive ectoderm in combination with fertilization-derived trophectoderm and primitive endoderm.

Diploid mouse conceptuses lacking a paternal genome can form morphologically normal but small fetuses of up to 25 somites, but they invariably fail to develop beyond mid-gestation. Such conceptuses differ from normal most notably in the poor development of extra-embryonic tissues which are largely of trophectodermal and primitive endodermal origin. However, it is not clear whether the demise of diploid parthenogenetic (P) or gynogenetic (G) conceptuses is attributable entirely to the defective development of these two tissues or whether differentiation of the primitive ectoderm, the precursor of the foetus, extra-embryonic mesoderm and amnion, is also impaired by the absence of a paternal genome. Therefore, a new blastocyst reconstitution technique was used which enabled primitive ectoderm from P blastocysts to be combined with primitive endoderm and trophectoderm from fertilization-derived (F) blastocysts. One third of the 'triple tissue' reconstituted blastocysts that implanted yielded foetuses. However, all foetuses recovered on the 11th or 12th day of gestation were small and, with one exception, either obviously retarded or arrested in development. The exception was a living 44 somite specimen which is the most advanced P foetus yet recorded. Foetuses were invariably degenerating in conceptuses recovered on the 13th day. In contrast, at least 16% of control reconstituted blastocysts with primitive ectoderm as well as primitive endoderm and trophectoderm of F origin developed normally on the 13th day of gestation or to term. Hence, the presence of a paternal genome seems to be essential for normal differentiation of all 3 primary tissues of the mouse blastocyst. The P foetuses that developed from reconstituted blastocysts were so closely invested by their membranes that they often showed abnormal flexure of the posterior region of the body. Several also showed a deficiency of allantoic tissue. Therefore, the possibility that the defect in development of P primitive ectoderms resided in their extra-embryonic tissues was investigated by analysing a series of chimaeras produced by injecting them into intact F blastocysts. The foregoing anomalies were not discernible even when P cells made a large contribution to the extra-embryonic mesoderm or amnion plus umbilical cord. Furthermore, selection against P cells was no greater in extra-embryonic derivatives of the primitive ectoderm than in the foetus itself.

Animals↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Can developmentally significant spatial patterning of the egg be discounted in mammals?

Mammals are generally held to be exceptions to the rule that organization of the egg plays a role in specifying the differentiation of cells, axes, or other aspects of patterning in the early embryo. However, there are several grounds for questioning this conclusion. Not only do certain experimental findings remain unexplained but, more importantly, nearly all have been interpreted specifically in terms of the differentiation of trophectoderm versus inner cell mass. The possibility that egg organization is instrumental in patterning of the early embryo in mammals has so far been almost entirely neglected, notwithstanding evidence that the mouse blastocyst becomes bilaterally symmetrical before it implants. Difficulties confronting attempts to tackle the issue of the significance of egg organization in mammals are discussed with respect to polarity and cytoplasmic differentiation in the oocyte and zygote. Evidence for an enduring influence of the maternal genome during early development is reviewed and weaknesses in the case against a role for egg organization are exposed. Finally, consideration is given to what needs to be done if this issue is to be resolved.

Animals↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Cell lineage and cell commitment in the early mammalian embryo.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Animals↗