Pediatric workforce: data from the American Board of Pediatrics.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to R O Guerin.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: While the number of internal medicine-pediatrics (med/peds) residency training programs has increased considerably in the past decade, questions continue to be raised about career paths of the graduates of these programs. It is uncertain whether med/peds graduates follow a generalist career path and whether they continue to practice both specialties. OBJECTIVE: To determine the career outcomes of graduates of med/peds residency programs. DESIGN: A survey questionnaire of graduates of med/peds residency programs. METHODS: The computer databases of the American Board of Pediatrics and the American Board of Internal Medicine were used to identify 1482 individuals who had completed training in combined med/peds residency programs between 1986 and 1995 and who had applied to either board for certification. The survey questionnaire was mailed to all graduates identified. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Time spent in professional activity (patient care, teaching, administration, and research), site of principal clinical activity, ages of the patient population, types of hospital privileges, practice organization, subspecialty activity, night and weekend coverage arrangements, community size of practice, involvement in teaching, and membership in professional organizations. RESULTS: Of the total group of 1482 graduates, 87.3% are certified by the American Board of Internal Medicine, 91.3% by the American Board of Pediatrics, and 81.6% by both boards. The survey was completed by 1005 graduates (67.8%). The principal activity of almost 70% of the graduates was direct patient care. Most graduates cared for patients of all ages. More than half of all respondents noted that their principal clinical site is a community office practice. Eighty-five percent managed patients who require hospitalization. Approximately 50% of respondents had a medical school appointment. CONCLUSIONS: This study, the largest survey to date of med/peds graduates, provides strong evidence that most med/peds graduates are practicing generalists who care for adults and children. In addition, the fact that 80% of graduates achieve dual board certification suggests that these physicians are well qualified to care for the spectrum of health care needs of children and adults. Because the changing US health care system mandates a strong primary care base, these physicians will play a small but important role in providing high-quality generalist care.
The first and second certifying examinations in adolescent medicine were administered jointly by the American Board of Pediatrics (ABP) and the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) on November 15, 1994, to 295 candidates, and on November 18, 1997, to 197 candidates including 170 who were taking the examination for the first time. This report describes the certification process and the characteristics of those taking the first and second examinations in adolescent medicine. The purposes of certification in adolescent medicine, consistent with the purposes of specialty boards, are to improve the quality of patient care during the second decade of life, expand and improve training to include a comprehensive and scientifically based approach to the care of young people as they enter adulthood, and stimulate faculty development and research for the problems of the adolescent population (1). Certification addresses these goals by establishing rigorous standards for training, verifying the knowledge base of candidates through a written examination, and requiring periodic recertification. This certification program recognizes a growing number of physicians with expertise in the medical problems of adolescents and the emergence in the past 30 years of a body of knowledge about the health problems, the effects of rapid biologic and psychologic change, and the interaction of biologic, psychologic, social, and environmental forces that characterize this unique developmental period (2).
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Several years ago the American Board of Pediatrics developed a list of 101 technical procedures, which was sent to directors of accredited pediatric programs (N = 231). There was a 70% response and 72 of 101 procedures were considered necessary for residents to develop competency by at least 80% of the program directors. The list of 72 procedures was then sent to 500 randomly selected general pediatricians from a pool size of 10,304. The response rate was 35%. Forty-nine of the 72 procedures were considered necessary by 80% of those responding and one third of the skills (24 of 72) could be classified as absolutely necessary because more than 95% of practitioners considered them to be. Only 7 procedural skills were considered unnecessary by more than 50% of practitioners. It is suggested that program directors consider the 24 skills as ones that should be taught and competence in performing them be verified and recorded.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.