PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R Paridaens

Publications and source records attributed to R Paridaens.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Population pharmacokinetics and dynamics in phase II studies of the novel bioreductive alkylating cytotoxic indoloquinone EO9.

Population pharmacokinetic-dynamic analysis was prospectively integrated in the clinical phase II programme of EO9 to determine the population pharmacokinetic profile in a larger population of patients, to estimate individual patient pharmacokinetic parameters, and to investigate relationships between drug exposure and clinical outcome. A sparse sampling method was developed, which involved three sampling times, and was implemented during course 1. A Bayesian algorithm was used to estimate individual pharmacokinetic parameters, in particular total plasma clearance (CL) of EO9 and area under the curve (AUC). In total, samples were collected of 85 (65%) of the patients. Pharmacokinetic evaluation was successful in 61 (72%) of the sampled patients. CL of EO9 showed substantial variability (median 5.08 l/min; range 2.67-6.42) and was of the same magnitude as in the phase I study where full pharmacokinetic profiles were used. No significant relationships were noticed between exposure parameters and safety, but overall limited toxicity was observed. No tumor responses were documented. Prospective implementation of large-scale population pharmacokinetic-dynamic analysis is feasible and may generate important findings, in particular when tumor responses and relevant toxicity are observed.

Adult↗

Randomised trial of paclitaxel versus doxorubicin as first-line chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer: quality of life evaluation using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the Rotterdam symptom checklist.

The aim of the study was to compare the quality of life (QL) of patients treated with single-agent paclitaxel versus doxorubicin as first-line chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer. 331 patients with advanced breast cancer were randomised, with 294 eligible for analysis. Patients completed both the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire and the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist (RSCL) with six additional items, at baseline and after the third, fifth and seventh cycles of chemotherapy. A significant difference in progression-free survival in favour of doxorubicin caused a bias in the data with differences in expected completion rates of questionnaires beyond cycle three. Therefore, statistical comparisons were performed only for the first three cycles. Baseline compliance was 64% and 61% for the QLQ-C30 and RSCL questionnaires, respectively. Doxorubicin was associated with significantly more nausea/vomiting (P=0.001), loss of appetite (P=0.010) and a greater burden of disease and treatment (P=0.044), but with less bone pain (P=0.042) and rash (P=0.045) than paclitaxel. Both treatments were associated with improved emotional function and reduction in psychological distress at cycle 3. Longitudinal data suggested that doxorubicin was associated with less pain, specifically bone pain. Doxorubicin was more active but may have had more side-effects during the first three cycles. Long-term QL outcomes could not be assessed.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

Identification and interpretation of clinical and quality of life prognostic factors for survival and response to treatment in first-line chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer.

The aim of the project was to identify clinical and quality of life (QL) factors that together predict survival and response to chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer. Potential prognostic factors were studied in 187 women with baseline QL data from a trial of paclitaxel versus doxorubicin as first-line chemotherapy. Demographic and clinical factors studied were age, performance status, dominant site of disease and preceding disease-free interval (DFI). Factors from the EORTC QLQ-C30 were all function scales, fatigue, nausea/vomiting, pain, dyspnoea, insomnia, loss of appetite and global QL. The proportional hazards regression model with stratification for treatment, and the logistic regression model adjusting for treatment arm were used for univariate and multivariate analyses of survival and response to treatment, respectively. For survival, multiple sites of visceral disease, pain, global QL and fatigue were significant prognostic factors in the univariate analysis. The final multivariate model predicted poor survival with multiple sites of visceral disease (P=0.003), DFI </=2 years (P=0.026) and pain (P=0.003). For response, age, dyspnoea, fatigue and global QL were significant predictive factors in the univariate analysis. The final multivariate model for response selected DFI (P=0.009), multiple sites of visceral disease (P=0.037) and dyspnoea (P=<0.001) using forward selection, but model instability was indicated by the inclusion of fatigue and emotional function in the final model when backward selection was used. In addition to known clinical factors, patient-assessed QL variables appear to be prognostic for survival and response to chemotherapy in women with advanced breast cancer. However, identification of prognostic factors from responses to questionnaires may be unstable, and their reliability and clinical utility should be tested prospectively.

Adolescent↗

EORTC 10941: A phase II study of liarozole in postmenopausal patients with 'chemotherapy-resistant' or 'potentially hormone sensitive' metastatic breast cancer.

Liarozole is an imidazole compound that inhibits enzymes involved in steroid hormone aromatisation and retinoid metabolism. The IDBBC branch of the EORTC has performed a series of phase II studies of the agent in four groups of postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer. This paper reports the results of the first two groups: 'Chemotherapy Resistant' (unrestricted ER status, 1 or 2 prior chemotherapy regimens, 0-2 prior hormonal therapies) and 'Potentially Hormone Sensitive' (ER positive or unknown, 1 or 2 prior hormonal therapies with a substantial disease free interval or progression free survival, and no history of chemotherapy for metastatic disease). Liarozole was administered at 150-300 mg orally bid. The objective response rate was 12% in the 'Chemotherapy Resistant' group (n = 34), and 22% in the 'Potentially Hormone Sensitive' group (n = 37), with median response durations of 9 and 14 months, respectively. Median time to treatment failure was only 2 months in both groups, due largely to the significant percentage (24%) of patients who ceased treatment following excessive mucocutaneous and gastrointestinal toxicity. This adverse event profile will limit its use in breast cancer. Results of the 'ER negative' and 'Tamoxifen Refractory' groups will be reported in a future paper.

Adult↗

Syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone associated with chemotherapy-induced tumour lysis in small-cell lung cancer: case report and literature review.

A patient with a small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) developed an asymptomatic hyponatremia, with all features of the syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion (SIADH), two days after the start of his first cycle of chemotherapy with vindesine, ifosfamide and cisplatin. Progression of the tumour with an increase in paraneoplastic SIADH, or drug-induced causes of hyponatremia, could be ruled out by his further clinical course. The event was interpreted as a consequence of ADH release during the initial tumour cell lysis after effective chemotherapy. The occurrence of hyponatremia during the initial phase of chemotherapy for SCLC should be interpreted with caution. Although it is most commonly due to an increase in paraneoplastic ADH secretion reflecting ineffective therapy, it can also be due to release of ADH from malignant cells in the period of rapid tumour lysis, reflecting effective therapy. Based on this rare occurrence, a review of the aetiology, clinical findings, diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of SIADH in general is presented.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗

Activity and toxicity of GI147211 in breast, colorectal and non-small-cell lung cancer patients: an EORTC-ECSG phase II clinical study.

BACKGROUND: GI147211 is a water-soluble synthetic analogue of camptothecin showing promising in vivo and in vitro antitumor activity and an acceptable toxicity profile. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between April 1995 and November 1996, 67 eligible patients with pretreated breast cancer (25 patients) and chemo-naïve colorectal (19 patients) and non-small-cell lung cancer (23 patients) were entered into three multicentric, non-randomized phase II trials. Treatment schedule consisted of intravenous GI1147211 administered at a dose of 1.2 mg/m2/day for five consecutive days every three weeks. RESULTS: Hematological toxicity was common with grade 3-4 neutropenia in 54% of patients and neutropenic fever together or not associated with infection in 14.5% of patients. Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia and grade 2-4 anemia were observed in 20% and in 68% of patients, respectively. Non-hematological toxicity was generally mild to moderate and consisted mainly of gastrointestinal toxicity, asthenia and alopecia. A dose-escalation to 1.5 mg/m2/d was feasible in 17 (25%) patients. The antitumor activity of GI1147211 was moderate in breast cancer patients (3 partial responses (PRs), response rate (RR) 13%) and minimal in non-small cell lung cancer patients (2 PRs, RR 9%). No objective responses were obtained in colorectal patients. CONCLUSIONS: GI147211, at the dose and schedule employed in this study, showed an acceptable safety profile but a modest antitumor activity in the examined tumor types.

Adult↗

A phase I study of a new polyamine biosynthesis inhibitor, SAM486A, in cancer patients with solid tumours.

Because tumour cell proliferation is highly dependent upon up-regulation of de-novo polyamine synthesis, inhibition of the polyamine synthesis pathway represents a potential target for anticancer therapy. SAM486A (CGP 48664) is a new inhibitor of the polyamine biosynthetic enzyme S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase (SAMDC), more potent and specific than the first-generation SAMDC inhibitor methylglyoxal (bis) guanylhydrazone (MGBG). Preclinical testing confirmed promising antiproliferative activity. In this phase I study, SAM486A was given 4-weekly as a 120 h infusion. 39 adult cancer patients were enrolled with advanced/refractory disease not amenable to established treatments, PS </= 2, adequate marrow, liver, renal and cardiac function. Doses were escalated in 100% increments without toxicity in 24 pts from 3 mg m(-2)cycle(-1)up to 400 mg m(-2)cycle(-1). At 550 and 700 mg m(-2)cycle(-1)reversible dose-limiting neutropenia occurred. Other toxicities included mild fatigue, nausea and vomiting. No objective remission was seen. Pharmakokinetic analysis showed a terminal half-life of approximately 2 days. AUC and Cmax were related to dose; neutropenia correlated with AUC. The recommended dose for further phase II studies on this schedule is 400 mg m(-2)cycle(-1).

Adenosylmethionine Decarboxylase↗

Paclitaxel versus doxorubicin as first-line single-agent chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: a European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Randomized Study with cross-over.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of paclitaxel versus doxorubicin given as single agents in first-line therapy of advanced breast cancer (primary end point, progression-free survival ¿PFS) and to explore the degree of cross-resistance between the two agents. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred thirty-one patients were randomized to receive either paclitaxel 200 mg/m(2), 3-hour infusion every 3 weeks, or doxorubicin 75 mg/m(2), intravenous bolus every 3 weeks. Seven courses were planned unless progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred before the seven courses were finished. Patients who progressed within the seven courses underwent early cross-over to the alternative drug, while a delayed cross-over was optional for the remainder of patients at the time of disease progression. RESULTS: Objective response in first-line therapy was significantly better (P =.003) for doxorubicin (response rate ¿RR, 41%) than for paclitaxel (RR, 25%), with doxorubicin achieving a longer median PFS (7.5 months for doxorubicin v 3.9 months for paclitaxel, P <.001). In second-line therapy, cross-over to doxorubicin (91 patients) and to paclitaxel (77 patients) gave response rates of 30% and 16%, respectively. The median survival durations of 18.3 months for doxorubicin and 15.6 months for paclitaxel were not significantly different (P =.38). The doxorubicin arm had greater toxicity, but this was counterbalanced by better symptom control. CONCLUSION: At the dosages and schedules used in the present study, doxorubicin achieves better disease and symptom control than paclitaxel in first-line treatment. Doxorubicin and paclitaxel are not totally cross-resistant, which supports further investigation of these drugs in combination or in sequence, both in advanced disease and in the adjuvant setting.

Adenocarcinoma↗

A study of the value of p53, HER2, and Bcl-2 in the prediction of response to doxorubicin and paclitaxel as single agents in metastatic breast cancer: a companion study to EORTC 10923.

This study assesses the potential value of the tumor markers p53, HER2, and Bcl-2 in predicting the clinical response to doxorubicin and paclitaxel as single agents in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. The primary tumors of 114 patients in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10923 trial were assessed by immunohistochemistry using monoclonal antibodies; the results were correlated with clinical response to therapy. HER2 was positive in 24% of patients, p53 was positive in 25% of patients, and Bcl-2 was positive in 49% of patients. There was no correlation between the expression of any of the markers and the clinical response to either agent. Although methodologically limited, this study does not support the use of p53, HER2, or Bcl-2 to assist the selection of anthracycline versus taxane in metastatic breast cancer.

Adult↗

Promising results with exemestane in the first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer: a randomized phase II EORTC trial with a tamoxifen control.

Because tamoxifen (TAM), a nonsteroidal antiestrogen, is routinely used in the adjuvant setting, other hormone therapies are needed as alternatives for first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Currently, exemestane (EXE) and other antiaromatase agents are indicated for use in patients who experience failure of TAM. In this multicenter, randomized, open-label, TAM-controlled (20 mg/day), phase II trial, we examined the activity and tolerability of EXE 25 mg/day for the first-line treatment of MBC in postmenopausal women. Exemestane was well tolerated and demonstrated substantial first-line antitumor activity based on intent-to-treat analysis of peer-reviewed responses. In the EXE arm, values for complete, partial, and objective response, clinical benefit, and time to tumor progression (TTP) exceeded those reported for TAM although no statistical comparison was made. Based on these encouraging results, a phase III trial will compare EXE and TAM.

Administration, Oral↗

Vascular endothelial growth factor measured in platelet poor plasma allows optimal separation between cancer patients and volunteers: a key to study an angiogenic marker in vivo?

BACKGROUND: Serum VEGF levels are elevated in cancer patients and are used as a tumor marker in different malignancies. We have measured VEGF levels in different blood compartments in cancer patients and healthy volunteers in order to assess the most suitable way of processing blood for measuring VEGF as a marker of tumor-angiogenesis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: VEGF concentrations were analyzed by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in serum (VEGFS), EDTA plasma (VEGFEDTA), citrated plasma (VEGFC), CTAD-plasma (VEGFCTAD), platelet poor plasma (VEGFPPP), platelet rich plasma after induction of platelet activation (VEGFPRP). Platelet activation was assessed by measuring PF4 concentrations in different plasma samples. RESULTS: We observed higher VEGFS (P = 0.0027), VEGFEDTA (P = 0.003) and VEGFPPP (P = 0.0007) levels in cancer patients than in volunteers; VEGFPRP concentrations showed no significant difference (P = 0.208). Analysis of the correlation between VEGFplt and VEGFS in cancer patients showed a similar correlation in a comparable VEGFS concentration range as in the volunteers. When comparing VEGFC to VEGFCTAD, we find significantly higher VEGF and PF4 levels in citrated plasma (VEGF: P = 0.00019; PF4: P = 0.00023). CONCLUSIONS: It is likely that VEGFS in cancer patients encompass platelet-delivered VEGF and VEGF from other sources, notably from (neo)-angiogenesis in tumoral tissue. The best discrimination between volunteers and cancer patients was observed in PPP. As generating plasma can induce platelet activation, with consequent VEGF release from platelets, we suggest that to assess free circulating VEGF, CTAD plasma should be used.

Adult↗

Doxorubicin vs epirubicin, report of a second-line randomized phase II/III study in advanced breast cancer. EORTC Breast Cancer Cooperative Group.

The EORTC Breast Cancer Cooperative Group carried out a randomized trial to compare doxorubicin with epirubicin as second-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Two hundred and fifty-nine patients with at least one site of metastatic disease entered this trial, of whom 232 patients were eligible. Treatment consisted of doxorubicin 75 mg m(-2) or epirubicin 90 mg m(-2) i.v. every 3 weeks. The overall response rates for doxorubicin and epirubicin were 36% and 28% respectively (P = 0.173). The median time to progression was 23 weeks for doxorubicin and 19 weeks for epirubicin (P = 0.063) and the median duration of response was 40 weeks for doxorubicin and 32 weeks for epirubicin (P = 0.059). The median survival was 47 weeks for doxorubicin and 44 weeks for epirubicin (P = 0.196). Leucocyte count on retreatment day (P = 0.011) and platelet nadir (P = 0.031) were significantly lower in the doxorubicin-treated group. Also mucositis (P < 0.001), diarrhoea (P = 0.005) and haemorrhage (P = 0.048) were significantly worse in the doxorubicin arm. Nine patients on doxorubicin and two patients on epirubicin experienced congestive heart failure (CHF). At the dose levels used in this study, no statistical differences in response rate and survival were found between the two treatment arms. Treatment with doxorubicin tended to result in a slightly longer duration of response and time to progression but doxorubicin was more toxic than epirubicin.

Adult↗

Chronic lymphocytic alveolitis with migrating pulmonary infiltrates after localized chest wall irradiation.

In a number of patients, radiotherapy following surgery for breast carcinoma may induce radiation injury to the lungs. This has classically been divided into an early radiation pneumonitis and a late fibrosis, both confined to the irradiated lung volume. However we observed a female patient who similarly to other recent reports in the literature developed a recurring pneumonitis migrating from one lung to the other after radiotherapy for breast carcinoma. This migratory BOOP (bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia) was characterized by a lymphocytic alveolitis and responded well to corticosteroids. Clinicians should be aware of the possibility of a lymphocytic pneumonitis in both lungs after unilateral thoracic irradiation and recognize the distinctive features of fever, cough, dyspnoea and malaise in order to start an effective treatment with corticosteroids. They should also be aware of the high tendency for recurrence when tapering off.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents↗

Docetaxel is a potent cytotoxic drug in the treatment of advanced breast cancer.

Docetaxel (Taxotere) belongs to a new class of anti-neoplastic agents, the taxanes. As the structurally related compound, paclitaxel, it enhances microtubule assembly and inhibits depolymerization of tubulin, thereby disrupting mitosis and cell replication. From august 1994 till december 1995, we treated thirty patients with advanced or metastatic breast cancer in a protocol aiming at evaluating the efficacy of docetaxel, administered in second, third or fourth line chemotherapy. The drug was given at a dosage of 100 mg/m2, delivered as a 1-hour infusion once every 3 weeks. Among the 30 patients, 9 (30%) showed an objective response (PR) and 15 (50%) had disease stabilization. For those 2 groups, the median time to progression was 20 weeks (range 13-61) and 13.5 weeks (range 10-37) respectively; the median survival for the whole group was 22.5 weeks (range 1-72). Myelosuppression (neutropenia) was the dose-limiting toxicity. We conclude that docetaxel is a potent single agent in heavily pretreated locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer, even in those who are resistant to an anthracycline or an anthracenedione.

Adult↗

Vorozole (Rivizor): an active and well tolerated new aromatase inhibitor for the treatment of advanced breast cancer patients with prior tamoxifen exposure. Investigational Drug Branch of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Breast Cancer Cooperative Group.

Vorozole (Rivizor) is a potent and stereospecific inhibitor of aromatase having shown promising endocrine effects in phase I studies. In the present trial, 27 postmenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer, measurable lesions, presumably hormone responsive (ER or PR+, or ER? with disease-free survival longer than 1 year, or prior documented response to tamoxifen), were treated with vorozole one tablet 2.5 mg daily. All had been previously treated with tamoxifen as adjuvant (two patients) or for advanced disease (24 patients), or both (one patient). Objective remissions were observed in eight patients (30%) with two complete responses (CR) and six partial responses (PR) lasting for a median of 14.3 months (range 6.8-40.6); nine stabilizations were also recorded (median 7.9 months; range 3.7-40.1). Median time to progression for the 27 patients was 5.9 months. Sites of response were skin (three patients), lymph nodes (two patients), lung (two patients) and chest wall plus lymph nodes (one patient). Treatment was very well tolerated: mild hot flushes (four patients), gastrointestinal complaints (four patients) and no significant toxicity (common toxicity criteria grade above 2) or drug-related severe adverse event. It is concluded that vorozole is an active second-line endocrine treatment, deserving consideration for randomized comparison with other agents such as aminoglutethimide, megestrol acetate or medroxyprogesterone acetate.

Adult↗

Vorozole (R83842) in the treatment of postmenopausal advanced breast cancer: relationship of serum levels of vorozole and clinical results (a study of the EORTC Breast Cancer Cooperative Group).

The new non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor vorozole (R83842) was administered orally at a single daily dose of 2.5 mg to 27 postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer in a phase II trial as second-line endocrine treatment. The observed objective response rate of 30% and good tolerability of the drug confirm other recent reports. Endocrine determinations during 6 months of treatment demonstrated reduction of serum estrogens: estrone sulfate by more than 60%, estrone by 30-40%, but estradiol by only 10-20%. The ratios of serum androstenedione/estrone and testosterone/estradiol increased significantly, consistent with the inhibition of peripheral aromatase activity. Levels of progesterone, 17-alpha-hydroxyprogesterone, cortisol, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, androstenedione and aldosterone remained normal, indicating no interference with adrenocortical steroid synthesis. A general lack of correlation between the observed serum concentrations of vorozole and its effect on hormone serum levels or clinical response was found. This suggests that the determination of such serum levels gives a poor impression of the unambiguous anti-tumor activity of vorozole which may well have its main effect with the tumor tissue itself. The present results are in support of aromatase inhibition, but the possibility of an additional effect on the sulfation of estrogens merits further investigation.

Adult↗

Safety, activity and estrogen inhibition by exemestane in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer: a phase I study.

Exemestane is an irreversible, steroidal, oral aromatase inhibitor under evaluation in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer. A phase I study was conducted in 27 postmenopausal patients who were candidates for hormone therapy because they had advanced breast cancer and estrogen receptor-positive or unknown status. Most patients were moderately or heavily pretreated. Cohorts of at least three patients received sequentially escalating daily oral doses of 5-600 mg. The median duration of exemestane treatment was 13 weeks (range: 3-166 weeks). The maximal tolerated dose was not reached because of lack of treatment-related grade 3 or 4 toxicity. The most common adverse events, including those not related to treatment, were mild to moderate headache (44% of patients), dizziness (33%), nausea (33%), hot flushes (30%) and tumor-related pain (30%). There were three complete and four partial responses for an objective response rate of 26% (95% CI: 11.1-46.3%) in the intent-to-treat population; the median duration of response was 74 weeks (95% CI: 48-99 weeks). Exemestane, at the dose of 25 mg, maximally suppressed estradiol, estrone and estrone sulfate serum levels to 13, 5 and 10% of baseline, respectively. Exemestane appears to suppress estrogen, be well tolerated and have antitumor activity in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer. A large, safe therapeutic window of up to 600 mg was defined. In view of its safety and estrogen-suppression profiles, the most favorable effects were observed at the 25 mg daily dose.

Adult↗

Efficacy of paclitaxel or doxorubicin used as single agents in advanced breast cancer: a literature survey.

The anthracyclines are among the most active agents in the treatment of breast cancer. In recent years, the taxoids have produced promising results as single agents in breast cancer. Average overall response rates of 43% in previously untreated and 29% in pretreated metastatic breast cancer have been reported in phase II trials with paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ). Based on the known activity of doxorubicin and the single-agent phase II results of paclitaxel, two phase III randomized trials comparing these drugs as monotherapy in first-line, with crossover on progression, were conducted by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the Intergroup. The preliminary results of these studies were presented at international congresses and will be discussed here.

Antibiotics, Antineoplastic↗