PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R S Doody

Publications and source records attributed to R S Doody.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

A 1-year, placebo-controlled preservation of function survival study of donepezil in AD patients.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of donepezil compared with placebo on the preservation of function in patients with AD over a 1-year period. METHODS: This was a prospective, 54-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, survival to endpoint study. Patients were required to have at entry: a diagnosis of probable AD (National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke criteria); Mini-Mental State Examination score of 12 to 20; Clinical Dementia Rating of 1 or 2; modified Hachinski ischemia score < or =4; and capability of performing 8 of 10 instrumental activities of daily living and 5 of 6 basic activities of daily living. Patients (n = 431) were randomized to placebo or donepezil (5 mg/day for 28 days, 10 mg/day thereafter). Outcome measures were the AD Functional Assessment and Change Scale, the Mini-Mental State Examination, and Clinical Dementia Rating scale. At each visit, investigators determined whether predefined criteria for clinically evident decline in functional status had been met. Patients who met the endpoint criteria were discontinued per protocol. RESULTS: Donepezil extended the median time to clinically evident functional decline by 5 months versus placebo. The probability of patients treated with donepezil remaining in the study with no clinically evident functional loss was 51% at 48 weeks, compared with 35% for placebo. The Kaplan-Meier survival curves for the two treatment groups were different (p = 0.002, log-rank test). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with AD continue to show detectable disease progression over time, but treatment with donepezil for 1 year was associated with a 38% reduction in the risk of functional decline compared with placebo.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

Practice parameter: management of dementia (an evidence-based review) [RETIRED]. Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology.

OBJECTIVE: To define and investigate key issues in the management of dementia and to make literature-based treatment recommendations. METHODS: The authors searched the literature for four clinical questions: 1) Does pharmacotherapy for cognitive symptoms improve outcomes in patients with dementia? 2) Does pharmacotherapy for noncognitive symptoms improve outcomes in patients with dementia? 3) Do educational interventions improve outcomes in patients and/or caregivers? 4) Do other nonpharmacologic interventions improve outcomes in patients and/or caregivers? RESULTS: Cholinesterase inhibitors benefit patients with AD (Standard), although the average benefit appears small; vitamin E likely delays the time to clinical worsening (Guideline); selegiline, other antioxidants, anti-inflammatories, and estrogen require further study. Antipsychotics are effective for agitation or psychosis in patients with dementia where environmental manipulation fails (Standard), and antidepressants are effective in depressed patients with dementia (Guideline). Educational programs should be offered to family caregivers to improve caregiver satisfaction and to delay the time to nursing home placement (Guideline). Staff of long-term care facilities should also be educated about AD to minimize the unnecessary use of antipsychotic medications (Guideline). Behavior modification, scheduled toileting, and prompted voiding reduce urinary incontinence (Standard). Functional independence can be increased by graded assistance, skills practice, and positive reinforcement (Guideline).

Dementia↗
PubMed2001

Open-label, multicenter, phase 3 extension study of the safety and efficacy of donepezil in patients with Alzheimer disease.

BACKGROUND: Donepezil hydrochloride is a selective acetylcholinesterase inhibitor approved for the symptomatic treatment of mild to moderately severe Alzheimer disease (AD). Controlled clinical trials of up to 24 weeks have demonstrated that donepezil treatment (5 and 10 mg/d) significantly improves cognition and global function. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the long-term benefits of donepezil treatment in patients with AD. DESIGN: Multicenter, open-label, 144-week extension of 2 US phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials: a 15-week study (12 weeks of treatment followed by a 3-week placebo washout) and a 30-week study (24 weeks of treatment followed by a 6-week placebo washout). INTERVENTIONS: All patients (N = 763) initially received donepezil, 5 mg/d, for 6 weeks, after which an increase to 10 mg/d was encouraged. MEASURES: Primary efficacy measures were the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale and the Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of the Boxes. RESULTS: After the shorter 3-week placebo washout, donepezil-associated benefits remained above original baseline values for an additional 24 weeks of open-label treatment. Benefits on Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale scores for patients who received 10 mg/d in the double-blind study were evident compared with the other groups for 108 weeks of open-label treatment. In contrast, donepezil-associated benefits were lost after the 6-week placebo washout, and scores decreased below original baseline values for all patient groups. Although scores improved relative to the new open-label study baseline scores after drug use was restarted, patients remained below original baseline values. The most common adverse events were associated with the nervous and digestive systems and were generally mild and transient; 17% of patient discontinuations were associated with adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Donepezil is an effective and safe drug for the long-term symptomatic treatment of mild to moderately severe AD for up to 144 weeks (2.8 years), and sustained treatment may confer some advantages.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

A method for estimating progression rates in Alzheimer disease.

BACKGROUND: The ability to predict progression of disease in patients with Alzheimer disease (AD) would aid clinicians, improve the validation of biomarkers, and contribute to alternative study designs for AD therapies. OBJECTIVE: To test a calculated rate of initial decline prior to the first physician visit (preprogression rate) for its ability to predict progression during subsequent follow-up. METHODS: We calculated preprogression rates for 298 patients with probable or possible AD (using the criteria of the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke and the Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Associations (NINCDS-ADRDA) with a formula using expected Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores, scores at presentation, and a standardized estimate of duration. The patients are being followed up longitudinally in our Alzheimer Disease Research Center. The time to clinically meaningful deterioration, defined as an MMSE score drop of 5 or more points, was compared for patients stratified as slow, intermediate, and rapid progressors based on the preprogression rate. Cox regression analysis was used to examine the contribution of demographic variables (age, sex, ethnicity, and level of education), initial MMSE scores, estimated symptom duration, and the calculated preprogression rate to the time it took to reach the end point across the groups. RESULTS: Both initial MMSE (hazard ratio, 0.95 (0.002); z = 4.19; P<.001) and the calculated preprogression rate (hazard ratio, 1.06 (0.019); z = 3.16; P =.002) were significant in determining time to clinically meaningful decline during longitudinal follow-up (Cox regression analysis). Slow, intermediate, and rapid progressors (based on preprogression rates) experienced significantly different time intervals to clinically meaningful deterioration, with the slow progressors taking the longest time, the intermediate progressors in the middle, and the rapid progressors reaching the end point first (log rank chi(2)(1) = 9.81, P =.002). CONCLUSION: An easily calculable rate of early disease progression can classify patients as rapid, intermediate, or slow progressors with good predictive value, even at initial presentation.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Long-term efficacy and safety of donepezil in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease: final analysis of a US multicentre open-label study.

This multicentre, open-label study evaluated the long-term efficacy and safety of donepezil in the treatment of patients with mild to moderately severe Alzheimer's disease (AD). The 133 patients who entered the study had previously completed a 14-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with donepezil. In this open-label study, patients were treated initially with 3 mg per day donepezil, which could be increased to 5, 7 and 10 mg per day in a step-wise fashion. Patients attended the clinic for assessments at 3-week intervals for the first 12 weeks, then subsequently at 12-week intervals for up to 240 weeks (254 cumulative weeks). Efficacy was assessed using the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog) and the Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of the Boxes scale (CDR-SB), and data were compared with those predicted for historical untreated AD patients. During the first 6-9 months of the study, mean ADAS-cog and CDR-SB scores showed evidence of clinical improvement from baseline. After this time scores gradually deteriorated. Overall the decline was less than that estimated if this cohort of patients had not been treated. The most common adverse events were related to the nervous and digestive systems, and were generally mild and transient, resolving without the need for dose modifications. There was no evidence of hepatotoxicity. In conclusion, these data demonstrate that donepezil is a well-tolerated, realistic symptomatic treatment for AD over a period of up to 4.9 years. An interim report of the first 98 weeks of the study has been published previously.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Does APO epsilon4 correlate with MRI changes in Alzheimer's disease?

OBJECTIVE: To assess the relation between APO E genotype and MRI white matter changes in Alzheimer's disease. The APO epsilon4 allele is correlated with amyloid angiopathy and other neuropathologies in Alzheimer's disease and could be associated with white matter changes. If so, there should be a dose effect. METHODS: 104 patients with probable Alzheimer's disease (NINCDS-ADRDA criteria) in this Alzheimer's Disease Research Centre were studied. Patients received MRI and APO E genotyping by standardised protocols. Axial MRI was scored (modified Schelten's scale) for the presence and degree of white matter changes and atrophy in several regions by a neuroradiologist blinded to genotype. Total white matter and total atrophy scores were also generated. Data analysis included Pearson's correlation for regional and total imaging scores and analysis of variance (ANOVA) (or Kruskal-Wallis) and chi(2) for demographic and disease related variables. RESULTS: 30 patients had no epsilon4, 53 patients were heterozygous, and 21 patients were homozygous. The three groups did not differ in sex distribution, age of onset, age at MRI, MMSE, clinical dementia rating, or modified Hachinski ischaemia scores. There were no significant correlations between total or regional white matter scores and APO E genotype (Pearson correlation). CONCLUSIONS: No correlation between total or regional white matter scores and APO E genotype was found. The pathogenesis of white matter changes in Alzheimer's disease may be independent of APO E genotype.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Alien limb sign.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Attention↗
PubMed1999

The influence of handedness on the clinical presentation and neuropsychology of Alzheimer disease.

BACKGROUND: Research on the influence of handedness on the clinical presentation and neuropsychology of Alzheimer disease (AD) is scarce. OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical presentation and neuropsychological test performance of right- and left-handed patients with AD. DESIGN: We hypothesized that left-handedness would be associated with younger onset, more rapid progression, and possibly cognitive hemispheric asymmetry. After determining handedness with the Edinburgh Inventory for Handedness for 922 patients with AD, 18 left-handed patients were compared with 18 right-handed patients matched individually on Mini-Mental State Examination scores, education, and age. We compared clinical characteristics (eg, age of onset), estimated rate of initial cognitive decline, language and visuospatial test performances, and patterns of cognitive and motor asymmetries for the 2 groups. SETTING: Alzheimer's Disease Research Center at Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Results of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised verbal and performance IQ tests, the Western Aphasia Battery sequential commands subtest, the Boston Naming Test, the Halstead-Reitan Finger-Tapping Test, and the calculated Rate of Initial Progression. RESULTS: We found that left-handed patients had younger ages of onset but unexpectedly lower estimated rates of initial cognitive decline, and their results on language tests did not differ from those of right-handed patients. Regarding asymmetry, left-handed patients were more likely than right-handers to obtain lower verbal IQ than performance IQ scores and to exhibit faster finger-tapping speeds with their nondominant hand, but group differences did not attain statistical significance. There were disproportionately few left-handed patients with AD compared with population norms. CONCLUSIONS: Left-handed patients with AD do not differ from right-handed patients in the severity or pattern of neuropsychological deficits. Left-handedness or some factor associated with it may contribute to the early appearance of cognitive deficits during the development of Alzheimer disease, but may temper the subsequent rate of progression of deficits.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

Clinical benefits of a new piperidine-class AChE inhibitor.

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is associated with a deficiency of acetylcholine (ACh) in the forebrain that correlates with brain pathology and cognitive dysfunction. The most promising approach to enhancing central ACh neurotransmission has been the utilization of agents that inhibit cholinesterases which block its catabolism. Initially, the success of this strategy was limited by subtherapeutic levels of acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibition, tolerability problems and toxicity of the first agents. Donepezil HCI represents a new chemical class of AChE inhibitors, the piperidines. In clinical trials, donepezil has been shown to improve significantly cognition and global function in patients with mild to moderately severe AD, and has demonstrated an excellent tolerability and safety profile. These benefits, as well as a simple, once-daily dosing regimen, make donepezil a viable therapeutic option for AD patients.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

Baylor profound mental status examination: a brief staging measure for profoundly demented Alzheimer disease patients.

There is no brief patient-derived rating scale for staging and following profoundly demented Alzheimer disease (AD) patients. We developed the Baylor Profound Mental Status Examination (BPMSE) modeled after the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) to meet this need. The BPMSE consists of 25 cognitive questions that assess orientation, language, attention, and motor functioning; 10 examiner ratings of presence or absence of problem behaviors; and 2 qualitative observations of language and social interaction. Two hundred eight probable or possible AD patients (MMSE scores of 20 or less) received the BPMSE. Some were also rated on the clinical dementia rating (CDR) and Lawton activities of daily living (ADL). A ceiling effect occurred at MMSE scores above 11. BPMSE cognitive scores and MMSE scores correlated significantly (r = 0.76, p < 0.0001). Subareas of the BPMSE also intercorrelated significantly. The BPMSE correlated with both CDR and ADL scores (p < 0.001). Internal consistency, interrater reliability, and test-retest stability were excellent. There was no floor effect, and BPMSE scores continued to decline after the MMSE reached 0. The BPMSE is a quick and easy staging tool with excellent validity and test-retest stability that measures cognitive function successfully in patients with MMSE scores below 12. The scale is sensitive to longitudinal change and continues to assess decline when performance has reached the lowest levels on conventional measures.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

Clinical profile of donepezil in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.

Although the underlying pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is not fully understood, one of its key features is the widespread loss of central cholinergic innervation, known to be fundamental for cognitive processes. This finding led to the hypothesis that pharmacological enhancement of acetylcholine (ACh) neurotransmission may alleviate the symptoms of AD. Currently, cholinergic therapy, particularly cholinesterase (ChE) inhibition, represents the most realistic approach to the symptomatic treatment of AD. Donepezil HCl, for example, is a piperidine-based, reversible acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitor, chemically distinct from other ChE inhibitors and rationally designed for the symptomatic treatment of AD. It is highly selective for centrally acting AChE, with little or no affinity for butyrylcholinesterase, present predominantly in the periphery. Phase I and II clinical trials demonstrated donepezil's favourable pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and safety profile with no requirement for dose modification in the elderly or in patients with renal or hepatic impairment. Furthermore, its long half-life supports a simple and convenient once-daily dosing regimen. Subsequent to encouraging phase II clinical trial results, two pivotal, randomized, double-blind phase III trials (of 15 and 30 weeks' duration) demonstrated highly significant improvements in cognition and global function in mild to moderately severe AD patients treated with either 5 or 10 mg/day donepezil compared with placebo. Adverse events in the phase II and III trials, primarily cholinergic in nature, were transient and generally mild in severity and resolved during continued donepezil administration. Thus, the donepezil clinical trials programme has shown that this drug is a clinically effective and well-tolerated, once-daily treatment for the symptoms of mild to moderately severe AD.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

Therapeutic standards in Alzheimer disease.

Donepezil is an effective, well-tolerated, and easily administered symptomatic treatment for mild-to-moderate Alzheimer disease (AD). Data from Phase III clinical trials have demonstrated that donepezil improves cognition, global function, and activities of daily living. In addition, there were no clinically significant treatment-related effects on vital signs or laboratory values in any trial. Adverse events, when present, were generally mild in intensity, transient, and resolved during continued treatment with donepezil. This favorable safety profile, together with its reported clinical benefits established donepezil as one standard of AD therapy. Vitamin E is one of two anti-oxidant therapies that may help to slow the progression of AD over at least a two-year period. One large-scale clinical trial suggests that it has sufficient benefit and safety to join donepezil as a current standard of AD therapy.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed1998

Donepezil improves cognition and global function in Alzheimer disease: a 15-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Donepezil Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Donepezil hydrochloride (Aricept) is a selective acetylcholinesterase inhibitor developed for the treatment of Alzheimer disease. This phase 3 study was 1 of 2 pivotal trials undertaken to establish the efficacy and safety of using donepezil in patients with mild to moderately severe Alzheimer disease. OBJECTIVES: To further examine the efficacy and safety of using donepezil in the treatment of patients with mild to moderately severe Alzheimer disease. To examine the relationships between plasma donepezil concentrations, inhibition of red blood cell acetylcholinesterase activity, and clinical response. METHODS: This was a 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial with a 3-week single-blind washout. Outpatients at 23 centers in the United States were randomized to receive placebo, 5 mg of donepezil hydrochloride, or 10 mg of donepezil hydrochloride (5 mg/d during week 1 then 10 mg/d thereafter) administered once daily at bedtime. Primary efficacy was measured using the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-cog) and Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change including caregiver information (CIBIC plus). RESULTS: A total of 468 patients entered the study, more than 97% of whom were included in the intention-to-treat (end point) analyses. The use of donepezil produced statistically significant improvements in ADAS-cog, CIBIC plus, and Mini-Mental State Examination scores, relative to placebo. The mean drug-placebo differences, at end point, for the groups receiving 5 mg/d and 10 mg/d of donepezil hydrochloride were, respectively, 2.5 and 3.1 units for ADAS-cog (P<.001); 0.3 and 0.4 units for CIBIC plus (P< or =.008); and 1.0 and 1.3 units for Mini-Mental State Examination (P< or =.004). On the CIBIC plus scale, 32% and 38% of patients, respectively, treated with 5 mg/d and 10 mg/d of donepezil hydrochloride demonstrated clinical improvement (a score of 1, 2, or 3) compared with placebo (18%). The mean (+/-SEM) donepezil plasma concentrations at study end point were 25.9 +/- 0.7 ng/mL and 50.6 +/- 1.9 ng/mL in the groups receiving dosages of 5 mg/d and 10 mg/d, respectively. Corresponding mean (+/-SEM) percentages of inhibition of red blood cell acetylcholinesterase activity were 63.9% +/- 0.9% and 74.7% +/- 1.2% for these 2 dosages, respectively. There was a statistically significant positive correlation between plasma concentrations of donepezil and acetylcholinesterase inhibition; the EC50 (50% effect) was obtained at a concentration of 15.6 ng/mL. A plateau of inhibition (80%-90%) was reached at plasma donepezil concentrations higher than 50 ng/mL. The correlations between plasma drug concentrations and both ADAS-cog (P<.001) and CIBIC plus (P = .006) were also statistically significant, as were the correlations between red blood cell acetylcholinesterase inhibition and change in ADAS-cog (P<.001) and CIBIC plus (P = .005). The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events with both dosages of donepezil (68%-78%) was comparable with that observed with placebo (69%). The use of 10 mg/d of donepezil hydrochloride was associated with transient mild nausea, insomnia, and diarrhea. There were no treatment-emergent clinically significant changes in vital signs or clinical laboratory test results. More important, the use of donepezil was not associated with the hepatotoxic effects observed with acridine-based cholinesterase inhibitors. CONCLUSION: Donepezil hydrochloride (5 and 10 mg) administered once daily is a well-tolerated and efficacious agent for treating the symptoms of mild to moderately severe Alzheimer disease.

Aged↗
PubMed1998

A 24-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of donepezil in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Donepezil Study Group.

The efficacy and safety of donepezil as a treatment for patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD) was investigated in a multicenter, double-blind study. Patients were randomly assigned to treatment with placebo (n = 162), 5 mg/d donepezil (n = 154), or 10 mg/d donepezil (n = 157) for 24 weeks followed by a 6-week, single-blind placebo washout. The primary efficacy measures were the cognitive portion of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS-cog) and the Clinician's Interview Based Assessment of Change-Plus (CIBIC plus), with the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Clinical Dementia Rating Scale-Sum of the Boxes (CDR-SB), and patient rated Quality of Life (QoL) used as secondary measures. Cognitive function, as measured by the ADAS-cog, was significantly improved in the 5- and 10-mg/d donepezil groups as compared with the placebo group at weeks 12, 18, and 24. Clinician's global ratings on the CIBIC plus also improved in both the 5- and 10-mg/d donepezil groups relative to placebo. At the end of the 6-week placebo washout phase, ADAS-cog scores and CIBIC plus ratings were not significantly different for the three groups. Significant treatment benefits were also observed consistently in both the 5- and 10-mg/d groups on the MMSE and the CDR-SB, but there was no consistent effect on the patient-rated QoL. Cholinergic side effects (primarily diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting) were reported more often in the 10-mg/d group than either the 5-mg/d or placebo groups. Side effects were transient and generally mild in severity. These data indicate that donepezil is a well-tolerated drug that improves cognition and global function in patients with mild to moderate AD.

Aged↗
PubMed1997

Validity and reliability of the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Clinical Global Impression of Change. The Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study.

This article reports the development and psychometric properties of the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Clinical Global Impression of Change (ADCS-CGIC). At present, a number of unvalidated CGIC scales are used in clinical trials, with various methods for making ratings. The ADCS-CGIC was designed on the basis of a survey of ADCS clinicians and by adapting existing instruments. It includes an organized but unstructured format, with which a clinician can address clinically relevant change. The instrument's reliability and validity were assessed in a prospective trial of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and healthy subjects over a 12-month period. It showed good short-term reliability at 1 and 2 months, with 90 and 94% of AD subjects, respectively, rated as having changed not at all or only minimally. The ADCS-CGIC's face validity was demonstrated by untreated. AD subjects rated as having worsened over time at both 6 months (56% rated as having worsened) and 12 months (81% rated as having worsened), whereas only 2% of control subjects showed minimal worsening. As a measure of predictive validity, ADCS-CGIC ratings at 12 months were significantly associated with change on four severity scales. As with other measures, change ratings were sensitive to dementia severity. Moderately impaired subjects showed greater worsening than other subjects. ADCS-CGIC ratings of greater worsening were made after the informant interview, regardless of whether informants or subjects were interviewed first. The ADCS-CGIC is a valid and reliable instrument for use in clinical trials.

Aged↗
PubMed1997

Correlations between SPECT regional cerebral blood flow and psychometric testing in patients with Alzheimer's disease.

Thirty-nine patients with probable Alzheimer's disease (AD) were studied with [99mTc]HMPAO SPECT and a standardized neuropsychological battery testing intellect, memory, attention, language, motor and praxis functions, and depression. Spearman rank correlations and multivariate regression analyses were performed to correlate quantitative regional perfusion deficits to these tests. Patients were found to have decreased perfusion of left frontal, parietal, and temporal regions relative to right. WAB repetition scores and bilateral temporal flow were significantly correlated (P < 0.01). Correlations between visual memory and bilateral temporal flow and those between Mini-Mental State/ Geriatric Depression Scale scores and bihemispheric flow approached significance. Although in this study regional cerebral blood flow was relatively insensitive to neuroanatomical abnormalities underlying specific cognitive deficits, it may have some specificity for identifying the language disorder in AD.

Aged↗