PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R L Sutherland

Publications and source records attributed to R L Sutherland.

At least 109 records · Page 6Linked to original sources
PubMed1992

Regulation of androgen receptor gene expression by steroids and retinoic acid in human breast-cancer cells.

Although the androgen receptor (AR) has been detected by ligand-binding assays, there is little known about the expression and regulation of the AR gene in human breast-cancer cells. AR mRNA, measured by Northern analysis in 18 cell lines, was found to be expressed predominantly in oestrogen- and progesterone-receptor-positive (ER+, PR+) lines as a single species of approximately 10.5 kb but was also comparatively abundant in I ER- and PR-negative cell line, MDA-MB-453. Dexamethasone (Dex), Organon 2058 (Org 2058), dihydrotestosterone (DHT), and all-trans-retinoic acid (RA) down-regulated AR mRNA levels in T-47D (ER+, PR+) cells 6 hr after treatment, whereas oestradiol (E2) had no effect. In MDA-MB-453 (ER-, PR-) cells, regulation of AR mRNA by RA differed from the other cell lines: RA increased the level of AR mRNA. DHT-binding assays indicated a corresponding increase in AR protein. Transfection of the androgen-responsive mouse mammary tumour virus long-terminal repeat (MMTV LTR) linked to a chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) reporter gene was used to examine the effect of altered AR levels on androgen action. The increased level of AR following RA pre-treatment in MDA-MB-453 cells resulted in enhanced induction of CAT activity by DHT and, conversely, a decrease in the level of AR following RA pretreatment in T-47D cells resulted in reduced induction of CAT activity by DHT. These data demonstrate that AR is expressed predominantly in ER+ and PR+ cell lines and its expression is regulated by ligands also known to regulate ER or PR, including progestins and retinoids. Androgen responsiveness measured by a transfected reporter gene was altered according to the extent of up- or down-regulation of AR expression, demonstrating that responsiveness is dependent on receptor concentration.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed1992

Effect of sodium butyrate on estrogen receptor and epidermal growth factor receptor gene expression in human breast cancer cell lines.

Estrogen receptor (ER) binding has been shown to decrease in breast cancer cell lines exposed to sodium butyrate; however, the underlying mechanisms are unknown. In MCF-7 breast cancer cells, butyrate caused a rapid time- and concentration-dependent decrease in ER mRNA levels, apparent by 3 h at 3 mM butyrate. ER gene transcription rate was decreased and cycloheximide co-treatment did not relieve this inhibitory effect, suggesting that the butyrate effect was not dependent on ongoing protein synthesis. In both MCF-7 and T-47D cells the decrease in ER mRNA was mirrored by an increase in the level of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGF-R) mRNA. A marked inverse relationship exists between ER and EGF-R in human breast cancer biopsies and cell lines, and the reciprocal modulation of these genes by butyrate suggests that the expression of ER and EGF-R may be co-regulated. This relationship was further investigated in lines expressing only one or the other receptor. In the ER-positive EGF-R-negative line, MDA-MB-134-VI, butyrate exposure decreased ER mRNA levels, implying that the regulation of ER mRNA by butyrate is independent of EGF-R expression. However, butyrate decreased EGF-R mRNA in two ER-negative lines, MDA-MB-231 and HBL-100. As this effect differed from that in ER-positive lines, the regulation of EGF-R may depend on the expression of ER. The possibility that ER and EGF-R gene expression are closely linked has implications in the understanding of progression of human breast cancers to a hormone-independent phenotype and for the use of ER and EGF-R levels as independent prognostic indicators.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed1992

Expression and regulation of retinoic acid receptors in human breast cancer cells.

Retinoic acid is known to inhibit mammary carcinogenesis in rodents and to inhibit proliferation and steroid hormone receptor gene expression in human breast cancer cells. Since these effects are likely to be mediated by nuclear retinoic acid receptors (RARs) the present study was initiated to determine the expression and regulation of RARs in human breast cancer cell lines. Differential cellular gene expression of the RARs was determined by Northern blot analysis of total RNA prepared from 5 ER+ and 6 ER- cell lines. RAR alpha was detected as mRNA species of 2.7 and 3.4 kilobases in all cell lines and the level of gene expression was greater in ER+ cell lines (P less than 0.001). RAR beta mRNA (3.7 kilobases) was detected in seven of the eleven lines tested and was expressed most commonly in ER- cell lines. RAR gamma mRNA was expressed in all cell lines as a transcript of 3.4 kilobases at levels that were similar in both ER+ and ER- cell lines. Retinoic acid failed to regulate the expression of the RAR alpha and RAR gamma genes. The effect of steroid hormones on RAR alpha and RAR gamma mRNA levels was also examined. In four PR+ cell lines (T-47D, BT 474, MCF-7M, and MDA-MB-361), progestins markedly decreased RAR alpha mRNA levels. The progestin effect on RAR alpha levels in T-47D cells was detectable at concentrations of 0.05 nM and was maximal at 1 nM 16 alpha-ethyl-21-hydroxy-19-nor-4-pregnene-3,20-dione ORG 2058, whereas dihydrotestosterone and dexamethasone were without effect. RAR alpha and RAR gamma mRNA levels were rapidly decreased by progestin, and the effect was maximal 3-6 h after ORG 2058 treatment. However, the mRNA loss was transient, and recovery of RAR alpha and RAR gamma mRNA levels was noted 12-24 h after retinoic acid treatment. Although RAR gamma mRNA returned to control levels by 24 h, the decrease in RAR alpha mRNA was maintained at around 50% control until at least 48 h. In summary, RAR alpha and RAR gamma were expressed in all human breast cancer cell lines and were regulated by progestins in the PR+ T-47D cell line. The previously reported ability of retinoic acid to down-regulate PR mRNA and the present demonstration that progestins down-regulate RAR alpha and RAR gamma mRNA suggest that mutual regulation may be a mechanism through which PR and the RARs interact in human breast cancer cells.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed1992

Androgen regulation of prolactin-receptor gene expression in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-453 human breast cancer cells.

Lactogenic hormones which bind to the PRLR are likely to be growth-stimulatory in human breast-cancer cells. Oestrogen and progesterone control cellular expression of the PRLR; however, elevated androgen levels in some breast-cancer patients raised the possibility that androgens may also influence breast-cancer sensitivity to lactogenic hormones. This study investigated whether androgens could affect expression of the PRLR in the MCF-7 breast-cancer cell line. PRLR binding activity was increased approximately 2-fold by treatment for 24 hr with 10 nM R1881, TEST, DHT, MPA and ORG 2058. Northern analysis indicated that DHT also increased the level of PRLR mRNA. The antiprogesterone, RU 38486, displaced tritiated ORG 2058 binding but not tritiated DHT binding to MCF-7 cells; it completely antagonized ORG 2058 and partially antagonized R1881 induction of the PRLR, but had no effect on induction by DHT. The anti-androgen, RU 23908, displaced tritiated DHT binding but not tritiated ORG 2058 binding, and antagonized DHT and R1881 induction of PRLR but not induction of the PRLR by ORG 2058. These data indicated that ORG 2058 acting via the PR and DHT acting via the AR were able to induce PRLR expression in MCF-7 cells. In MDA-MB-453 cells, which express the AR but not the ER or PR, DHT and R1881 increased PRLR binding to 150% of control values at 0.1 nM. ORG 2058 was ineffective, demonstrating androgen induction of PRLR in the absence of PR and ER. These data indicate that PRLR can be regulated by androgens in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-453 human breast-cancer cells.

Androgens↗
PubMed1992

Coordinate regulation of oestrogen and prolactin receptor expression by sodium butyrate in human breast cancer cells.

Prolactin receptor and oestrogen receptor are co-ordinately expressed in human breast cancer cell lines and in human breast tumour biopsies, leading to the suggestion that the expression of these receptors may be coupled. To examine this hypothesis, T-47D and MCF-7 human breast cancer cells were treated with sodium butyrate, a known modulator of oestrogen receptor levels, and the changes in oestrogen and prolactin receptor mRNA and binding activity were measured. In both cell lines treatment with 0.3-10 mM sodium butyrate resulted in a parallel decrease in prolactin and oestrogen receptor mRNA levels and binding activity. In T-47D cells, where the effect was transient, mRNA levels of both receptors recovered in parallel. These data indicated that oestrogen receptor and prolactin receptor gene expression is modulated in parallel by sodium butyrate and supported the hypothesis that the expression of these two receptors is coupled.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed1992

Regulation of breast cancer cell cycle progression by growth factors, steroids and steroid antagonists.

The control of human breast cancer cell proliferation in vitro is known to involve complex interactions between steroid hormones, peptide hormones and growth factors. Little is known, however, of the mechanisms by which these factors, alone or in combination, control cell cycle progression and the expression of specific genes involved in cell cycle control. A pre-requisite for such studies is a cellular system in which non-proliferating or slowly proliferating cells can be maintained in a defined environment and stimulated to progress through the cell cycle by addition of hormones and growth factors. Such a system has been developed for T-47D human breast cancer cells: quiescent or slowly proliferating cells maintained in a serum-free medium can be stimulated to increase their rate of cell cycle progression upon a single addition of insulin, IGF-I, EGF, TGF alpha or bFGF. Oestradiol alone was ineffective but caused a significant increase in % S phase cells when added in the presence of insulin. Progestins, in the presence of absence of insulin, had a biphasic effect with an initial increase in cell cycle progression followed by cell cycle arrest. Both antioestrogens and the antiprogestin, RU 486, in the absence of oestrogen or progestin, were potent inhibitors of insulin-induced proliferation. Increases in cell cycle progression were invariably accompanied by acute increases in c-fos and c-myc mRNA levels. Induction of c-myc by oestrogen and progestin was inhibited by antioestrogens and RU 486, respectively. These data illustrate that the culture of breast cancer cells in a serum-free, chemically defined environment provides an excellent model in which to define the role of individual factors involved in breast cancer growth control. The biological data derived from this system provide a basis for identifying and characterizing genes involved in the control of cell cycle progression in human breast cancer.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed1992

Oestrogen receptor gene structure and function in breast cancer.

The mechanisms underlying loss of oestrogen responsiveness in breast cancer are not well-defined. Potential mechanisms include loss of receptor expression, alterations in the oestrogen receptor (ER) gene producing proteins with abnormal function, or changes to receptor-dependent or -independent pathways controlling cell proliferation. Examination by Southern analysis of the ER gene in a series of ER-negative and -positive breast tumour biopsies failed to provide evidence of gross rearrangements and in only one of thirty seven tumour DNA samples was significant gene amplification observed. No restriction fragment length polymorphisms were detected for the restriction enzymes EcoR I, Pst I or Hind III. Methylation of the ER gene as assessed by Hpa II and Msp I restriction enzyme digests varied between tumours but the degree of methylation was not correlated with levels of expression of the receptor protein. Similar findings applied in a series of ER-negative and -positive breast cancer cell lines and clonal lines of MCF-7 cells, which were developed as an in vitro model for the acquisition of oestrogen and antioestrogen resistance. In this model there was no evidence that changes to ER receptor function and/or structure at the level of the ER gene, mRNA, ligand binding, and ability to induce progesterone receptor might account for the development of hormone resistance. However, the ability of ER to interact with a DNA sequence containing the vitellogenin promoter oestrogen response element, as assessed by gel retardation assay, was impaired in the clone showing the greatest degree of oestrogen and antioestrogen resistance.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1992

The effect of progestins on prolactin receptor gene transcription in human breast cancer cells.

The sex steroid hormone progesterone modulates the developmental and lactogenic activity of prolactin in the mammary gland. Regulation of the level of prolactin receptor (PRLR) provides one possible mechanism by which this may occur, prompting this investigation of the molecular mechanisms involved in progestin regulation of prolactin receptor levels. Treatment of T-47D and MCF-7 human breast cancer cells with 10 nM of the synthetic progestin ORG 2058 for 24 hr resulted in an increase in all four PRLR mRNA transcripts detected. The effect of ORG 2058 was shown in T-47D cells to be time- and concentration-dependent and resulted in an approximate two-fold increase in PRLR mRNA after 24 hr of treatment with 10 nM or 100 nM ORG 2058. Nuclear run-on assays indicated that ORG 2058 increased the rate of T-47D PRLR gene transcription at all times between 1 hr and 28 hr of treatment. The protein synthesis inhibitors cycloheximide and puromycin abrogated the induction of PRLR gene transcription at 1 hr and 2 hr, which demonstrated that on-going protein synthesis was required for the ORG 2058 effect and suggested that progestins may exert some transcriptional effects via the induction of an intermediary protein. These experiments demonstrated that progestin induced a transcriptionally based increase in PRLR gene expression and provided a mechanism by which progesterone may modulate the mitogenic activity of prolactin during mammary gland development.

Autoradiography↗
PubMed1992

Transcriptional regulation of prolactin receptor gene expression by sodium butyrate in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells.

The prolactin receptor (PRLR) mediates the diverse effects of prolactin, which in the mammary gland include the development of lobuloalveolar structures and increased tumor cell proliferation. Treatment of mammary carcinoma cells with the differentiating agent sodium butyrate (NaB) is known to reduce PRLR binding activity and PRLR gene expression, however the mechanism which mediates these changes is unknown, prompting this investigation. Using MCF-7 human breast cancer cells, assay of the rate of PRLR gene transcription by the nuclear run-on technique indicated that 3 mM NaB reduced PRLR gene transcription by 50% after 3 h of treatment and that this effect was maintained for at least 24 h. The protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide failed to abrogate this effect, which indicated that NaB did not require continuing protein synthesis to reduce the rate of PRLR transcription. Measurement of PRLR mRNA stability, using Northern blot analysis at various times after the inhibition of transcription with actinomycin D, showed that NaB treatment did not alter PRLR mRNA half-life. These results indicate that NaB inhibits PRLR gene expression by a transcriptional mechanism that does not require continuing protein synthesis.

Blotting, Northern↗
PubMed1991

Direct transcriptional regulation of the progesterone receptor by retinoic acid diminishes progestin responsiveness in the breast cancer cell line T-47D.

Retinoic acid (RA) treatment of T-47D human breast cancer cells results in a rapid decrease in the concentration of progesterone receptor (PR) mRNA which causes a slow loss of cellular PR protein (Clarke, C. L., Roman, S. D., Graham, J., Koga, M., Sutherland, R. L. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 12694-12700). The mechanisms involved are unknown and this study was undertaken to determine whether the decline in PR mRNA was due to transcriptional inhibition and to evaluate the functional consequences of the RA-mediated decrease in PR. The transcription rate of the PR gene was decreased by RA, and the effect was maximal 2-3 h after treatment. Cycloheximide cotreatment was unable to relieve the inhibitory effect of RA and PR transcription suggesting that the effect was not dependent on ongoing protein synthesis. There was no effect of RA on PR mRNA half-life at the times examined (0-6 h of RA treatment). To determine the functional consequence of PR down-regulation the progestin-responsive plasmid pMSG-CAT was expressed transiently in T-47D cells which were then exposed to RA for 24 h. RA-pretreated cells were then treated with the synthetic progestin ORG 2058 and the extent of progestin stimulation of chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) activity measured. ORG 2058 treatment resulted in an induction of CAT activity which was maximal at a progestin concentration of 1 nM. Interestingly, the ability of ORG 2058 to induce CAT activity was decreased in RA-pretreated cells. The diminished progestin responsiveness of RA-pretreated cells was confirmed in separate experiments which showed that the progestin inducibility of TGF-alpha mRNA was also decreased in cells treated with ORG 2058 following pretreatment with RA for 24 h. These data demonstrate that RA decreases PR mRNA concentrations by direct transcriptional inhibition, leading to decreased cellular PR concentrations. The decreased levels of PR result in impaired responsiveness to progestins and this suggests that RA derived from dietary vitamin A may have a role in modulating cellular sensitivity to progestins.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed1991

Retinoic acid acts synergistically with 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 or antioestrogen to inhibit T-47D human breast cancer cell proliferation.

Although retinoic acid has been shown to inhibit proliferation in human breast cancer cells, the mechanisms by which these effects are mediated are not known. Since several steroid hormones and their synthetic antagonists also inhibit proliferation of human breast cancer cells, we investigated the interactions between retinoic acid, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 [1,25-(OH)2D3] and antioestrogens in the control of human breast cancer cell proliferation in vitro. When T-47D cells, the most sensitive of six human breast cancer cell lines to the growth inhibitory effects of retinoic acid, were treated with retinoic acid and 1,25-(OH)2D3, a synergistic inhibitory effect on cell growth was observed. Retinoic acid also enhanced the growth inhibitory effect of various antioestrogens (4-hydroxytamoxifen, 4-hydroxyclomiphene or LY117018). However, retinoic acid did not affect oestradiol-induced growth stimulation. Measurement of the cellular receptors for 1,25-(OH)2D3 and oestrogen revealed no significant change in receptor levels following treatment with concentrations of retinoic acid which modulated growth. These results indicate that retinoic acid not only has direct growth inhibitory effects on breast cancer cell proliferation but also augments the effects of some other known regulators of breast cancer cell replication including 1,25-(OH)2D3 and antioestrogens. Synergism appears to involve interactions with steroid hormone action distinct from changes in steroid hormone receptor levels.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed1991

Progestins both stimulate and inhibit breast cancer cell cycle progression while increasing expression of transforming growth factor alpha, epidermal growth factor receptor, c-fos, and c-myc genes.

This study documents a biphasic change in the rate of cell cycle progression and proliferation of T-47D human breast cancer cells treated with synthetic progestins, consisting of an initial transient acceleration in transit through G1, followed by cell cycle arrest and growth inhibition. Both components of the response were mediated via the progesterone receptor. The data are consistent with a model in which the action of progestins is to accelerate cells already progressing through G1, which are then arrested early in G1 after completing a round of replication, as are cells initially in other phases of the cell cycle. Such acceleration implies that progestins act on genes or gene products which are rate limiting for cell cycle progression. Increased production of epidermal growth factor and transforming growth factor alpha, putative autocrine growth factors in breast cancer cells, does not appear to account for the initial response to progestins, since although the mRNA abundance for these growth factors is rapidly induced by progestins, cells treated with epidermal growth factor or transforming growth factor alpha did not enter S phase until 5 to 6 h later than those stimulated by progestin. The proto-oncogenes c-fos and c-myc were rapidly but transiently induced by progestin treatment, paralleling the well-known response of these genes to mitogenic signals in other cell types. The progestin antagonist RU 486 inhibited progestin regulation of both cell cycle progression and c-myc expression, suggesting that this proto-oncogene may participate in growth modulation by progestins.

Blotting, Northern↗
PubMed1991

Inhibition of DNA binding and transcriptional activity of a nuclear receptor transcription factor by aurothiomalate and other metal ions.

The antirheumatic gold salt aurothiomalate (AuTM) has cellular actions that are consistent with modulation of gene expression. We have tested the hypothesis that an important mode of action of AuTM is inhibition of binding of certain transcription factors to regulatory elements in DNA. The chemistry of transcription factors containing the zinc finger motif makes them candidates for such an interaction with AuTM. In this regard, the interaction of a steroid hormone receptor, the progesterone receptor (PR), with its DNA response element (PRE) was chosen as a suitable model. Nuclear extracts of T-47D human breast cancer cells rich in PR were incubated with radiolabeled PRE, and binding was determined by gel retardation assay. Preincubation of nuclear extract with AuTM caused a concentration-dependent inhibition of binding of PR to PRE (IC50, approximately 3 microM). Other metal ions inhibited binding at higher concentrations, in a rank order correlating with their binding affinity for thiols. Thiomalic acid had no effect in the absence of gold in this system. To test the effect of AuTM on PR-mediated transcription, we transfected the progestin-inducible expression vector pMSG-CAT into T-47D cells. Transfected cells were incubated in the absence or presence of AuTM and treated with the synthetic progestin ORG2058, to induce chloramphenicol acetyl transferase (CAT) activity. With 10 and 100 microM AuTM, there was inhibition to 67 +/- 3% (p = 0.012) and 42 +/- 8% (p = 0.008) of CAT specific activity, respectively, compared with controls. These results demonstrate that AuTM can regulate gene expression and that inhibition of binding of a transcription factor to its response element is a likely mechanism. This provides a molecular model for further study of the antirheumatic action of gold salts.

Cell Nucleus↗
PubMed1990

Steroid hormone receptor gene expression in human breast cancer cells: inverse relationship between oestrogen and glucocorticoid receptor messenger RNA levels.

The relative expression in human breast cancer cells of messenger ribonucleic acids (mRNA) encoding different steroid hormone receptors is unknown. Accordingly, mRNA levels in total RNA extracted from 13 human breast cancer cell lines were measured by Northern analysis employing complementary DNA probes for the human oestrogen (ER), progesterone (PR), androgen (AR), vitamin D3 (VDR) and glucocorticoid receptors (GR). The 7 ER+ lines expressed a single 6.4 kilobases (kb) ER mRNA. Interestingly, low concentrations of ER mRNA were detected in the ER- cell lines, MDA-MB-330 and BT 20. PR mRNA, predominantly a 13.5 kb species, was expressed in the 6 lines known to be ER+, PR+ by radioligand binding; however, one ER+ cell line, MDA-MB-134, failed to express PR mRNA. A 10.5 kb AR mRNA was expressed at significantly higher levels in ER+ than ER- cell lines. All cell lines expressed a single 4.6 kb mRNA for VDR and a single 7.4 kb mRNA for GR. ER and PR mRNA levels were positively correlated (p = 0.011) and each was positively correlated with androgen receptor (AR) mRNA levels (p less than or equal to 0.009). ER, PR and AR mRNAs were negatively associated with GR levels (p less than or equal to 0.012), while ER and AR mRNA levels were negatively correlated with mRNA for the epidermal growth factor receptor. In contrast, levels of VDR mRNA were unrelated to the concentration of any other steroid receptor mRNA. Our data demonstrate the coordinate expression of ER, PR and AR genes, and an inverse relationship between sex steroid hormone receptor and GR gene expression in human breast cancer cell lines.

Blotting, Northern↗
PubMed1990

Differential effects of phorbol ester on epidermal growth factor receptors in estrogen receptor-positive and -negative breast cancer cell lines.

A previous study from this laboratory (Koga et al., Cancer Res., 48: 2734-2739, 1988) demonstrated that the growth inhibitory effect of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 in human breast cancer cells in vitro was associated with a decline in the concentration of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGF-R). In the present study experiments were undertaken with the phorbol ester, 12-O-tetradecanoyl-phorbol-13-acetate (TPA), an agent known to decrease EGF-R binding, in order to further define the relationship between changes in EGF-R binding and changes in growth rates in 10 human breast cancer cell lines. Treatment with TPA decreased the rate of cell proliferation in all cell lines except BT 474 in which a slight increase in proliferation rate was observed. Sensitivity to TPA was unrelated to estrogen receptor (ER) status and a wide spectrum of sensitivities was apparent. The concentrations of TPA that produced a 25% decrease in cell number ranged from less than 0.25 nM for MCF 7M and BT 20 cells to greater than 10 nM for the HBL 100, T 47D, and ZR 75-1 cell lines. Growth inhibition was associated with a block in cell cycle progression in the G1 and G2 + M phases of the cell cycle. In all cell lines studied, except BT 474, TPA treatment resulted in a reduction in the ability of cells to bind EGF. Saturation analysis revealed marked differences between the effects of TPA on EGF binding in ER+ and ER- cell lines. In ER+ cell lines, 2-h treatment with 10 nM TPA resulted in a marked reduction in the number of high affinity EGF-R sites and a significant decrease in binding affinity. Among this group of cell lines there was a significant positive correlation between the ability of TPA to decrease cell growth and the TPA-induced decrease in the number of EGF-R sites/cell (r = 0.82, P less than 0.03). In ER- cell lines, TPA-induced growth inhibition and the minor changes in EGF-R concentration were unrelated. However, growth inhibition was negatively correlated with TPA-induced changes in apparent affinity of the EGF-R (r = 1.00, P less than 0.003) and in the same rank order as the EGF-R concentration in control cells. These data demonstrate differential relationships between TPA-induced changes in growth and EGF-R binding in ER+ and ER- breast cancer cells, thus supporting the view that growth regulatory pathways are markedly different in these two subtypes of human breast cancer.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed1990

Progesterone receptor regulation by retinoic acid in the human breast cancer cell line T-47D.

Data are presented which document the first known effect of retinoic acid on progesterone receptor (PR) gene expression. Treatment of T-47D human breast cancer cells with retinoic acid for 48 h resulted in a marked concentration-dependent decrease in the level of PR mRNA and immunoreactive protein which was similar to the known effect of progestins on these parameters. Retinoic acid, however, did not bind to PR, nor did it cause the previously demonstrated increase in PR molecular weight observed after progestin exposure. When T-47D cells were treated with retinoic acid for 6 h rather than 48 h, no reduction in the level of PR protein was noted at any retinoic acid concentration whereas the effects of retinoic acid on PR mRNA at 6 and 48 h were the same. Examination of the time course of the effects of retinoic acid revealed a rapid decrease in PR mRNA levels detectable 1 h after and maximal 6 h after treatment of T-47D cells with retinoic acid. These effects of retinoic acid contrasted with previously demonstrated progestin effects on PR mRNA which were not apparent until 3 h after and were not maximal until 12 h after treatment. As expected, the PR protein concentration was unaffected for at least 6 h but was maximally decreased 24-48 h after retinoic acid treatment. In summary, retinoic acid treatment of T-47D cells caused a decrease in the cellular PR concentration by decreasing levels of receptor mRNA and protein, suggesting that retinoic acid is capable of modulating sensitivity to progestins in human breast cancer cells.

Blotting, Northern↗
PubMed1990

Solubilization and characterization of a lactogenic receptor from human placental chorion membranes.

Prolactin has a wide range of actions, including osmoregulation and the control of mammary gland development and lactation. These effects are mediated through a high-affinity cell surface receptor, which has been well characterized in a number of animal tissues. The molecular characteristics of the human receptor are unknown, however. The present studies were initiated, therefore, to determine the binding and molecular characteristics of the lactogenic receptor of human placental chorion membranes. Subcellular fractionation studies showed that the bulk of the receptor sedimented in the microsomal fraction at 45,000gav. Endogenous ligand was dissociated from the receptor with 3.5 M MgCl2 or 0.05 M acetate buffer (pH 4.8) with preservation of binding activity. The microsomal receptor bound human growth hormone (hGH), human prolactin (hPRL), ovine prolactin (oPRL), and human placental lactogen (hPL) but not non-primate growth hormones, indicating a narrow specificity for lactogenic hormones. The binding was only partially reversible in agreement with the known binding kinetics of animal lactogenic receptors. The receptor was solubilized with 45% yield from the microsomes using 16 mM 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propane sulphonate (CHAPS) detergent-250 mM NaCl, and the binding activity was fully restored by a two-fold dilution in the binding reaction to reveal a KD of 0.8 nM for hGH and a binding capacity of 200 fmol of specifically bound hGH per mg of microsomal protein. Gel filtration chromatography indicated the minimum molecular weight of the ligand-receptor complex was approximately 60,000 daltons, and sodium dodecyl sulphate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) of covalently cross-linked 125I-hGH-receptor complexes revealed a molecular size of 58,000 daltons. When account was taken of the contribution of the ligand, a molecular weight of 36,000 for the receptor's binding domain was obtained. These data indicate that the chorion lactogenic receptor has very similar binding and molecular characteristics to the lactogenic receptors from other mammalian species. Chorion membranes are thus a convenient source of material for the further purification and characterization of the human lactogenic receptor.

Cell Fractionation↗