PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R Marcén

Publications and source records attributed to R Marcén.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

A low incidence of new-onset insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus using tacrolimus in kidney recipients in Europe.

Employing tacrolimus (Tac) for routine immunosuppression in renal transplantation (RT), produced an incidence of new-onset, insulin-treated, diabetes mellitus (newDM) as high as 20%. More recently, several large multicenter kidney studies using Tac as the primary immunosuppressant have been reported in Europe. Between 1997 and 2001, we performed 155 RTs using Tac (0.2 mg/k/per day, targeting whole blood trough levels <15 ng/mL) with a rapid steroid taper. The acute rejection rate was 13%, and 89% of grafts are still functioning. Only 5 Tac-treated patients not previously requiring insulin needed insulin therapy for > or =30 days (3.2%). Eight separate studies employing Tac in at least one arm (N=2728) have been reported between 1997 and 2002. Tac was combined with azathioprine or MMF, and/or steroids. The incidence of new DM at study end ranged from 2.3% to 8.3%. The only trial with >6% incidence was the first one, using an initial dose of 0.3 mg/kg per day. The most recent studies utilized an initial dose of 0.2 mg/kg per day, targeting whole blood trough levels of <15 ng/mL and a steroid taper, with newDM at <6%. On the basis of these data, we confirm in that the use of Tac as a first-line immunosuppressant in renal transplant patients affords protection against acute rejection with a low level of newDM. The tendency to employ lower oral doses of Tac, lower blood target levels, and a reduced steroid dose appear to minimize glucose disturbances in RT.

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1↗

Renal transplant recipient outcome after losing the first graft.

Renal transplantation is the optimal therapy for end-stage renal failure and considerable attention has been given to graft and patient survival and the effectiveness of immunosuppressive regimens. However, little attention has been given to outcome for patients who lose their grafts. We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of the 793 first renal transplants performed at our institution between November 1979 and December 2001. A total of 348 patients lost their grafts, 116 by death with a functioning graft (33.3%) and 232 patients for other causes (66.7%). Eighty-six patients (37.1%) received a second transplant 3.5+/-2.4 years after returning to dialysis and the remainder continued on dialysis. Retransplanted patients were younger at the time of the first transplant (P=.000), and both time on dialysis (P=.012) and duration of graft function (P=.057) were shorter than for those remaining on dialysis. Therefore, retransplant patient survival at 1, 5, and 10 years was better than among those patients on dialysis not included on the waiting list (P<.001), but when compared with the relisted patients the survival rate was almost identical (96%, 85%, and 67% vs 97%, 82%, and 67%; P=NS). Almost 40% of patients who lost their first grafts were retransplanted. We did not observe differences in patient survival between retransplant and relisted patients. Because the number of cases is limited, our results need to be confirmed by larger series.

Adult↗

Influence of immunosuppression on the prevalence of cancer after kidney transplantation.

The prevalence of cancer in renal transplant patients is greater than in the general population. It is influenced by demographic and ethnic characteristics. We performed a retrospective study of 793 patients who received 872 kidney transplants at our center during 23 years. The age at transplantation was 41.4+/-14.0 years, the follow up 75.4+/-69.4 months. The cohorts include 203 patients treated with azathioprine-prednisone; 510, cyclosporine-based therapy; and 159, tacrolimus-based therapy. There were 95 patients (10.9%) who developed at least one neoplasm with 9 having more than one type of tumor. The incidence was of 17.3 cases per 1000 patients-years. Forty-four (46.3%) had skin cancer, 8 (8.4%) Kaposi sarcoma and 43 (45.3%) a non-skin cancer. Seven of eight patients with Kaposi sarcoma were on CsA therapy. The risk of developing a neoplasm at 5, 10, and 15 years was 8%, 17%, and 30% respectively. In a multivariate analysis, the risk factors associated with neoplastic diseases were older age (OR=1.061; 95% CI 1.039-1.084; P=.000), male sex (OR=2.658; 95% CI 1.536-4.599; P=.000), length of follow-up (OR=1.121; 95% CI 1.073-1.172; P =.000), and immunosuppression with CsA (OR=4.448; 95% CI 1.334-14.764; P=.015). Cancer was the cause of death in 26 patients, the fourth most common cause after cardiovascular disease, infection, and liver failure. We conclude that malignancies are an important cause of morbidity and mortality among transplant patients. Special attention must be devoted to older male patients with a long-term follow up to develop preventive and surveillance strategies.

Adult↗

Cytomegalovirus infection after renal transplantation: selective prophylaxis and treatment.

We have reviewed our experience in selective cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection prophylaxis and treatment in our renal transplant population. Between 1996 and 2001, 263 cadaveric renal transplant recipients had at least 6 months follow up. Immunosuppression was based on cyclosporine Neoral (n=108) or tacrolimus (n=155). CMV infection prophylaxis (oral acyclovir or gancyclovir at half usual doses) was only prescribed in recipients receiving a CMV positive ve kidney and in recipients treated with OKT3. CMV infection was diagnosed by a positive pp65 antigenemia upon appearance of CMV-related symptoms, leading to specific treatment (IV ganciclovir) only if symptoms were intense or there was visceral involvement. Thus, no preemptive treatment or programmed or periodic antigenemia was performed in any case. Nineteen episodes of symptomatic CMV infection were diagnosed (prevalence 7.2%). The frequency was similar for all immunosuppressive regimens. Only 9 of 19 (47%) of patients were given IV ganciclovir; the others were not treated. All patients survived without apparent complications, relapses, or recurrences. No oral gancyclovir was delivered after IV treatment. Our CMV prophylaxis protocol was limited to high-risk patients, using lower gancyclovir dosages than those usually advocated. It does not include programmed or scheduled search for CMV antigenemia in asymptomatic renal transplant patients. Despite these factors, our CMV infection rate and severity were similar to those reported with more aggressive protocols, with extended prophylaxis, preemptive therapy, or intense surveillance.

Acyclovir↗

Outcome of cadaveric renal transplant patients treated for 10 years with cyclosporine: is chronic allograft nephropathy the major cause of late graft loss?

BACKGROUND: The introduction of cyclosporine (CsA) has improved the short-term outcome of renal transplantation, but its effect on the long-term survival is not well known. METHODS: We analyzed 128 cadaveric first renal transplant recipients with CsA and prednisone as basal immunosuppression followed for at least 10 years, and we have compared them with a group of 185 historical patients treated with azathioprine (Aza) and prednisone. RESULTS: The 1-year graft survival was 83% in the CsA-treated patients and 68% in the Aza-treated patients (P<0.025), and the differences were significant for 3 years. Acute rejection accounted for the 10.9% of losses in CsA-treated patients and for 23.8% of losses in Aza-treated patients (P=0.046). Chronic allograft nephropathy was the cause of graft losses in 40.6% and 16.8% of cases (P=0.008). Patient survival at 5 years was 88% in CsA-treated patients and 79% in the Aza-treated patients (P<0.025). When analyzing the data of the 64 CsA-treated patients and the 84 Aza-treated patients with one functioning graft at 10 years, mean serum creatinine values were significantly higher in the CsA-treated patients at all time points but the increases were not significantly different. At 10 years, mean blood pressure was higher (P=0.002), and hypercholesterolemia (P=0.011) and hyperuricemia (P=0.000) were more prevalent in the CsA-treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: CsA resulted in a better short-time patient and graft survival that was not maintained in the long-term outcome. Chronic allograft nephropathy was the leading cause of graft loss in CsA-treated patients. Graft function was poorer in the CsA-treated patients, but its decline was similar in the two groups.

Adult↗

Differences between blood flow as indicated by the hemodialysis blood roller pump and blood flow measured by an ultrasonic sensor.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The ultrasonic transit time is currently the best method for measuring the blood flow rate in the extracorporeal hemodialysis circuit. The purpose of this study was to analyze the differences between blood flow as indicated by the hemodialysis blood roller pump (prescribed blood flow) and by an ultrasonic flowmeter (delivered blood flow). METHODS: The ultrasonic blood flow was measured in 20 patients on chronic hemodialysis who were dialyzed through an arteriovenous fistula. During each dialysis session the ultrasonic blood flow was measured at three different blood roller pump flow rates (300, 350, and 400 ml/min). In order to analyze the influence of inflow and outflow pressures on blood flow, this study was conducted during nine consecutive dialysis sessions during which needles of different sizes were used. RESULTS: The ultrasonic flow was always lower than indicated by the blood roller pump: 265+/-12, 304+/-15, and 341+/- 19 ml/min for blood roller pump flow rates of 300, 350, and 400 ml/min, respectively (variability: -11.6, -13.1, and -14.8%, respectively). An univariate regression analysis showed that the reduction in flow recorded ultrasonically correlated with both venous blood line pressure (r = -0.2679, p<0.001) and negative arterial blood line pressure (r = 0. 6773, p<0.001). By multivariate analysis, only the arterial blood line pressure has a predictive value. When all measurements were grouped by arterial blood line pressure ranges, the variability between ultrasonic blood flow and blood roller pump flow was found to be similar in those groups with the same arterial blood line pressure, regardless of the blood roller pump flow rate. CONCLUSIONS: The blood flow indicated by the dialysis blood roller pump is always greater than the delivered blood flow, and this difference is in turn conditioned by the negative pressure induced by the blood roller pump in the arterial blood line.

Blood Flow Velocity↗

Delayed graft function does not reduce the survival of renal transplant allografts.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of delayed graft function (DGF) in graft outcome when adjusted by the presence of acute rejection in the first month after transplantation. METHODS: A total of 437 cadaveric renal transplant patients on cyclosporine and steroids were included in the study. Variables related to donor, recipient, and graft were prospectively collected. RESULTS: The incidence of DGF was 44.4%. When patients dying with a functioning graft were censored, graft survival rates at 1 and 6 years were similar in patients with immediate function to those with DGF, when rejection was not present (96% and 81% vs. 95% and 83%, respectively). Rejection negatively influenced graft survival rates at 1 and 6 years, both in patients with immediate graft function (80% and 73%, P<0.05 vs. no DGF/no rejection) and more deeply in those with associated DGF (77% and 62%, P<0.001 vs. no DGF/no rejection). Rejection was more frequently diagnosed in patients with DGF than in those with immediate graft function (50% vs. 39.9%, P<0.05). Length of hospitalization was longer and the number of needle core biopsies was higher in patients with DGF or rejection. The presence of both complications had an additive effect. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that DGF did not adversely affect kidney graft survival in patients without rejection. However, it increased the length of hospitalization and the number of graft biopsies, thus increasing the cost of transplantation. Moreover, rejection was more frequent in patients with DGF, and it had a negative impact on graft outcome. Because the association of DGF and rejection gave the poorest outcome, an effort should be made to prevent both complications.

Adolescent↗