Central venous catheters and bloodstream infection.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to R Lefering.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
INTRODUCTION: Evidence-based medicine (EBM) has been proposed as a new paradigm of practising medicine. However, an unproductive polarisation between supporters and opponents can make its unbiased assessment difficult. This review gives an overview of the arguments and discusses their surgeon-specific importance. DISCUSSION: As EBM claims a position in the centre of medicine, it borders with other highly debated topics as, for instance, rationing and equity of care, doctor-patient interaction, medical research and education. Most arguments against EBM relate to its role in reducing health expenses by rationing healthcare. We think that the principles of EBM can be applied to make the inevitable process of rationing fair and reproducible. In addition, evidence-based surgery is criticised for interfering with patient individuality and physician autonomy, although this is a misunderstanding. Furthermore, the evidence-basis of EBM, in particular the randomised controlled trial (RCT) and systematic review, has been subject of discussion. Additionally, surgical research has its own inherent difficulties and, ultimately, some clinicians have doubted the practical feasibility of applying EBM at the bedside, because searching and critically appraising the literature is too difficult and time consuming. CONCLUSIONS: We believe that most critics consider EBM to be a potentially dangerous tool, because they fear it will be used against themselves. Thus, these conflicts only prove that EBM as a methodology may have a strong impact on solving them. As EBM has already made discernible progress, surgeons should not stand aside from these activities, which are bound to strongly influence healthcare in the next century.
A detailed analysis of the hospital-related costs of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in children was performed. Data on 10 laparoscopic cholecystectomies were collected prospectively. Pre-, intra- and postoperative variables were assessed by standardized questionnaires. The hotel costs and costs for nursing, physicians, medicaments and equipment were calculated in detail. Reusable instruments were assumed to be used for 50 operations per year over 5 years and the costs for disposable instruments were calculated for comparison. In addition, the data of 10 children who underwent open cholecystectomy were analyzed retrospectively. The mean hospital costs for one laparoscopic cholecystectomy was 3685 DM. The costs for the operation itself represented 36.5% of the hospital costs and were mainly due to expenses for surgeons and nurses. The costs for laparoscopic equipment and instruments represented only 8.5% of the total costs. If an open procedure instead of a laparoscopic operation had been performed with a similar duration of hospital stay, the hospital costs would have been reduced by 425 DM (11.5%). In laparoscopic cholecystectomy the costs for medical treatment in addition to the operation were 32.8% of the total costs and were mainly due to expenses for nursing and physicians, which added up to 165 DM per day. The hotel costs represented 30.7% of the total costs and added another 189 DM per day. Therefore, potential savings in the operation theatre are limited and most effective savings may be achieved by shortening the hospital stay. The use of disposable instruments would have increased the costs by 844 DM and already 20 operations per year would have been cheaper performed with reusable compared to disposable instruments. Reusable instruments are recommended. Additional 60 minutes operating time cost 312 DM (5.20 DM/minute) and therefore, laparoscopic training courses for surgeons may be cost-effective in order to reduce the costs for training in the operation theatre.
Quantification of therapeutic activities using the Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System (TISS) is an alternative approach to evaluate outcome of patients in intensive care. The reason for using cumulative TISS points is to integrate various adverse events (except mortality) according to the amount of therapeutic effort that they require. The reduced version of TISS with 28 items (TISS-28) allows a reliable assessment of therapeutic activities with limited observer variation, provided that an exact description of all items is given. Measurements can be validated by correlations with established severity of -disease classification systems such as APACHE II. Cumulative TISS-28 values correlate well with length of ICU stay (r = 0.98). On average, 27.2 points/day can be expected in an unselected mixed surgical ICU. Those who die can be included in non-parametric analyses of cumulative TISS values by allocation of arbitrary high values. Quantification of therapeutic interventions is a sensitive measure of outcome in patients who require intensive care but have a low risk of mortality. The usefulness of economic analysis further supports its clinical application.
The ATMI study of prevention of mediastinitis after cardiac surgery uses the total amount of therapeutic interventions measured by the TISS-28 score as the primary endpoint. The study is designed as an adaptive group-sequential plan with three sequences, as experiences with the TISS-28 in cardiac intensive care units are scarce. According to the Bauer-Köhne method the sample sizes of the second and third sequences can be calculated in a data-driven manner after the results of the previous interim analyses are available. Thus the first trial phase can be considered as an internal pilot study.
During the consensus-based process of protocol development external experts were invited to comment on a proposal for a trial protocol on adjuvant immunotreatment of patients with wound infection after median sternotomy (ATMI). Controversies and arguments can be divided into five main areas: 1) rationale and objectives; 2) criteria for patient selection; 3) adjuvant treatment; 4) measures of efficacy; and 5) course and timetable of the study. We present and summarise the experts comments and criticism as well as the result of the final discussion of the study group with respect to these areas.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: Based on personal observations the neuromuscular blocking potency of atracurium was supposed to be diminished in purulent intrathoracic diseases. This hypothesis was tested in a prospective clinical trial. METHODS: 52 adult patients undergoing general anaesthesia (methohexitone, sufentanil, flunitrazepam, N2O, enflurane) for elective thoracic surgery were investigated. After the intubation dose of 0.6 mg/kg atracurium was applied continuously to maintain a 90% suppression of the evoked compound electromyogram. According to the intraoperatively established diagnosis patients were allocated to three categories: 1) non-malignant tumor as the control group (n = 15), 2) lung cancer (n = 22), 3) purulent intrathoracic process without tumor (n = 15). The groups were compared regarding onset time, DUR 10% and maintenance dose of atracurium. RESULTS: Patients with lung cancer did not differ significantly from the controls regarding efficiency of atracurium. In contrast, patients with a purulent intrathoracic process showed a significantly longer onset time (6.3 +/- 2.5 vs. 2.9 +/- 0.8 min, p < 0.001), and a significantly shorter DUR 10% (23 +/- 6 vs. 36 +/- 10 min, p < 0.001) compared to the control group. Mean infusion rate of atracurium to maintain a 90% suppression of the evoked compound electromyogram was significantly higher in patients with a purulent process compared to the controls (10.5 +/- 3.2 vs. 6.0 +/- 1.2 micrograms/kg.min, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our results support the hypothesis that patients with a purulent intrathoracic disease show a clear reduction in neuromuscular blocking potency of atracurium.
From March 1994 to March 1996, 287 patients, presenting with lower extremity injuries, who required immobilizing bandages or casts, where included in a prospective, randomized study. These patients received either low-molecular heparin or acetylsalicylic acid for thrombosis prophylaxis. In all patients a clinical examination and a colour-coded duplex sonography were performed after removal of the cast for detection of lower extremity venous thrombosis. A plebography was performed when thrombosis was suspected. A subcutaneous injection of divarin 1750 was given once daily in 143 patients. Thrombosis prophylaxis with Aspirin 2 x 500 mg administered orally was performed in 144 patients. Deep vein thrombosis occurred in 9 patients (6.3%) with clivarin prophylaxis and in 7 patients (4.8%) treated with Aspirin. In both groups, no clinically significant side effects of the medications were observed.
Fecal incontinence is a serious problem especially for the elderly. The epidemiology of incontinence is not well described in the literature although it is often used as an endpoint for treatment evaluation in clinical trials. Complete continence is often assumed to be the "normal" standard. The goals of this study were to establish detailed prevalence rates for fecal incontinence in a standard population and to identify differences due to age and sex. A questionnaire about fecal incontinence and its consequences with predefined answers was filled out anonymously by 500 volunteers. The study population was selected to meet the respective age and sex distribution of the German adult population. The data indicated that 4.8% of the persons were unable to control solid stools, while 19.6% had problems at least with one type of incontinence (solid, pasty, or lipid stools, winds). Problems with pasty or liquid stools are more frequent in women. The ability to control wind is decreased in elderly persons. The time needed to reach a toilet is shorter for women, and generally decreases in the elderly. Men more often describe soiling the underwear. Persons with signs of incontinence show decreased levels of social activities. A global incontinence rate of 5% fits well with some previously published results. Soiling of the underwear is not well suited for defining incontinence. The increased rate in women may in part be explained by morphological differences. The reduced time to hold stools especially in the elderly in combination with a reduced mobility may result in a higher rate of incontinence, which is correlated with reduced social activities.
In this article sepsis scoring systems commonly used are presented as regards their results and shortcomings. Furthermore, in a more general context, the direct and indirect effect on the individual patients is discussed and recommendations are given on how to use scoring systems.
AIM: To compare the effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic and conventional "open" appendectomy in the treatment of acute appendicitis. METHODS: Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials available by May 1998 that compared both techniques. Within each trial and for each outcome an effect size was calculated; the effect sizes were then pooled by a random-effects model. RESULTS: We summarised outcome data of 2877 patients included in 28 trials. Operating time was +16 min (95% confidence interval +12-20 min) longer for laparoscopic appendectomy. Overall complication rates were comparable, but wound infections were definitely reduced after laparoscopy [rate difference -4.2%, (-2.3% to -6.1%)]. Intra-abdominal abscesses, however, occurred slightly more frequently [+0.9%, (-0.4% to +2.3%)]. Hospital stay after laparoscopic appendectomy was 15 h (8-23 h) shorter, and patients returned to full fitness or work 7 days (5-9 days) earlier. Pain intensity on day 1 was slightly less. Heterogeneity was present for some outcome measures due to methodological differences among the primary studies. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic appendectomy reduces wound infections and eases postoperative recovery. Nevertheless, the various differences among the primary studies and their partly flawed methodology make it difficult to generalise from these findings.
All 1994 publications of four leading journals in surgery, orthopedics and internal medicine in Germany (Der Chirurg, Der Unfallchirurg, Langenbecks Archiv für Chirurgie, Medizinische Klinik) were reviewed by means of a structured analysis. The type of article, authorship, number of references, geographical location, quality, and main conclusion (positive; neutral; negative) of each article were documented. The journals focused on clinical studies (32.2-59.6%), case reports (11.0-26.1%) and reviews (6.4-40.9%). Articles about surgical techniques were mainly found in Der Chirurg (16.9%), experimental studies in Der Unfallchirurg (14.7%) and Langenbecks Archiv für Chirurgie (25.7%). Most articles were written by university clinic personnel (62.6-81.4%). In 11.0-22.6% of all articles, the head of a clinic was the first author and the co-author in 36.5-58.7%. Women were found to be first author in 4% in surgery, and in 10.4% in internal medicine. Of a total of 495 publications, 53.9% were written in Northrhine-Westphalia, Bavaria or Baden-Württemberg and only 1.6% in the five new federal states. Of all articles 16.4% were by foreign authors, with 10.5% originating from German-speaking countries. The portion of controlled randomized trials ranged between 4.9% (Der Unfallchirurg) and 11.3% (Der Chirurg) of all published studies. Studies and case reports with negative results were found to be more evident in Der Chirurg and Langenbecks Archiv für Chirurgie (ca. 20%) as compared to Der Unfallchirurg and Medizinische Klinik (ca. 6%). All journals provided good general information about the actual developments in a variety of topics to the reader. However, some improvement concerning international contributions, participation of the new federal states, and the quality of studies is recommended.
Clinical experience has shown that concomitant diseases and risk factors have a significant influence on the patient's outcome. Since none of the currently available score systems consider the impact of concomitant diseases or risk factors on burn trauma mortality, the present study was planned to further evaluate the role of these factors. Four hundred and ninety-eight patients could be included in this retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. Parameters documented were: sex, age, weight, height, laboratory data, TBSA, inhalation trauma (IHT), full thickness (3 degrees) burn and pre-existing conditions. Single-variable analysis (SVA), logistic regression and CART analysis were performed. The data confirm the role of age and TBSA as the strongest prognostic variables. Chronic alcohol abuse and smoking, IHT and pre-existing cardiac and neurologic conditions were also found to be significant. Borderline groups could be identified in the ABSI score (7-10), where the risk factors cause 'mortality-shifting'. It can be concluded that risk factors and pre-existing conditions have a significant impact on the prognosis of burn mortality and should be incorporated into further refinements of burn admission scores.
BACKGROUND: Most standard trauma score systems have been developed and validated in the United States. However, trauma differs between the United States and Germany. This prospective study tested the validity of eight current trauma scoring systems (Glasgow Coma Scale, Trauma Score, Revised Trauma Score, Injury Severity Score, TRISSTS, TRISSRTS, Prehospital Index, Polytraumaschluessel) in 612 patients in Cologne. METHODS: Between January 1, 1987, and December 31, 1987, 2,136 trauma related emergencies were seen by emergency physicians in the field. All trauma patients with a Trauma Score below 16 and a random sample of 10% of patients with a Trauma Score of 16 were included in the study (n = 625). Follow-up was successfully completed for 612 patients (97%). Their hospital outcome was correlated with their individual score result. RESULTS: All trauma score systems under study showed high accuracy rates. TRISSRTS and TRISSTS performed best with values of above 0.97 for the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the standard trauma score systems are valid tools for patient classification and support TRISSRTS as the international reference score system for the assessment of injury severity. This validation will allow comparisons between different trauma care systems.
The results of a nationwide survey regarding the treatment of incisional hernias following open laparotomy revealed that the Mayo-duplication is the surgical technique preferred by the majority of surgeons. However, in exceptional situations alloplastic material is implanted by up to 50% of the surgeons asked. More than one forth of the departments performed more than 30 incisional hernia repairs per year. Even for complicated cases the surgeons' own estimation of their recurrence rates was 11.7%. Compared with the data (recurrence rate of the Mayo-duplication of 30%-50%) published in the literature there seems to be a quantitative and qualitative underestimation of the treatment of incisional hernias.
The data of 1037 severely injured patients (mean ISS = 20) from 15 clinics were centrally and prospectively collected in the Trauma Registry of the German Society of Trauma Surgery and analyzed anonymously. Significant differences in respect to the treatment criteria (i.e., duration of basic diagnostics in severe trauma) and quality of outcome (TRISS method and Z statistic) were revealed for some clinics. The feedback of their data offers the associated clinics the possibility of identification of treatment phases that are worth being optimized.
The APACHE II score is a well-known measure of illness severity and widely used for prognosis in the ICU. A total of 91 trauma patients were identified among 939 ICU admissions (18 months), and their actual mortality (11/91; 12.1%) clearly exceeds the prognosis due to APACHE II (7.1%). Trauma-specific scores (TRISS, ISS, and RTS) revealed much higher estimates: 13%-22% which confirms a systematic underestimation of risk of death score in trauma patients in the APACHE system.