Diabetic control after total pancreatectomy.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to R Pezzilli.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: More than half of all patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma are over 70 years of age. Life expectancy for the elderly population is increasing and currently major pancreatic resection provides the only meaningful chance of cure for periampullary and pancreatic tumors. Controversy over what constitutes the correct treatment of these tumors in elderly patients continues to this day. The aim of our study was to determine whether age alone or age plus some prognostic factors constitute contraindications to major pancreatic resections. METHODS: Between 2000 and 2005, data from 88 consecutive patients who had major pancreatic resection for periampullary or pancreatic tumors were entered into a prospective database. Fifty-three patients under 70 years of age (young patients), and 35 patients 70 years of age or older (elderly patients) were compared with respect to several characteristics and the postoperative course. RESULTS: Postoperative mortality and morbidity, length of hospital stay, and long-term survival were similar in the two groups. In the elderly group, the mortality rate was significantly higher in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and the morbidity rate was significantly higher in patients with ASA 3 than in patients with ASA 1-2, in whom a pancreaticoduodenectomy or total pancreatectomy had been performed. CONCLUSIONS: Age alone is not a contraindication for major pancreatic resection. In elderly patients a careful evaluation of the co-morbidities and of the type of surgical procedure is mandatory in order to allow the proper selection of those patients best suited for surgery in specialized centers.
BACKGROUND: In clinical practice there is the need to utilise a time saving questionnaire to assess the quality of life. AIMS: To establish the validity of the SF-12 questionnaire in chronic pancreatitis patients and to identify the predictors capable of modifying the physical and mental summaries in these patients. QUESTIONNAIRES: SF-12 and SF-36 questionnaires were used. SUBJECTS: One hundred and forty-one outpatients with proven chronic pancreatitis. The data of 141 sex- and age-matched Italian subjects of two normative groups (61,434 Italian subjects for SF-12 and 2031 Italian subjects for SF-36) were used as controls. RESULTS: Chronic pancreatitis patients had the SF-12 physical and mental component summaries significantly related to the SF-36 physical and mental component summaries (P<0.001). The presence of pancreatic pain and non-pancreatic surgery accounted for 41.3% in the formation of the PCS-36 score and 37.2% in that of the PCS-12 score, respectively. Gender, BMI and pancreatic pain accounted for 15.3% of the information in the formation of the MCS-36 and for 14.7% in that of the MCS-12; using these clinical variables, the loss of information in applying the SF-12 instead of the SF-36 was very low (4.1 and 0.6% for the PCS and the MCS, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The SF-12 is a good alternative to the SF-36 in assessing the quality of life in chronic pancreatitis.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the survival rate of patients with endocrine tumors of the pancreas, functioning or non-functioning, associated or not with MEN 1 syndrome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty-three patients with pancreatic endocrine tumors diagnosed in our department from 1978 to 2003 were studied. RESULTS: The study included 37 men (44.6%) and 46 women (55.4%). The median age of patients at diagnosis was 55 years (range 19-81 years). Fifty-two patients (62.7%) had non-functioning endocrine tumors, 16 (19.3%) had functioning endocrine tumors and 15 (18.1%) had MEN 1 disease with pancreatic involvement. Twenty-seven patients (32.5%) had liver metastases at the time of diagnosis, involvement of the lymph nodes was found in 47 out of 79 patients (59.5%). Forty patients (48.2%) had radical surgery, 20 (24.1%) had palliative surgery and 53 were treated medically. The survival rate was significantly related to the presence of metastases, lymph node involvement, and the type of tumor and treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor resection, the absence of liver and lymph node metastases, and the presence of MEN 1 syndrome are related to a better survival rate. Radical surgery continues to have a central role in the therapeutic approach to endocrine tumors of the pancreas.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Methods of lubrication are rarely considered to be a matter for study in gastrointestinal endoscopy. We evaluated a new technique, i. e. the release of seed oil in discrete amounts from the tip of the scope during colonoscopy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 346 consecutive patients prospectively underwent colonoscopy with a standard lubricating method (using water-soluble jelly; group A) or with the standard method plus seed oil (corn oil) instillations through the biopsy channel (group B). The following variables were evaluated in the two groups: the success rate for total intubation, and the time required to reach the cecum; the time needed to examine the colon at withdrawal; the detection rates for colorectal diseases; the level of pain and degree of difficulty associated with the examination. Patients in whom total colonoscopy was not achieved were asked to undergo a further examination in which the other lubricating technique was used. RESULTS: Successful intubation to the cecum was significantly more frequent ( P < 0.005) in the oil lubrication group (group B, 159/168) than in the control group (group A, 145/170), and less time was needed ( P < 0.001). No significant differences were found with regard to time for examination at withdrawal and detection rates for colorectal diseases. Level of pain and degree of difficulty during colonoscopy were significantly lower in the oil group ( P < 0.001). In the cross-over examinations done in patients in whom total colonoscopy was not achieved, no statistical difference was found between the two groups. We observed no side effects for patients or damage to the instrument. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed technique could be a simple, safe, and inexpensive method for easier and less painful colonoscopy; moreover, it might facilitate difficult examinations. Further studies are needed to confirm our data and to ensure that the use of this technique is not liable to damage the scope.
INTRODUCTION: Health-related quality of life is becoming a major issue in the evaluation of any therapeutic intervention in patients with chronic or hard to cure diseases. AIMS: To assess the quality of life in patients with chronic pancreatitis, the majority of whom have had the disease for a long time, and to evaluate which factors linked to the disease are able to influence the quality of life. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A total of 190 consecutive patients (157 males, 33 females; mean age 58.6+/-12.7 years, range 18-92 years) with proven chronic pancreatitis were enrolled. The SF-36 questionnaire was used for assessing the health-related quality of life. RESULTS: The z-scores of the eight domains of the patients with chronic pancreatitis were significantly negative indicating an overall impairment of the quality of life when compared to the Italian normative sample. Pancreatic pain was the unique clinical variable able to significantly impair all eight domains of the SF-36, while Wirsung dilation and diabetes were negatively related to some physical and mental domains. The body mass index was the unique variable positively related with some SF-36 domains. CONCLUSIONS: Pain may be considered the most important factor affecting the quality of life of chronic pancreatitis patients; moreover, alimentary and metabolic factors deserve more attention in improving the quality of life of these subjects.
We report a case of serum pancreatic hyperenzymemia as a primary manifestation of sarcoidosis; pancreatic involvement was confirmed by endoscopic ultrasonography which revealed a notable glandular fibrosis of the pancreas. It is important that patients with systemic sarcoidosis who have increased serum levels of amylase and lipase be checked in order to detect the presence of possible pancreatic involvement. Endoscopic ultrasonography represents the technique of choice used to confirm the clinical suspicion of pancreatic inflammation.
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Till now, no Italian studies providing information on acute pancreatitis have been published. The aim of this study was to evaluate the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of acute pancreatitis in Italy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study involved 37 Italian centres distributed homogeneously throughout the entire national territory and prospectively collected epidemiological, anamnestic, laboratory, radiological, therapeutic (pharmacological, endoscopic and surgical) data, relevant to each individual case of acute pancreatitis consecutively observed during the period from September 1996 to June 2000. RESULTS: One thousand two hundred and six case report forms were collected, but 201 patients (16.6%) were subsequently eliminated from the final analysis. We therefore studied 1005 patients, 533 (53%) males and 472 (47%) females, mean age 59.6 +/- 20 years. On the basis of the Atlanta classification of acute pancreatitis, 753 patients of the 1005 cases analysed (75%) were mild and 252 patients (25%) severe. The aetiology was biliary in 60% of the patients, related to alcohol abuse in 8.5%, while in 21% of the cases it could not be identified. Over 80% of the patients (83%) were admitted to hospital within 24 h from the onset of clinical symptoms, while only 6% were admitted after 48 h. In particular, 65% of the patients were admitted to hospital within the first 12 h. Antibiotics were used in 85% of the severe and 75% of mild forms. Endoscopic therapy was carried out in 65% of the severe cases, but only in 40% it was carried out prior to 72 h. Eighty-five patients (8.5% of the total, 34% of the severe forms) underwent surgical intervention: 20% on the first day, 38.5% within the fourth day, and the remaining (41.5% of the cases) later on for infected necrosis. The mean duration of hospitalisation for patients with mild pancreatitis was 13 +/- 8 days, while for the severe disease it was of 30 +/- 14 days. The overall mortality rate was 5%, 17% in severe and 1.5% in mild pancreatitis. CONCLUSIONS: Acute pancreatitis in Italy is more commonly a mild disease with a biliary aetiology. The treatment of the disease is not optimal and, on the basis of these data, needs to be standardised. Despite this, the overall mortality rate is low (5%).
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the clinical value of a new direct and competitive immunoassay for trypsinogen activation peptide (TAP) determination in acute pancreatitis (AP). METHODS: The subjects were 34 patients with AP (22 mild, 12 severe), 12 patients with nonpancreatic acute abdominal pain (AA), 11 healthy subjects (HS), and 16 consecutive patients who underwent therapeutic ERCP (ERCP). Serum TAP, amylase, and lipase levels were determined in AP, AA, and HS at their initial observation; the AP patients were also studied for 6 consecutive days after admission. In the ERCP patients, serum TAP, amylase, and lipase levels, as well as urine TAP and amylase levels, were determined before and 6 hours after endoscopy. RESULTS: Serum TAP levels on admission were 0.35 +/- 1.60 OD (mean +/- SD) in AP patients and 0.005 +/- 0.001 OD in AA patients, while HS patients had no detectable serum TAP levels. ERCP patients had no detectable serum TAP levels before and 6 hours after the ERCP, whereas urine TAP concentrations were 1.72 +/- 3.43 OD and 0.75 +/- 1.49 OD before and 6 hours after the execution of the endoscopy, respectively (P = 0.249). The sensitivities and specificities of serum TAP, amylase, and lipase levels in discriminating between AP and AA were 23.5% and 91.7%, 94.1% and 100%, and 97.1% and 100%, respectively, while those used in the assessment of the severity of AP were 29.9% and 73.5%, 38.8% and 81.2%, and 28.4% and 83.6%, respectively. CONCLUSION: TAP is of limited value in assessing the diagnosis and the severity of acute pancreatic damage.
BACKGROUND: Loxiglumide is a potent and selective cholecystokinin-1 (CCK-1) receptor antagonist able to inhibit gall-bladder contraction. AIM: To assess the effect of CCK-1 receptor blockade on the pain of patients with biliary colic. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fourteen patients with biliary colic but no suspicion for acute cholecystitis, were randomly and blindly assigned to loxiglumide (50 mg i.v.) or hyoscine-N-butyl bromide (20 mg i.v.) treatment. Pain intensity was monitored by a Visual Analogue Scale. Patients with less than 80% response at 30 min, were retreated with a second injection of the same compound. RESULTS: Reduction in pain score (mean +/- S.E.M.) was faster and significantly greater in patients treated with loxiglumide (n = 7) than in controls (n = 7): 88 +/- 7% vs. 47 +/- 12% after 20 min, P < 0.05; 92 +/- 6% vs. 49 +/- 13%, after 30 min, P < 0.05. Only one of seven patients treated with loxiglumide needed a second injection at 30 min (vs. six of seven controls, P < 0.05). No adverse effect was observed after either treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Loxiglumide is highly effective in obtaining pain relief in patients with biliary colic. The analgesic effect of CCK-1 receptor blockade is superior to that of a conventional anticholinergic treatment.
AIM: To evaluate relapse of acute pancreatitis in patients with biliary pancreatitis in whom coexisting diseases or patient refusal have excluded cholecystectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-seven patients presenting a first episode of biliary acute pancreatitis underwent urgent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES). RESULTS: ERCP with ES was successful in all but one patient (97.8%) who was then cholecystectomised. Complications related to the endoscopic procedure were reported in five patients (10.6%). During the follow-up period (median time 12 months; range 1-84 months), 10 patients (21%) suffered from biliary complications. Three patients (6.4%), all with lithiasis of the gallbladder, had relapses of acute pancreatitis, two of them within 2 months of the previous episode, and one about a year later after ingestion of a rich meal and alcoholic beverages. The first two were cholecystectomised. Two patients died during the follow-up period from unrelated diseases. CONCLUSIONS: In subjects who are at high risk for anaesthesia, endoscopic procedures may be utilised.
AIM: To evaluate the clinical, morphological and aetiological aspects of acute pancreatitis in children in Italy. PATIENTS: The hospital records of 50 consecutive patients with acute pancreatitis observed in 5 Italian Pediatric Departments were reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 25 males and 25 females (median age 10.5 years, range 2-17) were studied. Of these patients, 48 (96%) had abdominal pain. The pancreatitis was associated with biliary disease in 10 patients (20%); it was due to viral infection in 6 patients (12%), pancreatic duct abnormalities in 4 (8%, familial chronic pancreatitis in 3 (6%), trauma in 5 (10%) and other causes in 5 (10%); the pancreatitis was of unknown origin in 17 patients (34%). Previous attacks of the disease had occurred in 14 patients. A diagnosis of mild pancreatitis was made in 41 patients (82%) and of severe disease in 9 (18%). One patient with severe pancreatitis died from multiorgan failure. Patients with severe pancreatitis had significantly higher serum concentrations of C-reactive protein than patients with mild pancreatitis. Hospital stay was similar for patients with the mild form and those with the severe form of the disease. CONCLUSIONS: In Italian children, acute pancreatitis is of unknown origin in about one-third of the children and is recurrent in 28% of the cases. The disease is severe in 18% of the cases.
BACKGROUND: The diagnostic value of the determination of the serum pancreatic polypeptide (PP) and gastrin concentrations after a standard meal for early diagnosis of patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN 1) is controversial. The aim of this study was to clarify this issue. Thirteen patients with MEN 1, seven healthy family members, and eight healthy controls were studied. Plasma PP and serum gastrin were measured before and after the ingestion of a standardized meal. The meal caused a statistically significant (p < 0.05) increase of both PP and gastrin in all three groups studied. Concerning PP, no statistically significant difference was observed between patients and controls. In family members, the values were significantly (p < 0.05) lower than in the other two groups. On the whole, no significant differences in gastrin levels were noted between patients and controls; in family members, the values were significantly (p < 0.05) lower than in patients. All patients who had abnormally high postprandial values of PP and gastrin also had abnormally high basal values of these two peptides. The determination of serum PP and gastrin levels after a meal stimulation test in patients with MEN 1 adds no information about the presence of pancreatic endocrine tumors over that provided by basal values of the two peptides.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: Urine trypsinogen-2 has been suggested as a marker of damage due to acute pancreatitis. Our aim was to assess the time-course and the clinical value of this test in acute pancreatitis. METHODS: A urine trypsinogen-2 dipstick test was performed on 30 patients with acute pancreatitis upon admission to the emergency room, as well as on 30 patients with non-pancreatic acute abdominal pain, and in 30 healthy subjects. RESULTS: In 53.3% of the patients with acute pancreatitis the dipstick test showed abnormal urine trypsinogen-2 whereas this test gave negative results in all patients with non-pancreatic acute abdomen and in all healthy subjects. Patients with severe acute pancreatitis had a frequency of abnormal results of urine trypsinogen-2 (8/9, 88.9%; 95% CI, 51.8-99.7%) significantly higher (P = 0.031) than those with the mild disease (8/21, 38.1%; 95% CI, 18.1 -61.6%), while no significant differences were found in the urine trypsinogen-2 results between patients with biliary acute pancreatitis and those with non-biliary acute pancreatitis. Regarding the time-course of urine trypsinogen-2, there were no significant differences during the three days of the study. CONCLUSIONS: The specificity of urine trypsinogen-2 in the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis is good however its sensitivity is low.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.