PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R Labianca

Publications and source records attributed to R Labianca.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Venous thromboembolism and cancer: guidelines of the Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM).

Thromboembolic complications represent one of the most important cause of morbidity and mortality in cancer patients. Although several data have been published demonstrating the strong association between cancer and venous thromboembolism (VTE), there is poor perception, among oncologists, of the level of risk of thrombosis and of relevance of managing VTE in these patients. The Associazione Italiana di Oncologia Medica (AIOM) has provided some recommendations to direct clinical practice according to evidence-based data concerning cancer and VTE. In fact, we conducted an extensive literature review (1996-2005) to produce evidence-based recommendations to improve perceptions of the magnitude of this risk among Italian medical and surgical oncologists and alert on the new approaches to prophylaxis and treatment of VTE in cancer patients. Levels of evidence are given according to a five-point rating system, and similarly for each key recommendation a five-point rating system suggests if the evidence is strong and indicate that the benefits do, or do not, outweigh risks and burden.

Anticoagulants↗
PubMed2006

Challenges in the treatment of gastrointestinal tumours.

In the last 20 years there have been many breakthroughs in the treatment of gastrointestinal tumours. In this review we have considered the three most important subgroups of gastrointestinal tumours (colorectal, gastric and pancreatic cancer), focusing on the state-of-the-art treatments.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed2006

New strategies in colon cancer adjuvant therapy.

Adjuvant therapy in colorectal cancer has always been a controversy during years. Despite the fact that benefit of adjuvant therapy in stage III is clear, a more controversial question concerns efficacy in stage II. The introduction of new drugs in addition to standard regimens has some benefit, but also adds toxicity. Ongoing studies with novel targeted therapies will show their results in the next years. Other open questions include duration of therapy and whether there is a real possibility of selecting patients for treatment on the basis of prognostic factors.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed2005

Targeted therapy in colorectal cancer: do we know enough?

The present paper is a critical review about the recent development of new agents that have revolutioned the therapeutical approach of solid tumours with a particular focus on colorectal cancer. Until a few years ago, chemotherapy has been considered the only medical treatment for advanced disease. At the moment, new drugs blocking some cell functions, such as monoclonal antibodies or tyrosin kinase inhibitors are available for many oncologists, but their efficacy should be debated for several reasons. Despite having a strong biological and preclinical rationale, the clinical results of these agents are not comparable to the results obtained by imatinib in gastrointestinal stromal tumour or in chronic myeloid leukaemia even though superior to chemotherapy alone. Moreover, the efficacy does not show any correlation with the molecular expressions of the tumours. In this review, we considered different hypotheses in order to explain these results.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗
PubMed2005

The role of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) reintroduction with irinotecan or oxaliplatin in truly 5-FU-refractory advanced colorectal cancer patients.

OBJECTIVES: Although several evidences have demonstrated a synergistic activity of 5-fluorouracil with irinotecan and oxaliplatin, thus explaining the use of this drug combination in the first-line treatment of advanced colorectal cancer, the need for the reintroduction of 5-FU in the second-line setting is more questionable. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the outcome of patients developing progressive disease while on an infusional 5-FU-based front-line chemotherapy and subsequently treated with one of the four following chemotherapy regimens: irinotecan, oxaliplatin and irinotecan or oxaliplatin both combined with the de Gramont schedule (LV5-FU2). RESULTS: 225 patients (137 males and 88 females), were eligible for analysis. Second-line chemotherapy consisted of irinotecan in 79 patients (35%, group A), oxaliplatin in 47 patients (21%, group B), irinotecan with LV5-FU2 in 53 patients (24%, group C) and oxaliplatin with LV5-FU2 in the remaining 46 cases (20%, group D). The response rate to second-line chemotherapy was obtained in 6/79 patients (8%) in group A, in 4/47 patients (9%) in group B, in 11/53 patients (21%) in group C and in 10/46 patients (22%) in group D (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that reintroduction of 5-FU could increase irinotecan and oxaliplatin activity in patients progressing during a 5-FU-based first-line chemotherapy.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Gemcitabine in combination with oxaliplatin compared with gemcitabine alone in locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer: results of a GERCOR and GISCAD phase III trial.

PURPOSE: Gemcitabine (Gem) is the standard treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer. Given the promising phase II results obtained with the Gem-oxaliplatin (GemOx) combination, we conducted a phase III study comparing GemOx with Gem alone in advanced pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer were stratified according to center, performance status, and type of disease (locally advanced v metastatic) and randomly assigned to either GemOx (gemcitabine 1 g/m2 as a 100-minute infusion on day 1 and oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2 as a 2-hour infusion on day 2 every 2 weeks) or Gem (gemcitabine 1 g/m2 as a weekly 30-minute infusion). RESULTS: Three hundred twenty-six patients were enrolled; 313 were eligible, and 157 and 156 were allocated to the GemOx and Gem arms, respectively. GemOx was superior to Gem in terms of response rate (26.8% v 17.3%, respectively; P = .04), progression-free survival (5.8 v 3.7 months, respectively; P = .04), and clinical benefit (38.2% v 26.9%, respectively; P = .03). Median overall survival (OS) for GemOx and Gem was 9.0 and 7.1 months, respectively (P = .13). GemOx was well tolerated overall, although a higher incidence of National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria grade 3 and 4 toxicity per patient was observed for platelets (14.0% for GemOx v 3.2% for Gem), vomiting (8.9% for GemOx v 3.2% for Gem), and neurosensory symptoms (19.1% for GemOx v 0% for Gem). CONCLUSION: These results confirm the efficacy and safety of GemOx, but this study failed to demonstrate a statistically significant advantage in terms of OS compared with Gem. Because GemOx is the first combined treatment to be superior to Gem alone in terms of clinical benefit, this promising regimen deserves further development.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2004

Phase II study of a triplet regimen in advanced colorectal cancer using methotrexate, oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil.

Building upon the concept of schedule-specific biochemical modulation of 5-fluorouracil (FU), which alternates bolus and continuous infusion (CI) FU, we have incorporated oxaliplatin (l-OHP) following the bolus part of the regimen to explore the activity of this new combination. Patients with advanced, untreated, measurable colorectal cancer received sequential methotrexate (MTX) (days 1 and 15)-->l-OHP+FU (days 2 and 16) (200, 85 and 600 mg m(-2), respectively) followed by 3 weeks of CI FU (200 mg m(-2) day(-1)) given from day 29 to 50, modulated by weekly leucovorin (LV) (20 mg m(-2)). After 1 week of rest, the second cycle was started. The treatment was continued until progression or patient's refusal. According to the intention-to-treat analysis on all 46 patients accrued, the response rate was 42% (95% CL=28-55%), with three complete responses and 16 partial responses. The median overall survival was 15.9 months and the median progression-free survival 6.9 months. Toxicity was very mild, with the bolus part of the regimen more toxic than the infusional part (24 vs 7% of grade III-IV, respectively). This new combination of MTX -->l-OHP-FU followed by FU CI is well tolerated, feasible and produces activity results similar to other more simple, but more toxic, regimens. Pros and cons of the different fluoropyrimidines-l-OHP combinations are discussed.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

High curative resection rate with weekly cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, epidoxorubicin, 6S-leucovorin, glutathione, and filgastrim in patients with locally advanced, unresectable gastric cancer: a report from the Italian Group for the Study of Digestive Tract Cancer (GISCAD).

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the role of a weekly preoperative chemotherapy in locally advanced, unresectable gastric cancer. In all, 82 patients with an Eastern Oncology Cooperative Group PS <or=2 and normal cardiac function were enrolled onto the study. Surgical unresectability was confirmed in 52 patients (63%) at laparotomy, and in 30 (27%) cases by CT scan of the abdomen and endoscopic ultrasonography. Chemotherapy treatment was: cisplatin 40 mg x m(-2); 5-fluorouracil 500 mg x m(-2); epidoxorubicin 35 mg x m(-2); 6S-leucovorin 250 mg x m(-2) and glutathione 1.5 g x m(-2) (PELF). One cycle consisted of 8 weekly treatments. Response to chemotherapy was observed in 40 of 82 patients (49%): six (7%) complete and 34 (41%) partial responses, and in four (5%) cases a complete pathological response was confirmed. Of the 40 responding patients, 37 (45%) had potentially curative surgery. Grade 3/4 leucopenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in three and two patients. At a median follow-up of 48 months, 25 of the 37 resected patients (68%) were alive and 24 (65%) were disease free. The median and 4-year survival for the whole group was 17 months and 31%, respectively. The median survival was 12 months for inoperable patients and it was not reached in resected patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Population-based sentinel lymph node biopsy in early invasive breast cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has been proposed as a reliable method for staging of early invasive breast cancer (EIBC). In the present study we analyse the impact of this procedure when systematically applied to all unselected women of a community-based Breast Cancer Unit (BCU). METHODS: All consecutive women with unifocal cT1-2 (<or=3 cm) cN0 EIBC diagnosed at our BCU were considered for radiocolloid sentinel node localisation and biopsy. RESULTS: Only 387 of all consecutive 542 patients met eligibility criteria for SLNB. Reasons for ineligibility included tumour size, palpable axillary nodes, plurifocality and/or multicentricity, and refusal to undergo the procedure. Successful SLNB was performed in 362 patients (94% of those eligible), but in 108 of these axillary dissection (AD) had to be performed anyway, mainly because of SLN-positivity. Therefore, SLNB ultimately allowed sparing axillary dissection in 256 patients out of the entire population of women with EIBC. CONCLUSIONS: Radiocolloid-guided SLNB, when appropriately applied in the context of a population-based service, can help in sparing unnecessary AD, with its related costs and morbidity, in approximately half of all women presenting with EIBC. In absolute terms, in the EU this could result in approximately 100,000 unnecessary AD avoided each year.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Adjuvant therapy for stage II colon cancer: an elephant in the living room?

At present, standard adjuvant treatment for patients with stage III colon cancer after surgical resection is represented by 6 months of chemotherapy based on 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin regimens. Even elderly patients enjoy the benefit of chemotherapy in terms of superior overall survival with no detrimental effects on quality of life. More questionable is the role of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II colon cancer patients, the standard of care for whom is surgical resection alone. Although a majority of patients will be cured with resection, a significant minority will ultimately relapse, suggesting the need to identify patients who may benefit from adjuvant therapy. Putative prognostic markers for stage II patients, as well as the state-of-the-art of the adjuvant treatment in this setting, are reviewed in this paper.

Chemotherapy, Adjuvant↗
PubMed2003

A phase II study of weekly cisplatin, 6S-stereoisomer leucovorin and fluorouracil as first-line chemotherapy for elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer.

The incidence of gastric cancer (GC) increases significantly after the fifth decade and palliative chemotherapy is the ultimate treatment in the majority of patients. We investigated safety and efficacy of a weekly regimen with cisplatin, fluorouracil and leucovorin as first-line chemotherapy for elderly patients with advanced GC. Chemotherapy-naive patients older than 65 years were considered eligible for study entry. Frail elderly patients were identified and excluded according to the following criteria: age >85 years, dependence in one or more activities of daily living (activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living scales), three or more comorbid conditions, one or more geriatric syndromes. Chemotherapy consisted of 1-day per week administration of intravenous cisplatin 35 mg m(-2), 6S-stereoisomer leucovorin 250 mg m(-2) and fluorouracil 500 mg m(-2) (PLF). Patients were re-evaluated after eight weekly cycles and six additional weekly administrations were planned for patients without disease progression. A 5-day subcutaneous filgrastim (5 mug Kg(-1) day(-1), days +1-+5) was used after the first treatment delay for neutropenia and maintained thereafter. In the whole group, the best intention-to-treat overall response rate was 43% (95% CI: 30-56%). The time to disease progression and the median survival time were 5.3 and 8.6 months, respectively. Fatigue was the commonest nonhaematologic toxicity (71% of the patients). Filgrastim was used in 30 patients who showed grade II (20 patients) or grade III (10 patients) neutropenia. Neither grade IV toxicity nor toxic deaths were observed. The weekly PLF regimen resulted safe and effective in elderly patients with advanced GC. This outpatient regimen is based on old and low-cost drugs and it may represent an alternative to new and more expensive combinations.

Age Factors↗