PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R M Lush

Publications and source records attributed to R M Lush.

29 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Coadministration of nefazodone and benzodiazepines: I. Pharmacodynamic assessment.

One hundred two healthy men were evaluated in one of three studies conducted to evaluate the coadministration of nefazodone, 200 mg twice daily, and three benzodiazepines: triazolam, 0.25 mg; alprazolam, 1 mg twice daily; or lorazepam, 2 mg twice daily. In the first study, psychomotor performance, memory, and sedation were assessed at 0, 0.5, 1.5, 2.5, and 9 hours after single doses of triazolam alone and again after 7 days of nefazodone. Data from 6 of 12 subjects in this study were evaluable because of a dosing error in the other 6 subjects. In the subsequent two parallel design studies, groups of 12 volunteers received 7 days of either placebo; nefazodone, 200 mg; alprazolam, 1 mg twice daily; or alprazolam plus nefazodone or, in the second study, either placebo; nefazodone; lorazepam, 2 mg twice daily; or lorazepam plus nefazodone; the studies were identical, double-dummy, double-blind designs. Psychomotor performance, memory, and sedation were assessed at 0, 1, 3, and 8 hours after the 8 a.m. dose on days 1, 3, 5, and 7 of the studies. In all studies, blood samples were also obtained at testing times so that effect/concentration comparisons could be made and so full pharmacokinetic analyses could be done for separate studies. Nefazodone had no effect on psychomotor performance, memory, or sedation relative to placebo in any study. The mean maximum observed effect (MaxOE) on psychomotor performance and sedation were increased when triazolam was given after 7 days of nefazodone (p < 0.05); also, triazolam concentration was 60% higher at this time. Alprazolam and lorazepam impaired performance on day 1 (mean MaxOE, 34 and 30%, respectively) relative to placebo and nefazodone. By day 7 of alprazolam or lorazepam, psychomotor impairment decreased, indicating the development of tolerance. Alprazolam plus nefazodone increased psychomotor impairment (MaxOE, approximately 50%) and sedation relative to alprazolam alone on days 3, 5, and 7 (p < 0.05). Higher alprazolam concentrations explained the increased impairment in the alprazolam plus nefazodone treatment group; however, it is also possible that there was a delay in the development of tolerance. There were no differences in psychomotor impairment, memory, sedation, or lorazepam concentration detected between the lorazepam alone and lorazepam plus nefazodone treatments. This is consistent with the absence of a pharmacokinetic interaction between nefazodone and lorazepam. These results indicate that if the coadministration of a benzodiazepine is required in patients receiving nefazodone therapy, clinically significant interactions would be less likely with those eliminated by conjugative metabolism such as lorazepam. In cases where a benzodiazepine eliminated by oxidative metabolism is required, a reduction in initial dosage and careful clinical evaluation for signs of psychomotor impairment may be appropriate.

Adult↗

Hepatic CT enhancement: comparison of ionic and nonionic contrast agents in the same patients.

PURPOSE: The authors prospectively compared the effects of ionic and nonionic contrast agents on hepatic enhancement at computed tomography (CT) in the same patient population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-six patients underwent abdominal CT with either ionic or nonionic contrast agents. At 6-month follow-up, the alternative agent was used. Pre- and postcontrast attenuation values of liver and vessels were obtained; enhancement and postinjection time of each image were recorded. The area under a computer-generated enhancement-time curve was calculated as a means of measuring enhancement over time. Mean liver enhancement with ionic and nonionic contrast agents was compared. RESULTS: Mean hepatic enhancement with ionic contrast material was greater than with nonionic contrast material at all time intervals through 90 seconds after injection. The difference was statistically significant from 61 to 70 seconds. Mean peak liver enhancement for ionic and nonionic contrast agents was nearly identical (59 and 58 HU, respectively), but mean time to peak hepatic enhancement with nonionic contrast agent was greater by 10 seconds. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that ionic contrast agent may effect greater liver tumor conspicuity.

Female↗

Hepatic CT enhancement. Part I. Alterations in the volume of contrast material within the same patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of alterations in the volume of contrast material on liver enhancement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients underwent repeat computed tomographic (CT) examinations within 6 months, the first with either 100, 150, or 180 mL of nonionic contrast material (2 mL/sec). In the second, only volume was altered. Liver attenuation was measured before and after contrast material administration, and enhancement was calculated for each image. Comparisons were made only within the same patients. RESULTS: Mean liver enhancement was greater with 150 mL compared with 100 mL beyond 55 seconds after injection. Mean peak enhancement was greater by 21 HU with 150 mL; mean time to peak enhancement was longer by 14 seconds. Mean liver enhancement was greater with 180 mL compared with 150 mL at all intervals beyond 80 seconds. Mean peak enhancement was greater by 22 HU; mean time to peak liver enhancement was longer by 24 seconds. CONCLUSION: Alterations in contrast material volume have substantial impact on liver enhancement and potentially tumor conspicuity. The optimal window of time for liver imaging after contrast material injection varies with the volume administered.

Adult↗

Hepatic CT enhancement. Part II. Alterations in contrast material volume and rate of injection within the same patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of alterations in contrast material volume and injection rate on liver computed tomographic (CT) enhancement within the same patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty patients underwent repeat CT within 6 months, one with 150 mL of nonionic contrast material at 2 mL/sec, the other with 150 mL (n = 8, group A), 100 mL (n = 14, group B), or 180 mL (n = 18, group C) at 3 mL/sec. Comparisons were made only within the same patients. RESULTS: In group A, mean liver enhancement was greater with the higher rate (3 mL/sec) up to 130 seconds after injection, mean peak liver enhancement was greater by 10 HU, and mean time to peak enhancement was shorter by 15 seconds. In group B, mean peak enhancement was greater with 150 mL by 9 HU, and mean time to peak enhancement was longer by 27 seconds. In group C, peak enhancement and time to peak liver enhancement were greater. CONCLUSION: Contrast material volume and injection rate have interdependent effects on liver enhancement and potentially tumor conspicuity. Higher rates compensate partially for lower volume, but enhancement is still reduced. The optimal window of time for imaging after injection varies with injection technique.

Adult↗

Hepatic CT enhancement: a method to demonstrate reproducibility.

Optimal techniques for intravenous administration of contrast material in computed tomographic (CT) examination of the liver remain controversial mainly because of inaccurate methods of data evaluation. This study tested the reproducibility of hepatic contrast material enhancement within the same patient and the accuracy of two methods of data analysis. Fourteen patients received identical CT examinations. Attenuation of liver and vessels was measured before and after administration of contrast material, and enhancement was calculated for each image. Data were analyzed by averaging enhancement values obtained over 5- and 10-second intervals and by using a new computer program that creates an enhancement-time curve and measures area under the curve (AUC) for any specific time interval. Data were compared between patients' first and second examinations. Mean liver enhancement was nearly identical at all time intervals with the AUC technique. Analysis of interpatient data showed marked variability of all parameters at all measured time intervals, suggesting that results from comparative studies within the same patient may be more accurate than those for studies of two different treatment groups. The AUC technique is preferable to other methods of data analysis for contrast enhancement evaluation.

Adult↗

Container residue after the administration of aqueous activated charcoal products.

Commercial aqueous activated charcoal (AC) products may sit in emergency departments, pharmacies, and homes for prolonged periods resulting in the inability to resuspend the AC for patient administration. The potential risk to the patient from not receiving an adequate amount of AC, especially when AC may be the sole means of gastric decontamination, is obvious. To simulate this potential problem, samples of five different aqueous AC products (ActaChar, Actidose, InstaChar, LiquiChar, and SuperChar) were placed into storage for periods of 3 and 12 months. At the end of each study period, samples were agitated and the effluent and container residue were collected, oven-dried, and weighed. With the exception of Actidose, all products retained substantial amounts of AC in the container at both time intervals. These data stress the negative impact of dormant storage on the resuspendability of aqueous activated charcoal products. Furthermore, they suggest the importance of thorough container agitation and rinsing to insure that the patient receives sufficient AC. This is especially important when AC is the sole means of decontamination.

Charcoal↗

A phase II study of 5-aza-2'deoxycytidine (decitabine) in hormone independent metastatic (D2) prostate cancer.

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: Decitabine (5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine) is an S-phase-specific pyrimidine analog with hypomethylation properties. In laboratory models of prostate cancer (PC-3 and DU-145), decitabine induces cellular differentiation and enhanced expression of genes involved in tumor suppression, immunogenicity, and programmed cell death. METHODS: We conducted a phase II study of decitabine in 14 men with progressive, metastatic prostate cancer recurrent after total androgen blockade and flutamide withdrawal. Decitabine was administered at a dose of 75 mg/m2/dose i.v. as a 1 hour infusion every 8 hours for three doses. Cycles of therapy were repeated every 5 to 8 weeks to allow for resolution of toxicity. RESULTS: Two of 12 patients evaluable for response had stable disease with a time to progression of more than 10 weeks. This activity was seen in 2 of 3 African-American patients. Toxicity was similar to previously reported experience. No significant changes in urinary concentrations of the angiogenic factor bFGF, a potential biomarker of tumor activity, were identified over time in 7 unselected patients with progressive disease. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that decitabine is a well tolerated regimen with modest clinical activity against hormone-independent prostate cancer. Further investigations in patients of African-American origin may be warranted.

Aged↗

The mutated androgen receptor and its implications for the treatment of metastatic carcinoma of the prostate.

Androgen deprivation is the most effective therapy for patients with advanced prostatic carcinoma. The lack of androgen stimulation on these cells causes them to become apoptotic. Although therapeutic efficacy of initial androgen deprivation in prostate cancer is high, the emergence of androgen-independent cancer is inevitable. Withdrawal of the antiandrogen flutamide elicits surprising activity in these cancers. In numerous studies the response rates cell line harbors a mutation in codon 877 of the androgen receptor. The mutant receptor loses androgen specificity and is activated by various steroids as well as flutamide. Identical and similar mutations have now been isolated from human prostate cancer tissue. The discovery of the mutated androgen receptor sheds light on the emergence of androgen-independent cancer and should facilitate the development of more efficacious therapies.

Androgen Antagonists↗

The pharmacokinetics of TNP-470, a new angiogenesis inhibitor.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To characterize the pharmacokinetic profile of TNP-470, a synthetic analog of fumagillin that is a potent inhibitor of angiogenesis and inhibits neovascularization in several solid tumor models. DESIGN: A dose-escalation phase I clinical trial. SETTING: The National Institutes of Health. PATIENTS: Patients with human immunodeficiency virus-associated Kaposi's sarcoma. INTERVENTIONS: The TNP-470 dosage was increased in 13 sequential cohorts using a modified Fibonacci escalation scheme (4.6, 9.3, 15.4, 23.2, and 43.1 mg/m2). The drug was administered as a 1-hour intravenous infusion. Serial blood samples were collected and assayed by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography and the pharmacokinetics were characterized. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: There was a linear relationship between the dose of TNP-470 and both area under the curve to infinity (AUC[inf]) and time to maximum concentration (Cmax). The Cmax ranged between 6.6 ng/ml at the lowest dosage (4.6 mg/m2) and 597.1 ng/ml at the highest dosage (43.1 mg/m2). The agent was rapidly cleared from the circulation with a short terminal half-life (0.88 +/- 2.5 hr), which is consistent with preclinical data. Peak plasma concentrations of AGM-1883, an active metabolite, ranged between 0.4 and 158.1 ng/ml. CONCLUSION: Concentrations of TNP-470 that have in vitro activity were achievable in vivo. The drug was rapidly cleared from the circulation after a single 1-hour infusion. There was considerable interpatient variability in the clearance, but no evidence of saturable elimination. If more prolonged exposure is necessary for activity, administration of TNP-470 by continuous infusion may be suitable.

Adult↗

Continuous hyperthermic peritoneal perfusion with cisplatin for the treatment of peritoneal mesothelioma.

PURPOSE: Peritoneal mesothelioma remains a difficult therapeutic challenge. Aggressive debulking combined with continuous hyperthermic peritoneal perfusion (CHPP) using cisplatin (CDDP) is a novel strategy for the treatment of peritoneal mesothelioma, allowing high regional delivery of chemotherapeutics and hyperthermia while minimizing systemic toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From June 1993 to May 1996, 10 patients with peritoneal mesothelioma (six men, four women; mean age 40 years, range 15-57) underwent tumor debulking followed by a 90-minute CHPP. CHPP parameters included mean initial CDDP of 120 micrograms/mL (range 81-166), perfusate volume 5.2 L (range 4-7), flow 1.5 L/min, intraperitoneal temperature at three locations-41.5 degrees C, 40.5 degrees C, 41.1 degrees C, and core temperature 38.4 degrees C (range 37.2 degrees C-39.5 degrees C). Nine of 10 patients had malignant peritoneal mesothelioma, eight with associated ascites, while the tenth had a symptomatic, multiply recurrent benign peritoneal mesothelioma. Nine of 10 patients were optimally debulked. Pharmacokinetics were performed on blood and perfusate samples on nine patients; CDDP levels were quantitated by atomic absorption spectroscopy. RESULTS: Total perfusate cisplatin AUC was a mean of 21-fold higher (range 2- to 116-fold) than total serum cisplatin AUC, and serum CDDP behaved similarly to systemically administered CDDP. Median follow-up after CHPP is 10 months (range 2-32), with no treatment-related mortality. In eight optimally debulked patients there is no evidence of recurrent disease clinically or by CT or MRI. Seven patients with symptomatic ascites have been completely palliated. CONCLUSIONS: CHPP with CDDP is well tolerated with no significant regional toxicity. Because favorable CDDP pharmacokinetics suggest the potential for enhanced CDDP tumoricidal effect during CHPP, tumor debulking and CHPP may represent an effective strategy for the treatment of peritoneal mesothelioma.

Adolescent↗

Pharmacometric analysis of the effect of furosemide on suramin pharmacokinetics.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To characterize the effects of furosemide on the pharmacokinetics of suramin, a renally eliminated investigational antineoplastic agent. DESIGN: Retrospective population pharmacokinetic analysis. SETTING: Government biomedical research facility. PATIENTS: Twenty-six men with hormone-refractory prostate cancer and one with adrenocortical carcinoma. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received suramin by continuous or intermittent infusion with and without concomitant furosemide. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Optimum suramin regimens were achieved by adaptive feedback control, and pharmacokinetic data were collected both in the presence and absence of furosemide. Suramin concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (coefficient of variation < 8%). Suramin concentrations were fit to a three-compartment linear model with six coefficients and two rate inputs, which allowed furosemide to affect suramin pharmacokinetics. Individual and population parameter estimates were determined using the iterative two-stage approach. Concomitant furosemide was associated with a median decrease in total body clearance of suramin by 36% (range 0-63%, p < 0.0001). No other parameter was significantly altered, and there was no trend for change in any pharmacokinetic value with time. Suramin plasma concentrations were simulated with and without prolonged furosemide therapy in 26 patients for 12 weeks. The average suramin concentration increased by greater than 33% in 12 patients; 2 patients had a greater than 67% increase in this extreme case model. CONCLUSION: Coadministration of furosemide with suramin can cause an increase in suramin concentrations; however, due to suramin's long half-life, its rate of accumulation is very slow. Nonetheless, in individuals receiving suramin by nonadaptive control, appropriate precautions should be taken when prolonged furosemide therapy is begun.

Adrenal Cortex Neoplasms↗