PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R R Ozsvath

Publications and source records attributed to R R Ozsvath.

5 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1998

Integral and shell-MIP display algorithms in MR and CT three-dimensional models of the brain surface.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Our purpose was to demonstrate the use of integral and shell maximum intensity projection (shell-MIP) display algorithms in the 3-D CT and MR depiction of cerebral gyral and surface venous anatomy and disorders. These new algorithms are compared against MIP and shaded-surface-display (SSD) algorithms. METHODS: Integral and shell-MIP displays were generated from a specified number of proximal surface voxel layers in a 3-D model. Algorithmic models were compared on nine contrast-enhanced spoiled gradient-recalled acquisition in a steady state (SPGR) MR venograms for brain surface anatomic identification and detail. Seven CT venograms were compared for conspicuity of filling defects. Twelve contrast-enhanced preoperative planning 3-D MR models were rated for neurosurgical utility. RESULTS: A shell-MIP score of 7.00 and an integral score of 6.78 represented the highest mean subjective MR gyral quality (1-10 scale) followed by an SSD score of 3.89 and an MIP score of 1.06. Mean confidence scores for MR central sulcus identification (1-10 scale) were shell-MIP, 7.67; integral, 7.00; SSD, 3.22; and MIP, 1.00. Mean superficial venous quality MR ratings (1-10 scale) were shell-MIP, 8.22; MIP, 7.39; integral, 7.00; and SSD, 3.72. The mean number of cortical veins draining into each side of the superior sagittal sinus on MR was as follows: MIP, 6.19; integral, 6.06; shell-MIP, 5.94; and SSD, 3.81. Mean confidence scores for filling defect identification on CT venograms (1-5 scale) revealed a shell-MIP score of 4.36 and an integral score of 4.29 to be superior to a MIP score of 3.00. In selected cases, 3-D presurgical planning, prior to tumor resection, was clinically useful. CONCLUSION: Integral and shell-MIP are useful 3-D display algorithms for simultaneous display of superficial cerebral veins and gyri on MR images and of thrombosis on CT venograms.

Algorithms↗
PubMed1997

Pyloric volume: an important factor in the surgeon's ability to palpate the pyloric "olive" in hypertrophic pyloric stenosis.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine whether the size of the pyloric mass is one of the factors in the surgeon's ability to palpate the pyloric "olive". MATERIALS AND METHODS: The ultrasonographic images and medical records of 60 infants with surgically confirmed hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (HPS) were reviewed. The pyloric diameter (PD) and pyloric length (PL) were measured and the pyloric volume (PV) was calculated using the equation PV = 1/4pi x (PD)2 x PL. Based on the pediatric surgeon's physical examination the infants were divided into two groups: those with and those without palpable pyloric masses. RESULTS: Infants with a palpable pyloric mass had an average pyloric volume of 3.33 +/- 1.76 mm3, which was statistically larger than those whose hypertrophied pylorus could not be palpated (average volume 2.59 +/- 2.07 mm3, P < 0.01). There was no statistically significant age difference between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Clinical skill of the examiner and other clinical aspects (patient cooperation, etc.) determine palpability of the pylorus in HPS. The size of the hypertrophied pylorus is also an important factor affecting the clinician's ability to palpate the pyloric mass.

Age Factors↗
PubMed1997

Cerebral venography: comparison of CT and MR projection venography.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to show equivalence or superiority of CT venography compared with the existing test of choice--MR venography--in the evaluation of dural sinus thrombosis and in the identification of cerebral veins and dural sinuses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four patients underwent both CT and MR venography of the intracranial venous circulation. Seventeen patients were examined for suspected dural sinus thrombosis. Four patients underwent projection venography to assess tumor invasion of a major dural sinus. The remaining three patients were examined for cavernous sinus thrombosis, arteriovenous malformation, and an elevated jugular bulb. Without knowledge of the patients' case histories, two radiologists evaluated each CT venogram and MR venogram. The radiologists then arrived at a consensus regarding the absence or presence of dural sinus thrombosis. Later, the radiologists conducted a second interpretation with knowledge of the patients' clinical histories during which time MR and CT venograms were compared with regard to the advantages and disadvantages of each imaging technique. In addition, the venograms were assessed for the presence of 12 different venous structure. Projection venograms were displayed using a maximum-intensity-projection (MIP) algorithm, and the individual source images were also evaluated. The CT venograms were also displayed using shell-MIP and integral display algorithms. RESULTS: Using MR venography, the two radiologists diagnosed dural sinus thrombosis in eight of the 17 patients with suspected dural sinus thrombosis. In these eight patients, the diagnosis was also made with CT venography. The diagnosis was confirmed by follow-up CT in four patients and by follow-up MR imaging in two patients. The MIP algorithm did not allow direct visualization of thrombus by either the CT or the MR imaging technique; however, the CT integral display algorithm enabled direct visualization of thrombus on the three-dimensional projection venograms. The systematic comparison of imaging techniques showed that CT venography reliably reveals all cerebral veins and sinuses when they are seen with MR venography. In addition, CT venography more frequently visualizes sinuses or smaller cerebral veins with low flow as compared with MR venography. CONCLUSION: Cerebral CT venography is superior to MR venography in the identification of cerebral veins and dural sinuses and is at least equivalent in the diagnosis of dural sinus thrombosis. CT venography is a viable alternative to MR venography in the examination of patients with suspected dural sinus thrombosis.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Cerebral CT venography.

PURPOSE: To produce cerebral venograms with thin-section helical computed tomography (CT) and to assess their diagnostic utility. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-six CT venograms were obtained in 33 patients after intravenous administration of iodinated contrast material. Eighteen patients had suspected dural sinus thrombosis. Twelve patients had tumor adjacent to a major venous structure. Three patients underwent CT venography during CT angiography. RESULTS: Superior sagittal, transverse, and straight sinuses were identified on every CT venogram. Other veins were seen with high frequency. Dural sinus thrombosis was diagnosed in seven patients, with magnetic resonance (MR) venographic correlation in five patients. CT venograms were easier to interpret and had fewer artifacts than MR venograms. Relationships of tumor to adjacent cerebral venous structures were well shown on CT venograms. CONCLUSION: CT venography yields detailed images of the intracranial venous circulation with consistently high quality. It is a rapid, useful method for diagnosis of dural sinus thrombosis and for preoperative mapping of venous structures in patients with neoplasm.

Adult↗