PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R L Spitzer

Publications and source records attributed to R L Spitzer.

At least 163 records · Page 9Linked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

Identifying patients with depression in the primary care setting: a more efficient method.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if there is a core subset of depressive symptoms that could be used to efficiently diagnose depression after administering the 2-item PRIME-MD a screening questionnaire for depression. METHODS: One thousand patients selected randomly and by convenience from 4 primary care clinics were assessed by PRIME-MD and completed a questionnaire measuring the following validation variables: functional status and well-being, disability days, somatic symptoms, depression severity, suicidal thoughts, health care utilization, and the physician-patient relationship. RESULTS: Four symptoms (sleep disturbance, anhedonia, low self-esteem, and decreased appetite) accounted for virtually all the depression symptom-related variance in functional status and well-being, with 8.3% of patients having 2 of these symptoms and 8.2% having 3 or 4 of these symptoms. There was excellent agreement between diagnosis based on core symptoms and major depression (K= 0.77; overall accuracy rate, 94%). There were significant differences (P<.001) among patients with negative depression screen, 0 to 1, 2, and 3 to 4 core symptoms with scores on each of the validation variables getting progressively worse in these 4 groups. A cutoff point of 2 core symptoms identified all but 3 patients with major depression and an additional 5% of the entire sample without major depression who were significantly (P<.05) worse than patients without depression on each of the validation variables. CONCLUSION: A strategy that includes the use of a 2-item depression screener followed by the evaluation of 4 core depressive symptoms is an efficient and effective way of identifying and classifying primary care patients with depression in need of clinical attention.

Alabama↗
PubMedDate not supplied

A comparison of clinical and self-report diagnoses of DSM-III personality disorders in 552 patients.

This report examines the relationship between clinicians' diagnoses of personality disorder and self-report diagnoses of personality disorder obtained from the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire (PDQ). The results from 552 patients showed general lack of agreement between clinical and self-report diagnoses of DSM-III personality diagnoses. The best agreement obtained was for Borderline Personality Disorder: k = 0.46, and r = .51 for scaled ratings. Possible sources of disagreement including failings of the self-report questionnaire, difficulties in relying upon patients' self-reports, lack of reliability of clinical diagnoses of personality, and possible inherent lack of reliability of several of the DSM-III personality disorders are discussed.

Adolescent↗