PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R Petchey

Publications and source records attributed to R Petchey.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

What sort of networks are public health networks?

BACKGROUND: Re-organization of the English National Health Service (NHS) has fragmented the public health workforce, relocating teams from about 100 health authorities into over 300 primary care trusts (PCTs). The UK Government announced the setting up of public health networks (PHNs) as a solution to the problems created by fragmentation. METHODS: Fifty-seven semi-structured telephone interviews were held with key players in PHNs in all strategic health authority areas in England in early 2003. RESULTS: PHNs appeared to be primarily networks of public health professionals rather than of organizations. Informants were unsure about PCTs' commitment to public health. Predominantly, members were those NHS personnel with a clear and explicit public health role. Most PHNs intended to include others later (e.g. health visitors, environmental health officers), although a few thought that inclusivity was essential from the start. Continuing professional development for public health personnel dominated the work being undertaken, with some collaborative work across PCTs. PHNs were seen as a compulsory reconfiguration of existing networks, and informants doubted that they were appropriate for the many levels of networking that public health work requires. CONCLUSION: The formation of PHNs does not appear to have been either necessary or sufficient. However, the public health community has a well-established tradition of networking, and therefore has the skills to use PHNs advantageously.

Community Networks↗

Specialist public health capacity in England: working in the new primary care organizations.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the capacity and development needs, in relation to key areas of competency and skills, of the specialist public health workforce based in primary care organizations following the 2001 restructuring of the UK National Health Service. STUDY DESIGN: Questionnaire survey to all consultants and specialists in public health (including directors of public health) based in primary care trusts (PCTs) and strategic health authorities (SHAs) in England. RESULTS: Participants reported a high degree of competency. However, skill gaps were evident in some areas of public health practice, most notably "developing quality and risk management" and in relation to media communication, computing, management and leadership. In general, medically qualified individuals were weaker on community development than non-medically qualified specialists, and non-medically qualified specialists were less able to perform tasks that require epidemiological or clinical expertise than medically qualified specialists. Less than 50% of specialists felt that their links to external organizations, including public health networks, were strong. Twenty-nine percent of respondents felt professionally isolated and 22% reported inadequate team working within their PCT or SHA. Approximately 21% of respondents expressed concerns that they did not have access to enough expertise to fulfil their tasks and that their skills were not being adequately utilized. CONCLUSIONS: Some important skill gaps are evident among the specialist public health workforce although, in general, a high degree of competency was reported. This suggests that the capacity deficit is a problem of numbers of specialists rather than an overall lack of appropriate skills. Professional isolation must be addressed by encouraging greater partnership working across teams.

England↗

The maintenance of confidentiality in primary care: a survey of policies and procedures.

We investigated policies and procedures for the maintenance of confidentiality in primary care by means of a postal survey of 109 general practices in a large non-metropolitan urban health authority in England. The response rate was 61%. Practices believed a variety of staff should be informed if a patient was HIV-positive, ranging from 'patient's own GP' (100%) to 'clerical staff' (8%). In 88% of practices receptionists occasionally or normally asked patients why they wished to see a doctor, although in 76% such conversations were audible to other patients. Ninety-nine per cent claimed to have a policy on confidentiality, although it existed in writing in 62% and was publicized in only 27%. In 88% of practices non-clinical staff had access to written patient records. Ninety-three per cent provided staff training in confidentiality, but in 34% it was confined to induction. Almost all practices had taken some steps to safeguard confidentiality, but few had explicit, formal confidentiality policies. Information sharing and non-clinical staff access to medical records were extensive, and few practices communicated their arrangements to patients. Practices need to review their policies and procedures for the maintenance of confidentiality.

Confidentiality↗

A profile of PMS salaried GP contracts and their impact on recruitment.

BACKGROUND: Personal medical services (PMS) pilot sites aim to use salaried GP schemes to improve GP recruitment and retention and enhance the quality of service provision, particularly in underserved areas. OBJECTIVES: Our objectives were to (i) compare the work incentives of salaried compared with standard GP contracts; (ii) assess recruitment success to salaried posts; and (iii) describe the types of GPs attracted to these new posts. METHOD: All first wave PMS pilot sites with salaried GP posts known to be 'live' in October 1998 were included in the analysis of employment contracts and job descriptions. Information on recruitment was obtained by a questionnaire survey of PMS sites that were intending to recruit a salaried GP. RESULTS: The mean full-time equivalent salary was 43,674 pounds sterling with additional benefits in terms of sick leave, maternity leave and paid expenses. Eighty-nine percent of posts were eligible for the NHS pension scheme. Posts were mainly full time (40.8 hours per week). GPs were responsible for providing services equivalent in scope to general medical services. One-fifth of contracts freed GPs from out-of-hours responsibility and most freed them from practice management. Forty-three of the pilot sites actively recruited to fill 63 salaried posts, which involved a total of 51 recruitment 'rounds', with some pilots advertising more than once. There were 291 applications. The median number of applicants per post was three and the median time to recruitment was 6 weeks. Eighty-five percent of sites were satisfied with the quality of their applicants and 64% with the quantity. Eighty-five percent of applicants previously had been working in general practice, most in locum or salaried posts. Applicants tended to be young and male. Sixty posts were filled. CONCLUSIONS: Salaried contracts offer positive incentives to recruitment in terms of reduced hours of work and freedom from administrative responsibility. Recruitment success was similar to that achieved by inner city practices generally. This modest achievement might be enhanced by the addition of professional development schemes and increased flexible/part-time working.

Adult↗

A prescription for improvement? An observational study to identify how general practices vary in their growth in prescribing costs.

OBJECTIVE: To identify how some general practices have low growth in prescribing costs relative to other practices. DESIGN: Observational study. SETTING: Trent region of England. PARTICIPANTS: 162 general practices: 54 with low growth in prescribing costs, 54 with average increases in costs, and 54 with large increases in costs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in prescribing costs in therapeutic categories in which it has been suggested that savings can be made. RESULTS: There were significant differences between the three groups of practices in terms of their changes in prescribing costs for almost all the variables studied. For the group of practices with lowest growth in costs the most important factors were reducing numbers of prescription items and costs per item; relatively low growth in the costs of "new and expensive" drugs; increasing generic prescribing; and reducing costs for modified release products. This group of practices did not increase costs as much as the others for lipid lowering drugs (P=0.012) and hormone replacement therapy (P=0. 007). The practices with the greatest increases in costs had particularly large increases for proton pump inhibitors, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and modified release products. Compared with the other groups these practices had larger increases in costs for "expensive hospital initiated drugs" (P=0.009). CONCLUSION: General practices vary in their growth in prescribing costs in many ways, with growth in costs for "new and expensive" drugs being particularly important.

Drug Costs↗

The last resort would be to go to the GP'. Understanding the perceptions and use of general practitioner services among people with HIV/AIDS.

In England and Wales, departments of Genito-Urinary Medicine have led the clinical response to HIV infection and AIDS (HIV/AIDS). They provide an open-access self-referral service on a basis of strict confidentiality. People with HIV/AIDS have been found to be reluctant to involve their general practitioner (GP) in their care. Previous research has not investigated their decisions about service use in the context of their broader strategies for coping with the multiple psychological and social challenges, which are posed by HIV/AIDS as a chronic, stigmatised condition. We report a depth-interview study of twenty people with HIV/AIDS in a low-prevalence nonmetropolitan urban area of England. Their health care choices were products of complex judgements. Five concerns predominated: expertise, security, rights to care, confidentiality and the maintenance of normality. Transfer to GP care signified a transition from essential wellness to essential illness and represented a loss of biographical continuity. Their other concerns express problems of information management, which are universal features of stigmatising conditions. These may be heightened in the case of locally provided services, where any leakage of discrediting information is likely to impact directly on everyday life. These concerns should be understood and respected in policy initiatives to develop services.

Confidentiality↗

Staff grade doctors and the consultant ladder: falling off or stepping off?

The majority of the doctors in staff grade posts surveyed had qualified overseas and a substantial proportion were dissatisfied with their posts. Very few doctors had received adequate careers counselling before starting their post and many were concerned at the lack of opportunities for career development.

Career Mobility↗

A tale of two (low prevalence) cities: social movement organisations and the local policy response to HIV/AIDS.

In the field of HIV/AIDS, social movement organisations (SMOs) have been identified as powerful potential catalysts for change through their impact on formal organisational structures and the policy process. In addition, they have the capacity to be important providers of services in their own right, through the community resources they are capable of mobilising. In the United Kingdom, however, their role in policy formation is disputed. Previous studies have concluded that they have been most influential at national policy and ward level. At the level of local policy making, their influence has been found to be patchy and confined largely to securing recognition of HIV as an issue. Most previous research has, however, been conducted in high prevalence, metropolitan settings with functional SMOs. This paper presents the results of a comparative case study of two neighbouring provincial low prevalence district health authorities (HAs) in England. We describe the changing national policy context from 1986 to 1995 and use a strategic change model to analyse the local development of care and treatment services for people with HIV/AIDS, in particular the relationship between SMOs and HAs. Despite being demographically, socioeconomically and epidemiologically similar, and sharing an identical national policy framework, the two districts demonstrate completely divergent organisational responses to the HIV/AIDS epidemic. We conclude that the level of prior social movement mobilisation and the degree of receptivity for change within the HA are the key variables for explaining variations in the scale of strategic change observed in the two districts.

Adult↗

The role of the general practitioner in the community care of people with HIV infection and AIDS: a comparative study of high- and low-prevalence areas in England.

BACKGROUND: Policy for the care of people suffering from HIV and AIDS has changed over the past decade. Schemes for shared primary and secondary care have been met with varying success, and patients may be reluctant to become involved. No systematic evaluation comparing the views of primary care providers and users in areas of varying HIV prevalence has been published. AIM: To examine the role of general practice in areas of England with low and high human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) prevalence and to compare barriers to general practice care in each area. METHOD: We used focus groups, semistructured questionnaires and interviews in north London (high HIV prevalence) and Nottingham (low HIV prevalence). RESULTS: Four focus groups took place in London. A total of 411 general practitioners (GPs) in London and 405 in Nottingham replied to postal questionnaires. Overall, 121 primary care staff in 40 London practices and 26 staff in five Nottingham practices were interviewed. In all, 54 people infected with HIV were interviewed in London and 20 in Nottingham. Providers and users regarded the 24-hour availability and the familiar environment of general practice as its key assets. Lack of expertise and time were its disadvantages. Providers were concerned about inadequate communication with specialist services. Although providers were concerned about confidentiality, whether they had liberal and sympathetic attitudes was more important in deciding whether people with HIV used the service. In the low-prevalence area, general practice involvement was the result of individual initiatives, and practices were not integrated into specialist care. In the high-prevalence area, HIV care was more usual in general practice, but there was also little integration with HIV services. CONCLUSIONS: In high-prevalence districts, a strategy to make HIV care routine for all GPs may be appropriate. In low-prevalence areas, a network of selected, strategically located, relatively high-involvement practices may be more effective in meeting the primary care needs of people with HIV infection and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS).

Community Health Services↗

'Ending up a GP': a qualitative study of junior doctors' perceptions of general practice as a career.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate junior doctors' perception of general practice as a career. METHOD: In-depth interviews with a purposive sample of 54 junior doctors were carried out. RESULTS: Three main criteria were identified: clinical content of practice, lifestyle, and organizational context of practice. Clinical content was most highly valued, but was recognized to conflict with lifestyle. Compared with hospital medicine, general practice was associated with inferior clinical content but superior lifestyle. Views on organizational context were more equivocal. Choice of general practice as a career was often based on negative judgements. CONCLUSIONS: Junior doctors' perceptions of general practice are expressions of a hospital-centric culture. Criteria for career choice are diffuse and complex. There was no evidence that the 1990 GP Contract deterred recruitment. The compromise between intrinsic satisfaction and lifestyle may be significant for GP morale.

Adult↗

Putting principals back into practice: an evaluation of a re-entry course for vocationally trained doctors.

BACKGROUND: Current recruitment difficulties in general practice have sharpened the interest of the profession in non-principals. No re-entry course for general practice has previously been run in the UK. AIM: To design and evaluate a re-entry course for general practice. METHOD: A re-entry course was developed to help doctors return to general practice as principals. A telephone interview was carried out with each delegate prior to their attendance on the course and was repeated one month and six months after the course to measure any change in career intentions and the perceived benefit of attending the course. RESULTS: Six months after the course, 11 out of 14 delegates had taken positive steps to return to general practice or had increased their time commitment to medicine. This contrasts with only one of the control group having made any steps to change career. CONCLUSION: The course was evaluated and found to be beneficial, particularly in terms of increasing the confidence of the delegates.

Curriculum↗

General practitioner fundholding: weighing the evidence.

A new development in the British National Health Service is fundholding, whereby certain general practitioners are given budgets from which they purchase services for patients. Our knowledge about fundholding is rudimentary. Many important questions remain unanswered. These include: the impact of fundholding on the efficiency of overall resource utilisation; its effect on strategic planning; its effect on equity; its impact on the role of the doctor and the doctor-patient relationship; and its consequences for practice organisation and the culture of primary care. Even the scant results we do have must be interpreted cautiously. Fundholding was introduced during a period of great turbulence for general practice. Its strategic function was uncertain and its impact has been confounded by the effects of a series of earlier and concurrent policy changes. Few reliable conclusions about fundholding, either positive or negative, can be drawn from existing research.

Costs and Cost Analysis↗

Collings report on general practice in England in 1950: unrecognised, pioneering piece of British social research?

Collings's grim description of postwar general practice in England and his sombre analysis of its prospects created an immediate sensation. In addition to its value as a historical document, the report is also regarded as a turning point in the postwar history of British general practice. The study is also interesting for another reason, which has not been acknowledged: Collings merits recognition as a pioneer of ethnographic research at a time when it was largely unknown elsewhere in British social research.

Family Practice↗

GPs in principle but not in practice: a study of vocationally trained doctors not currently working as principals.

OBJECTIVES: To identify doctors who are vocationally trained but not currently practising as principals in general practice; their reasons for not practising as principals; and whether the prospect of a re-entry course would appear to this group. DESIGN: Postal questionnaire survey based on semistructured interviews. SUBJECTS: Doctors who had been vocationally trained but were not currently practising as principals: 351 possible subjects identified by a process of "networking." SETTING: Trent Regional Health Authority. RESULTS: 166 of the doctors who replied fitted the criteria (100 women; 66 men). The out of hours commitment was ranked as the most important factor for not practising as a principal--95 women and 50 men rated it important--followed by difficulty in combining work with family commitments--84 women, 31 men. 82 respondents (49%) said they would be interested in a re-entry course if one were available. CONCLUSIONS: There is a pool of vocationally trained doctors in Trent region who are not practising as principals in general practice. More flexible working patterns and the availability of a re-entry course could make the post of principal in general practice a more attractive proposition to these doctors.

Adult↗

Exploratory study of general practitioners' orientations to general practice and responses to change.

BACKGROUND: Research into general practitioners' responses to the changes in the health service has focused on the quantifiable dimensions of workload, stress, job satisfaction and mental health. AIM: This study set out to investigate general practitioners' practice orientations and responses to change. METHOD: The study was undertaken in 1992. 'Young principals' who had attended MSD Foundation regional courses were invited by letter to reflect on recent change in general practice and to give their views on morale and recruitment. RESULTS: Forty nine young principals responded (response rate 45%). Responses were found to cluster around four orientations to practice: collectivism, pragmatism, traditionalism, and alienation. These varied in terms of four underlying values: autonomy, individualism, external referent and optimism. CONCLUSION: General practitioners' responses to change are more complex than is currently understood and are influenced by orientation to practice. In a relatively homogeneous 'enthusiastic' subgroup of general practitioners there is striking variation in practice orientation.

Adult↗