PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R L Sutherland

Publications and source records attributed to R L Sutherland.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

Cloning and characterization of GRB14, a novel member of the GRB7 gene family.

Screening of a human breast epithelial cell cDNA library with the tyrosine-phosphorylated C terminus of the epidermal growth factor receptor identified a novel member of the GRB7 gene family, designated GRB14. In addition to a pleckstrin homology domain-containing central region homologous to the Caenorhabditis elegans protein F10E9.6/mig 10 and a C-terminal Src homology 2 (SH2) domain, a conserved N-terminal motif, P(S/A)IPNPFPEL, can now be included as a hallmark of this family. GRB14 mRNA was expressed at high levels in the liver, kidney, pancreas, testis, ovary, heart, and skeletal muscle. Anti-Grb14 antibodies recognized a protein of approximately 58 kDa in a restricted range of human cell lines. Among those of breast cancer origin, GRB14 expression strongly correlated with estrogen receptor positivity, and differential expression was also observed among human prostate cancer cell lines. A GST-Grb14 SH2 domain fusion protein exhibited strong binding to activated platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) receptors (PDGFRs) in vitro, but association between Grb14 and beta-PDGFRs could not be detected in vivo. In serum-starved cells, Grb14 was phosphorylated on serine residues, which increased with PDGF, but not EGF, treatment. Grb14 is therefore a target for a PDGF-regulated serine kinase, an interaction that does not require PDGFR-Grb14 association.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗

Cancer-associated mis-sense and deletion mutations impair p16INK4 CDK inhibitory activity.

The p16INK4 gene is a candidate tumour-suppressor gene which maps to the genomic locus 9p21, and mutations of this gene are associated with melanoma and other cancers. Biochemical studies suggest that p16INK4 mediates its effects by specifically inhibiting the G1 cyclin-dependent kinases CDK4 and CDK6, thereby regulating the progression through G1 into S phase of the cell cycle. To evaluate the functional effects of mutations in p16INK4 which have been observed in primary cancers and cancer cell lines, we constructed a series of deletion mutants comprising amino acid regions 9-72, 9-131, 73-131 and 73-156; a mis-sense mutation identified in melanoma (Arg87Pro); and the polymorphism Ala48Thr and investigated their ability to inhibit cyclin D1/CDK4 kinase activity in vitro. Removal of 25 amino acids from the carboxy terminus of p16INIK4 (9-131) had little impact on its inhibitory activity. In contrast, deletion of the 65 N-terminal amino acids comprising the first and second ankyrin repeats of p16INK4 (73-131) abolished its inhibitory activity. The carboxy (73-156) and amino termial (9-72) fragments of p16INK4 also failed to inhibit cyclin D1/CDK4 activity. These results indicate that the core region (73-131) as well as amino acids N-terminal of this sequence are important, whereas sequences C-terminal of amino acid 131 are less important for the inhibitory activity of this molecule. The melanoma-associated Arg87Pro mutation resulted in loss of inhibitory activity, whereas the Ala148Thr polymorphic variant was as effective as the alanine variant of p16INK4 in inhibiting D1/CDK4 kinase activity. Binding assays revealed that inhibition was invariably associated with p16INK4 binding to CDK4. Hence, our studies indicate that minor perturbations in p16INK4 primary structure can lead to loss of its inhibitory activity, possibly contributing to oncogenesis in numerous cell types.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Inducible expression of cyclin D1 in T-47D human breast cancer cells is sufficient for Cdk2 activation and pRB hyperphosphorylation.

The sequential transcriptional activation of cyclins, the regulatory subunits of cell cycle specific kinases, regulates progress through the cell cycle. In mitogen-stimulated cells cyclin D1 induction in early G1 is followed by induction of cyclin E, activation of the cyclin-dependent kinase Cdk2, and hyperphosphorylation of the retinoblastoma gene product (pRB) in mid-to-late G1 phase. T-47D breast cancer cells expressing cyclin D1 under the control of a metal-responsive metallothionein promoter were used to determine whether Cdk2 activation and pRB hyperphosphorylation are consequences of cyclin D1 induction. A 4-5-fold increase in cyclin D1 protein abundance was followed by approximately 2-fold increases in cyclin E protein abundance and Cdk2 activity and by hyperphosphorylation of pRB. These responses were apparent approximately 3 h after the increase in cyclin D1 protein, and approximately 3 h prior to the entry of cyclin D1-stimulated cells into S phase 12 h after zinc treatment. Cyclin D1 immunoprecipitates contained Cdk4 but no detectable Cdk2 and displayed pRb but not histone H1 kinase activity. Cdk2 activation was therefore likely to be due to increased abundance of cyclin E/Cdk2 complexes rather than formation of active cyclin D1/Cdk2 complexes. The sequence of events following zinc induction of cyclin D1 thus mimicked that following mitogen induction of cyclin D1. These data show that cyclin D1 induction is sufficient for Cdk2 activation and pRB hyperphosphorylation in T-47D human breast cancer cells, providing evidence that cyclin D1 induction is a critical event in G1 phase progression.

Breast Neoplasms↗

Cyclins and breast cancer.

Recent advances in the understanding of cell cycle control by cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinases provide a basis for delineating the molecular mechanisms of proliferation control by steroids and the development and progression of hormone-dependent cancers. Cyclin D1 is necessary, rate-limiting and sufficient for G1 progression in breast cancer cells and regulation of cyclin D1 expression or function is an early response to steroid and steroid antagonist regulation of proliferation. The cyclin D1 gene is amplified in approximately 15%, and its product overexpressed in 40-50%, of primary breast carcinomas. The strong evidence that cyclin D1 plays a major role in cell cycle control in breast epithelial cells suggests that its deregulated expression may have effects on disease progression and phenotype including sensitivity to endocrine therapies.

Breast Neoplasms↗

Inverse regulation of oestrogen receptor and epidermal growth factor receptor gene expression in MCF-7 breast cancer cells treated with phorbol ester.

In human breast cancer cell lines, an inverse relationship exists between the basal levels of oestrogen receptor (ER) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGF-R) gene expression. In addition, the tumour-promoting phorbol ester 12-O-tetradecanoyl-phorbol-13-acetate (TPA) inhibits ER and stimulates EGF-R expression in MCF-7 breast cancer cells. This study aimed to define further the potential mechanisms involved in the modulation of ER and EGF-R gene expression by TPA. ER mRNA levels were reduced after 3 h and declined to 30% of control between 12 and 72 h after exposure to 10 nM TPA. This decrease in mRNA levels was preceded by an apparent fall in ER transcription rate. There was no effect on the stability of ER mRNA following pretreatment for 3-24 h with TPA, supporting the conclusion that the fall in ER mRNA levels was predominantly due to a decrease in ER transcription rate. Levels of EGF-R mRNA increased 10-fold by 12 h due predominantly to an increased transcription rate. The TPA-induced decrease in ER mRNA was unaffected by the simultaneous administration of the protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide, whereas the increase in EGF-R mRNA was inhibited by co-incubation with cycloheximide. These data indicate a requirement for continuing protein synthesis for the TPA effect on EGF-R but not on ER mRNA levels. Because the modulation of ER and EGF-R gene expression by TPA is likely to involve the protein kinase C (PKC) signal transduction pathway, the effects of other known activators of PKC were investigated. The non-phorboid tumour promoter mezerein modulated ER (an 80% decrease) and EGF-R (a 20-fold increase) mRNA levels in a similar manner to TPA. In contrast, neither 1,2-dioctanoyl-sn-glycerol (DiC8) nor 1-oleoyl-2-acetyl-sn-glycerol (OAG), both permeant analogues of the endogenous physiological activators of PKC, affected ER and EGF-R mRNA levels. These latter results were not due to a lack of efficacy because a single administration of DiC8 was as effective as TPA in inducing c-fos mRNA at 30 min. However DiC8 was less active in the later induction of c-myc mRNA. These data demonstrate reciprocal regulation of ER and EGF-R gene expression by TPA, involving effects on transcriptional events, which appear to be mediated by sustained activation of PKC.

Breast Neoplasms↗

Expression of the androgen receptor and an androgen-responsive protein, apolipoprotein D, in human breast cancer.

Little is known regarding the activity and function of the androgen receptor (AR) in human breast cancer. In the present study AR was evaluated in untreated primary breast cancers using antisera to the amino- and carboxy-termini of the receptor and quantitated using colour video image analysis. A strong correlation between tissue concentration and percentage AR-positive cells was observed for each antiserum. However, comparison of percentage positive cells using the amino- and carboxy-terminal AR antisera in individual breast cancer specimens revealed a subset of tumours with discordantly increased staining for the carboxy terminus. These findings suggest the presence of amino-terminal-truncated AR in a proportion of breast cancer cells or presence of AR mutations or associated protein alterations that affect binding of the amino-terminal AR antiserum. Immunohistochemical expression of the androgen-regulated glycoprotein, apolipoprotein D (apo-D), was also evaluated in the breast cancer specimens. Focal positivity of apo-D staining, which did not always co-localise with AR-positive cells, was observed within breast tumours. Furthermore, no correlation was evident between percentage positive cells stained for AR and apo-D in breast cancer specimens. These findings indicate that, although apo-D expression is androgen regulated in human breast cancer cell lines in vitro, its expression in primary breast cancers may be regulated by other factors. The expression of AR in primary breast cancers also suggests that the receptor may be involved in tumour responsiveness or in abnormal responses to endocrine therapies.

Adult↗

Differential effects of retinoids and antiestrogens on cell cycle progression and cell cycle regulatory genes in human breast cancer cells.

Retinoids have antiproliferative effects in human breast cancer cells and share some characteristics with antiestrogens, although the molecular targets involved have yet to be identified in either case. Using T-47D human breast cancer cells, we compared the effects of retinoic acid (RA) and the antiestrogen ICI 164384 on cell cycle phase distribution and the expression of genes with known functions in cell cycle control. Both RA and ICI 164384 inhibited cell cycle progression in G1 phase, but the RA effect was delayed by 16 h. This delay in action was also seen with 9-cis RA and other retinoids. Administration of 17 beta-estradiol abolished the effects of ICI 164384 but was without effect in RA-treated cells. Antiestrogen treatment caused a rapid inhibition of c-myc and cyclin D1 gene expression and reduced Cdk2 activity by more than 50% at 24 h. RA, however, did not affect c-myc or cyclin D1 gene expression, nor did it significantly change the mRNA or protein levels of cyclins D3 or E or cyclin-dependent kinases (CDK) Cdk2 or Cdk4. RA-induced reduction in Cdk2 activity was modest and occurred after %S phase declined, while Cdk4 activity was reduced, coincident with cell cycle changes. However, following either RA or ICI 164384, there was a reduction in the amount of hyperphosphorylated pRB, first apparent well before cell cycle changes were seen. These data demonstrate that: (a) the mechanisms of action of antiestrogens and retinoids are different but converge at pRB; and (b) RA can affect CDK activity without reducing cyclin or CDK levels.

Breast Neoplasms↗

D-penicillamine causes free radical-dependent inactivation of activator protein-1 DNA binding.

D-Penicillamine (beta, beta-dimethyl cysteine) is an antirheumatic thiol drug with a poorly understood mechanism of action. On the basis that gold(I) thiolates and D-penicillamine are both capable of forming stable bonds with endogenous thiols, we sought a common target of action. Cysteine residues in the basic DNA binding domains of Jun and Fos, members of the activator protein-1 (AP-1) transcription factor family, have been identified as likely targets for the therapeutic action of antirheumatic gold(I) thiolates. The current study demonstrates that AP-1 DNA binding is inhibited by D-penicillamine in the presence of Fenton reagents (Fe2+/EDTA and H2O2) but not with either agent alone. The effect is biphasic, with maximum inhibition in the concentration range of approximately 100-250 microM. Cysteine has qualitatively similar properties, although the effect is less pronounced. In contrast, glutathione and thiomalate do not inhibit AP-1 DNA binding, even in the presence of Fenton reagents. Mutant proteins were used to identify the cysteine residues within the DNA binding domains of Jun and Fos that are essential for the inhibitory action of D-penicillamine. The results suggest that D-penicillamine is distinguished from other thiols by its formation of sulfur-containing radicals capable of inhibiting AP-1 DNA binding by a mechanism involving the cysteine residues of Jun and Fos.

Breast Neoplasms↗

Cyclin D1 and estrogen receptor messenger RNA levels are positively correlated in primary breast cancer.

The CCND1 gene, encoding the cell cycle regulatory protein cyclin D1, maps to chromosome 11q13, a locus that is amplified in about 13% of breast cancers. Because several studies have indicated a relationship between 11q13 amplification and markers of phenotype including estrogen receptor (ER) status, we tested the relationship between CCND1 and ER gene expression in 364 primary breast cancers using Northern blot analysis. Seventy-three % of samples were positive for ER mRNA, and cyclin D1 mRNA levels in the ER-positive group were significantly higher than those in the ER-negative group (P = 0.0001). When the samples were divided into quartiles of cyclin D1 expression, 58% of samples were ER positive in the lowest quartile and 87% in the highest quartile. The tumors expressing the highest levels of cyclin D1 (7%) were all ER positive. Furthermore, ER mRNA levels in the half with lower cyclin D1 mRNA were significantly less than in the half with higher cyclin D1 levels (P = 0.0001). Using simple regression analysis, there was a significant positive correlation between cyclin D1 and ER mRNA levels in the total population (P = 0.0001). This study demonstrates that cyclin D1 mRNA and ER mRNA are positively correlated in primary breast cancer, but the functional relationship between these genes remains to be elucidated.

Breast Neoplasms↗

Cyclin DI amplification is not associated with reduced overall survival in primary breast cancer but may predict early relapse in patients with features of good prognosis.

Amplification of chromosome 11q13 is frequently observed in human malignancies, including breast cancers. A candidate oncogene at this locus is the CCND1 gene, which encodes the cell cycle regulatory protein cyclin D1. Because published data on the relationship between 11q13 amplification and prognosis in breast cancer have been controversial, we investigated the clinical significance of CCND1 amplification and its association with established clinicopathological features of prognosis in 1014 primary breast cancer patients. Amplification of the CCND1 gene and the INT-2/FGF-3 gene, which also maps to 11q13, was 10% and 17%, respectively. There were no associations between CCND1 or INT-2 amplification and patient age, tumor size, tumor grade, axillary lymph node status, HER/neu amplification, MIB-1 monoclonal antibody to Ki67 antigen count, or p53 expression. CCND1 amplification was predominantly observed in hormone receptor-positive tumors; at a copy number >/=3, CCND1 amplification was significantly correlated with both estrogen receptor (ER; P = 0.036) and progesterone receptor (P = 0.012) positivity. After a median follow-up period of 66 months, CCND1 or INT-2 amplification was not associated with significant increases in relapse or death from breast cancer. However, in the node-negative and ER-positive subgroups, there was a trend for an increased relapse rate in patients with INT-2 or CCND1 amplification. Thus, in this study, assessment of CCND1 or INT-2 amplification at 11q13 by slot-blot hybridization was of little use in determining phenotype or disease outcome in the whole group of patients but had a potential role in identifying a subset of poor-prognosis patients within the node-negative or ER-positive, good-prognosis groups. Because the prevalence of CCND1 amplification is much lower than the reported prevalence of cyclin D1 overexpression, additional studies are required to determine the true prognostic significance of altered cyclin D1 expression in breast cancer.

Adult↗

Preferential stimulation of human progesterone receptor B expression by estrogen in T-47D human breast cancer cells.

Human progesterone receptor (PR) expression is controlled by two promoter regions giving rise to transcripts encoding PR A and B proteins. It is unknown whether estrogen and progesterone, the major physiological modulators of PR expression, exert their effects equally on the PR promoters. The aim of this study was to analyze estrogen and progestin effects on PR promoters, PR-encoding transcripts, and PR A and B proteins in T-47D human breast cancer cells. The progestin ORG 2058 caused a prolonged decrease in transcription of the PR gene and also abrogated estrogen stimulation of PR transcription. Estradiol (E2) treatment increased the activity of the B but not the A promoter transfected into T-47D cells. ORG 2058 had no effect on the basal or E2-stimulated activity of either promoter. E2 caused a preferential increase in transcripts derived from promoter B, whereas progestins decreased the levels of all PR transcripts. E2 preferentially increased the concentration of the PR B protein and caused a decrease in the PR A/B ratio. This demonstration that estrogen and progestin independently control the synthesis of transcripts arising from the PR promoters and that estrogen alters the cellular PR A/B ratio provides possible mechanisms underlying the cell and tissue specificity of PR regulation.

Breast Neoplasms↗

Expression of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors p16INK4, p15INK4B and p21WAF1/CIP1 in human breast cancer.

Aberrant cyclin expression has been implicated in oncogenesis in a number of human cancers. Since altered function of regulators of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) activity other than cyclins, in particular CDK inhibitors, might play a similar role in oncogenesis, we examined the expression and regulation of the CDK inhibitors p16INK4, p15INK4B and p21WAF1/CIP1 in human breast cancer cell lines. Both the INK4 and INK4B genes were homozygously deleted in 3 cell lines, while INK4 alone was deleted in 2 cell lines. A further 2 cell lines displayed loss of an allele at this locus, and in 1 of these the remaining allele contained a mis-sense mutation within the coding region of the p16INK4 protein. The majority of cell lines examined, including 2 normal mammary epithelial cell strains, expressed low levels of INK4 mRNA and low or undetectable levels of INK4B mRNA. However, INK4 mRNA was expressed at high levels in 5 cell lines, and this was associated with deletion or inactivation of the retinoblastoma susceptibility gene product pRB but not with mutation of TP53. No deletions of the WAF1/CIP1 gene were observed, but WAF1/CIP1 mRNA levels were reduced in cell lines with TP53 mutation. Transfection of a p16INK4 expression vector into MDA-MB-231 cells lacking the INK4 gene failed to produce any p16INK4-expressing cell lines, suggesting that such cells were selected against in continuous culture. Despite the frequent deletion of INK4 in breast cancer cell lines, no evidence was obtained for INK4 deletions in DNA from 45 primary breast carcinomas. Thus, homozygous deletion of the INK4 gene appears to be a rare event in primary breast cancer.

Base Sequence↗

The pure antiestrogen ICI 182,780 binds to a high-affinity site distinct from the estrogen receptor.

Both estrogen receptor-positive (ER+), tamoxifen-sensitive (5-21) and tamoxifen-resistant (5-23) subclones of the parental MCF-7 breast cancer cell line were used in competitive ligand binding studies involving either [3H]ICI 182,780 or 4-OH-[3H]tamoxifen (4OHT) displacement by unlabelled estradiol (E2) or the antiestrogens (AE) 4OHT and ICI 182,780. Neither radioligand was displaced significantly by E2 over a range of concentrations; binding was predominantly inhibited by the corresponding radio-inert ligand. Scatchard analysis of the data revealed that the binding capacities of both cell lines for ICI 182,780 were approximately 7-fold greater than the previously determined number of ER sites per cell, with the affinity being an order of magnitude less than that of E2 for ER. No difference was found between the TAM-sensitive and -resistant cells in their binding of either AE. When cells were preincubated with either E2, TAM or 4OHT at a high, fixed concentration to block the ER or AE binding sites (AEBS), respectively, displaceable binding of [3H]ICI 182,780 was still observed, indicating binding at a site other than the classical ER or previously described AEBS. Our results suggest that there is a specific, saturable and relatively high-affinity binding site for ICI 182,780 in MCF 5-21 and MCF 5-23 breast cancer cells. However, the physiological relevance of this binding site requires further clarification because in cell growth assays, E2 (at 1/10 the dose of ICI 182,780) overcame the inhibitory effect of the antiestrogen in both of the cell lines.

Binding Sites↗

Inhibition of AP-1 binding and transcription by gold and selenium involving conserved cysteine residues in Jun and Fos.

Gold(I) salts and selenite, which have diverse therapeutic and biological effects, are noted for their reactivity with thiols. Since the binding of Jun-Jun and Jun-Fos dimers to the AP-1 DNA binding site is regulated in vitro by a redox process involving conserved cysteine residues, we hypothesized that some of the biological actions of gold and selenium are mediated via these residues. In electrophoretic mobility-shift analyses, AP-1 DNA binding was inhibited by gold(I) thiolates and selenite, with 50% inhibition occurring at approximately 5 microM and 1 microM, respectively. Thiomalic acid had no effect in the absence of gold(I), and other metal ions inhibited at higher concentrations, in a rank order correlating with their thiol binding affinities. Cysteine-to-serine mutants demonstrated that these effects of gold(I) and selenite require Cys272 and Cys154 in the DNA-binding domains of Jun and Fos, respectively. Gold(I) thiolates and selenite did not inhibit nonspecific protein binding to the AP-1 site and were at least an order of magnitude less potent as inhibitors of sequence-specific binding to the AP-2, TFIID, or NF1 sites compared with the AP-1 site. In addition, 10 microM gold(I) or 10 microM selenite inhibited expression of an AP-1-dependent reporter gene, but not an AP-2-dependent reporter gene. These data suggest a mechanism regulating transcription factor activity by inorganic ions which may contribute to the known antiarthritic action of gold and cancer chemoprevention by selenium.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Steroidal regulation of cell cycle progression.

Sex steroid hormones and their antagonists have well-defined mitogenic and growth-inhibitory effects on target cells including cancer cells. These effects are mediated by cell cycle phase-specific actions, implying that steroids control rates of cell cycle progression by regulating the expression of key cell cycle regulatory genes. An emerging model of cell cycle control involves transcriptional induction of cyclin genes and consequent activation of cyclin-dependent kinases, which initiate cellular events necessary to complete checkpoints within the cell cycle. Our recent studies have focused on the roles of G1 cyclins, particularly cyclin D1, in the control of cell cycle progression in human breast cancer cells. These studies show that cyclin D1 induction is an early response to mitogenic stimulation by oestrogens and progestins, is rate-limiting for G1 progression and is sufficient for completion of the cell cycle in cells arrested in early G1 phase by serum deprivation. Furthermore, inhibition of cyclin D1 expression is an early response to growth-inhibitory anti-oestrogens. These results suggest that cyclin D1 is a target for regulation of cell cycle progression by sex steroids and their antagonists.

Breast Neoplasms↗

Antiestrogen inhibition of cell cycle progression in breast cancer cells in associated with inhibition of cyclin-dependent kinase activity and decreased retinoblastoma protein phosphorylation.

To define the mechanisms by which antiestrogens inhibit breast cancer cell proliferation, the effects of the antiestrogen ICI 182780 on G1 cyclins and their cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) partners were investigated in MCF-7 cells. Inhibition of entry into S phase became evident 9 h after treatment, with the proportion of cells in S phase reaching a minimum by 24 h. ICI 182780 increased the proportion of the hypophosphorylated, growth inhibitory form of the retinoblastoma protein (pRB). This change began at 4-6 h, preceding effects on S phase. This suggests that there are early effects on the activities of CDKs that target pRB that are not merely a consequence of changes in cell cycle progression. The kinase activity of Cdk2 decreased to low levels at 18-24 h when changes in S phase and pRB phosphorylation were well advanced. An earlier effect was seen on kinase activity associated with immunoprecipitated cyclin D1, which was reduced approximately 40% by 12 h, with further decreases at 18-24 h. Cdk2 and Cdk4 protein levels remained constant over 24 h. Cyclin D1 messenger RNA and protein were down-regulated by ICI 182780 from 2 h, with levels halved at 8 h. ICI 182780 also increased the expression of the CDK inhibitors p27KIP1 and p21WAF1/CIP1 at later times. These observations are compatible with the hypothesis that antiestrogens block entry of cells into S phase and inhibit cell proliferation as the consequence of an early decline in pRB phosphorylation contributed to by reduced cyclin D1/Cdk4 activity. At later times, increased CDK inhibitor abundance may act to repress Cdk2 and Cdk4 activities, causing additional reductions in pRB phosphorylation, thus maintaining the antiestrogen blockade of cell cycle progression.

Breast Neoplasms↗

Differential expression of oestrogen regulated genes in breast cancer.

Pathological endpoints such as tumour size, lymph node status and vascular invasion remain the most useful guides in selecting treatment strategies for breast cancer. There is a need, however, to further investigate the molecular mechanisms that determine the properties of an individual tumour e.g., hormone responsiveness and probability of metastasis. While numerous prognostic factors have now been identified few have contributed to defining clinical response to therapy. Oestrogen-regulated genes are likely to be important since they not only define a functional oestrogen receptor, but alterations in their expression might provide insights into the mechanisms involved in tumour progression and loss of endocrine sensitivity. Recently an oestrogen responsive gene, pLIV1, has been isolated and shown to be expressed in ER+ disease where it appears to predict nodal involvement. The present paper describes aspects of its regulation and discusses the potential role of this and other genes in the development of endocrine resistance.

Breast Neoplasms↗