PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R M Pijnappel

Publications and source records attributed to R M Pijnappel.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Diagnostic accuracy of needle-localized open breast biopsy for impalpable breast disease.

BACKGROUND: Needle-localized open breast biopsy (NLBB) is considered the gold standard procedure for the diagnosis of impalpable breast disease. In an observational follow-up study the sensitivity and negative predictive value of this procedure was determined in a clinical population with long-term follow-up. METHODS: Some 199 consecutive patients with a benign histological diagnosis on NLBB were followed for the occurrence of breast cancer, using information from the Dutch National Morbid-Anatomical Record Department. Based on a review of mammograms and histological slides, an expert panel decided whether the carcinomas detected during follow-up were newly developed, or were present already at the time of the NLBB. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 60.5 months, seven carcinomas were detected. At panel review, six appeared to have been missed by NLBB. The sensitivity of NLBB was 99 per cent after 2 years of follow-up, but dropped to 96 per cent after 5 years. Similarly, the negative predictive value dropped from 99 per cent after 2 years to 94 per cent after 5 years of follow-up. CONCLUSION: NLBB is an accurate diagnostic procedure for the evaluation of impalpable breast disease. However, with longer follow-up the accuracy becomes lower than generally reported.

Adult↗

The diagnostic accuracy of core biopsy in palpable and non-palpable breast lesions.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the accuracy of large-core needle biopsy in evaluating palpable and nonpalpable breast lesions. METHODS AND PATIENTS: Stereotaxic and ultrasound (US) guided core biopsies were performed in 103 breast lesions in 97 patients. Subsequently, all patients underwent surgery. All specimens (core biopsy and surgical) underwent radiography for evaluation of microcalcifications. The histopathologic findings of the core biopsies and the surgical specimens were correlated. RESULTS: Core biopsies and surgery findings were concordant in 100% of the 27 palpable lesions and in 89% of the 76 nonpalpable lesions. One case of malignancy, ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), was not diagnosed by core biopsy. In 102 (99%) of the 103 breast lesions, a correct choice for additional diagnostic procedure or definitive treatment could have been made upon histopathologic findings of core biopsy. CONCLUSION: Stereotaxic and ultrasound-guided core biopsy are safe, reliable and less traumatic than excisional biopsy. Special attention is necessary when atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) or DCIS without invasive carcinoma is found. Radiography of the biopsy specimens for detection of microcalcifications is essential.

Adult↗

[Digital roentgen-guided large-needle biopsy as an alternative to surgical biopsy in patients with nonpalpable mammographic abnormalities].

OBJECTIVE: To compare histopathological findings from stereotaxic needle core biopsies and from excision biopsies performed on patients with impalpable breast lesions suggestive of carcinoma. DESIGN: Prospective and descriptive, with a description of the stereotaxic needle core biopsy procedure. SETTING: Academic Hospital Utrecht, the Netherlands. METHODS: In 36 patients core biopsies were done with 14-gauge biopsy needles, followed by a localisation procedure with surgical biopsy. The pathological features of the core and excision specimens were compared. RESULTS: Results of 35 (97%) core biopsies corresponded to those of excision biopsies. Stereotaxic core biopsy was not possible due to technical problems in 2 cases. CONCLUSION: Stereotaxic core biopsy appears to be an acceptable alternative to excision biopsy.

Adult↗