Communicating about toxicological risks.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Health Education↗
Biomedical subjects
R M Meertens
Publications and source records attributed to R M Meertens.
Aetiology of burn injuries among children aged 0-4 years: results of a case-control study.
During the year 1987/1988 a case-control study was conducted, by means of a postal questionnaire, among parents of children aged 0-4 years. Cases (n = 122) were 0-4-year-old Dutch children who visited emergency departments with burn injuries. Controls (n = 213) were a sample of the Dutch population of 0-4-year-old children without burn injuries. Odds ratios based on logistic regression (OR-LR) and 90 per cent confidence intervals (CI (90 per cent) were calculated for a number of putative risk factors. The risk of burns was higher for children with other than Dutch (e.g. Turkish) ethnicity (OR-LR = 5.6; CI (90 per cent) = 2.6-11.9). Children who lived in relatively small houses turned out to have a higher risk of burns (OR-LR = 2.5; CI(90 per cent) = 1.3-4.7). To our surprise, children belonging to lower socioeconomic classes were found to have a decreased risk of burns (OR-LR = 0.3; CI (90 per cent) = 0.1-0.6). Furthermore, among several manipulatable risk factors, the use of an oven window which gets hot while in use appeared to have an increased risk of burns (OR-LR = 2.1; CI(90 per cent) 1.3-3.5). The same holds for the storage of hot drinks in their original pots instead of in vacuum flasks (OR-LR = 2.0; CI (90 per cent) 1.2-3.1). Cooking on a gas stove was found to be another risk factor (OR-LR = 2.5; CI(90 per cent) 1.1-10.0).
Burns↗
Determinants of behavioural risk factors for burn injuries.
Systematically developed health education should be based on a thorough knowledge of the determinants of the behavioural risk factors. Compared to other health-related behaviours, safety behaviour has some specific characteristics, which complicate studying its determinants. First, there is a multitude of circumstances leading to injuries, which means that it is not possible to pinpoint one desired behaviour to be linked with the prevention of injuries. Secondly, people are often not familiar with (the advantages and disadvantages of) all the possible preventive measures. Thirdly, the usefulness of preventive measures may depend on housing situations. So far, no elegant way of coping with these problems in examining the determinants of safety behaviour seems to have been suggested in the literature. In this article an approach to the study of determinants of safety behaviour is presented. The general description of this approach is illustrated by a study on the determinants of the behavioural risk factors for burn injuries in young children, which was conducted among Dutch and Turkish parents of children aged 0-4 years. The results indicate, for instance, that parents who implemented the safety behaviour reported that safety behaviour had become habitual to them.
Accidents, Home↗
The aetiology of burns in developed countries: review of the literature.
This article reviews the literature on the incidence and aetiology of burn injuries. Burn injuries are among the most serious injuries man can incur. Although prevention of burn injuries has been given a good deal of attention in the past, it has never been subjected to a systematic approach which could result in a thorough knowledge of the incidence and the major risk factors and risk groups. The methodological limitations of the studies carried out in this field are striking. For instance, none of the studies of risk factors has used a control population for comparison. No figures are available on the total number of burn injury patients in the Netherlands. Estimates are derived from the situation in other countries, which yields an incidence of four per 1000 per year. Scalds are relatively common in the 0-4-year category. This is usually assumed to be caused by the stage of development of motor and cognitive skills, coupled with incorrect assumptions about these skills by parents. Men are found to be more often the victims of burns than women. Coffee and tea are assumed to be risk factors. The supposed risk factors and risk groups need to be investigated in a controlled epidemiological study, in order to allow establishment of preventive measures.
Accidents, Home↗
How to study the aetiology of burn injury: the epidemiological approach.
Effective prevention of burn injury should be based on sound aetiological knowledge. This article deals with epidemiological methods to study the incidence of burn injury as a function of its risk factors. Central methodological issues are comparability of baseline prognosis, comparability of measurements (of effects in cohort studies and of risk factors in case-control studies), and comparability of external circumstances. These principles are clarified with a number of fictitious examples of risk factors for burn injury. It is explained that in preventive trials comparability may be achieved by randomization, blinding and placebo intervention. The main tools in non-experimental studies are deliberate selection and multivariate analysis. Special attention is given to the definition of the source population and to reducing measurement incomparability in case-control studies. Some well-designed case-control studies following these principles might bring effective prevention of burn injury some steps nearer.
Burns↗