PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R L Prigeon

Publications and source records attributed to R L Prigeon.

21 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

The contribution of insulin-dependent and insulin-independent glucose uptake to intravenous glucose tolerance in healthy human subjects.

Glucose disposal occurs by both insulin-independent and insulin-dependent mechanisms, the latter being determined by the interaction of insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion. To determine the role of insulin-independent and insulin-dependent factors in glucose tolerance, we performed intravenous glucose tolerance tests on 93 young healthy subjects (55 male, 38 female; 18-44 years of age; body mass index, 19.5-52.2 kg/m2). From these tests, we determined glucose tolerance as the glucose disappearance constant (Kg), calculated beta-cell function as the incremental insulin response to glucose for 19 min after an intravenous glucose bolus (IIR0-19), and derived an insulin sensitivity index (SI) and glucose effectiveness at basal insulin (SG) using the minimal model of glucose kinetics. To eliminate the effect of basal insulin on SG and estimate insulin-independent glucose uptake, we calculated glucose effectiveness at zero insulin (GEZI = SG - [SI x basal insulin]). Insulin-dependent glucose uptake was estimated as SI x IIR0-19, because the relationship between SI and beta-cell function has been shown to be hyperbolic. Using linear regression to determine the influence of these factors on glucose tolerance, we found that GEZI was significantly related to Kg (r = 0.70; P < 0.0001), suggesting a major contribution of insulin-independent glucose uptake to glucose disappearance. As expected, SI x IIR0-19 also correlated well with Kg (r = 0.74; P < 0.0001), confirming the importance of insulin-dependent glucose uptake to glucose tolerance. Although IIR0-19 alone correlated with Kg (r = 0.35; P = 0.0005), SI did not (r = 0.18; P > 0.08).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗

Quantification of the relationship between insulin sensitivity and beta-cell function in human subjects. Evidence for a hyperbolic function.

To determine the relationship between insulin sensitivity and beta-cell function, we quantified the insulin sensitivity index using the minimal model in 93 relatively young, apparently healthy human subjects of varying degrees of obesity (55 male, 38 female; 18-44 yr of age; body mass index 19.5-52.2 kg/m2) and with fasting glucose levels < 6.4 mM. SI was compared with measures of body adiposity and beta-cell function. Although lean individuals showed a wide range of SI, body mass index and SI were related in a curvilinear manner (P < 0.0001) so that on average, an increase in body mass index was associated generally with a lower value for SI. The relationship between the SI and the beta-cell measures was more clearly curvilinear and reciprocal for fasting insulin (P < 0.0001), first-phase insulin response (AIRglucose; P < 0.0001), glucose potentiation slope (n = 56; P < 0.005), and beta-cell secretory capacity (AIRmax; n = 43; P < 0.0001). The curvilinear relationship between SI and the beta-cell measures could not be distinguished from a hyperbola, i.e., SI x beta-cell function = constant. This hyperbolic relationship described the data significantly better than a linear function (P < 0.05). The nature of this relationship is consistent with a regulated feedback loop control system such that for any difference in SI, a proportionate reciprocal difference occurs in insulin levels and responses in subjects with similar carbohydrate tolerance. We conclude that in human subjects with normal glucose tolerance and varying degrees of obesity, beta-cell function varies quantitatively with differences in insulin sensitivity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adipose Tissue↗

Effect of glucocorticoid and growth hormone treatment on proinsulin levels in humans.

Treatment with glucocorticoids is associated with a disproportionate elevation in the PI/IRI ratio. To determine whether growth hormone--another agent capable of producing insulin resistance and changing B-cell function--also alters the PI/IRI ratio and whether growth hormone and glucocorticoids have a synergistic effect on PI and IRI levels, we examined these variables in four groups of young healthy subjects (n = 8/group) after 7 days of treatment with placebo, prednisone (0.8 mg.kg-1 x day-1), rhGH (0.1 mg.kg-1 x day-1), and the combination of prednisone and rhGH. Fasting plasma glucose levels increased significantly above those of the control group in subjects receiving prednisone or prednisone and rhGH but not in subjects receiving rhGH alone. The basal concentration of IRI increased in response to prednisone, rhGH, and the combination of prednisone and rhGH. However, this increase in IRI was largely due to an increase in PI, so that the PI/IRI ratio increased from 14.7 +/- 2.4% in control subjects to 33.9 +/- 5.3% in subjects on prednisone (P < 0.005), 40.9 +/- 4.3% in individuals receiving rhGH (P < 0.001 vs. control subjects), and 58.1 +/- 9.2% in subjects receiving both prednisone and rhGH (P < 0.001 vs. control subjects). We suggest that this change in PI/IRI with glucocorticoid and growth hormone treatment may be due to an alteration in B-cell synthesis or release of PI. This change in the PI/IRI ratio is not dependent on fasting hyperglycemia but may contribute to the hyperglycemia often observed with these agents. Furthermore, these data show that IRI is not a reliable indicator of true insulin levels or insulin sensitivity in either growth hormone- or glucocorticoid-treated subjects.

Adult↗