PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R Neri

Publications and source records attributed to R Neri.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources

Disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus: report of the Consensus Study Group of the European Workshop for Rheumatology Research. II. Identification of the variables indicative of disease activity and their use in the development of an activity score. The European Consensus Study Group for Disease Activity in SLE.

A European Consensus Group study, involving 29 centres from 14 countries, was performed in order to reach agreement on the definition of disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and to construct a new disease index. Data on 704 lupus patients were collected and analysed, using univariate and multivariate statistical procedures, to select those clinical and laboratory features of the disorder which best correlate with the global assessment of disease activity assigned to the patients by the physician of each participating centre. A combination of 15 clinical and laboratory variables was shown to be the best predictor of disease activity in SLE. A European Consensus Lupus Activity Measurement (ECLAM) was then formulated. This index included the 15 selected variables, weighted (with some adjustments) according to their respective regression coefficients in the multivariate model. ECLAM appears to be an effective instrument for scoring patients with different degrees of disease activity. This is the first SLE disease activity index based on data from a very large number of lupus patients followed at a large number of lupus centres in different countries. It might therefore very well serve as a standardised measure for future European clinical studies. Final assessment of the validity, reliability and sensitivity of this index is now underway.

Europe↗

Development of a functional disability measurement tool to assess early arthritis: the Recent-Onset Arthritis Disability (ROAD) questionnaire.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a self-administered questionnaire, the ROAD (Recent-Onset Arthritis Disability), to probe physical disability in Italian patients with early arthritis (EA) of less than one year's duration. METHODS: The development of the ROAD follows a series of major steps: (1) identification of a specific patient population, (2) item pool development, (3) item reduction, (4) internal consistency, (5) pre-testing of the prototype instrument, and (6) a validation study which results in determination, reliability, validity and responsiveness. In this study we have verified the first five steps. Pre-defined areas of disability were culled from eight existing Italian version arthritis-specific questionnaires, and three generic global health measurement tools. Semi-structured interviews helped to derive a 76-item pool from an initial group of 122 items. This questionnaire was administered to 78 EA patients. RESULTS: For scale generation, a combination of frequency importance product (FIP = frequency x mean relevance score) and factor analysis was applied. The top 20 items based on the FIP were then subjected to further analysis. Each question was correlated with every other question. This allowed us to eliminate 8 questions that were therefore highly correlated and were measuring the same concept. The final instrument has 12 items, representing a combination of symptoms that are common, frequently recurring and of general importance to EA patients. Factor analysis provides a 3-factor health status model explaining 70.1% of the variance. The upper extremity function (5 items) is loaded on the first factor, which explains 45.4% of the total measured variance. The lower extremity function (4 items) formed the second factor (14.2% of the total variance). The third factor was determined by activities of daily living/work (3 items) and explain 10.5% of the total variance. The score of the different subscales can be presented graphically as a ROAD profile. CONCLUSION: Using a traditional development strategy, we have constructed a self-administered instrument for measuring physical functioning in patients with EA. The next stage includes reliability, validity and responsiveness testing of the 12-item questionnaire.

Activities of Daily Living↗

Measuring functional disability in early rheumatoid arthritis: the validity, reliability and responsiveness of the Recent-Onset Arthritis Disability (ROAD) index.

OBJECTIVE: Disability has been identified as a core outcome measure in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The aim of this study was to test the Recent-Onset Arthritis Disability (ROAD) questionnaire for validity, reliability and responsiveness in Italian patients with early RA. METHODS: The psychometric properties of ROAD were tested in 159 patients with early RA, mean age 54.7 (+/- 8.8), 74.3% women, mean disease duration 14.5 months (+/- 1.9 months). All completed the ROAD, the Medical Outcomes Study SF-36 Health Survey (SF-36), the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and the patient global assessment (PGA) of functional disability twice, in order to test for validity and responsiveness. Of the 159 patients who completed the health status instruments on two occasions, 121 were included in the responsiveness analyses. The test-retest reliability of the ROAD questionnaire was calculated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and the Bland and Altman method on 77 patients who completed the questionnaire twice over an interval of one week. Construct validity was assessed using Spearman's correlations, while responsiveness was evaluated by 3 different methods: (1) effect size (the mean difference between the baseline scores and thefollow-up scores divided by the standard deviation of the baseline scores); (2) standardized response mean (the mean change in scores divided by the standard deviation of the change in scores); (3) receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS: ROAD fulfilled the established criteria for validity, reliability and responsiveness. In comparison with the SF-36, the expected correlations were found when comparing items measuring similar constructs, thus supporting the convergent construct validity. Significant correlations were seen between ROAD scores and HAQ scores (rho = 0.372), SF-36 physical component summary (PCS) (rho = -0.413), PGA functional disability (rho = 0.417), pain (rho = 0.639), Ritchie index (rho = 0.357), number of swollen joints (rho = 0.387), patient and physician assessment of disease activity (rho = 0.467 and 0.323, respectively), and Disease Activity Score (rho = 0.476). Test-retest reliability was satisfactory, with ICCs of 0.927 (upper extremity function), 0.892 (lower extremity function), and 0.851 (activity of daily living/work). Bland-Altman plots confirmed this finding. The results of responsiveness analysis indicate that the ROAD subscales were slightly more sensitive to perceived change in functional disability than those of HAQ, SF-36 PCS, and PGA offunctional disability. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that the ROAD index is a reliable, valid and responsive tool for measuring physical functioning in patients with early RA, and is suitable for use in clinical trials and daily clinical practice. Its generalizability and utility for assessing aggressive treatment and functional outcomes must now be evaluated in broader settings.

Arthritis, Rheumatoid↗

Parotid sialography and lip biopsy in the evaluation of oral component in Sjögren's syndrome.

In order to evaluate their sensitivity and specificity, parotid sialography (PS) and labial salivary gland biopsy were performed in 150 putative patients with Sjögren's syndrome (SS) (74 with SS alone and 76 with SS associated with other well-defined disorders). Although PS and LSGB strongly correlated to each other (Kendall's Tau 0.47, z = 7.78, p less than 0.0001), PS confirmed the diagnosis of SS in a significantly higher prevalence of patients with respect to LSGB (63% vs 37%, chi 2 = 18.25, p less than 0.001). When the sensitivity and specificity of PS and LSGB were calculated, PS showed a better sensitivity, and an only slightly lower specificity than LSGB (86% vs 70% and 78% vs 86% respectively). In conclusion, our study indicates that PS has been unduly overlooked in the past decades as a diagnostic tool for the salivary component of SS, and should be reconsidered as a potentially useful and relatively non-invasive procedure in the approach of patients with this disease.

Adult↗