Virtual reality in medical training.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to R L Helmreich.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
A model based on an input process and outcome conceptualisation is suggested to address safety-relevant factors in emergency medicine. As shown in other dynamic and demanding environments, human factors play a decisive role in attaining high quality service. Attitudes held by health-care providers, organisational shells and work-cultural parameters determine communication, conflict resolution and workload distribution within and between teams. These factors should be taken into account to improve outcomes such as operational integrity, job satisfaction and morale.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
In this study, measures of astronaut effectiveness were administered to volunteers from the astronaut corps in order to validate psychological "select-in" criteria for long-duration space missions. Using a peer nomination format, astronauts rated their peers with whom they had either flown or trained. Factor analysis revealed two latent performance dimensions: job competence and group living. The job competence dimension measured the instrumental aspects relating to job knowledge and job performance. The group living dimension measured the interpersonal aspects relating to teamwork and desirability as a colleague on Space Station. Analyses revealed that the personality variables could explain a significant proportion of the variance in the group living performance dimension, but not the job competence performance dimension. The findings are not surprising since astronauts are highly screened on the basis of past attainment, but are not as highly screened on aspects relating to teamwork and interpersonal concerns.
Are the personality characteristics of astronauts related to their professional effectiveness? In order to answer this question, effectiveness and personality data were collected from 65 NASA astronauts. Several findings emerged from these data. Five personality subscales were related to effectiveness in one form or another. They were: high Negative Expressivity and Negative Communion (subordinate and gullible), low Impatience and Irritability, low Openness (to new ideas and experiences), low Negative Instrumentality (egoism) and high Agreeableness. Examining the graphs of these relationships indicated that they were not linear. This examination indicated that high levels on these undesirable personality characteristics (e.g., Impatience/Irritability) were distributed across all levels of effectiveness. Low levels of the undesirable personality characteristics were found only among the most effective astronauts. We concluded that these other-directed personality qualities will assume increasing importance in long-term spaceflight, and consequently, should be the focus of greater attention in future astronaut selection and training.
This study examined the reliability and convergent validity of three methods of peer and supervisory ratings of the effectiveness of individual NASA astronauts and their relationships with flight assignments. These two techniques were found to be reliable and relatively convergent. Seniority and a peer-rated Performance and Competence factor proved to be most closely associated with flight assignments, while supervisor ratings and a peer-rated Group Living and Personality factor were found to be unrelated. Results have implications for the selection and training of astronauts.
The first data from the NASA/University of Texas Crew Performance project on the behavior of flightcrews with and without formal training in Cockpit Resource Management (CRM) is reported. Expert observers made detailed ratings of 15 components of crew behavior in both line operations and in full mission simulations. The results indicate that such training in crew coordination concepts increases the percentage of crews rated as above average in performance and decreases the percentage rated as below average. The data also show high and unexpected degrees of variations in rated performance among crews flying different aircraft within the same organization. It was also found that the specific behaviors that triggered observer ratings of above or below average performance differed markedly between organizations. Characteristics of experts' ratings and future research needs are also discussed.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Measured attitudes regarding cockpit management were contrasted for pilots whose line flying performance was independently evaluated by Check Airmen as above or below average. A highly significant discriminant function was obtained indicating that these attitudes are significant predictors of behavior. The performance of 95.7% of the pilots was correctly classified by the analysis. Implications of the results for cockpit resource management training and pilot selection are discussed.
Negatively valued masculinity (M-) and femininity (F-) personality scales were developed to supplement the positively valued Masculinity (M+) and Femininity (F+) scales of the Personal Attributes Questionnaire (PAQ; Spence & Helmreich). M- consisted of traits that had been judged to be (a) more typical of males than females, (b) undesirable in both sexes, and (c ) agentic or instrumental in content. Two F- scales were developed, both containing stereotypically feminine, undesirable traits, one set of traits referring to communionlike characteristics (Fc-) and the other to verbal passive-aggressive qualities (FVA-). Significant sex differences in the predicted direction were found on all scales. In both sexes, low and typically nonsignificant correlations were found between parallel positive and negative scales, but highly significant negative correlations were found between positive and negative cross-sex scales. These findings provide additional evidence for the multidimentionslity of masculinity and femininity. Scores on a self-esteem measure were positively correlated with M+ and F+, uncorrelated with M-, and negatively correlated with the F- scales. Different patterns of scores were associated with two types of problem behaviors. In both sexes, neuroticism was most highly correlated (in a negative direction) with M+, and acting out behavoir was most strongly correlated (in a positive direction) with M-. The next highest correlation in both instances was with FVA-.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.