Biomedical subjects

R Moratto

Publications and source records attributed to R Moratto.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

PRIAMUS--proximal flow blockage cerebral protectIon during carotid stenting: results from a multicenter Italian registry.

AIM: The aim of this Italian prospective registry was to evaluate the applicability and efficacy of the Mo.Ma Device (Invatec, Roncadelle, Italy) for the prevention of cerebral embolization during carotid artery stenting (CAS) in a real world population. METHODS: In 4 Italian centers, 416 patients (300 men; mean age 71.6+/-9 years) between October 2001 and March 2005 were enrolled in a prospective registry. Two-hundred and sixty-four symptomatic (63.46%) with >50% diameter stenosis and 152 (36.54%) asymptomatic patients with >70% diameter stenosis were included. The Mo.Ma Proximal Flow Blockage Embolic Protection System was used to perform protected CAS, achieving cerebral protection by endovascular clamping of the common carotid artery (CCA) and of the external carotid artery (ECA). RESULTS: Technical success, defined as the ability to establish protection with the Mo.Ma device and to deploy the stent, was achieved in 412 cases (99.03%). The mean duration of flow blockage was 4.91+/-1.1 min. Transient intolerances to flow blockage were observed in 24 patients (5.76%), but in all cases the procedure was successfully completed. No peri-procedural strokes and deaths were observed. Complications during hospitalization included 16 minor strokes (3.84%), 3 transient ischemic attacks (0.72%), 2 deaths (0.48%) and 1 major stroke (0.24%). This resulted in a cumulative rate at discharge of 4.56% all strokes and deaths, and of 0.72% major strokes and deaths. All the patients underwent thirty-day follow-up. At thirty-day follow-up, there were no deaths and no minor and major strokes, confirming the overall cumulative 4.56% incidence of all strokes and deaths rate, and of 0.72% rate of major strokes and deaths at follow up. In 245 cases (58.89%) there was macroscopic evidence of debris after filtration of the aspirated blood. CONCLUSIONS: This Italian multicenter registry confirms and further supports the efficacy and applicability of the endovascular clamping concept with proximal flow blockage in a broad patient series. Results match favorably with current available studies on carotid stenting with cerebral protection.

Aged↗

PubMed2005

Effectiveness and safety of carotid endarterectomy under remifentanil.

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) with conscious sedation under remifentanil (Remifentanil anesthesia - RA) vs conventional loco-regional anesthesia (Conventional-LRA) in the current practice of a vascular surgery unit. METHODS: We introduced the ''Remifentanil-RA'' in our practice according to a two-step protocol. In the first step we performed a pilot prospective study to assess the procedure's safety and reproducibility in our setting on 60 consecutive patients with symptomatic and/or high-grade (>70%) internal carotid artery stenosis and alternately assigning them either to ''Remifentanil-RA'' or ''Conventional-LRA'' CEA. In the second step we analysed our routine operative records as to effectiveness and safety on 533 patients who consecutively underwent ''Remifentanil-RA'' CEA. We compared them with 533 age- and sex-matched historical controls who underwent ''Conventional-LRA'' CEA. RESULTS: The patients' mean age was 71.2+/-6.8 vs 71.8+/-6.1 (''Remifentanil-RA'' vs ''Conventional-LRA''). About 73% of them were male and 56% had a symptomatic carotid stenosis. Neither the pilot study nor second step comparison showed differences in outcome measures. We found only higher peri-operative nausea/ vomit (3.6% vs 0.4% ''Remifentanil-RA'' vs ''Conventional-LRA'', P<0.0002) and fewer re-operations for post-operative hematomas (3% vs 5.4% respectively, P=0.048). CONCLUSIONS: We found that ''Remifentanil-RA'' CEA was safe, effective and satisfactory. Nevertheless, with the potential problems of intubation and those already found with side effects, a randomized control trial (RCT) is needed in order to prove that this method is superior to ''Conventional-LRA'' CEA.

Aged↗

PubMed2004

First clinical experiences with an endovascular clamping system for neuroprotection during carotid stenting.

OBJECTIVES: This report evaluates the feasibility and efficacy of an endovascular blood flow blockage technique to prevent intracerebral embolization of plaque debris during carotid artery stenting. METHODS: Forty-two patients were enrolled in five clinical sites in Germany and Italy with either an asymptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis > or =75% (mean 87%) or a symptomatic stenosis > or =60% (mean 85%). Cerebral protection during the stenting procedure was achieved using an endovascular clamping technique, obtained by occlusion of the external and common carotid artery via two independently inflatable balloons integrated in the Mo.Ma system. Blood with particulate plaque debris was aspirated before flow was restored. The patient's clinical and the neurological status were assessed during intervention, at discharge, and at 3 months follow-up. RESULTS: Stenting was performed in all but one patient. The mean flow occlusion time was 10.6+/-6.5 min. Transient clamping intolerance was observed in five patients (12%). In two patients, neurological deficits persisted for 2 and 12 h, respectively. Two minor strokes (4,7%) occurred at 5 and 72 h after the procedure. No major strokes or deaths were observed at 3 months follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: This first clinical experience with the Mo.Ma device substantiates the feasibility of endovascular clamping in preventing cerebral embolization during carotid artery stenting.

Carotid Artery, Internal↗

PubMed1998

Experience with the Stentor endograft at four Italian centers.

PURPOSE: To report the outcome of an Italian multicenter trial of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) exclusion using the Stentor device. METHODS: Between April 1995 and July 1996, 66 patients (63 men; average age 69 years, range 53 to 84) with infrarenal AAAs meeting the inclusion criteria were enrolled. The average diameter of the aneurysm was 4.6 cm (range 4.2 to 7). Three (4.5%) of the 66 AAAs were anastomotic aneurysms. RESULTS: Sixteen (25%) tubular and 50 (76%) bifurcated endograft procedures were attempted; 4 (6.1%) were converted and 1 terminated owing to technical faults with the bifurcated graft's second limb. One tube graft was too short and failed to exclude an anastomotic aneurysm. Sixty (91%) endograft procedures were completed successfully. Six (9.1%) vascular complications occurred, three in one patient who subsequently died of pulmonary embolism 72 hours postoperatively (1.5% mortality). There were four (6.1%) proximal endoleaks; two sealed spontaneously in < 1 month, and a third was converted (7.6% conversion rate). The fourth is being observed. Clinical success (aneurysm exclusion with no death or endoleak) at 30 days was 86.3% (57/66). In the 23-month follow-up of 57 eligible patients, 2 patients died of unrelated causes and 1 graft limb thrombosed, requiring a crossover femoral bypass. One patient was converted to surgical repair at 5 months postoperatively when increasing aneurysm size signaled an undisclosed endoleak (1.8% late conversion rate). Five other secondary endoleaks were treated with endovascular techniques. CONCLUSIONS: The Stentor was technically feasible in 10% to 40% of AAA candidates in this study, although deployment of the second limb was problematic in the bifurcated device. Introduction of the second-generation Vanguard endograft brought this study to an end.

Aged↗

PubMed1997

The Italian trial of endovascular AAA exclusion using the Parodi endograft.

PURPOSE: To report the outcome of the prospective 11-center Italian Parodi Trial using straight and tapered endografts for the endovascular exclusion of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). METHODS: From April 1994 to July 1995, 27 patients were evaluated and selected for endovascular AAA exclusion. The Parodi devices were delivered through femoral arteriotomies using 18 to 22F introducers and deployed by balloon expansion of the terminal stents. RESULTS: Of 27 cases attempted, 24 endografts (15 tube, 9 aortomonoiliac) were implanted (1 deployment and 2 access failures [11.1%] were converted). Three endoleaks (12.5%) were treated intraoperatively with covered stents, two successfully, and the third sealed within 30 days. Three (12.5%) of the 24 treated patients died in-hospital of device-(n = 2) and procedure-related (n = 1) causes; the remaining 21 patients were discharged within 8 days. Of the 8 aortomonoiliac grafts in follow-up, only 1 (12.5%) failed in the mean 23-month (range 18 to 30) follow-up: however, 4 (31%) of 13 tube graft patients were converted to surgery within 18 months. Of the 16 (66.7%) surviving endografts at 2 years, 6 (38%) showed no change in the AAA diameter, while 10 (62%) had shrunk. CONCLUSIONS: The tube graft was applicable in only about 5% of cases, and accurate endograft sizing and distal fixation were problematic. The aortomonoiliac design was not appealing to surgeons but fared better in the long term. Given the advent of newer endograft models, the Italian Parodi Trial has been terminated.

Aged↗

PubMedDate not supplied

[Carotid endarterectomy using the classical technique and by eversion].

After a brief introduction on the history of the surgical treatment of carotid stenosis the authors illustrate both the classical endarterectomy and the eversion endarterectomy. The constant search for a technique which could be of easy execution and also reduce the risk of complication (especially late ones, such as restenosis), brought the authors to adopt the eversion endarterectomy with reimplantation of internal carotid artery. From 1990 through 1995, 1034 carotid endarterectomies were performed, of which 611 with eversion technique and 423 with others techniques. The average follow-up was 38 months. The eversion endarterectomy group had lower neurological morbidity and mortality rates, both early and late. Even more important, they had a lower incidence rate of hemodynamically relevant restenosis (0.37% in the eversion endarterectomy group vs 1.97% in the other group).

Adult↗