Biomedical subjects

R Roetzheim

Publications and source records attributed to R Roetzheim.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2000

The use and outcomes of outpatient mastectomy in Florida.

BACKGROUND: To identify patient characteristics associated with outpatient mastectomies and their outcomes. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with breast cancer and treated with mastectomies in Florida in 1994 were identified from state discharge abstracts and the state tumor registry. The relationship between clinical/demographic characteristics and the odds of having an outpatient mastectomy was identified using multiple logistic regression. Outcomes were assessed by calculating the risk of being rehospitalized within 30 days of discharge. RESULTS: Twenty percent of mastectomies were performed on an outpatient basis. Outpatient mastectomies were more likely to be performed on women who were older, who lived in higher income communities, or who were uninsured. Health insurance type was not associated with having an outpatient mastectomy. Women undergoing outpatient mastectomy were more likely to be readmitted within 30 days of discharge; however, the excess risk was very small (0.7%). CONCLUSIONS: The risks from outpatient mastectomy are small. Ongoing monitoring of outcomes and assessment of patient satisfaction are needed.

Ambulatory Surgical Procedures↗

PubMed1999

University students' knowledge and awareness of HPV.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of university students regarding the human papillomavirus (HPV). METHODS: A random sample of 500 university students was mailed a self-administered questionnaire that elicited their knowledge and awareness about HPV and compared their knowledge and attitudes with those of other sexually transmitted diseases (STDs). Among the 480 deliverable addresses, 289 students responded (response rate 60%). RESULTS: Only 37% of respondents had ever heard of HPV, and the median score on a 13-item knowledge scale was only 3. Of seven STDs assessed, respondents indicated they knew the least about HPV and perceived that this STD has received the least educational effort. In multivariate analyses, predictors of lower knowledge and awareness about HPV were male gender and sexual behavior (having multiple partners, not using condoms). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the high prevalence of HPV among young adults, most students knew very little about this infection. Implementing HPV educational programs and measuring their effectiveness should be a priority.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

Prostate cancer screening in primary care.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the actual frequency with which men have prostate screening in primary care settings, nor are the determinants of screening understood. METHODS: We examined the records of 50 consecutive primary care office visits by men aged 50 or older. Men were asked to complete a brief questionnaire outlining their previous use of prostate screening services and the factors that influenced screening. RESULTS: Screening in the previous year with digital rectal examination (DRE) and prostate specific antigen (PSA) was reported by 46% and 30% of respondents, respectively. Most respondents (86%) had heard of prostate screening and most (78%) believed it was effective. The only factor predictive of screening with DRE in multivariate analysis was a doctor's discussion of screening (odds ratio, 4.8). Two factors were predictive of PSA screening--knowing someone who had prostate cancer (odds ratio, 12.8) and advancing age (odds ratio [per year], 1.1). CONCLUSIONS: Many men are not having annual prostate screening. Men who were older, who reported knowing someone with prostate cancer, and whose doctors discussed screening, were more likely to have been screened in the past year.

Attitude to Health↗

PubMed1997

A family practice residency cervical screening project: perceived screening barriers.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A community-based family practice residency program initiated a cervical screening project to provide free Pap smears to women who had not had one in 3 years. The research identified reasons why patients had not been screened within the past 3 years. METHODS: A total of 214 consecutive participants in the free Pap smear clinic completed questionnaires. The questionnaire asked about reasons why screening had not occurred over the last 3 years. RESULTS: Altogether, 65.4% of the study group reported cost-related factors as barriers to participation; 37.9% cited either scheduling concerns, fear, or embarrassment; and 36% cited misinformation issues about either screening recommendations, effectiveness of treatment, or disease presentation. CONCLUSIONS: Strategies to increase participation in Pap smear screening clinics may include increasing availability of free or low-cost screening examinations, increasing time efficiency and scheduling flexibility of examinations, and making efforts to mitigate the fear and embarrassment associated with the exam.

Adult↗

PubMed1996

The influence of risk factors on breast carcinoma screening of Medicare-insured older women. National Cancer Institute Breast Cancer Screening Consortium.

BACKGROUND: It is not certain whether older women with additional breast carcinoma risk factors are adequately screened or whether they are more likely to undergo screening than other older women. This study was conducted to determine whether selected risk factors influence the breast carcinoma screening rates of Medicare-insured older women (i.e., age 65 years or older). METHODS: Self-reported rates of screening mammography and clinical breast examination in the previous year were compared for women with benign breast disease, women with a family history of breast carcinoma, and women lacking these risks, using samples of non-Hispanic white, Medicare-insured women surveyed at the 5 National Cancer Institute Breast Cancer Screening Consortium sites in 1991 (n = 5376, mean age = 69.7 years) and 1994 (n = 5086, mean age = 69.7 years). RESULTS: In 1993, rates of screening mammography reported in the previous year at the 5 Consortium sites had a range of 46-61% for women with a family history of breast carcinoma, 49-66% for women with benign breast disease, and 31-43% for women lacking these risks. Women with a positive family history or a personal history of benign breast disease were also more likely to report having had a clinical breast examination in the previous year and having received a physician's mammography recommendation. A substantial proportion of older women with a positive family history remain inadequately screened, however. Between 25% and 35% of women in this group had not had a screening mammogram in the previous 2 years, while at some Consortium sites more than 20% reported never having had a mammogram in their lives. CONCLUSIONS: Older women with additional risk factors are more likely to undergo screening mammography. This is due partly to more frequent physician recommendations for screening and partly to more frequent provision of clinical breast examinations. However, a substantial proportion of high risk older women remain inadequately screened, despite widespread clinical consensus that these women should be regularly screened. Interventions that target older women with risk factors and their physicians appear warranted. Understanding the mechanisms by which risk factors influence screening is an important area for future research.

Aged↗