PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R Paro

Publications and source records attributed to R Paro.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Analysis of chromatin structure by in vivo formaldehyde cross-linking.

Recent advances leave no doubt that higher order chromatin structures play a fundamental role in many developmentally important mechanisms of gene regulation. In particular analyses in genetic model systems like yeast and Drosophila uncovered novel proteins that are involved in the regulation of chromatin structures. Many of these proteins do not bind directly to DNA but interact in large multimeric complexes. To identify the DNA elements regulated by these multiprotein complexes, alternative approaches to the standard methods of DNA-protein analysis had to be devised. Here we present a method that preserves the architecture of the higher order chromatin structures by cross-linking cells in vivo with formaldehyde. An immunoprecipitation strategy is then used to identify the DNA targets of chromosomal proteins of interest. This method can be applied to study the distribution of proteins at high resolution over extended chromosomal regions.

Animals↗

An imprinting element from the mouse H19 locus functions as a silencer in Drosophila.

Genomic imprinting as originally described in Sciara is displayed by many organisms. In mammals, X-inactivation and the parent-of-origin-specific silencing of imprinted genes are examples of this phenomenon. A heritable chromatin structural modification may be the critical mechanism in such instances of chromosome condensation and preferential gene inactivation. H19 is an imprinted gene in which the repressed paternal allele is hypermethylated and the compacted chromatin is relatively resistant to digestion by nucleases. In order to uncover underlying conserved epigenetic mechanisms we have introduced a mouse H19 transgene into Drosophila. We show here that a 1.2-kb H19 upstream sequence functions in cis as a parent-of-origin independent silencing element in Drosophila. Strikingly, this cis-acting element is located within an upstream region that is necessary for H19 imprinting in mice. These results suggest involvement of an evolutionary conserved mechanism in both genes silencing in Drosophila and imprinting in mice.

Animals↗

The polycomb group protein complex of Drosophila melanogaster has different compositions at different target genes.

In Drosophila the Polycomb group genes are required for the long-term maintenance of the repressed state of many developmental regulatory genes. Their gene products are thought to function in a common multimeric complex that associates with Polycomb group response elements (PREs) in target genes and regulates higher-order chromatin structure. We show that the chromodomain of Polycomb is necessary for protein-protein interactions within a Polycomb-Polyhomeotic complex. In addition, Posterior Sex Combs protein coimmunoprecipitates Polycomb and Polyhomeotic, indicating that they are members of a common multimeric protein complex. Immunoprecipitation experiments using in vivo cross-linked chromatin indicate that these three Polycomb group proteins are associated with identical regulatory elements of the selector gene engrailed in tissue culture cells. Polycomb, Polyhomeotic, and Posterior Sex Combs are, however, differentially distributed on regulatory sequences of the engrailed-related gene invected. This suggests that there may be multiple different Polycomb group protein complexes which function at different target sites. Furthermore, Polyhomeotic and Posterior Sex Combs are also associated with expressed genes. Polyhomeotic and Posterior Sex Combs may participate in a more general transcriptional mechanism that causes modulated gene repression, whereas the inclusion of Polycomb protein in the complex at PREs leads to stable silencing.

Animals↗

[The cloning and analysis of a single gene in Drosophila homologic with human oncogene TTG].

The human TTG/RBTN family is an oncogene family. There are three members in this family: TTG-1/RBTN-1, TTG-2/RBTN-2 and TTG-3/RBTN-3. Two of them, TTG-1/RBTN-1 and TTG-2/RBTN-2 have been isolated at the sites of chromosomal translocations in T-cell leukaemia. This gene family encodes cysteine-rich proteins with two tandem copies of a LIM motif. The function of the LIM motif is unknown. We found that the TTG-2 gene is highly conserved among mammals; Drosophila and yeast. As a first step to obtain a model system for studying the function of the LIM motifs, we isolated the Drosophila homologue dttg. In contrast to human, Drosophila appeared to have only one ttg/rbtn gene. A 2087bp cDNA clone was isolated, encoding a protein of 266 amino acids. A second transcript with an alternative 5' end was identified in RNA from embryos. The Drosophila ttg protein consisted of two tandem copies of the conserved LIM domain characteristic of the human TTG/RBTN family. The amino acid sequence similarity with human TTG-1 and TTG-2 is 79% and 62%, respectively. The dttg, like TTG-1, have an intron in the second LIM encoding region, which is not present in TTG-2.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗

Drosophila Polycomb-group regulated chromatin inhibits the accessibility of a trans-activator to its target DNA.

The genes of the Polycomb-group (Pc-G) are responsible for maintaining the inactive expression state of homeotic genes. They act through specific cis-regulatory DNA elements termed PREs (Pc-G Response Elements). Multimeric complexes containing the Pc-G proteins are thought to induce heterochromatin-like structures, which stably and heritably inactivate transcription. We have tested the functional role of the FAB fragment, a PRE of the bithorax complex. We find that this element behaves as an orientation dependent silencer, capable of inducing mosaic gene expression on neighboring genes. Transgenic fly lines were constructed containing a PRE adjacent to a reporter gene inducible by the yeast GAL4 trans-activator. The competition between the activator and Pc-G-containing chromatin was visualized on polytene chromosomes using immunocytochemistry. The Pc-G protein Polycomb and GAL4 have mutually exclusive binding patterns, supporting the notion that Pc-G-induced chromatin structures can prevent activators from binding to their target sequences. However, this antagonistic function can be overcome by high doses of GAL4, even in the absence of DNA replication.

Animals↗

A single ancestral gene of the human LIM domain oncogene family LMO in Drosophila: characterization of the Drosophila Dlmo gene.

Members of the human TTG/RBTN family, now renamed 'LMO' for LIM-only proteins, encode proteins with two tandem copies of a LIM motif. There are three members of this family, two have been isolated at the sites of chromosomal translocations in T-cell leukaemia. The function of the LIM motifs is at present unknown. We found that the LMO-2 gene is highly conserved between mammals, Drosophila and yeast. As a first step to obtain a model system for studying the function of the LIM motifs we have isolated the Drosophila homologue Dlmo. In contrast to mammals Drosophila appears to have only one lmo gene. A 2087 bp cDNA clone was isolated from a larval cDNA library, encoding a protein of 266 amino acids. A second transcript with an alternative 5' end was identified in RNA from embryos. The Drosophila lmo protein consists of two tandem copies of the conserved LIM domain characteristic of the human LMO family and an extended amino and carboxy terminus, which is not present in the human proteins. The amino acid sequence similarity with human LMO-1 and LMO-2 in LIM 1 is 79% and 69% and in LIM-2 90% and 60%, respectively. In addition a short stretch of 25 nucleotides with a homology of 83% between LMO-2 and Dlmo is found in the 3' UTR. Dlmo, like LMO-1, has an intron after the second LIM encoding region, which is not present in LMO-2. It is expressed maternally and at a high level in early embryogenesis as well as in adults. Interestingly we observed that the Dlmo protein is immunologically related to LMO-2 and can be detected by immunohistochemistry in early cellular blastoderm embryos. The gene was localised to a genetically well characterized region (17C on the X chromosome) opening the way for identification of mutations.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗

Mapping functional domains of the polycomb protein of Drosophila melanogaster.

In Drosophila the Polycomb group (Pc-G) proteins are responsible for the stable and heritable silencing of genes. The Pc-G apparently uses heterochromatin-like mechanisms to transcriptionally inactivate developmental regulators such as the homeotic genes. The Polycomb (Pc) protein is part of a large multimeric complex composed of other members of the Pc-G. We have identified functionally relevant domains of the Pc protein by sequencing different Pc alleles. Additionally, using a Pc-beta gal fusion protein with deleted internal histidine repeats, we found that this mutant protein cannot bind to four particular target loci, but otherwise does not change the remaining overall binding pattern. We show that, in contrast to the dotted subnuclear localization of the wild-type protein, the nuclear distribution of mutant proteins becomes homogeneous. Surprisingly, in Pc mutants the polyhomeotic protein, another member of the Pc-G, is also redistributed in the nucleus. Our results indicate that the appropriate subnuclear localization of the two proteins is critical for the silencing function of the Pc-G complex.

Alleles↗

Chromatin multiprotein complexes involved in the maintenance of transcription patterns.

In Drosophila, the maintenance of active and inactive patterns of gene expression during development involves the activity of two genetically complex systems. Molecular analysis of the components, apparently acting in large multiprotein complexes, has allowed a substantial advancement in our understanding of the role of chromatin higher order structures in gene regulation and nuclear organization. The Polycomb-group factors induce heterochromatin-like structures on genes that need to be stably and heritably inactivated. The role of the trithorax-group factors is to counteract these repressed chromatin domains and thus to render the genes accessible to activating factors.

Animals↗

Discrete Polycomb-binding sites in each parasegmental domain of the bithorax complex.

The Polycomb protein of Drosophila melanogaster maintains the segmental expression limits of the homeotic genes in the bithorax complex. Polycomb-binding sites within the bithorax complex were mapped by immunostaining of salivary gland polytene chromosomes. Polycomb bound to four DNA fragments, one in each of four successive parasegmental regulatory regions. These fragments correspond exactly to the ones that can maintain segmentally limited expression of a lacZ reporter gene. Thus, Polycomb acts directly on discrete multiple sites in bithorax regulatory DNA. Constructs combining fragments from different regulatory regions demonstrate that Polycomb-dependent maintenance elements can act on multiple pattern initiation elements, and that maintenance elements can work together. The cooperative action of maintenance elements may motivate the linear order of the bithorax complex.

Animals↗

Gene inactivation in Drosophila mediated by the Polycomb gene product or by position-effect variegation does not involve major changes in the accessibility of the chromatin fibre.

In Drosophila position effect variegation and Polycomb-dependent regulation of homeotic gene expression are phenomena in which genes are inactivated in a clonally inherited manner. In both processes inactivation involves proteins that interact with the chromosome at or close to the position of inactivated genes. Two models have been proposed to explain this form of genetic silencing. In one, cooperative concatamerisation of a large multisubunit protein complex packages the chromatin fibre into a higher order structure, which is inaccessible for the transcription apparatus. In the second, the chromatin fibre is left unaltered but the region to be silenced is assigned to a compartment within the nucleus to which not all transcription factors have access. To distinguish between these types of model we have used the ligation-mediated PCR procedure to quantitate the accessibility of restriction sites in the chromatin fibre in both the active and inactivated forms. By making use of appropriate mutations and tissues we show that the inactivation of genes by Polycomb or by position effect variegation is not accompanied by a substantial change in the accessibility of the fibre. These results favour models in which the inactivation is achieved by sequestration of the silenced region in a particular nuclear compartment rather than by a chromatin packaging model.

Animals↗

Spreading the silence: epigenetic transcriptional regulation during Drosophila development.

In early Drosophila development a complex cascade of diffusible transcription factors generates an intricate expression pattern of developmental regulators such as the homeotic genes. The mechanism which subsequently maintains the pattern during the rest of development is mainly using epigenetic features for its function. Evidence comes from the analysis of the Polycomb-group (Pc-G), a class of genes which is responsible for maintaining the inactive state of expression. The Pc-G was found to share many parallels to genes involved in heterochromatin formation. Different members of the Pc-G interact in large multiprotein complexes, which apparently can cover and inactivate large chromosomal domains. Specific DNA elements have been identified that are used by the Pc-G proteins to nucleate these specialized domains of silent chromatin. Thus, the Pc-G proteins appear to permanently inactivate genes by generating heterochromatin-like structures which could then be inherited by the daughter cells in an epigenetic manner. Heritable gene silencing is an important but little understood mechanism in pattern formation. Phenomenologically related effects have been observed in many organisms. These range from the transcriptional silencing of the inactive mating type loci in yeast to parental imprinting phenomena and X-chromosome inactivation in mammals. Analysis of these functions in Drosophila provides an excellent model system for studying the molecular basis of such epigenetic mechanisms that use higher order chromatin structures for transcriptional repression.

Animals↗

Molecular characterisation of the Polycomblike gene of Drosophila melanogaster, a trans-acting negative regulator of homeotic gene expression.

The Polycomblike gene of Drosophila melanogaster, a member of the Polycomb Group of genes, is required for the correct spatial expression of the homeotic genes of the Antennapaedia and Bithorax Complexes. Mutations in Polycomb Group genes result in ectopic homeotic gene expression, indicating that Polycomb Group proteins maintain the transcriptional repression of specific homeotic genes in specific tissues during development. We report here the isolation and molecular characterisation of the Polycomblike gene. The Polycomblike transcript encodes an 857 amino acid protein with no significant homology to other proteins. Antibodies raised against the product of this open reading frame were used to show that the Polycomblike protein is found in all nuclei during embryonic development. Antibody staining also revealed that the Polycomblike protein is found on larval salivary gland polytene chromosomes at about 100 specific loci, the same loci to which the Polycomb and polyhomeotic proteins, two other Polycomb Group proteins, are found. These data add further support for a model in which Polycomb Group proteins form multimeric protein complexes at specific chromosomal loci to repress transcription at those loci.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Mapping Polycomb-repressed domains in the bithorax complex using in vivo formaldehyde cross-linked chromatin.

The Polycomb group (Pc-G) proteins are responsible for keeping developmental regulators, like homeotic genes, stably and inheritably repressed during Drosophila development. Several similarities to a protein class involved in heterochromatin formation suggest that the Pc-G exerts its function at the higher order chromatin level. Here we have mapped the distribution of the Pc protein in the homeotic bithorax complex (BX-C) of Drosophila tissue culture cells. We have elaborated a method, based on the in vivo formaldehyde cross-linking technique, that allows a substantial enrichment for Pc-interacting sites by immunoprecipitation of the cross-linked chromatin with anti-Pc antibodies. We find that the Pc protein quantitatively covers large regulatory regions of repressed BX-C genes. Conversely, we find that the Abdominal-B gene is active in these cells and the region devoid of any bound Pc protein.

Animals↗

The Polycomb gene is differentially regulated during oogenesis and embryogenesis of Drosophila melanogaster.

Homeotic genes are responsible for determining the identity of body structures along the anterior-posterior axis. In Drosophila the early patterning system defines the differential expression pattern of the homeotic genes. In laterstages the Polycomb-group (Pc-G) genes were found to keep homeotic genes stably repressed in those domains where they have to be inactive. At the molecular level the Pc-G is supposed to exert its repressory role by influencing the higher order structure of chromatin. Here we show that during oogenesis the Polycomb (Pc) protein is localized in the polytene nuclei of the nurse cells. In addition, in late stages we observe overlapping gradients of expression in the somatic follicle cells, suggesting also an important function of Pc on the determinants involved in egg formation. During embryogenesis Pc is found in all tissues, though in later stages it preferentially accumulates in the CNS. Interestingly, we have identified a feedback-type regulation: the Ultrabithorax gene, a homeotic target gene of Pc, in its own domain of expression is down-regulating Pc.

Animals↗

Mechanisms of heritable gene repression during development of Drosophila.

During development, patterns of differential gene expression, defining determined states of cells, need to be maintained over many cell generations. In Drosophila, genetic and molecular analyses led to the discovery of a set of proteins which seem to exert such a memory function by using epigenetic mechanisms. Recent experiments demonstrate that, in particular, the heritable inactivation of regulatory genes relies on stable changes in the higher-order constitution of chromatin.

Animals↗

Polycomb and polyhomeotic are constituents of a multimeric protein complex in chromatin of Drosophila melanogaster.

The polycomb group (Pc-G) genes are responsible for maintaining the repressed state of homeotic genes during development. It has been suggested that the Pc-G exerts its transcriptional control by regulating higher order chromatin structure. In particular, the finding of genetic and molecular similarities to components involved in heterochromatin formation, led to the proposal that homeotic genes are permanently repressed by mechanisms similar to those responsible for heterochromatin compaction. Because of synergistic effects, Pc-G gene products are thought to act in a multimeric complex. Using immunoprecipitation we show that two members of the Pc-G, Polycomb and polyhomeotic, are constituents of a soluble multimeric protein complex. Size fractionation indicates that a large portion of the two proteins are found in a distinct complex of molecular weight 2-5 x 10(6) Da. During embryogenesis the two proteins show the same spatial distribution. In addition, by double-immunofluorescence labelling we can demonstrate that Polycomb and polyhomeotic have exactly the same binding patterns on polytene chromosomes of larval salivary glands. We propose that some Pc-G proteins act in multimeric complexes to compact the chromatin of stably repressed genes like the homeotic regulators.

Animals↗