PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R Neman

Publications and source records attributed to R Neman.

5 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1975

Experimental evaluation of sensorimotor patterning used with mentally retarded children.

In the present study, a sensorimotor "patterning" program used with 66 institutionalized, mentally retarded children and adolescents was evaluated. The subjects were randomly assigned to one of three groups: (a) Experimental 1 group, which received a program of mobility exercises including patterning, creeping, and crawling; visual-motor training; and sensory stimulation exercises; (b) Experimental 2 group, which received a program of physical activity, personal attention, and the same sensory stimulation program given to the first group; or (c) Passive Control group, which provided baseline measures but which received no additional programming as part of the study. Experimental 1 group subjects improved more than subjects in the other groups in visual perception, program-related measures of mobility, and language ability. Intellectual functioning did not appear to be enhanced by the procedures, at least during the active phase of the project. The results were discussed with reference to other researchers who have failed to support the patterning approach, and some reasons were suggested for the differences between the present and past investigations.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1975

A reply to Zigler and Seitz.

The Zigler and Seitz (1975) critique was carefully examined with respect to the conclusions of the Neman et al. (1975) study. Particular attention was given to the following questions: (a) did experimenter bias or commitment account for the results, (b) were unreliable and invalid psychometric instruments used, (c) were the statistical analyses insufficient or incorrect, (d) did the results reflect no more than the operation of chance, and (e) were the results biased by artifactually inflated profile scores. Experimenter bias and commitment were shown to be insufficient to account for the results; a further review of Buros (1972) showed that there was no need for apprehension about the testing instruments; the statistical analyses were shown to exceed prevailing standards for research reporting; the results were shown to reflect valid findings at the .05 probability level; and the Neman et al. (1975) results for the profile measure were equally significant using either "raw" neurological scores or "scales" neurological age scores. Zigler, Seitz, and I agreed on the needs for (a) using multivariate analyses, where applicable, in studies having more than one dependent variable; (b) defining the population for which sensorimotor training procedures may be appropriately prescribed; and (c) validating the profile measure as a tool to assess neurological disorganization.

Adolescent↗