Biomedical subjects

R Libman

Publications and source records attributed to R Libman.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Quality improvement in acute stroke: the New York State Stroke Center Designation Project.

BACKGROUND: Many hospitals lack the infrastructure required to treat patients with acute stroke. The Brain Attack Coalition (BAC) published guidelines for the establishment of primary stroke centers. OBJECTIVE: To determine if stroke center designation and selective triage of acute stroke patients improve quality of care. METHODS: Baseline chart abstraction was performed on all stroke patients admitted to 32 hospitals serving Brooklyn and Queens, NY, from March to May 2002. Hospitals were invited to meet BAC guideline-based criteria. Adherence was verified by on-site visits. After designation, acute stroke patients were selectively triaged. Remeasurement data were collected from August to October 2003. RESULTS: The authors abstracted 1,598 charts at baseline and 1,442 charts at remeasurement. From baseline to remeasurement, median times decreased for door to physician contact (25 vs 15 minutes, p = 0.001), CT performance for potential tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) candidates (68 vs 32 minutes, p < 0.001), and t-PA administration (109 vs 98 minutes (p = NS). IV t-PA utilization increased from 2.4 to 5.2% (p < 0.005), select t-PA protocol violations decreased from 11.1 to 7.9% (p = NS), and the stroke unit admission rate increased from 16 to 39% (p < 0.001). In stroke centers (n = 14) vs nondesignated hospitals (n = 18), there were shorter median times from door to physician contact (10 vs 25 minutes, p < 0.001), CT performance for potential t-PA candidates (31 vs 40 minutes, p = NS), and t-PA administration (95 vs 115 minutes, p < 0.05). Stroke centers, compared with nondesignated centers, admitted acute stroke patients to stroke units more often (55.9 vs 10.9%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Stroke center designation and selective triage of acute stroke patients improved the quality of care, including access to timely thrombolytic therapy and stroke units.

Aged↗

PubMed2000

Predicting prognosis after stroke: a placebo group analysis from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Trial.

BACKGROUND: Physicians are often asked to predict outcome after acute stroke. Very little information is available that can reliably predict the likelihood of severe disability or death. OBJECTIVE: To develop a practical method for predicting a poor outcome after acute ischemic stroke. METHODS: Data from the placebo arms of Parts 1 and 2 of the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA [recombinant tissue plasminogen activator] Stroke Trial were used to identify variables that could predict a poor outcome, defined as moderately severe disability, severe disability, or death (Modified Rankin Scale score >3) 3 months after stroke. RESULTS: Baseline variables that predicted poor outcome were the NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) >17 plus atrial fibrillation, yielding a positive predictive value (PPV) of 96% (95% CI, 88 to 100%). The best predictor at 24 hours was NIHSS >22, yielding a PPV of 98% (95% CI, 93 to 100%). The best predictor at 7 to 10 days was NIHSS >16, yielding a PPV of 92% (95% CI, 85 to 99%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a severe neurologic deficit after acute ischemic stroke, as measured by the NIHSS, have a poor prognosis. During the first week after acute ischemic stroke, it is possible to identify a subset of patients who are highly likely to have a poor outcome. These findings require confirmation in a separate study.

Aged↗

PubMed2000

Guillain-Barré syndrome: An unusual presentation of West Nile virus infection.

West Nile fever is a mosquito-borne febrile illness seen in Africa, Asia, and Europe, but reported in North America only once. The recent outbreak in New York City represents the first time this virus has been detected in North America. West Nile virus usually causes mild symptoms, though rarely it can cause neurologic diseases, with a fatal outcome or permanent neurologic sequelae. We describe an elderly patient with West Nile virus infection who presented with Guillain-Barré syndrome.

Aged↗

PubMed2000

Placebo treatment in acute stroke trials : benefit or harm to patients?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Some stroke patients and their families express reservations about participating in trials of experimental therapies for acute stroke. Among many reasons given for this is the concern that by participating, patients may be deprived of some component of routine care. We sought to determine the effect on outcome of participating in a clinical stroke trial while being treated with placebo. METHODS: Prospective clinical information was collected for all patients admitted with acute ischemic stroke between July 1995 and July 1996. A subgroup of these patients was enrolled in a clinical trial of acute stroke therapy and had been randomly assigned to the placebo group. The control group was selected from concurrent stroke patients who were not enrolled in any clinical trial. The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) was performed on admission and on day 7 after admission. The Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) was also performed at discharge. Stroke severity was classified as "severe" if NIHSS was >/=9 or GOS >/=3. Group comparisons were performed with chi(2) tests. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-six patients were evaluated. Forty-seven were placebo patients, and 79 were selected as control subjects. There were no significant differences between the groups with respect to age, sex, hematocrit, blood glucose level, history of hypertension, diabetes, smoking, or initial NIHSS. In addition, there was no difference between groups in terms of the frequency of baseline stroke subtype. Among our controls, 55 patients (70%) were on antithrombotic treatment during hospitalization, whereas none of our placebo patients were on any antithrombotic treatment. For the GOS at follow-up, a good outcome was attained by 76% of the control subjects and 72% of placebo patients (not significant). A severe NIHSS (>9) at follow-up, however, was documented in 15% of controls and 59% of placebo patients (P<0.001). There was a trend toward a higher ("worse") mean follow-up NIHSS among placebo patients (mean NIHSS, 11) versus controls (mean NIHSS, 6) (P=0.09). CONCLUSIONS: Patients enrolled in the placebo arms of some acute clinical stroke trials have similar functional outcomes but more severe neurological deficits at 1 week than did a control group. These findings might be partially explained by the withholding of antithrombotic medication and the exclusion criteria inherent in most trials. Vigilance is required to ensure that all patients participating in stroke studies be guaranteed optimal known medical therapy.

Aged↗

PubMed1999

Agreement and variability in the interpretation of early CT changes in stroke patients qualifying for intravenous rtPA therapy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Ischemic changes identified on CT scans performed in the first few hours after stroke onset, which are thought to possibly represent early cytotoxic edema and development of irreversible injury, may have important implications for subsequent treatment. However, insecurity and conflicting data exist over the ability of clinicians to correctly recognize and interpret these changes. We performed a detailed review of selected baseline CT scans from the NINDS rt-PA Stroke Trial to test agreement among experienced stroke specialists and other physicians on the presence of early CT ischemic changes. METHODS: Seventy baseline CT scans from the NINDS Stroke Trial were read and classified for the presence or absence of various early findings of ischemia by 16 individuals, including NINDS trial investigators, other neurologists, other emergency medicine physicians, and radiology or stroke fellows. CT scans included normal scans and scans from patients who later developed symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, as well as scans on which the NINDS rt-PA Stroke Trial neuroradiologist identified clear-cut early CT changes. For each CT finding, kappa-statistics were used to assess the proportion of agreement beyond chance. RESULTS: kappa-Values (95% confidence interval [CI]) ranged from 0.20 (-0.20, 0.61) (fair agreement) to 0.41 (0.37, 0.45) (moderate agreement) among the 16 viewers, and the kappa-value was only 0.39 (0.29, 0.49) (fair) in answer to the question "do early CT changes involve more than one third of the MCA [middle cerebral artery] territory?" There was substantial variability within each specialty group and between groups. kappa-Values were only fair to moderate even among physicians experienced in selecting and treating acute stroke patients with rtPA. Observed agreement ranged from 68% to 85%. Physicians agreed on the finding of early CT changes involving >33% of the MCA territory 77% of the time, although the kappa-value of 0.39 suggested only moderate agreement beyond chance. CONCLUSIONS: There is considerable lack of agreement, even among experienced clinicians, in recognizing and quantifying early CT changes. Improved methods of recognizing and quantifying early ischemic brain damage are needed.

Cerebrovascular Disorders↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Avoiding patient injury during general anesthesia.

Attention to detail when preparing a dental patient for rehabilitation utilizing general anesthesia will prevent a variety of positional and traumatic injuries. The dentist and anesthesiologist must anticipate potential hazards to the unconscious patient.

Accident Prevention↗