Biomedical subjects

R L Whelan

Publications and source records attributed to R L Whelan.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1998

Colon adenocarcinoma and B-16 melanoma grow larger following laparotomy vs. pneumoperitoneum in a murine model.

PURPOSE: Mouse mammary carcinoma tumors are established more easily and grow larger after sham laparotomy and open bowel resection than after CO2 pneumoperitoneum and laparoscopic-assisted bowel resection. The purpose of this study was to determine whether similar differences in tumor growth would be found when sham laparotomy and pneumoperitoneum were compared for the colon-26 mouse adenocarcinoma and B-16 mouse melanoma tumor lines. METHODS: In all three studies, a high-dose injection of tumor cells was used, which resulted in tumors in almost all control mice. In Study 1, female BALB/C mice (n = 127) were injected intradermally in the dorsal skin with 10(6) colon-26 cells in a 0.1-ml volume before interventions. In Study 2, female C57 BL/6 mice (n = 140) were inoculated similarly with 10(6) B-16 melanoma cells. Study 2 consisted of three separate trials conducted on different days. Study 3 was performed because considerable differences in mean tumor size were observed in each of these trials. In Study 3, the B16 experiment was repeated with a larger n (n = 82) on a single day. In each study, after tumor cell injections, mice were randomly assigned to one of three groups: 1) anesthesia control (no procedure); 2) full laparotomy (4-cm midline incision x 20 minutes, staple closure); or 3) CO2 pneumoperitoneum (4-6 mmHg X 20 minutes). Tumors were excised and weighed on postoperative day 12. RESULTS: In Studies 1 and 3, mean tumor sizes of the laparotomy groups were significantly larger than both the control group and pneumoperitoneum group lesions (P values by Student's t-test). In Study 2, laparotomy group tumors, although significantly larger than control group lesions, were not significantly larger than pneumoperitoneum group tumors. For all three studies, there was no significant difference between mean tumor sizes of the pneumoperitoneum and control groups. CONCLUSION: Both colon-26 adenocarcinoma and B-16 melanoma tumors grow larger after laparotomy than after pneumoperitoneum in a murine model. The mechanism of these postoperative tumor growth differences remains to be elucidated.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed1998

Abdominal wound tumor recurrence after open and laparoscopic-assisted splenectomy in a murine model.

PURPOSE: The cause of abdominal wall tumor recurrences after laparoscopic surgery for cancer remains unknown. A recent study from our laboratory using a murine splenic tumor model suggests that poor surgical technique (i.e., crushing of the tumor) and not the CO2 pneumoperitoneum is responsible for port wound tumors. However, in that experiment no actual laparoscopic procedure or manipulation was performed. The purpose of the current study was to determine the rate of abdominal wound tumors after laparoscopic-assisted splenectomy performed via a CO2 pneumoperitoneum vs. open splenectomy using the mouse splenic tumor model. METHODS: To establish splenic tumors, female BALB/c mice (N=72) were given subcapsular splenic injections of a 0.1-ml suspension containing 10(5) C-26 colon adenocarcinoma cells via a left flank incision at the initial procedure. Eight days later, animals were randomized into one of two groups: 1) laparoscopic-assisted splenectomy, or 2) open splenectomy. Laparoscopic-assisted splenectomy animals had three laparoscopic ports placed and then underwent laparoscopic mobilization of the spleen under a CO2 pneumoperitoneum followed by extracorporeal splenectomy via a subcostal incision. Group 2 animals underwent open splenectomy via a subcostal incision after three port incisions were made in the same locations as for laparoscopic-assisted splenectomy mice. The incision was closed after 20 minutes in both groups. Ten days later, the mice were killed and inspected for abdominal wall tumor implants. The experiment was performed via two separate trials. RESULTS: When results of the two trials were combined, there was no significant difference in the incidence of animals in each group with at least 1 port tumor (open, 21 percent; laparoscopic-assisted splenectomy, 33 percent; P=0.14). However, the overall incidence of port site tumors (number of ports with tumors/total number of ports for each group) was significantly higher in the laparoscopic-assisted splenectomy group than in the open group (20 vs. 7 percent; P=0.01). The subcostal incisional tumor recurrence rate was also higher in the laparoscopic-assisted splenectomy group (50 vs. 21 percent; P=0.02). as was the perioperative mortality rate (21 vs. 7 percent; P=0.08). Results of the two individual trials were also considered separately. The incidence of port wound tumors decreased significantly from the first to the second laparoscopic-assisted splenectomy trial (36 vs. 9 percent; P=0.003), although the incidence of tumors at the subcostal incision and the mortality rate for the two laparoscopic-assisted splenectomy group trials were not significantly different. The open group tumor incidences did not change from trial to trial. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, significantly more port and incisional tumors were noted in the laparoscopic-assisted group. Although not statistically significant, mortality rate of the laparoscopic-assisted group was higher than the open group. The reasons for these findings are unclear. Laparoscopic mobilization was quite difficult and required excessive splenic manipulation, which may have liberated tumor cells from the primary tumor and facilitated port tumor formation. With increased experience, less manipulation was required to complete mobilization. Of note, the incidence of port tumors in the laparoscopic-assisted splenectomy group decreased significantly from the first to the second trials; therefore, it is possible that surgical technique is a factor in port tumor formation. However, the persistently high tumor incidence at the subcostal incision site argues against the hypothesis that the second trial's laparoscopic mobilizations were less traumatic. The CO2 pneumoperitoneum may also be a factor. Further studies are warranted to clarify these issues.

Abdominal Neoplasms↗

PubMed1998

The effects of elevated intraabdominal pressure, hypercarbia, and positioning on the hemodynamic responses to laparoscopic colectomy in pigs.

BACKGROUND: This study investigated three factors postulated to be sources of physiological stress in laparoscopic surgery: hypercarbia, elevated intraabdominal pressure, and the steep Trendelenburg position. Our research was designed to define the effects of each of these potential stressors on hemodynamic responses observed during laparoscopic colectomy in pigs. METHODS: Twenty-four pigs were randomized into the following four groups, based on the method for obtaining surgical exposure while a colectomy or laparoscopic-assisted colectomy was performed: Open surgery (n = 6), CO2 pneumoperitoneum (n = 6), Helium pneumoperitoneum (n = 6), and abdominal wall Lifter (n = 6). The animals were paralyzed with minute ventilation adjusted. All animals underwent extensive pulmonary and hemodynamic monitoring with measurements of the following parameters: RR, Vt, minute ventilation, O2, sat, ETCO2, PVR, HR, MAP, CO, PAP, CVP, PCWP, SV, LVSWI, DO2, and VO2. The laparoscopic pigs were placed in the steep Trendelenburg position during surgery. RESULTS: The effect of a CO pneumoperitoneum was to increase PaCO2 PVR and cause an acidemia that could not be prevented by an increase in minute ventilation. Elevated intraabdominal pressure decreased UO. Both pneumoperitoneum groups had a fourfold increase in IVCP, a measure of intraabdominal pressure. Some of this increase was due to placement into the Trendelenburg position; IVCP increased to a lesser degree in the Lifter group. The steep Trendelenburg position caused significant increases in PAP, CVP, and PCWP; however, a contributory effect of elevated intraabdominal pressure cannot be ruled out. None of these procedures had any significant effect on the HR or MAP. There was a significant increase in CO in the CO2 and Lifter groups; however, when CO was controlled for HR effects, there was no significant effect on SV from any of these different procedures. LVSWI, DO2, and VO2 were not affected by any of the different exposure methods. CONCLUSIONS: The effects of laparoscopic surgery and open surgery on hemodynamic responses are minimal, and no one method is superior to another when performed in pigs that are healthy, hydrated, and hyperventilated to keep ETCO2 < 40. However, since elderly and sick patients have a lower threshold for physiologic decompensation, we can infer that the small hemodynamic changes noted in this study might become significant factors when surgery is performed on compromised patients. The finding that an abdominal wall lifting device causes the fewest metabolic and hemodynamic effects makes its use an important consideration when performing laparoscopic surgery in patients with cardiopulmonary compromise, hemodynamic instability, or any preexisting renal insufficiency.

Abdomen↗

PubMed1998

The effect of peritoneal air exposure on postoperative tumor growth.

BACKGROUND: Previous work has demonstrated that cell-mediated immune function is better preserved in rodents after laparoscopic than open surgery. The cause of this laparotomy-related immunosuppression is unclear. Some investigators have attributed it to the length of the incision; others, to peritoneal air exposure. It has also been shown that tumors in mice are more easily established and grow larger after sham laparotomy than after pneumoperitoneum. Lastly, the differences in tumor growth have been shown to be, at least in part, attributable to the immunosuppression that occurs after laparotomy. The purpose of this study was to determine if air pneumoperitoneum, presumably via immunosuppression related to peritoneal air exposure, is associated with increased tumor growth in the postoperative period. METHOD: A total of 150 immunocompetent syngeneic mice received high-dose intradermal injections of mouse mammary carcinoma tumor cells. They were then randomized to undergo one of the following procedures: (a) anesthesia alone, (b) air insufflation (44 mm Hg), (c) CO2 insufflation, or (d) full laparotomy. No intraabdominal procedure was carried out. All procedures were 20 min long. After 12 days, the animals were killed and the mean tumor mass determined for each group. RESULTS: All animals grew tumors. There was no significant difference in the mean tumor size of the anesthesia control, CO2 insufflation, and air insufflation groups (p > 0.85 by ANOVA). However, the laparotomy group tumors were 1.5 times as large as those of the other three groups (p < 0.05 by ANOVA). CONCLUSIONS: In this model, air insufflation did not significantly affect postoperative tumor growth, nor did CO2 pneumoperitoneum. However, full laparotomy was associated with increased tumor growth.

Air↗

PubMed1998

An in vitro model fails to demonstrate aerosolization of tumor cells.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the ability of pressurized CO2 gas to aerosolize B16 melanoma (B16) tumor cells in an in vitro model. METHODS: The experimental apparatus consisted of an 18.9-L plastic cylindrical vessel and a compliant latex pouch was attached to the top. Two 5-mm ports penetrated the vessel; insufflation and desufflation were carried out through them. A culture dish containing 20 million B16 cells in liquid culture media was placed at the base within the container. In the first experiment, the vessel was insufflated with CO2 gas to a static pressure of 15 or 30 mm Hg with the outflow port closed. After 10 min, the outflow port was opened and the gas was desufflated through a collecting device containing sterile culture medium. In a second experiment, a continuous flow of CO2 through the vessel was maintained after a pressure of 15 or 30 mm Hg was established. A total of 10 L CO2 was cycled through the vessel. In both experiments, 24 determinations were carried out at each pressure. Each experimental culture dish was microscopically scanned for 2 weeks for the presence of tumor cells. The third and fourth experiments tested for the presence of aerosolized nonviable tumor cells in the expelled gas. Using the model described above, after 10 mins of 30 mm Hg static pressure, the CO2 gas was expelled directly onto a glass slide and cytofixed. Alternately, after 10 mins at 30 mm Hg static pressure, the gas was expelled through a saline-filled Soluset (Abbott Laboratories), centrifuged, and the residue cytofixed onto a glass slide. Each of the five slides per experiment were examined microscopically for the presence of cells. RESULTS: In the first and second experiments, no cells or growth were observed in any of the 96 experimental dishes. In experiments three and four, no cells were detected on any of the slides. CONCLUSIONS: It was not possible with this model to aerosolize tumor cells in a pressurized CO2 environment. Our results suggest that aerosolization of tumor cells is not the mechanism of port site recurrences after laparoscopic surgery for malignant disease.

Aerosols↗

PubMed1998

Traumatic handling of the tumor independent of pneumoperitoneum increases port site implantation rate of colon cancer in a murine model.

BACKGROUND: Reports of port site tumor recurrences after laparoscopic-assisted resection of colon tumors have raised concerns about the safety of laparoscopic cancer surgery. Tumor cell suspension studies in animals have implicated the CO2 pneumoperitoneum (pneumo) in the etiology of port tumors. Unfortunately, in several ways, the cell suspension model is unrealistic and does not permit assessment of how tumor cells become liberated from the primary tumor. The purpose of this study was to establish a more realistic splenic tumor model and to determine the relative importance of the CO2 pneumo and excessive surgical manipulation in the development of port site and incisional tumor recurrences. METHODS: Splenic tumors were established in female Balb/C mice (n = 134) via a subcapsular injection of 10(5) C-26 colon adenocarcinoma cells (0.1 ml volume) via a left-flank incision at the initial procedure. Ten days later, the animals were reexplored via a 1-cm left subcostal incision. Those with isolated splenic tumors (95%) were randomized into one of four groups: (a) control, (b) CO2 pneumo, (c) crushed tumor, or (d) crushed tumor with pneumo. Ports were placed in the left lower, right lower, and right upper quadrants of each mouse. In groups 1 and 2, the mice underwent a meticulously performed splenectomy; in groups 3 and 4, the tumor capsule was crushed intraabdominally prior to splenectomy. In groups 1 and 3, the subcostal incision was closed and the ports were removed after 15 min of anesthesia. Following splenectomy, group 2 and group 4 mice underwent closure of the subcostal incision and a 15-min CO2 pneumo (4-6 mm Hg) after which the ports were removed. Twelve days later, the mice were killed and examined for abdominal wall tumor implants. RESULTS: Significantly more animals in group 3 (crushed tumor) developed port site and incisional tumors than those in group 1 (control) (p < 0.002 for both comparisons). The same results were found when group 4 (crush plus pneumo) was compared to group 2 (pneumo) (p < 0.002 for both comparisons). Regarding the port wounds, when the ports are considered individually (number of ports with tumors/total number of ports for each group), there were significantly more port tumors in the two crush groups than in the noncrush groups. No significant differences were noted when the port site and incisional tumor rates for group 1 (control) and group 2 (pneumo) were compared or when the results for group 2 (crush) and group 4 (crush pneumo) were compared. CONCLUSIONS: A splenic tumor model was successfully established. When compared to meticulous technique, purposefully traumatic handling of the splenic tumor before resection resulted in significantly more port wound and incisional tumors. In contrast, the addition of a pneumo after splenectomy did not significantly influence the incidence of port tumors in either the "good" or the "poor" technique groups. These results suggest that surgical technique plays a larger role in the development of port site tumors than the CO2 pneumoperitoneum.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed1998

Increased tumor establishment and growth after open vs laparoscopic bowel resection in mice.

BACKGROUND: Surgery can suppress immune function and facilitate tumor growth. Several studies have demonstrated better preservation of immune function following laparoscopic procedures. Our laboratory has also shown that tumors are more easily established and grow larger after sham laparotomy than after pneumoperitoneum in mice. The purpose of this study was to determine if the previously reported differences in tumor establishment and growth would persist in the setting of an intraabdominal manipulation. METHODS: Syngeneic mice received intradermal injections of tumor cells and underwent either an open or laparoscopic cecal resection. In study 1, the incidence of tumor development was observed after a low dose inoculum; whereas in study 2, tumor mass was compared on postoperative day 12 after a high-dose inoculum. RESULTS: In study 1, tumors were established in 5% of control mice, 30% of laparoscopy mice, and 83% of open surgery mice (p < 0.01 for all comparisons). In study 2, open surgery group tumors were 1.5 times as large as laparoscopy group tumors (p < 0.01), which were 1.5 times as large as control group tumors (p < 0.02). CONCLUSION: We conclude that tumors are more easily established and grow larger after open laparoscopic bowel resection in mice.

Animals↗

PubMed1998

General oncologic effects of the laparoscopic surgical approach. 1997 Frankfurt international meeting of animal laparoscopic researchers.

The results from the majority of the reviewed studies support the hypothesis that abdominal surgery, performed via either a large incision or CO2 pneumoperitoneum, systemically encourages tumor growth in the postoperative period. A full laparotomy incision appears to have a significantly greater effect than CO2 pneumoperitoneum on postoperative tumor growth. Whether the large tumor observed in the surgical groups are the result of increased tumor cell proliferation or diminished tumor cell death remains unclear. There is some evidence pointing to both mechanisms. The loss of the postoperative tumor growth differences between the open and pneumo animals in the athymic mouse experiment suggests that cell-mediated immune function plays a role in tumor containment. The proliferation study results, however, suggest that other stimulatory influence(s) are also at work. Clearly, much research needs to be done regarding the etiology of these tumor growth differences. Other tumor cell lines need to be studied, and investigations regarding tumor growth in an intra-abdominal location need be performed as well. This body of research suggests that the manner in which the surgeon gains access to the abdominal cavity may have an impact on the propensity of tumor cells to implant, survive, and grow in the period immediately after surgery. If true, this may be the most compelling justification for the use of minimally invasive techniques for the curative resection of malignancies. However, it remains to be proven that human tumors will demonstrate differences in tumor growth similar to those noted in some of these animals models. Furthermore, it is not all clear that slight differences in tumor growth postoperatively will translate into significant differences in long-term survival or recurrence rates. At first glance, the existence of port-site tumors would appear to contradict totally the conclusions of many studies discussed in this synopsis. If laparoscopic methods are associated with decreased rates of tumor growth and establishment, then why do port-site tumors form? This is a complex issue calling for discussion that goes far beyond the scope of this article. However, several brief comment on this topic follow. The etiology of port tumors is unknown, although traumatization of the tumor during mobilization, resection, or removal is likely to play a significant role in the liberation of tumor cells from the primary. A relatively small protective benefit, in terms of slower tumor growth rates in laparoscopic patients, will likely not be sufficient to prevent a large inoculum of viable tumor cells in an abdominal wound from establishing a metastasis. Furthermore, as suggested earlier, the systemic effects on tumor growth may be different from the local (i.e., intra-abdominal or abdominal wound) effects. Finally, the true incidence of port tumors remains unknown. It has not been definitively established that the laparoscopic wound tumor incidence is significantly higher than the open rate, although this is the assumption of most surgeons. Several relatively large recently published laparoscopic series have reported port tumor incidences of 0 to 1.2%, which is in the same "ballpark" as the 0.6 1.0% abdominal wound tumor incidences mentioned in several open colectomy series. Clearly, much more research in this area is needed to understand port tumors better and to reconcile the port tumor results with the systemic tumor growth benefits that may be associated with minimally invasive methods.

Animals↗

PubMed1998

Wound tensile strength and contraction rate are not affected by laparotomy or pneumoperitoneum.

BACKGROUND: Many cellular elements responsible for wound healing are affected by laparotomy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of laparotomy and CO2 pneumoperitoneum on wound healing. METHODS: Male Sprague Dawley rats were randomly assigned to one of three experimental groups. Anesthesia control rats underwent no procedure. Pneumoperitoneum group rats were insufflated with CO2 gas. Laparotomy group rats underwent a 7-cm midline laparotomy incision. The interventions were 30 min long. For the incisional study (n = 30), a 4-cm dorsal full-thickness skin incision was made on each rat and then closed with staples. On postoperative days 7 and 14, an equal number of rats were sacrificed from each group, and wound tensile strength measurements were performed. For the excisional study (n = 45), each group of 15 rats underwent a 2-cm diameter circular dorsal full-thickness skin excision. Blinded measurements of wound area were performed every other day until wounds closed. RESULTS: Wound tensile strength values were not significantly different among experimental groups at either time point. The study had a power of 80% to find a 30% difference at POD 7 and a power of 80% to find a 23% difference at POD 14 to a confidence level of p < 0.05. Wound contraction data from the excisional model were analyzed with the Generalized Estimation Equations statistical approach. When we modeled the treatment group as a covariate, no statistical difference was found between groups, demonstrating equal slopes across time. CONCLUSIONS: From the results of these studies, we conclude that wound healing in this model is not significantly diminished following laparotomy or peritoneal insufflation, as compared to anesthesia control.

Animals↗

PubMed1998

Intestinal tuberculosis: return of an old disease.

OBJECTIVE: Tuberculosis (TB) can no longer be considered a rare disease in the United States due, in part, to the AIDS epidemic. Because the signs and symptoms of intestinal TB are nonspecific, a high index of suspicion must be maintained to ensure a timely diagnosis. The aim of this article is to review the history, epidemiology, pathophysiology, and treatment of TB. METHODS: This review is based on an examination of the world literature. RESULTS: In only 20% of TB patients is there associated active pulmonary TB. Areas most commonly affected are the jejunoileum and ileocecum, which comprise >75% of gastrointestinal TB sites. Diagnosis requires colonoscopy with multiple biopsies at the ulcer margins and tissue sent for routine histology, smear, and culture. If intestinal TB is suspected, empiric treatment is warranted despite negative histology, smear, and culture results. Treatment is medical, and all patients should receive a full course of antituberculous chemotherapy. Exploratory laparotomy is necessary if the diagnosis is in doubt, in cases in which there is concern about a neoplasm, or for complications that include perforation, obstruction, hemorrhage, or fistulization. CONCLUSIONS: This review draws attention to the resurgence of tuberculosis in the United States. An increased awareness of intestinal tuberculosis, coupled with knowledge of the pathophysiology, diagnostic methods, and treatment should increase the number of cases diagnosed, thus improving the outcome for patients with this disease.

AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections↗

PubMed1997

Postoperative immune function varies inversely with the degree of surgical trauma in a murine model.

BACKGROUND: Major surgery through a laparotomy incision is associated with a postoperative reduction in immune function. Studies in rats involving sham procedures suggest that immune function may be preserved after laparoscopy. This study investigates the effects of incision length and exposure method for bowel resection with respect to postoperative immune function as assessed by delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) reactions. METHODS: Male Sprague Dawley rats (n = 175) were challenged preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and on postoperative day 2 with an intradermal injection of 0.2 mg phytohemagglutinin (PHA), a nonspecific T-cell mitogen. The averages of two measures of perpendicular diameters were used to calculate the area of induration. Anesthesia control rats underwent no procedure. Minilaparotomy rats underwent a 3.5-cm midline incision. Sham full laparotomy rats underwent a 7-cm midline incision. The open bowel-resection group underwent a cecal ligation and resection through a 7-cm midline incision. In the laparoscopic-assisted resection group a CO2 pneumoperitoneum and four-port technique was utilized to deliver the cecum through a 4-mm port where the cecum was extracorporeally ligated and resected. RESULTS: Preoperative responses were similar in all five groups. Incision length: Full laparotomy group responses were 20% smaller than anesthesia control responses on postoperative day (POD)1 through POD4 (p < 0.02). At no time point were the responses in the minilaparotomy group significantly different from either anesthesia control or full laparotomy group responses. Exposure method: The laparoscopic-assisted resection group responses were 20% larger than open group responses at the time of two of the four postoperative measurements (p < 0.05, both comparisons). At all postoperative time points, open resection group responses were significantly smaller than control responses (p < 0.05, all comparisons), whereas at no time point were laparoscopic group responses significantly different from control responses. CONCLUSION: We conclude that postoperative cell-mediated immune function varies inversely with the degree of surgical trauma. Results from the minilaparotomy and laparoscopy groups suggest that procedures done through small incisions may result in preservation of postoperative immune function.

Analysis of Variance↗

PubMed1997

A murine model of laparoscopic-assisted intervention.

BACKGROUND: In order to better investigate the effects of laparoscopic surgery, it is necessary to establish reliable, reproducible, and economical animal models of laparoscopic intervention. Here we describe a mouse model of laparoscopic-assisted colon resection. METHODS: After successful induction of anesthesia the mouse is placed in Trendelenburg position and the peritoneal cavity is insufflated with carbon dioxide gas through an angiocatheter placed in the right upper quadrant. A 4-mm rigid scope with camera attachment is then inserted through a midline port created just caudal to the xiphoid. A second port is then created in the right lower quadrant to allow introduction of laparoscopic forceps into the peritoneal cavity. The cecum, which extends 1.5 cm beyond the ileocecal valve, is grasped with forceps and exteriorized through the operative port. Extracorporeally, the cecum is ligated and resected before the cecal stump is returned to the peritoneal cavity. The abdominal wall defects are then stapled closed. RESULTS: This simple model can be mastered by individuals with very limited surgical experience. This laparoscopic model has been used successfully in our laboratory in a number of experiments with an intraoperative complication rate of 3. 2% (3/94), which was similar to the open surgery group rate of 2.1% (2/95, p = 0.99 by chi square). We observed no postoperative leaks in either group. The only postoperative death occurred in the open resection group due to dehiscence of the laparotomy wound. CONCLUSIONS: We propose that this model may be useful for comparing the effects of open to laparoscopic surgery.

Animals↗

PubMed1997

A prospective comparison of laparoscopic exposure techniques for rectal mobilization and sigmoid resection.

BACKGROUND: We determined the efficacy of a pneumoperitoneum and a gasless abdominal wall lifting device in providing exposure for low rectal mobilization and sigmoid resection in a swine model. The results of these laparoscopic techniques were compared with those obtained using standard open surgical methods. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a prospective randomized nonblinded trial. Twenty-four adult female pigs were randomized into three groups depending on exposure technique: group 1, open (n = 6); group 2, carbon dioxide (n = 6) or helium (n = 6) pneumoperitoneum; and group 3, a mechanical abdominal wall lifting device (n = 6). A low rectal mobilization and sigmoid resection with a double-stapled, circular, end-to-end anastomosis was performed in all pigs. In group 2, a laparoscopic-assisted approach was used. Parameters assessed included length of operation, length of the colonic specimen, number of lymph nodes per specimen, and extent of anterior and posterior rectal mobilization (centimeters from the anal verge). RESULTS: Operative times were significantly shorter for group 1 than for group 2; no significant differences were found between the two laparoscopic subgroups. No significant difference was found in length of the colonic specimen or in number of lymph nodes harvested for each group. Extent of anterior and posterior rectal mobilization was also not significantly different for the three groups. Although mean mobilization lengths for each group were not significantly different, the range of values was broader in the laparoscopic groups. CONCLUSIONS: A comparable mobilization and bowel resection can be performed laparoscopically, regardless of the exposure technique used. Gasless laparoscopy may prove useful in patients in whom pneumoperitoneum is contraindicated; it will not replace pneumoperitoneum as the only method for obtaining laparoscopic exposure because of the ease of use and frank superiority of the pneumoperitoneum in most circumstances. Abdominal wall lifting devices seem to be a reasonable alternative to pneumoperitoneum for sigmoid resection and rectal mobilization.

Animals↗

PubMed1996

The effect of calcium and vitamin supplements on the incidence and recurrence of colorectal adenomatous polyps.

BACKGROUND: Recent attention has focused on calcium and certain vitamins as potential protective agents against colorectal neoplasia. METHODS: Two case-control studies were conducted on patients who underwent colonoscopy between 1986 and 1988, comparing 297 patients with newly diagnosed adenomas with 505 controls (without current or prior history of neoplasia), and 198 patients with recurrent adenomas with 347 recurrent controls (with no current neoplasia, but with a history of polypectomy). Subjects were interviewed regarding their regular usage of supplementation with vitamins A, C, D, and E, or with calcium, multivitamins, or any vitamin supplements. RESULTS: No consistent associations were observed with the use of any of these supplements. CONCLUSIONS: More studies are necessary to confirm these findings. It may be necessary to develop other chemopreventive agents, such as aspirin, for colorectal neoplasia.

Adenoma↗

PubMed1996

Controlled trial of laparoscopic-assisted vs open colon resection in a porcine model.

BACKGROUND: Several series of laparoscopic colon resection have been reported in the literature with varied results; however, no controlled series of laparoscopic vs open colon resection has been reported. The purpose of this study was to determine the relative safety and adequacy of laparoscopic colon resection in a controlled trial using a porcine model. METHODS: Domestic pigs (n = 23) were randomly divided into two groups. Animals underwent either an open or laparoscopic-assisted segmental resection of the sigmoid colon. The open resections were performed through a 20-cm midline incision and the laparoscopic technique utilized five 12-mm ports. Laparoscopic resection took twice as long to complete as open resection (P < 0.001). Return of gastric function was significantly faster in the laparoscopic group than in the open group (P < 0.032). RESULTS: No significant differences were found in total length of resection, proximal or distal margins, number of lymph nodes recovered, length of mesenteric vessel resected, or time to return of bowel function. At vivisection, more adhesions to the abdominal wall were noted in the open group (P < 0.002). One death occurred in the laparoscopic group 2 h postoperatively (8.3% mortality) while all open group pigs survived. However, there was no statistically significant difference in mortality rates by chi-square analysis (P > 0.5). CONCLUSIONS: Despite longer operative time, laparoscopic intervention is technically feasible, safe, and may offer significant postoperative benefits due to fewer abdominal adhesions.

Anastomosis, Surgical↗

PubMed1996

Trocar site recurrence is unlikely to result from aerosolization of tumor cells.

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to investigate the ability of a high-pressure CO2 environment to aerosolize tumor cells in both in vitro and in vivo models. (An aerosol is defined as a stable gaseous suspension of insoluble particles). Also, this study was designed to determine if rapid desufflation is capable of transporting fluid laden with tumor cells. METHODS: The four in vitro aerosol experiments were performed in an 18.9-1 plastic vessel fitted with two 7-mm ports and a compliant latex balloon affixed to the top. After CO2 insufflation, the vessel was desufflated through a sterile soluset containing 25 ml of culture media that was subsequently emptied into a culture dish, incubated for two weeks, and periodically assessed for growth. At the bottom of the vessel, one of the following was placed: Study 1 and 2, a suspension of B16 melanoma or colon 26 tumor cells in liquid culture media; Study 3, colon 26 cells in saline solution; Study 4, several pieces of solid colon 26 tumor. In Studies 1 to 3, cell preparations were subjected to the following high-pressure CO2 conditions (pneumo): 1) static pneumo of 15 and 30 mmHg (10 minute dwell); 2) a continuous flow (CF) of CO2 (1O l) while maintaining a pressure of 15 or 30 mmHg in the vessel. In Study 4, only the 30 mmHg static and CF conditions were tested. Between 6 and 12 determinations were performed for each condition and cell preparation. In vivo aerosol experiments consisted of Spraque Dawley rats that received intraperitoneal injections of 10-5 B16 cells in 0.1 ml of liquid media. Two laparoscopic ports were placed in the abdomen, one each for insufflation and desufflation. Study groups were: 1, static CO2 pneumo of 15 mmHg; 2 and 3, continuous CO2 flow (10 l) at a stable pneumo pressure of 5 and 10 mmHg. Desufflation was performed via the same collecting device and handled in an identical manner to the in vitro experiments described above. The in vitro balloon experiment was designed to investigate the ability of desufflation to transport fluid-containing tumor cells; latex balloon model was used. To prevent complete loss of volume on desufflation, a wire coil was placed inside the balloon. Twenty ml of media containing 20 x 10(-6) B16 cells was placed in the bottom of the balloon. The balloon was insufflated with 1 to 2 l of gas. There were three study groups that differed in the degree to which the cell suspension was agitated before desufflation. Study conditions were as follows: 1) no agitation; 2) moderate agitation to coat the lower walls and coil; 3) maximum agitation to coat the entire balloon. To verify the viability of tumor cells, at the end of each in vitro and in vivo study, a sample of tumor cells or peritoneal washing was incubated in sterile media. These samples served as positive controls. RESULTS: In vitro aerosol studies consisted of the following. At the end of two weeks of incubation, no tumor growth was noted in any of the 124 test dishes. The 14 control samples all demonstrated tumor growth. In vivo aerosol studies consisted of the following. Zero of 18 experimental dishes grew tumor. All three peritoneal washing samples demonstrated growth. In vitro balloon studies consisted of the following. Zero of 12 test dishes in Groups 1 and 2 demonstrated growth, whereas five of six dishes did so in Group 3 (maximally agitated before desufflation). Again, positive controls all grew tumor cells. SUMMARY: We were unable to demonstrate aerosol formation in any of the in vitro and in vivo studies performed. In the balloon experiment, desufflation-related transport of tumor cells was demonstrated but only when the entire balloon surface was coated with the tumor cell suspension before desufflation. CONCLUSION: Aerosols of tumor cells are not likely to form. Free intraperitoneal tumor cells are most likely found in liquid suspension. Desufflation is a potential means of transport of cell-laden fluid.

Aerosols↗

PubMed1996

Better preservation of immune function after laparoscopic-assisted vs. open bowel resection in a murine model.

UNLABELLED: We evaluated cell-mediated immune function after laparoscopic-assisted and open bowel resection in rats by measuring delayed-type hypersensitivity responses to keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) and phytohemagglutinin (PHA). METHODS: Male Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 120) were sensitized to 1 mg of KLH ten days before investigations. Rats were challenged preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and on postoperative day (POD) 2 with an intradermal injection of 0.3 mg of KLH and 0.2 mg of PHA (at different sites). Averages of two measures of perpendicular diameters (taken 24 and 48 hours postchallenge) were used to calculate the area of induration using the formula for the area of an ellipse, A = (D1/2 x D2/2) x pi. Anesthesia control animals underwent no procedure (n = 40). Open resection group underwent ligation and resection of the cecum (length = 2 cm) through a 7 cm midline incision (n = 40). In the laparoscopic-assisted resection group, under CO2 pneumoperitoneum (4-6 mmHg), the cecum was identified, dissected free, and exteriorized through a 4 mm port. The cecum was then ligated and resected extracorporeally (n = 40). RESULTS: Preoperative responses to both KLH and PHA were the same in all three groups. Furthermore, within each group, postoperative responses were similar. When groups were compared, the anesthesia group responses were significantly greater than the open resection group responses at all time points (P < 0.05 for all comparisons). Laparoscopic assisted resection group responses differed from control at only two of eight postoperative measures. Laparoscopic resection group responses were significantly greater than open resection group responses to challenge with both KLH and PHA on POD1 (P < 0.02, for both comparisons) and POD 4 (P < 0.05, for both comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative cell-mediated immune function is better preserved after laparoscopic-assisted bowel resection than after open resection as assessed by skin antigen testing.

Animals↗

PubMed1995

Increased tumor establishment and growth after laparotomy vs laparoscopy in a murine model.

OBJECTIVE: To test our hypothesis that tumors would be more easily established and grow more aggressively after laparotomy than after laparoscopy. This hypothesis was based on studies that have demonstrated that surgery can suppress immune function and facilitate tumor growth and that have shown preservation of immune function after laparoscopic procedures. DESIGN: Double-blinded, randomized, control trial. SETTING: Research laboratory and animal care facility. ANIMALS: One hundred forty 5- to 6-week-old C3H/He female mice. INTERVENTIONS: Three experiments with three groups each: laparotomy, insufflation, and anesthesia controls. All animals received an intradermal inoculation of tumor cells in the dorsal skin. The anesthesia control cohort underwent no procedure. The laparotomy cohort underwent a midline laparotomy from the xiphoid process to the pubis, which was closed after 30 minutes. The insufflation cohort underwent peritoneal insufflation with carbon dioxide for 30 minutes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Tumor volume, tumor mass, and incidence of tumor establishment. RESULTS: In the first experiment, the tumor volumes of the anesthesia control and insufflation groups followed a similar pattern of plateau and regression. The tumor volumes of the laparotomy group followed a different pattern and were significantly larger than those of the control and insufflation groups on postoperative days 6 and 12 (P < .05 for all comparisons). In the second experiment, tumors in the laparotomy group were approximately three times larger than those of the control group (P < .01) and almost twice as large as insufflation group tumors (P < .01) by mass. In the third experiment, there was a significantly higher incidence of tumor establishment in the laparotomy group than in the insufflation (P < .04) or control (P < .01) groups. The incidence was not different between the control and insufflation groups. CONCLUSIONS: Tumors were more easily established and grew more aggressively after laparotomy than after insufflation. These results, coupled with those that demonstrate an immune advantage to laparoscopy over laparotomy, suggest that the difference in observed tumor growth may be related to immune function. While much work remains to be done, we believe these data provide evidence of a previously undemonstrated benefit of laparoscopic intervention.

Animals↗