PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R Rodeheffer

Publications and source records attributed to R Rodeheffer.

5 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2000

Congestive heart failure despite normal left ventricular systolic function in a population-based sample: the Strong Heart Study.

In selected clinical series, > or = 50% of adults with congestive heart failure (CHF) do not have left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction. Little is known of the prevalence of this phenomenon in population samples. Therefore, clinical examination and echocardiography were used in the second examination of the Strong Heart Study (3,184 men and women, 47 to 81 years old) to identify 95 participants with CHF, 50 of whom had normal LV ejection fraction (EF) (> 54%), 19 of whom had mildly reduced EF (40% to 54%), and 26 of whom had EF < or = 40%. Compared with those with no CHF, participants with CHF and no, mild, or severe decrease in EF had higher creatinine levels (2.34 to 2.85 vs 1.01 mg/dl, p < 0.001) and higher prevalences of diabetes (60% to 70% vs 50%) and hypertension (75% to 96% vs 46%, p < 0.05). Compared with those with no CHF, participants with CHF and normal EF had prolonged deceleration time (233 vs 204 ms, p < 0.05) and a reduced E/A, whereas those with CHF and EF < or = 40% had short deceleration time (158 ms, p < 0.05) and high E/A (1.70, p < 0.001); patients with CHF and normal EF had higher LV mass (98 vs 84 g/m2, p < 0.001) and relative wall thickness (0.37 vs 0.35, p < 0.05) than those without CHF. Patients with CHF with normal EF were, compared with those without CHF or with CHF and EF < or = 40%, disproportionately women (mean 84% vs 63% and 42%, p < 0.001), older (mean 64 vs 60 years and 63 years, respectively, p < 0.01), had higher body mass index (mean 33.1 vs 31.0 and 27.7 kg/m2, p < 0.05), and higher systolic blood pressure (mean 137 vs 130 and 128 mm Hg, both p < 0.05). Thus, in a population-based sample, patients with CHF and normal LV EF were older and overweight, more often women, had renal dysfunction, impaired early diastolic LV relaxation, and concentric LV geometry, whereas patients with CHF and severe LV dysfunction were more often men, had lower body mass index, a restrictive pattern of LV filling, and eccentric LV hypertrophy.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Frequency of familial dilated cardiomyopathy.

Based on evaluation of 59 probands and their families, we previously demonstrated that over 20% of patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) have familial disease. We acquired 36 additional probands and found familial disease in 24.2% of the 95 probands in this expanded consecutively ascertained cohort. The family history, as reported by the patient and relatives, is often an unreliable indicator of familial disease because patients may be unaware of the significance of a family history of sudden death, arrhythmia or stroke. We demonstrate that careful family history with review of medical records identifies more familial cases than merely asking the patient if there is a family history of DCM. However, even such a careful family history does not identify all familial cases. Some familial cases are identified only by echocardiographic investigation of asymptomatic relatives. We found no clinical attributes of probands, other than family history, which predicted familial disease.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1992

Prevalence and etiology of idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (summary of a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute workshop.

Idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDC) is the primary indication for cardiac transplantation, with associated costs of approximately $177 million per year. Recognizing the economic implications of IDC, the increasing incidence, and the limited information on pathogenesis and prognosis, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute convened a workshop on the Prevalence and Etiology of Idiopathic Dilated Cardiomyopathy on June 13 to 14, 1991. The difficulties of studying the disease were reviewed, including its relatively low prevalence, its potentially pluricausal nature, and the fact that it is often a diagnosis of exclusion. Still, it presents significant challenges to the cardiovascular scientific community, since the mechanism of myocardial damage and related etiologic and prognostic factors are virtually unknown. The development of more reliable measures of immune-mediated damage and noninvasive measures of impaired cardiac function present new research opportunities in this disorder. Standardized diagnostic criteria for use in observational and interventional trials were developed, and priorities for future research were proposed. Population-based registries and nested case-control studies, where feasible, are appropriate study designs for tracking incidence and prevalence, and for identifying risk factors, respectively. Interventional studies should focus on secondary prevention, through modifying immune-mediated damage in clinically evident dilated cardiomyopathy, and through prevention of sudden death in patients with the disorder. Primary prevention trials must await the identification of modifiable risk factors and of appropriate and effective interventions.

Cardiomyopathy, Dilated↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Hypersensitivity myocarditis in heart transplant candidates.

Hypersensitivity myocarditis is a rare event; however, routine histologic examination of all (193) explanted hearts for heart transplantation in our institutions revealed hypersensitivity myocarditis in 15 patients (7%). This is a previously unreported finding in heart transplant recipients. None of the cases was detected clinically, although all manifested peripheral eosinophilia at some point during the 2 weeks before transplantation. Only one patient exhibited a skin rash interpreted as allergic. The severity of the interstitial infiltrate varied from grade I to grade IV (semiquantitative). This group of pretransplantation patients was receiving a multiplicity of drugs, some of which could have potentially triggered the hypersensitivity myocarditis, although in only one case was a definite association between a hypersensitivity reaction and a drug made. The unusually high rate (10.3% for the Emory cases) of drug-induced myocarditis in this group of patients, contrasted with the general autopsy population, probably reflects that these patients received more vigorous than usual drug treatment, particularly antibiotics, to sustain them until a suitable donor was found.

Adult↗