PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R Pazdur

Publications and source records attributed to R Pazdur.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1999

Tumor downstaging and sphincter preservation with preoperative chemoradiation in locally advanced rectal cancer: the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the rates of tumor downstaging after preoperative chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CTX/XRT) that delivered 45 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks with continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil (300 mg/m2/day) was given to 117 patients. The pretreatment stage distribution, as determined by endorectal ultrasound (u), included uT2N0 in 2%, uT3N0 in 47%, uT3N1 in 49%, and uT4N0 in 2% of cases; endorectal ultrasound was not performed in 13% of cases (15 patients). Approximately 6 weeks after completion of CTX/XRT, surgery was performed. RESULTS: The pathological tumor stages were Tis-2N0 in 26%, T2N1 in 5%, T3N0 in 21%, T3N1 in 15%, T4N0 in 5%, and T4NI in 1%; a complete response (CR) to preoperative CTX/XRT was pathologically confirmed in 32 (27%) of patients. Tumor downstaging occurred in 72 (62%) cases. Only 3% of cases had pathologic evidence of progressive disease. Pretreatment tumor size (< 5 cm vs. > or = 5 cm) was the only factor predictive of tumor downstaging (p < 0.04). A decrease of > 1 T-stage level was accomplished in 45% of those downstaged. Overall, a sphincter-saving (SP) procedure was possible in 59% of patients and an abdominoperineal resection (APR) was required in 41 % of cases. Factors predictive of SP included downstaging (p < 0.03), age > 40 years (p < 0.007), pretreatment tumor distance, 3 to 6 cm from the anal verge (p < 0.00001), tumor size <6 cm (p < 0.02), mobility (p < 0.004), tumor stage 6 cm from the anal verge, SP was performed in 14 of the 15 (93%) patients with a CR and 32 of 33 (97%) of patients with residual disease (p < 0.00004). CONCLUSIONS: Significant tumor downstaging results from preoperative chemoradiation allowing sphincter sparing surgery in over 40% of patients whose tumors were located < 6 cm from the anal verge and who otherwise would have required colostomy.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

A multicenter, phase II trial of weekly irinotecan (CPT-11) in patients with previously treated colorectal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: This multicenter, Phase II trial was performed to evaluate the antitumor activity and toxicity of irinotecan (CPT-11) in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma that had recurred or progressed after 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy. METHODS: CPT-11 was given as a 90-minute intravenous infusion in repeated 6-week (42-day) courses comprising weekly treatment for 4 consecutive weeks followed by a 2-week rest. Tumor measurements were obtained after every second course of therapy. Toxicity was assessed weekly using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria. RESULTS: A total of 166 patients were entered into the trial. The first 64 patients received a starting dose of 125 mg/m2. An additional 102 patients were enrolled at a starting dose of 100 mg/m2 to determine whether a reduction in the starting dose would result in lower toxicity without sacrificing efficacy. Objective responses to CPT-11 were observed in 18 patients (1 complete response and 17 partial responses) (response rate [RR] = 10.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.1-15.6%). An additional 67 patients (40.4%) had stable disease as their best response. At the 125 mg/m2 starting dose, the RR was 14.1% (9 of 64 patients; 95% CI, 5.5-22.6%). Among patients given a starting dose of 100 mg/m2, the RR was 8.8% (9 of 102 patients; 95% CI, 3.3-14.3%). The overall median survival was 9.9 months (range, 0.3-36.8 months). The most frequently observed Grade 3/4 toxicities were gastrointestinal events (i.e., diarrhea [27.1%], nausea [15.1%], emesis [9.6%], abdominal cramping [22.2%], and neutropenia [19.9%]). There were no significant differences in the frequencies of Grade 3/4 toxicities between the 125 mg/m2 and 100 mg/m2 starting dose levels except for Grade 3/4 emesis (21.9% vs. 2%; P < 0.001). Patients age > or = 65 years were twice as likely (38.6% vs. 18.8%; P < 0.008) to develop Grade 3/4 diarrhea compared with younger patients when all courses of therapy were evaluated. However, older age did not significantly predict for a higher incidence of first-course diarrhea (25.0% vs. 14.7%; P = 0.106). CONCLUSIONS: CPT-11 can induce tumor regression in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma that has progressed during or shortly after 5-FU-based chemotherapy. Gastrointestinal events and neutropenia were the most common serious toxicities. Given the trend toward a higher response rate without substantially greater toxicity, 125 mg/m2 has been selected as the preferred starting dose for further studies. Careful attention to appropriate CPT-11 dose modification and early intervention with loperamide may be especially important in elderly patients.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Prognostic implications of response to preoperative infusional chemoradiation in locally advanced rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of response to preoperative infusional chemoradiation on outcome parameters among patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Preoperative chemoradiotherapy, 45 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks with continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil (300 mg/m2 per day), was given to 117 patients. As determined by pretreatment endorectal ultrasound (EUS), 96% of cases were Stage T3, and 51% had EUS evidence of perirectal adenopathy. Surgery was performed approximately 6 weeks after chemoradiation therapy. Postoperatively adjuvant systemic therapy, consisting of 400-425 mg/m2 of 5-fluorouracil plus 20 mg/m2 leucovorin for 5 days, was administered every 28 days for six cycles. Outcome parameters of local control (LC), freedom from distant metastases (DMC), disease-free survival (DFS) and cancer specific survival (CSS) were evaluated relative to primary tumor characteristics. RESULTS: The final post-treatment pathological tumor stages were complete response in 27%, Tis-2 N0 in 26%, T2 N1 in 5%, T3 N0 in 21%, T3 N1 in 15%, T4 N0 in 5% and T4 N1 in 1%. Down-staging occurred in 61% of cases. The pretreatment primary tumor size only influenced rates of local control (P < 0.03) and had no other influence on outcome parameters. Pretreatment evidence of perirectal lymph node involvement had no impact on outcome parameters. Pathologic evidence of nodal involvement did affect DMC (P < 0.002) and DFS (P < 0.003). Pathologic evidence of response did influence freedom from the development of distant metastases (P < 0.004). On pairwise analysis this relationship held only when responders were compared to non-responders. No difference was observed based on the level of downstaging at the primary tumor. Correspondingly, DFS was improved when non-responders were compared to downstaged patients (P < 0.01). Response to preoperative chemoradiation failed to affect rates of LC or CSS. For the group as a whole, adjuvant chemotherapy improved only CSS (P < 0.03). Adjuvant chemotherapy was given to 74 patients, 36 of whom had responded to preoperative chemoradiation. Improvements were only seen in DFS (P < 0.03) when down-staged patients were compared to the non-responders who received adjuvant chemotherapy. In addition, the DFS rates were lower in the non-responder group who received adjuvant chemotherapy even when they were compared to down-staged patients who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy (P < 0.04). CONCLUSION: Consistent with other reports, disease free survival and subsequent development of distant metastases is reduced in the more than 60% of patients who respond to preoperative infusional chemoradiation. Evidence of response appears more significant than the degree of response. At present, no impact is seen on cancer specific survival rates. Consideration should be given for strategies that base selection of subsequent adjuvant chemotherapy on response to preoperative chemoradiation.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Effects of age on balance assessment using voluntary and involuntary step tasks.

BACKGROUND: Taking a step while standing and modifying a step while walking are two strategies often used to maintain balance when balance disturbances are encountered during activities of daily living. This study investigated whether performance on an involuntary step task, which is assumed to be a surrogate for fall recovery abilities, was comparable to performance on a voluntary step task. METHODS: The performance of a voluntary and an involuntary step task was measured in healthy young adult (mean age 21 years) and healthy elderly adult (mean age 68 years) female subjects. Subjects stepped as fast as possible in the direction of a minimally destabilizing lateral waist pull (voluntary step task), or they responded naturally to a large destabilizing lateral waist pull (involuntary step task). The effects of age, task, and their interaction on the primary outcome variables of step foot liftoff time, landing time, step length, and step height were examined. RESULTS: In the voluntary step task, the older adults, compared to the young, required significantly more time to lift their foot (Young: 307 msec; Elderly: 424 msec). In the involuntary step task, the elderly were as quick as the young in lifting their foot (Young: 322 msec; Elderly: 335 msec). The young lifted their foot at about the same time for the two tasks. The elders, on the other hand, lifted their foot significantly earlier in the involuntary step task, compared to the voluntary step task (Vol: 424 msec; Invol: 335 msec). CONCLUSIONS: A voluntary step task underestimates the ability of healthy elderly adults to respond quickly when large destabilizing balance disturbances are encountered.

Accidental Falls↗
PubMed1999

Phase II trial of docetaxel for cholangiocarcinoma.

The authors evaluated the activity and toxicity of docetaxel given as a 1-hour infusion every 21 days in patients with unresectable cholangiocarcinoma. Seventeen patients with cytologically or histologically confirmed cholangiocarcinoma received intravenous docetaxel over 1 hour, repeated every 21 days. The initial dose of docetaxel was 100 mg/m2, with a subsequent 25% dose reduction for patients experiencing grade 3 or 4 toxicities. Treatment was continued until disease progression or occurrence of intolerable side effects. All patients received premedication with dexamethasone 8 mg by mouth twice daily for 5 days, starting 1 day before docetaxel infusion. Sixteen of the 17 patients were assessable for response and toxicity; one patient was removed from the trial for intercurrent illness. Thirty-eight cycles of docetaxel were delivered (median, two cycles). No complete or partial responses were noted. Fourteen patients had progressive disease, one patient had stable disease, and one patient died of septic shock shortly after starting treatment. Granulocytopenia was the dose-limiting toxicity. Thirteen patients had grade 4 granulocytopenia, 11 of whom required antibiotics for neutropenic fever. Granulocytopenia was the only grade 4 toxicity observed. Grade 3 toxicities included stomatitis, anemia, fatigue, vomiting, and hypotension. Grade 1 or 2 toxicities included alopecia, diarrhea, peripheral edema, myalgias, and anorexia. Administered on this dose and schedule, docetaxel lacked activity in patients with cholangiocarcinoma. The toxicity profile, including dose-limiting granulocytopenia, has been previously described in patients receiving docetaxel.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy best predicts survival after curative resection of gastric cancer.

OBJECTIVE: In Western populations, long-term survival rates after curative resection of gastric cancer remain extremely poor. The lack of effective adjuvant therapy has prompted the evaluation of neoadjuvant approaches. Since 1988, we have conducted three separate phase II trials using neoadjuvant chemotherapy to treat patients with potentially resectable gastric cancer. The present study was conducted to evaluate whether response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy is predictive of survival in patients with resectable gastric cancer. METHODS: Eighty-three patients with pathologically confirmed gastric adenocarcinoma were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy before planned surgical resection. Response was assessed by upper gastrointestinal series, endoscopy, computed tomography scan, and pathologic examination. RESULTS: For the three phase II trials, clinical response rates ranged from 24% to 38%. Three patients (4%) had a complete pathologic response. Sixty-one patients (73%) underwent a curative resection. Median follow-up was 26 months. Univariate analysis revealed T stage, number of positive nodes, and response to chemotherapy to be significant predictors of overall survival. However, on multivariate analysis, response to chemotherapy was found to be the only independent prognostic factor. CONCLUSIONS: Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy is the single most important predictor of overall survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer. These findings support further evaluation of neoadjuvant approaches in the treatment of this disease.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1999

Novel chemotherapeutic agents for gastrointestinal cancers.

Although 5-fluorouracil has been the most commonly prescribed chemotherapy agent in the treatment of patients with gastrointestinal malignancies, new agents discussed herein provide options for the treatment of patients with colorectal, gastric, and pancreas cancer. Irinotecan was recently approved for the treatment of patients with colorectal cancer refractory to 5-fluorouracil. It has also been evaluated in chemotherapy-naïve patients both alone and in combination with 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin or with oxaliplatin. Evaluated primarily in patients with colorectal cancer, oxaliplatin, a novel platinum compound, is an active agent. In combination with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin, oxaliplatin provides a higher response rate than 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin alone. Furthermore, when oxaliplatin was added to the same 5-fluorouracil-based regimen in which patients had disease progression, clinical activity was observed. Other agents discussed herein are raltitrexed and the oral fluorinated pyrimidines, including uracil:tegafur plus leucovorin, capecitabine, eniluracil plus oral 5-fluorouracil, and S-1. Gemcitabine has been demonstrated to be more effective than 5-fluorouracil in the alleviation of disease-specific symptoms in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Gemcitabine also confers a modest survival advantage. Combinations of these novel compounds are evaluated in gastrointestinal malignancies in the advanced disease setting and in adjuvant therapy programs.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed1999

Fluoropyrimidines: a critical evaluation.

After nearly four decades of clinical experience with the fluoropyrimidines, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) remains an integral part of chemotherapy for colorectal cancer. A range of 5-FU treatment regimens with or without biochemical modulation are currently used and toxicity appears to be schedule dependent. The use of oral 5-FU was abandoned because of erratic absorption caused by varying levels of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) found in the gastrointestinal tract. This effect may be overcome by administering agents that are converted to 5-FU or by inhibiting or inactivating DPD. Xeloda((R)) (capecitabine) was designed as an orally administered, selectively tumoractivated(TM) cytotoxic agent which achieves higher levels of 5-FU in the primary tumor than in plasma or other tissues. The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved Xeloda for use in patients with metastatic breast cancer resistant to paclitaxel and in whom further anthracycline therapy is contraindicated. Xeloda is also registered in Canada, Switzerland, Thailand and Argentina. In phase II clinical trials in colorectal cancer, Xeloda produced response rates of 21-24% and median time to disease progression of 127-230 days. Other oral agents in development for the treatment of colorectal cancer include tegafur/uracil plus oral leucovorin, S-1 and eniluracil plus oral 5-FU.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1999

Oxaliplatin and UFT/oral calcium folinate for advanced colorectal carcinoma.

Oxaliplatin is a unique platinum compound with single-agent activity in both chemotherapy-naïve colorectal cancer patients and patients who progressed on 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). The combination of oxaliplatin and 5-FU has demonstrated preclinical synergy, and recent clinical trials have demonstrated enhanced activity for the combination in the clinical setting as well. UFT (uracil plus tegafur in a 4:1 molar ratio) plus oral calcium folinate (Orzel) is an oral fluoropyrimidine with several potential advantages over intravenous 5-FU and known activity in colorectal cancer. The current trial was designed to evaluate the role of these agents in combination in the treatment of patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1999

Preoperative UFT and calcium folinate and radiotherapy in rectal cancer.

Protracted infusions of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) combined with pelvic radiotherapy have been associated with improved survival and decreased local and distant metastases in the adjuvant therapy of rectal cancer. However, this method of 5-FU infusion requires the inconvenience and expense of central venous line placement and care, infusion pumps, and treatment of catheter-related complications. We previously demonstrated that a completely oral therapy with UFT (uracil plus tegafur in a 4:1 molar ratio) plus oral calcium folinate (Orzel) can achieve pharmacokinetic parameters similar to those associated with protracted 5-FU infusions. This trial examines the feasibility of using UFT plus oral calcium folinate both during preoperative pelvic radiation and postoperatively, and shows that patients can be treated safely and effectively with a completely oral chemotherapy program combining UFT plus oral calcium folinate with pelvic radiation therapy.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Phase II study of prolonged infusion of Taxol in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Taxol represents a new class of anticancer agents with activity against a wide variety of solid tumors. In preclinical systems, its cytotoxicity is schedule dependent with prolonged exposure being more effective. We studied a 120-hour infusion schedule of Taxol in patients with metastatic measurable colorectal carcinoma who had had one prior 5-FU-based chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients with measurable metastatic colorectal carcinoma were eligible. Patients had to have normal liver, renal, and bone marrow functions. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. The starting dose of Taxol was 150 mg/m2 infused over 120-hours in the outpatient setting. Taxol was repeated every 21 days. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were registered. Among 14 evaluable patients, we did not observe any complete or partial response. Major toxicity included myelosuppression and mucositis. There was no treatment-related death. CONCLUSION: Taxol administered by this schedule was found ineffective in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma who had previously received one 5-FU-based chemotherapy.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Pharmacokinetics of recombinant human interferon-alpha 2a combined with 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma.

We evaluated the pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) combined with recombinant human interferon (IFN)-alpha 2a in 10 previously untreated patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma. 5-FU was administered as a continuous i.v. infusion, 750 mg/m2/day for 5 days during week 1. One s.c. injection of IFN-alpha 2a, 9 x 10(6) IU, was administered during week 2. Beginning with week 3, a continuous i.v. infusion of 5-FU 750 mg/m2/day for 5 days was administered in combination with IFN-alpha 2a, 9 x 10(6) IU s.c. three times per week. The combination of 5-FU and IFN-alpha 2a was continued every other week until either 3 months after complete remission or tumor progression. No grade 4 toxicity was observed. Granulocytopenia (two patients), leukopenia (one patient), thrombocytopenia (one patient), stomatitis (two patients), fatigue (one patient) and hand-foot syndrome (one patient) were the major (grade 3) toxic reactions encountered. Overall, one complete and six partial responses were noted. The results of the paired t-test showed no statistically significant differences between the means of the two treatments, 5-FU and 5-FU plus IFN-alpha 2a, with respect to the steady-state plasma concentration, area under the concentration-time curve, total body clearance, or steady-state volume of distribution of 5-FU, or the serum concentration of IFN. We conclude that 5-FU and IFN-alpha 2a do not interact pharmacokinetically at the doses and schedules in the regimen studied.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Prospectively randomized trial of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with high-risk colon cancer.

PURPOSE: This study had two major goals: (1) to assess the effectiveness of a regimen of fluorouracil (5-FU) plus levamisole plus leucovorin as postoperative surgical adjuvant therapy for patients with high-risk colon cancer, and (2) to evaluate 6 months versus 12 months of chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with poor-prognosis stage II or III colon cancer were randomly assigned to receive adjuvant chemotherapy with either intensive-course 5-FU and leucovorin combined with levamisole, or a standard regimen of 5-FU plus levamisole. Patients were also randomly assigned to receive either 12 months or 6 months of chemotherapy, which resulted in four treatment groups. RESULTS: Eight hundred ninety-one of 915 patients entered (97.4%) were eligible. The median follow-up duration is 5.1 years for patients still alive. There was a difference among the four treatment groups with respect to patient survival, and a significant duration-by-regimen interaction was observed. Specifically, standard 5-FU plus levamisole was inferior to 5-FU plus leucovorin plus levamisole when treatment was given for 6 months (5-year survival rate, 60% v 70%; P < .01). CONCLUSION: There was no significant improvement in patient survival when chemotherapy was given for 12 months compared with 6 months. When chemotherapy was given for 6 months, standard 5-FU plus levamisole was associated with inferior patient survival compared with intensive-course 5-FU plus leucovorin plus levamisole. These data suggest that 5-FU plus levamisole for 6 months should not be used in clinical practice, whereas 6 months of treatment with 5-FU plus leucovorin plus levamisole is effective.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1998

Phase II trial of paclitaxel, fluorouracil, and cisplatin in patients with advanced carcinoma of the esophagus.

PURPOSE: We have previously identified paclitaxel as an active single agent in the treatment of esophageal cancer. We performed a phase II trial of paclitaxel in combination with cisplatin and fluorouracil (5-FU), conventionally used chemotherapy for esophageal cancer. The antitumor response, toxicity, and survival of patients treated with the three-drug regimen were evaluated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-one patients with advanced, surgically unresectable, or metastatic squamous cell or adenocarcinoma of the esophagus were treated. No prior chemotherapy was allowed. Thirty patients had adenocarcinoma and 31 patients had squamous cell carcinoma. The majority (47 patients; 77%) had metastatic disease and 14 patients (23%) had an unresectable primary or locally recurrent tumor. Patients received paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 by 3-hour infusion day 1; cisplatin 20 mg/m2 daily days 1 through 5, and 5-FU by continuous infusion at a dose of 1,000 mg/m2 daily days 1 through 5. Because of toxicity observed in the first 10 patients treated, the starting dose of 5-FU was subsequently reduced to 750 mg/m2 daily in the remaining patients. A planned attenuation of cisplatin to 15 mg/m2 daily was made after the first three cycles. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was not routinely administered unless the patient had an episode of febrile neutropenia or prolonged grade 4 neutropenia. Treatment was recycled every 28 days. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients completed a median of five cycles, and 60 patients were assessable for response. Major responses were seen in 29 patients (48%; 95% confidence intervals, 35 to 61), which included seven complete responses (12%). Comparable response rates were seen for patients with adenocarcinoma (46%) and those with squamous carcinoma (50%), and for patients with metastatic disease (22 of 46 patients; 48%) and those with locally advanced disease (seven of 14 patients; 50%). A significantly higher complete response rate was observed in patients with squamous carcinoma (20%) compared with those with adenocarcinoma (3%; chi2 P=.04). The median duration of response was 5.7 months (range, 1 to 18.6 months). Median survival was 10.8 months (range, 1.5 to 25 months). Toxicity was severe but manageable with dose attenuation, and included 18% of patients with grade 3 neurologic toxicity. Twenty-eight patients (46%) required a dose attenuation for toxicity, and 42 of 275 treatment cycles (15%) required a dose attenuation. Twenty-nine patients (48%) required hospitalization for toxicity, which included 11 patients for neutropenic fever (18%). There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSION: The combination of paclitaxel, cisplatin, and 5-FU has substantial antitumor activity in metastatic esophageal carcinoma, with a remarkable complete response rate noted in patients with squamous carcinoma. Paclitaxel is an important new agent in the treatment of esophageal carcinoma, and further evaluation of this agent in combination chemotherapy is warranted. Given the toxicity associated with the current regimen, the optimal dose and schedule of paclitaxel in combination chemotherapy remain to be established.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1998

Phase I trial of uracil-tegafur (UFT) plus oral leucovorin: 28-day schedule.

UFT [Taiho Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan; (BMS-200604), Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ], a fluorouracil prodrug, is an oral 4:1 molar concentration of uracil plus tegafur. This study examined the dose-limiting toxic effects and maximum tolerated dose of UFT plus leucovorin administered for 28 consecutive days followed by a 7-day rest period. A course of therapy was repeated every 35 days. UFT dose levels examined were 200 mg/m2/day, with planned escalations to 250, 300, 350, and 400 mg/m2/day; the leucovorin dose remained at 150 mg/day. Three patients were initially enrolled at each UFT dose level. The total daily doses of both UFT and leucovorin were divided into three doses administered every 8 hr. Diarrhea became the dose-limiting toxicity at 400 mg/m2/day UFT, with grade 3 diarrhea noted in 2 of the 3 patients receiving that dose. To further define a phase II UFT starting dose, 3 additional patients were entered at the 350 mg/m2 level; 3 of the 6 patients treated at this level developed grade 3 nonhematological toxic effects. No partial or complete responses were observed. The recommended phase II UFT starting dose is 300 mg/m2/day plus 150 mg/day leucovorin. Since neutropenia, significant mucositis, and "hand-foot syndrome" were not observed with UFT plus leucovorin, the toxicity profile of this regimen appears favorable compared with that of intravenous regimens of fluorouracil plus leucovorin. This phase I trial of UFT served as the basis for a phase II trial, current phase III trials, and a national adjuvant therapy trial of UFT for high-risk colon cancer patients.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1998

UFT Plus Oral Leucovorin: A New Oral Treatment for Colorectal Cancer.

UFT is an oral antineoplastic agent that combines the 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) prodrug tegafur with uracil in a 1:4 molar ratio. Uracil is added because it competitively inhibits the degradation of 5-FU, resulting in increased plasma and tumor 5-FU concentrations. Although UFT has been available in Japan since 1984, it has only recently been in clinical development in the United States. Beginning in 1991, phase I/II trials of UFT have been conducted in the United States to establish a maximum tolerated dose, evaluate its pharmacokinetics, and assess its efficacy and safety in advanced colorectal cancer. Pharmacokinetic studies demonstrated that UFT 300 mg/m&sup2;/day administered in divided doses every 8 h for 28 days provides an effective oral method of delivering a prolonged exposure to 5-FU. UFT plus oral leucovorin is well tolerated, with diarrhea as the dose-limiting toxicity. Unlike i.v. administered 5-FU, UFT is not associated with significant myelosuppression, mucositis, hand-foot syndrome, or alopecia, and patients have a decreased risk of toxicity-related hospitalization. In a phase II trial in advanced colorectal cancer, UFT plus oral leucovorin produced an objective response rate of 42%, with survival similar to weekly i.v. 5-FU plus leucovorin. The reduced toxicity, efficacy comparable to i.v. 5-FU, and the convenience and cost savings of an orally administered regimen have potential pharmacoeconomic advantages.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1998

Irinotecan: toward clinical end points in drug development.

The objective response rate is the initial method to assess the activity of a novel anticancer agent. Response rates may not characterize a new agent's clinical benefit, however, especially if moderate to severe toxicity may be associated with treatment. Clinical end points, such as improvement in survival or relief of disease-related symptoms, provide clinicians with a more rational basis for selecting therapies. Irinotecan (CPT-11 [Camptosar]) was introduced into clinical practice based primarily on its consistent phase II activity (response rates of 13.3% to 21.7% in patients with advanced colorectal cancer refractory to 5-fluorouracil [5-FU]). Two recently presented, randomized, phase III trials have examined irinotecan's impact on clinical end points of survival, quality of life, tolerability, and control of disease-related symptoms in 5-FU-refractory colorectal cancer patients. The first trial prospectively compared irinotecan and best supportive care (BSC) to BSC alone in patients with 5-FU-resistant metastatic colorectal cancer. Irinotecan-treated patients had significantly prolonged survival, improved quality of life, and better control of disease-related symptoms. The second trial compared irinotecan to infusional 5-FU schedules in colorectal cancer patients whose tumors had progressed within 3 months of prior 5-FU. Patients treated with irinotecan lived significantly longer than those given infusional 5-FU and had a comparable quality of life. These randomized trials demonstrate an evolution in our understanding of the clinical utility of irinotecan.

Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic↗