PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R Ponzone

Publications and source records attributed to R Ponzone.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Clinical outcome of adjuvant endocrine treatment according to PR and HER-2 status in early breast cancer.

Patients with estrogen receptor (ER)+/progesterone receptor (PR)- and/or HER-2 overexpressing breast carcinomas may derive lower benefit from endocrine treatment. We examined retrospectively data from 972 breast cancer patients who received tamoxifen (725), tamoxifen + Gn-RH analogs (127) and aromatase inhibitors (120) as adjuvant treatments. ER+/PR- versus ER+/PR+ tumours were characterised by larger size (P = 0.001), higher tumour grade (P = 0.001), higher Ki-67 expression (P = 0.001) and lower mean ER (P = 0.000) and HER-2 expression (P = 0.000). At univariate analysis, tumour grading [hazard ratio (HR) = 4.0; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.4-11.1; P = 0.007], nodal status (HR = 3.4; 95% CI 1.2-5.7; P = 0.000), tumour diameter (HR = 2.9; 95% CI 1.7-4.7; P = 0.000) lack of PR expression (HR = 2.1; 95% CI 1.3-3.4; P = 0.002) and HER-2 overexpression (HR = 1.9; 95% CI 1.0-3.5; P = 0.03), as well as Ki 67 expression (HR = 1.7; 95% CI 1.0-2.7; P = 0.04) were associated with shorter disease-free survival (DFS). At the multivariate analysis, nodal status (HR = 3.6; 95% CI 1.9-6.8; P = 0.0001), lack of PR expression (HR = 2.3; 95% CI 1.3-4.0; P = 0.003) and tumour diameter (HR = 2.1; 95% CI 1.1-3.8; P = 0.018) retained their prognostic significance, whereas HER-2 overexpression was associated with a trend towards shorter DFS that was of borderline statistical significance (HR = 2.0; 95 % CI 1.0-3.9; P = 0.05). Our data suggest that lack of PR expression and HER-2 overexpression are both associated with aggressive tumour features, but the prognostic information of PR status on the risk of recurrence in endocrine-treated breast cancer patients is stronger.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Concurrent radiotherapy does not affect adjuvant CMF delivery but is associated with increased toxicity in women with early breast cancer.

We evaluated whether concurrent radiotherapy (RT) affected delivery and toxicity of adjuvant intravenous CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil) in women with operable breast cancer. The medical charts of 321 consecutive breast cancer patients who received CMF either alone for 6 cycles, or for 4 cycles following of an anthracycline (A-CMF) were reviewed. One hundred forty-four women underwent radiotherapy concurrently with CMF. Optimal CMF delivery (success as opposite to failure) was defined as the combined achievement of an average relative dose intensity (aRDI) > or = 85% and an average percent of the total dose (aPTD) > or = 90% for the three drugs in the CMF regimen. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that concurrent-RT did not affect CMF delivery (OR for success 1.391 p=0.230). The sequential A-CMF regimen (OR for success 0.208, 95% C.I. 0.120-0.360, p<0.001) and age > or = 56 (OR for success 0.351, 95% C.I. 0.200-0.161, p<0.001) were independently associated with suboptimal CMF delivery. Moreover, concurrent RT was independently associated with increased leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, upper abdominal pain, mucositis and fatigue. Our retrospective analysis suggests that concurrent-RT has no impact on optimal CMF delivery, but it increases the burden of CMF-related toxicity.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Evaluation of low-dose venlafaxine hydrochloride for the therapy of hot flushes in breast cancer survivors.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of long-term treatment with venlafaxine at low dose for the reduction of vasomotor symptoms in breast cancer survivors. DESIGN: Forty consecutive breast cancer patients suffering troublesome hot flushes have been treated for 8 weeks with venlafaxine XR 37.5 mg/day in an open-label study. Vasomotor symptoms have been evaluated before starting treatment and every 4 weeks with a hot flushes diary pointing out the number and the severity of vasomotor symptoms. A Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) was completed at baseline and at the end of the treatment. RESULTS: Thirty patients had completed the first 4 weeks of treatment, reporting a reduction of hot flushes frequency of 39% as compared to baseline (p<0.001). After 8 weeks of treatment, a further significant reduction was observed both for the hot flushes frequency (-53%; p<0.001) and for the hot flushes score (-59%; p<0.001), a measure which reflects both the number and the severity of hot flushes. Very few side effects were reported, mostly nausea in the first 2 weeks of assumption and mouth dryness. Only 23 women had completed BDI at week 8; a reduction of 23% was observed (p=0.000). CONCLUSION: Venlafaxine is an effective treatment for the relief of vasomotor symptoms in patients previously treated for breast cancer. A favourable effect is maintained also in those patients using tamoxifen as adjuvant therapy. The use of the low dose (37.5 mg/day) is associated with minimal side effects and produces a good improvement in hot flushes if pursued over 8 weeks.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

The influence of hormone replacement therapy on the pathology of breast cancer.

AIM OF THE STUDY: To assess whether the pathological characteristics of breast carcinomas arising in post-menopausal women who ever used hormonal replacement therapy (HRT) differ from those of post-menopausal patients who never used HRT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six hundred and forty three consecutive breast cancer patients were entered in a case control-study. Cases were represented by 111 breast cancer patients who had used or were using HRT at the time of diagnosis, while the remaining 532 patients who never used HRT were chosen as controls. RESULTS: Tumour diameter was smaller in HRT users (17.6 vs 22.1 mm; p=0.002) and tumours of lobular histology were almost twice more frequent among HRT users as in 'never users' (21 vs 12%; p=0.01). No differences were found in grading, hormonal receptor status and axillary nodal status. The expression of c-erb B-2, p53, Ki67 and PS2 measured by immunohistochemistry was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that HRT use may modify the pathological presentation of breast cancer. Further studies are indicated, while other clinical-pathological characteristics did not differ according to HRT use.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

Management of risk of breast carcinoma in postmenopausal women.

Breast carcinoma is the most frequent tumor in the female population. Many factors can influence the risk of breast cancer; some of them, such as old age and breast cancer 1/2 (BRCA1/BRCA2) gene mutations, are associated with a fourfold increase in risk. A previous diagnosis of atypical ductal or lobular hyperplasia or having a first-degree relative with a carcinoma are factors associated with a two- to fourfold increase in risk. A relative risk between 1 and 2 is associated with longer exposure to endogenous hormones as a result of early menarche, late menopause and obesity, or with recent and prolonged use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) or with behavioural factors such as high alcohol and fat intake. Is it possible to modify breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women? Risk factors related to lifestyle can be changed, even if it is not clear whether modifying these behavioural factors during the postmenopausal period will influence the overall breast cancer risk. For instance, the influence of exogenous hormones throughout life (both oral contraceptives and HRT) should be evaluated according to the individual risk-benefit ratio. The problem is even more complex for women who carry genetic mutations and for those who have close relatives with breast cancer, who may be candidates for risk reduction strategies. Prophylactic bilateral mastectomy is still controversial, but is frequently offered to or requested by this group of women and may be indicated in BRCA1/BRCA2 carriers. Chemoprevention with tamoxifen and with the new selective estrogen receptor modulators, namely raloxifene, is very promising and deserves a thorough discussion for all high-risk women.

Anthropometry↗
PubMed2003

Sentinel node dissection as definitive treatment for node negative breast cancer patients.

AIMS: Negative sentinel node may predict tumour-free axillary nodes in breast cancer. We report the performance of sentinel node dissection at our Institution. METHODS: We analysed data from 212 consecutive women with primary invasive breast tumours less than 3 cm in diameter and no axillary lymphadenopathy who underwent radioguided sentinel node dissection by means of 99mTc-colloidal albumin between 1999 and 2002. Completion axillary node dissection was performed if sentinel nodes contained metastases or if no sentinel nodes were identified. RESULTS: Sentinel nodes were identified in 207/212 of the patients. Fifty-seven patients had tumour-positive sentinel nodes. Only tumour diameter showed significant association with sentinel node status (p<0.000). Per-operative histologic evaluation had a sensitivity of 67.3% and a negative predictive value of 90.4%. No subset of sentinel node positive patients was identified for whom axillary node dissection could be safely avoided. No recurrences were detected at a median follow-up of 15 months. CONCLUSION: Radioguided sentinel node dissection offers a reliable way to assess nodal status in most breast cancer patients. In our experience, both preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and intraoperative histologic evaluation add useful information to the procedure.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Sentinel node biopsy for breast cancer: yes, less surgery is better surgery.

Breast surgery evolves towards always more precise, but less invasive techniques. The halstedian concept of radical surgery has been abandoned and the majority of patients are now allowed to preserve their breasts provided they receive radiation therapy after surgery. In many institutions standard axillary lymph-node dissection is being replaced by the less invasive and probably also more accurate staging technique known as sentinel-node dissection. Nevertheless, the procedure requires interdisciplinary collaboration and rigorous quality control monitoring to provide optimal results. Many issues, some of which will be discussed in the light of our personal experience, still need to be tested in clinical controlled trials.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2002

The androgen-regulated gene human kallikrein 15 (KLK15) is an independent and favourable prognostic marker for breast cancer.

Many kallikrein genes were found to be differentially expressed in various malignancies, and prostate specific antigen (encoded by the KLK3 gene) is the best tumour marker for prostate cancer. Prostate specific antigen has recently been shown to be an independent favourable prognostic marker for breast cancer. KLK15 is newly discovered kallikrein gene that is located adjacent to KLK3 on chromosome 19q13.4. KLK15 has 41% similarity to KLK3 and the encoded protein, hK15, can activate pro-prostate specific antigen. We studied the expression of KLK15 by real-time quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction in 202 tissues from patients with breast carcinoma of various stages, grades and histological types. KLK15 expression was found to be a significant predictor of progression-free survival (hazard ratio of 0.41 and P=0.011) and overall survival (hazard ratio of 0.34 and P=0.009). When all other known confounders were controlled in the multivariate analysis, KLK15 retained its prognostic significance. Higher concentrations of KLK15 mRNA were found more frequently in node negative patients (P=0.042). No association was found between KLK15 expression and any other clinicopathological variable. Further, KLK15 is an independent prognostic factor of progression-free survival and overall survival in the subgroup of patients with lower grade and those with oestrogen receptor and progesterone receptor negative tumours in both univariate and multivariate analysis. KLK15 levels of expression were slightly higher (although not statistically significant) in the oestrogen receptor negative and progesterone receptor negative subgroups of patients. KLK15 is up-regulated by androgens in breast cancer cell lines. Time-course and blocking experiments suggest that this regulation is mediated through the androgen receptor.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Quantitative analysis of human kallikrein gene 14 expression in breast tumours indicates association with poor prognosis.

KLK14 (formerly known as KLK-L6) is a recently identified member of the human kallikrein gene family. This family harbours several genes aberrantly expressed in various cancers as well as established (PSA/hK3, hK2) and potential (hK6, hK10) cancer markers. Similar to other kallikrein genes, KLK14 was found to be regulated by steroid hormones, particularly androgens and progestins, in breast and ovarian cancer cell lines. Preliminary studies indicated that KLK14 is differentially expressed in breast, ovarian, prostatic and testicular tumours. Given the above, we determined the prognostic significance of KLK14 expression in breast cancer. We studied KLK14 expression in 178 histologically confirmed epithelial breast carcinomas by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and correlated with clinicopathological variables (tumour stage, grade, histotype etc.) and with outcome (disease-free survival and overall survival), monitored over a median of 76 months. KLK14 mRNA levels ranged from 0 to 1,219 arbitrary units in breast cancer tissues, with a mean+/-s.e. of 136+/-22. An optimal cutoff value of 40.5 arbitrary units was selected, to categorise tumours as KLK14-positive or negative. Higher concentrations of KLK14 mRNA were more frequently found in patients with advanced stage (III) disease (P=0.032). No statistically significant association was found between KLK14 and the other clinicopathological variables. KLK14 overexpression was found to be a significant predictor of decreased disease-free survival (hazard ratio of 2.31, P=0.001) and overall survival (hazard ratio of 2.21, P=0.005). Cox multivariate analysis indicated that KLK14 was an independent prognostic indicator of disease-free survival and overall survival. KLK14 also has independent prognostic value in subgroups of patients with a tumour size </=2 cm and positive nodal, oestrogen receptor and progestin receptor status. We conclude that KLK14 expression, as assessed by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, is an independent marker of unfavourable prognosis for breast cancer.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Human kallikrein gene 13 (KLK13) expression by quantitative RT-PCR: an independent indicator of favourable prognosis in breast cancer.

Kallikreins are a group of serine proteases with diverse physiological functions. KLK13 (previously known as KLK-L4) is a novel kallikrein gene located on chromosome 19q13.4 and shares a high degree of homology with other kallikrein family members. Many kallikrein genes were found to be differentially expressed in various malignancies, and their regulation is controlled by steroid hormones in prostate and breast cancer cell lines. We studied the expression of KLK13 by quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction in 173 patients with epithelial breast carcinoma. An optimal cutoff point equal to the 40th percentile was defined, based on the ability of KLK13 to predict disease-free survival. KLK13 values were then associated with other established prognostic factors and with disease-free survival and overall survival. Higher positivity for KLK13 expression was found in older, oestrogen receptor positive patients. In univariate analysis, KLK13 expression is a significant predictor of improved disease-free survival and overall survival (P<0.001 and P=0.009, respectively). Cox multivariate analysis indicated that KLK13 was an independent prognostic variable in the subgroups of patients with Grade I-II tumours and in patients who were oestrogen receptor and progesterone receptor positive, and node positive. Hazard ratios derived from Cox analysis, related to disease-free survival and overall survival were 0.22 (P=0.001) and 0.24 (P=0.008), respectively, for the Grade I-II group; 0.36 (P=0.008) and 0.44 (P=0.038), respectively, for the node positive group and 0.36 (P=0.008) and 0.18 (P=0.008), respectively, for the oestrogen receptor positive group. The adjusted hazard ratio for progesterone receptor positive patients for disease-free survival was 0.25 (P=0.012). For patients in the node positive and oestrogen receptor positive subgroup (n=51) the adjusted hazard ratio was 0.25 (P=0.006) and for the node positive and progesterone receptor positive subgroup (n=46) the hazard ratio was 0.24 (P=0.008). Taken together, these data suggest that higher KLK13 expression in these subgroups of breast cancer patients is associated with an approximately 55 to 80% reduction in the risk of relapse or death. We conclude that KLK13 expression, as assessed by quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction, is an independent favourable prognostic marker for breast carcinoma.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Term breech trial.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Breech Presentation↗
PubMed2001

Breast cancer and hormone replacement therapy: putting the risk into perspective.

Data on hormone replacement therapy and breast cancer risk come from a number of observational studies (mostly American studies). Those published up to 1995 were reanalyzed by the Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer (CGHFBC). They involved populations where exceedingly high estrogen doses were used as first-line therapy, and a progestin was added in a minority of women. Overall, the CGHFBC reanalysis found that the relative risk increased by 0.023 for each year of use (with an absolute excess risk of two or six cases out of 1000 women treated for 5 or 10 years, respectively). Further American studies, published in 2000 and involving populations where lower doses were used, showed a risk increase of 0.01 per year of estrogen-only use. Both the CGHFBC reanalysis and the further studies did not find an increase of risk in treated overweight women. Possibly, overweight women already have a maximal estrogenic stimulus on the breast due to extraglandular estrogen production. An additional explanation could be that oral estrogens, through their hepatocellular effects, reverse some biological features of obesity (e.g. decreased sex hormone binding globulin level and increased insulin-like growth factor-I bioactivity) that potentially increase breast cancer risk, so balancing the estrogen stimulation. The CGHFBC reanalysis did not show a substantial difference in breast cancer risk between the majority using estrogen alone and the small minority using estrogen plus progestin. Conversely, Swedish studies and the recent American studies suggest that the risk increase could be higher with the addition of a progestin, compared with estrogen-only use. The biological effect of progesterone/progestins on the breast tissue is controversial. Even if the observed increase in risk could be partially ascribed to non-progesterone-like effects of some progestins (e.g. opposing the hepatocellular effects of oral estrogens) and also (in the American studies) to use-bias, a detrimental action due to progesterone-like effects cannot be excluded. However, the theoretical possibility exists that low doses of oral estrogens, plus a progestin providing progesterone-like effects only, will be shown to be associated with a limited breast cancer risk increase.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed2000

How to manage the menopause following therapy for breast cancer. is raloxifene a safe alternative?

Raloxifene is a selective oestrogen receptor modulator (SERM) that has anti-oestrogenic effects on breast and endometrial tissue and oestrogenic actions on bone, lipid metabolism and blood clotting. In postmenopausal women raloxifene decreases bone turnover and increases bone mineral density, reducing the incidence of vertebral fractures. Unlike tamoxifen, raloxifene does not cause endometrial hyperplasia or cancer, as demonstrated by endometrial monitoring with ultrasonography and biopsy during treatment. Evidence suggests that raloxifene lowers total low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels behaving like oestrogens, but does not increase high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. In randomised clinical trials on postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, raloxifene reduced the risk of newly diagnosed ER-positive invasive breast cancer by 76% during a median of 40 months of treatment. However, raloxifene does not alleviate early menopausal symptoms, such as hot flushes and urogenital atrophy, and may even exacerbate some of them. In conclusion, raloxifene may be an alternative for the prevention of long-term effects of oestrogen deficiency (osteoporosis and heart diseases) in women with previous breast cancer not having hot flushes. For symptomatic patients, the association of raloxifene with different drugs which have demonstrated efficacy in the control of vasomotor symptoms is now under evaluation.

Blood Coagulation Disorders↗
PubMed2000

Serum total and free prostate-specific antigen for breast cancer diagnosis in women.

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is a serine protease expressed at high levels in prostate epithelium, and elevated PSA in serum is a well-established marker of prostate cancer. Recently, the relative proportions of free PSA and PSA complexed to the serine protease inhibitor alpha 1-antichymotrypsin have become important variables in distinguishing between prostate cancer and benign prostatic hyperplasia. Numerous studies have demonstrated the production of PSA in female tissues such as the breast, and low levels of PSA are present in female sera. The objective of this study was to measure and compare the relative proportions of free PSA and PSA complexed to the serine protease inhibitor alpha 1-antichymotrypsin in the serum of women with breast cancer or benign breast disease or women with no known malignancies. PSA was measured with an established immunoassay for total PSA and a novel immunoassay for free PSA, both of which had a detection limit of 0.001 microgram/liter (1 ng/liter). The percentage of breast cancer patients with free PSA as the predominant molecular form (> 50% of total PSA) in serum was five times higher than that of healthy women or women with benign breast disease, and PSA decreased in the serum of breast cancer patients after surgery. The diagnostic use of free PSA for breast cancer is limited at this point, due to the low diagnostic sensitivity (approximately 20%); however, free PSA as the predominant molecular form shows a high diagnostic specificity (approximately 96%) in comparison to women free of breast cancer or with benign breast disease. These results suggest that the clinical applicability of free PSA for breast cancer diagnosis and the biological mechanism behind its increase should be further investigated.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

HRT, breast and endometrial cancers: strategies and intervention options.

The demand for hormone replacement therapy (HRT) by women who enter the menopause is rapidly increasing in all developed countries. The concern that HRT may enhance morbidity and mortality from malignant diseases still limits the widespread adoption of hormonal treatments. Overall, epidemiological data on cancer incidence and HRT are reassuring, although long-term or inappropriate therapies may slightly increase the risk of developing malignant diseases. Many commercial hormonal compounds are currently available and the safest HRT regimen with regard to cancer risk must be identified. It is equally important that the best strategies for breast and endometrial surveillance in women commencing HRT be outlined, bearing in mind that the diffusion of hormonal therapies may be halted by unnecessary medical interventions.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed1999

Quantification of pepsinogen C and prostaglandin D synthase in breast cyst fluid and their potential utility for cyst type classification.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify pepsinogen C (PEPC) and prostaglandin D synthase (PGDS) in breast cyst fluid and examine if these two parameters can be used for breast cyst type classification. DESIGN AND METHODS: We quantified PEPC and PGDS in 92 and 50 breast cyst fluids, respectively, using previously established immunofluorometric procedures. We then examined if the levels of PEPC or PGDS correlate with the type of cyst or with other clinicopathological variables. RESULTS: Quantitative analysis of the breast cyst fluids indicated that PEPC is present in all cyst fluids at various concentrations ranging from 3 to 31,000 ng/mL. PGDS positivity was confined to 30% of the cyst fluids. PEPC and PGDS levels were correlated with the breast cyst fluid cation ratio and were associated with the type of the cyst. Increased PEPC levels in breast cyst fluids were significantly correlated with a > or = 1.5 K+/Na+ ratio and were associated with the secretory/apocrine type of cyst (Type I) (p = 0.011). Immunoreactive PGDS levels were highly correlated with a low cation ratio and were associated with the transudative/flattened type of breast cyst (Type II) (p = 0.0003). A weak association was observed between PEPC levels in breast cyst fluid and menopausal status (p = 0.093). No significant associations were observed for either PEPC or PGDS concentration in breast cyst fluid and number of cysts, recurrence of the disease, family history of breast cancer, number of children, abortion, and breast feeding. CONCLUSIONS: Quantification of PEPC and PGDS in breast cyst fluid may be useful in the subclassification of cyst type in patients with gross cystic disease.

Breast Diseases↗
PubMed1999

The effect of anastrozole on the pharmacokinetics of tamoxifen in post-menopausal women with early breast cancer.

Thirty-four post-menopausal women with early breast cancer who had received 20 mg tamoxifen once daily as adjuvant therapy for at least 10 weeks participated in a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicentre trial. The primary aim of the trial was to determine the effect of anastrozole upon tamoxifen pharmacokinetics, with secondary aims of assessing the tolerability of the two drugs in combination and whether or not tamoxifen had any effect upon the oestradiol suppression seen with anastrozole. Patients were randomized to receive either 1 mg anastrozole (16 patients) or matching placebo (18 patients) once daily on a double-blind basis for 28 days. No significant difference (P = 0.919) was observed in serum tamoxifen concentrations between the anastrozole and placebo groups during the trial. The serum concentration of oestradiol was significantly suppressed (P < 0.0001) in patients co-administered anastrozole compared with placebo in the presence of tamoxifen, confirming that anastrozole remained an effective suppressant of oestradiol in the presence of tamoxifen. The combination of tamoxifen and anastrozole was well tolerated, with very little difference in side-effects reported between anastrozole and placebo. In conclusion, the results of this study confirm that anastrozole does not affect the pharmacokinetics of tamoxifen when the two drugs are given in combination to post-menopausal women with early breast cancer. In addition, the oestradiol suppressant effects of anastrozole appear unaffected by tamoxifen.

Anastrozole↗