PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R M L Doran

Publications and source records attributed to R M L Doran.

4 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2004

Adjustable and non-adjustable strabismus surgery: a retrospective case-matched study.

Adjustable suture strabismus surgery was introduced to improve results in unpredictable strabismus cases. However, its usage is increasing and in some centres is routine. The present authors propose that the routine use of the adjustable suture technique can only be justified if it can be shown to confer an advantage to the patient. In a retrospective analysis of matched data, they compared the results of their adjustable with non-adjustable strabismus surgery. The adjustable suture procedures performed during a 5-year period, on non-thyroid eye disease patients, were matched to non-adjustable cases according to the type and aetiology of strabismus and the magnitude of deviation. Pairs were matched as closely as possible according to age and strabismus surgery history. All cases were incomitant. The surgical results of the two groups were analysed with regard to the pre-operative and post-operative angles of deviation, the post-operative drift, and a successful outcome, pre-defined by carefully selected criteria. Twenty-six cases were analysed in each of the two groups. Mean pre- and post-operative angles of deviation showed no significant difference between the two groups. 'Success' rates were 81% in the adjustable group and 88% in the non-adjustable group. Given that the success rate of the two techniques is similarly high, a much larger study is required to detect a difference in results, with statistical significance. The authors conclude that there is currently insufficient evidence that patients, without thyroid eye disease, benefit from the longer and potentially uncomfortable procedure of adjustable suture strabismus surgery to support its rapidly growing use and that a prospective randomised controlled trial is indicated.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

The usefulness of Vistech and FACT contrast sensitivity charts for cataract and refractive surgery outcomes research.

AIM: To investigate the repeatability and sensitivity of two commonly used sine wave patch charts for contrast sensitivity (CS) measurement in cataract and refractive surgery outcomes. METHODS: The Vistech CS chart and its descendant, the Functional Acuity Contrast Test (FACT), were administered in three experiments: (1) Post-LASIK and age matched normal subjects; (2) Preoperative cataract surgery and age matched normal subjects; (3) Test-retest repeatability data in normal subjects. RESULTS: Contrast sensitivity was similar between post-LASIK and control groups and between the Vistech and FACT charts. The percentage of subjects one month post-LASIK achieving the maximum score across spatial frequencies (1.5, 3, 6, 12, 18 cycles per degree) were (50, 33, 13, 13, 0 respectively) for FACT, but only (0, 0, 13, 4, 0 respectively) for Vistech. A small number of cataract patients also registered the maximum score on the FACT, but up to 60% did not achieve the minimum score. Test-retest intraclass correlation coefficients varied from 0.28 to 0.64 for Vistech and 0.18 to 0.45 for FACT. Bland-Altman limits of agreement across spatial frequencies were between +/-0.30 and +/-0.85 logCS for Vistech, and +/-0.30 to +/-0.75 logCS for FACT. DISCUSSION: The Vistech was confirmed as providing poorly repeatable data. The FACT chart, likely because of a smaller step size, showed slightly better retest agreement. However, the reduced range of scores on the chart due to the smaller step size led to ceiling (post-LASIK) and floor (cataract) effects. These problems could mask subtle differences between groups of patients with near normal visual function as found post-refractive or cataract surgery. The Vistech and FACT CS charts are ill suited for refractive or cataract surgery outcomes research.

Adult↗