PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

R Melrose

Publications and source records attributed to R Melrose.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Types of optometric testing emphasized in different practice modes.

BACKGROUND: In order to determine if tests performed in an examination vary with practice settings, we surveyed all 5,200 California licensed optometrists and asked them to identify their primary mode of practice and the percentage of time and/or frequency that certain test procedures were done in an eye examination. METHODS: We restricted our analysis to three practice modes: private, corporate, and nonprofit/health maintenance organization (NP/HMO). We received a 66.4 percent response rate. To determine any trends in emphasis of testing by the three practice modes and to establish relationships between the three, we compared each mode of practice to the other. The combinations were private vs. corporate, corporate vs. NP/HMO, and private vs. NP/HMO. The three combinations were compared to the frequency of performing case history, stereo acuity testing, binocular vision testing, biomicroscopy, dilated fundus examination, tonometry and perimetry. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: We found the following relationships in the frequency/emphasis of testing as statistically significant: 1) For stereopsis testing: private practices performed it more often than corporate; 2) For binocular vision testing: private practices performed it more than did either corporate or NP/HMO, corporate performed it more than NP/HMO; 3) For tonometry: corporate performed it slightly more than NP/HMO; 4) For dilation: NP/HMO performed it more than both private and corporate; and 5) For perimetry: private performed it more than both corporate and NP/HMO.

Data Collection

Disruption of synchrony between parasite growth and host cell division is a determinant of differentiation to the merozoite in Theileria annulata.

The multinucleated macroschizont stage of the protozoon Theileria annulata is an intracellular parasite of bovine leukocytes. The parasite induces the host cell to proliferate, and divides in synchrony with the immortalised host cell. Differentiation to the next stage occurs within the host cell culminating in the release of merozoites and destruction of the leukocyte. In this study clones of Theileria annulata macroschizont-infected cell lines were isolated by limiting dilution and tested for differentiation to the merozoite stage (merogony). Two cloned cell lines underwent differentiation with enhanced efficiency, while two others were of lower efficiency. Quantification was carried out using monoclonal antibodies, which showed that over 90% of the cells in an enhanced cloned cell line could be induced to differentiate. By carrying out induction at 41 degrees C for limited periods of time followed by culture at 37 degrees C evidence was obtained that differentiation to the merozoite is a two-step process: a preliminary reversible phase, followed by a second irreversible phase of differentiation. Analysis of the nuclear number of the macroschizont and the growth rate of the cloned cell lines showed that the ability to differentiate was associated with an increase in nuclear number (size) of the macroschizont, generated by a disruption in the synchrony between parasite growth and host cell division. We believe that these results reveal a relationship between a reduction in parasite division and differentiation, and that there are similarities between stage differentiation in parasites and cellular differentiation in higher eukaryotes.

Animals