PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R S Hanspal

Publications and source records attributed to R S Hanspal.

10 recordsLinked to original sources

Return to work after lower limb amputation.

This study investigated the proportion of patients who returned to work following amputation and the factors that influenced a positive or negative outcome. One hundred patients of working age who had sustained unilateral lower limb amputation at least 1 year previously and who were established prosthesis users participated in the study. A specially designed questionnaire similar to a guided interview was administered by the rehabilitation physician at the patients' routine follow-ups. The questionnaire yielded a unique score dependent on whether return to work (or a different or preferred occupation) had been achieved with good or reduced productivity. All patients were eligible for mobility benefit, including schemes to purchase suitably adapted vehicles if necessary. However, no vocational rehabilitation was available. Sixty-six per cent of patients returned to employment and this was related to mobility, time since amputation and Handicap Scale scores. Age, socket comfort, level and cause of amputation, type of previous work or the presence of other medical problems did not differ between those who did and did not return to work. The Employment Questionnaire showed good correspondence with the London Handicap Scale, indicating some concurrent validity, although future development might include consideration of psychological factors, which could explain more of the reasons for continued unemployment.

Adult↗

Water activity limbs.

With advances in technology there is an increasing availability of Water Activity Limbs (WALs) and subsequently a greater number of requests for their provision. This study aims to establish a national consensus for indications, recommended best practice and procedures. The study was conducted with 2 rounds of questionnaires sent to 40 doctors, prosthetists and therapists each. The first questionnaire had a list of possible tasks requiring a WAL and respondents were asked to record their personal rating for prescription of each of the indications. Following analysis of the 91 responses, a list of indications, guidelines and procedures was sent to the same 120 respondents, enquiring whether they agreed or disagreed to each recommendation. The tasks orientated questionnaire showed that more than 50% of respondents considered occupation as an absolute indication. Other indications were some specific water sports. Occasional swimming and beach activity were only considered as possible indications. Showering was not considered an indication. The second questionnaire showed an overwhelming agreement to most of the procedures and indications recommended except social reasons for leisure. The authors present recommendations for prescription of WALs as guidelines and procedures based on the national consensus amongst peers. They also recommend a process for establishing evidence in a speciality where there is very little published evidence to recommend best practice.

Amputees↗