PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R Rechid

Publications and source records attributed to R Rechid.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Guidelines for cost-effective implementation of Picture Archiving and Communication Systems. An approach building on practical experiences in three European hospitals.

This paper describes a comprehensive approach for the assessment of the impact of (partial) Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS). The approach is developed, based on actual clinical experience in three European hospitals and tested in these environments. The approach departs from a thorough analysis of the working procedures and information flows before implementation, both descriptive and quantitative. On the basis of this analysis, quantitative (and hence testable) objectives of the implementation are defined. The implementation strategy is defined after comparison of various scenarios, taking costs and effects for both the final and the transition phases into account. The approach is supported by a comprehensive evaluation protocol and a software package (PACER). The approach is demonstrated in this paper by applying it on a hypothetical PACS implementation for CT, ultrasound and for the part of the radiology department serving ICU. The objectives of this PACS are: (1)--to shorten the turn around time between the radiology department and ICU from 4 h to 30 min, (2)--to save 2000 m2 of film per year and (3)--to save personnel time. In this case the PACS is introduced in three phases and completed after three years. The cost analysis shows that, if started in 1995, a financial break even point is reached after 6 years, when comparing costs for the film-based system with those of the PACS. Experiences in the three sites show that the approach helps to harvest potential benefits, allowing a cost-effective implementation of PACS.

Cost-Benefit Analysis↗

HIPIN--a generic HIS/RIS-PACS interface based on clinical radiodiagnostic procedures.

Within the EurIPACS HIPIN topic a generic HIS/RIS-PACS interface will be designed, implemented and evaluated. It is generally agreed that integration with the HIS/RIS is essential for the acceptance of PACS in a clinical environment. An interface between HIS/RIS and PACS allows more efficient usage of both systems, better integration of data, better consistency checking on shared data and better security and error handling. Also the PACS performance is improved by using HIS/RIS information to steer the image migration within the PACS. In this paper the functional specifications of the interface are described. These specifications are based on descriptions of clinical radiodiagnostic procedures. The generic interface consists of a common part, and of site specific adapters. The common part is identical for all incarnations and performs message scheduling, processing and logging. The adapters are specific for each communication standard, e.g. ACR-NEMA or HL7, and for each hospital. The interface will be implemented at the radiology department of the Philipps University Hospital in Marburg (Germany) and at the orthopaedic and neuroradiology departments of the hospital of the Free University in Brussels (Belgium).

Computer Communication Networks↗

Overview of CAPACITY data.

This paper presents an overview of the data from 15 cases collected with the CAPACITY software for cost analysis of PACS. The data suggest that both hospital wide and partial PACS implementations do not pay back yet. Only Nuclear Medicine PACS systems may be introduced cost-neutral in the near future. Because of the assumed price drop of hardware components of 5-25% per year, hospital wide and partial PACS may allow cost savings within the next 10-20 years. There are major differences in viewpoints concerning the required PACS configurations and their costs. The experiences with the CAPACITY software suggest the need for the establishment of key rules, for designing a PACS configuration and for estimating PACS costs.

Computer Systems↗

A new interactive protein sequence alignment program and comparison of its results with widely used algorithms.

A computer program that allows interactive sequence comparison is described. It graphically displays a search matrix using residue physiochemical characteristics and multilength segmental comparisons. The user selects through a mousing device and screen pointer the sequence spans to be matched. The results of this method are compared with those of ALIGN and BESTFIT.

Algorithms↗

PACER: a software tool for PACS decision makers.

This paper describes the development of the software package PACER as it evolved from a cost model to a software package for PACS decision making. PACER was developed as part of the TEASS topic from the EurIPACS project. EurIPACS is an EU subsidized project covering a wide area of PACS related research. The TEASS topic concerns the evaluation of prototype PACSystems in three European hospitals. PACER allows the user to evaluate costs of various PACS implementation scenarios and compare them to the costs of the current film based situation. Its cost calculation is based on a straight forward description of costs of a film based radiology department and of PACS. The PACER cost analysis can consider stepwise introduction of PACS and a corresponding stepwise disappearance of the film environment. This analysis includes effects of price developments. PACER calculates costs and expenses for a number of years in succession. The calculated results can be analysed using graphs, tables and sensitivity analysis tools. Preliminary tests in three hospitals indicate that PACER can indeed be a useful tool in the decision process concerning PACS.

Costs and Cost Analysis↗