PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R Rivolta

Publications and source records attributed to R Rivolta.

58 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

[Abdominal aortic aneurysm and rectal cancer: what surgical strategy?].

The incidence of abdominal aortic aneurysm and colorectal cancer association is 0.5-1%. This concomitance of two potentially lethal diseases creates a decision making problem regarding priority of treatment. The Authors report a case in which colorectal cancer and abdominal aortic aneurysm were present. This patient first underwent surgery for colorectal cancer, then for aortic aneurysm. Moreover, the Authors review the Literature and discuss their decisional principles about treatment priorities.

Adenocarcinoma↗

[Cholecystectomy and colorectal cancer: a retrospective study of a sample of 285 operated patients].

A review of 285 patients operated for colo-rectal cancer in order to evaluate cholecystectomy rate in their pathologic history is reported. A surprisingly high rate (9.47%) was registered also when compared with Literature data. Although not definitely conclusive for a positive correlation between cholecystectomy and colo-rectal cancer, the Authors believe that this study identifies a subgroup of patients potentially at risk for colo-rectal cancer. In these subjects a prophylactic, periodic colonoscopy could be useful.

Adult↗

[The endoscopic treatment of postoperative stenoses of the upper digestive tract].

The authors compare their experience in dilatation of postoperative benign esophageal strictures. A total of 60 patients (37 males, 23 females: mean age 52), all with severe dysphagia, from January 1985 to September 1995, underwent endoscopic dilatation: 32 of these with Savary dilators and 28 with balloon dilators. Dilatation was effective in 93% in both groups. Two severe complications were recorded (1 heart attack and 1 perforation) in the group that underwent endoscopic dilatation with Savary dilators. During endoscopic management, pain recurred in 43% and 87% of cases after balloon or Savary dilatations, respectively. The authors believe balloon dilators are more effective, better tolerated and with less complications than Savary dilators. They reserve the management with Savary dilators to the extremely severe esophageal strictures.

Catheterization↗