PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R Q To

Publications and source records attributed to R Q To.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

The basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor Mist1 functions as a transcriptional repressor of myoD.

A good model system to examine aspects of positive and negative transcriptional regulation is the muscle-specific regulatory factor, MyoD, which is a basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factor. Although MyoD has the ability to induce skeletal muscle terminal differentiation in a variety of non-muscle cell types, MyoD activity itself is highly regulated through protein-protein interactions involving several different co-factors. Here we describe the characterization of a novel bHLH protein, Mist1, and how it influences MyoD function. We show that Mist1 accumulates in myogenic stem cells (myoblasts) and then decreases as myoblasts differentiate into myotubes. Mist1 functions as a negative regulator of MyoD activity, preventing muscle differentiation and the concomitant expression of muscle-specific genes. Mist1-induced inhibition occurs through a combination of mechanisms, including the formation of inactive MyoD-Mist1 heterodimers and occupancy of specific E-box target sites by Mist1 homodimers. Mist1 lacks a classic transcription activation domain and instead possesses an N-terminal repressor region capable of inhibiting heterologous activators. Thus, Mist1 may represent a new class of repressor molecules that play a role in controlling the transcriptional activity of MyoD, ensuring that expanding myoblast populations remain undifferentiated during early embryonic muscle formation.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Mist1: a novel basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor exhibits a developmentally regulated expression pattern.

Basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) proteins often belong to a family of transcription factors that bind to the DNA target sequence -CANNTG- (E-box) that is present in the promoter or enhancer regions of numerous developmentally regulated genes. In this study, we report the isolation and initial characterization of a novel bHLH factor, termed Mist1, that was identified by virtue of its ability to interact with E-box regulatory elements in a yeast "one-hybrid" screening procedure. Northern analysis revealed that Mist1 transcripts are expressed in several adult tissues, including stomach, liver, lung, and spleen but no expression is detected in the heart, brain, kidney, or testis. During mouse embryogenesis, Mist1 mRNA is first observed at E10.5 in the primitive gut and in the developing lung bud. Expression persists through E16.5 and remains restricted primarily to the epithelial lining. Mist1 also is detected in skeletal muscle tissues beginning at E12.5, persisting throughout all embryonic stages examined although in older embryos and in the adult expression becomes severely reduced. At later developmental times, Mist1 transcripts also are found in the pancreas, submandibular gland, and adult spleen. As predicted, the Mist1 protein is nuclear and binds efficiently to E-box sites as a homodimer. Mist1 also is capable of binding to E-box elements when complexed as a heterodimer with the widely expressed E-proteins, E12 and E47. Surprisingly, although Mist1 binds to E-boxes in vivo, the Mist1 protein lacks a functional transcription activation domain. These observations suggest that Mist1 may function as a unique regulator of gene expression in several different embryonic and postnatal cell lineages.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Examination of mammalian basic helix-loop-helix transcription factors using a yeast one-hybrid system.

Basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factors play diverse roles in controlling many developmental events. Although a great deal is understood about how bHLH factors activate gene transcription via E-box DNA consensus sequences, studies of bHLH factor function in higher eukaryotes often have been hindered by the presence of multiple family members. As a first step in developing a simplified in vivo system to examine bHLH factor activities, we examined whether the bHLH muscle regulatory factors MRF4 and MyoD function appropriately in yeast. We show that Gal4-MRF4 fusion proteins, or native MRF4 proteins, activate expression of an E-box HIS3 reporter gene whereas MyoD proteins remain inactive. Deletion of the MRF4 transcription activation domain (TAD) or point mutations that abolish MRF4 DNA interactions inhibit HIS3 expression. Substitution of the MRF4 TAD with the Gal4 TAD also produces a functional protein, demonstrating that these transcription activation domains are functionally equivalent in yeast. Replacement of the MRF4 TAD with the related MyoD TAD, however, generates an inactive protein, suggesting that some specificity exists between bHLH family members. Using this experimental system, we also demonstrate that mammalian cDNA libraries can be screened successfully for cDNAs encoding novel bHLH proteins that interact with E-box targets. Thus, this in vivo yeast system provides a novel approach to facilitate functional studies of bHLH factor regulation.

Animals↗

Myogenin and MEF2 function synergistically to activate the MRF4 promoter during myogenesis.

The basic helix-loop-helix muscle regulatory factor (MRF) gene family encodes four distinct muscle-specific transcription factors known as MyoD, myogenin, Myf-5, and MRF4. These proteins represent key regulatory factors that control many aspects of skeletal myogenesis. Although the MRFs often exhibit overlapping functional activities, their distinct expression patterns during embryogenesis suggest that each protein plays a unique role in controlling aspects of muscle development. As a first step in determining how MRF4 gene expression is developmentally regulated, we examined the ability of the MRF4 gene to be expressed in a muscle-specific fashion in vitro. Our studies show that the proximal MRF4 promoter contains sufficient information to direct muscle-specific expression. Located within the proximal promoter are a single MEF2 site and E box that are required for maximum MRF4 expression. Mutation of the MEF2 site or E box severely impairs the ability of this promoter to produce a muscle-specific response. In addition, the MEF2 site and E box function in concert to synergistically activate the MRF4 gene in nonmuscle cells coexpressing MEF2 and myogenin proteins. Thus, the MRF4 promoter is regulated by the MEF2 and basic helix-loop-helix MRF protein family through a cross-regulatory circuitry. Surprisingly, the MRF4 promoter itself is not transactivated by MRF4, suggesting that this MRF gene is not subject to an autoregulatory pathway as previously implied by other studies. Understanding the molecular mechanisms regulating expression of each MRF gene is central to fully understanding how these factors control developmental events.

Animals↗

The MRF4 activation domain is required to induce muscle-specific gene expression.

MRF4 is a member of the basic helix-loop-helix muscle regulatory factor family that also includes MyoD, myogenin, and Myf-5. Overexpression of MRF4 or the other muscle regulatory factors in fibroblasts converts the cells to differentiated muscle fibers and transcriptionally activates expression of endogenous and cotransfected muscle genes. Although these factors induce a similar phenotype, they also exhibit some distinct biological activities. For example, MyoD trans activates alpha-actin and troponin I reporter genes to very high levels, whereas MRF4 efficiently activates only alpha-actin expression. Since these proteins have a common basic helix-loop-helix domain, it is likely that portions of the proteins outside of this region impart some specificity to the activity of each muscle regulatory factor. As an initial step in determining the mechanism by which MRF4 and MyoD activate gene transcription, the transcriptional activation domain of MRF4 has been characterized. Experiments utilizing chimeric proteins containing the yeast GAL4 DNA-binding domain and portions of the MRF4 protein indicate that the MRF4 activation domain is located within amino acids 10 to 30. This amino terminus is both necessary and sufficient to elicit a transcriptional response in transfected cells. The MRF4 activation domain and the related amino-terminal MyoD activation domain are capable of substituting for one another in converting fibroblasts to a myogenic phenotype and in activating expression of an alpha-actin reporter gene, although the MRF4 and MyoD activation domains on these chimeric proteins also dictate the specificity of transcriptional activation. The different primary amino acid sequences of these regions leave open the possibility that different coregulator proteins interact with the muscle regulatory factors to elicit their correct transcriptional activity during skeletal muscle development.

3T3 Cells↗

Assembly of transcriptionally active chromatin in vitro: a possible role for topoisomerase II.

Some models of in vitro chromatin assembly suggest a biphasic molecular mechanism. The first phase, nucleosome formation, is comprised of the formation of histone-DNA complexes which mature into a canonical nucleosome structure. The second phase represents the process by which these nucleosomes become properly spaced with a regular periodicity on the DNA. In this report, we examine the role of DNA topoisomerases in the latter phase of chromatin assembly. To study this process, we use a Xenopus laevis cell-free extract, which assembles quantitative amounts of chromatin on circular DNA templates, and the type II topoisomerase-specific antitumor drugs VM-26 and endrofloxicin. Our results suggest that nucleosome formation is unaffected by the presence of VM-26 or endrofloxicin. However, periodic spacing of nucleosomes is inhibited significantly by these drugs. In the absence of proper chromatin assembly, circular DNA molecules are processed into nucleoprotein complexes which are transcribed poorly. Taken together, these results indicate that the antitumor drugs VM-26 and endrofloxicin influence gene expression indirectly by blocking the periodic spacing of nucleosomes.

Adenosine Triphosphate↗