PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R S Lagasse

Publications and source records attributed to R S Lagasse.

9 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1998

Haemodynamic stability and ketamine-alfentanil anaesthetic induction.

We have determined if alfentanil could obtund the haemodynamic instability commonly seen at induction of anaesthesia with ketamine. Five groups of ASA I and II patients received ketamine 1 mg kg-1 i.v., preceded by saline (group 1) or alfentanil 10, 20, 30 or 40 micrograms kg-1 (groups 2-5, respectively). Heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (AP), postoperative patient complaints and dysphoria were noted. All groups showed increases (P < 0.05) in both HR and AP after administration of ketamine, which were progressively smaller as the dose of alfentanil increased. After tracheal intubation, all groups showed further increases in HR and AP, with groups 3-5 (alfentanil 20-40 micrograms kg-1) showing significant obtundation (P < 0.05) of these increases compared with group 1. No patient in any group reported postoperative dysphoria or dissatisfaction with their anaesthetic. Ketamine 1 mg kg-1 with alfentanil 20-40 micrograms kg-1 provided statistically significant obtundation of the haemodynamic instability that is common with ketamine alone.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1996

Monitoring and analysis of outcome studies.

Monitoring technology appears to be advancing at a rare that exceeds our ability to assess its effectiveness. RCTs are often poorly designed and lacks statistical power. Even high-quality RCTs may not provide inferences that can be generalized across all patient populations. Alternative methods of technology assessment, such as closed claims analysis, meta-analysis, and statistical process control, also have limitations. PORTs using a standard model of combined techniques are beginning to solve some of the more common methodological problems. The future of technology assessment relies on the ability to conduct large-scale cohort studies from routine practice settings. In terms of intraoperative monitors, this may require production of a complete and valid database of all monitored variables that can compared to a complete and valid database of all monitored variables that can be compared to a complete and valid database of appropriate outcome indicators. National standard for collection of data need to be developed. At this time, professional societies should focus more on developing guidelines for technology assessment than on guidelines for technology utilization.

Cohort Studies↗
PubMed1995

Defining quality of perioperative care by statistical process control of adverse outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Through peer review, we separated the contributions of system error and human (anesthesiologist) error to adverse perioperative outcomes. In addition, we monitored the quality of our perioperative care by statistically defining a predictable rate of adverse outcome dependent on the system in which practice occurs and respondent to any special causes for variation. METHODS: Traditional methods of identifying human errors using peer review were expanded to allow identification of system errors in cases involving one or more of the anesthesia clinical indicators recommended in 1992 by the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. Outcome data also were subjected to statistical process control analysis, an industrial method that uses control charts to monitor product quality and variation. RESULTS: Of 13,389 anesthetics, 110 involved one or more clinical indicators of the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. Peer review revealed that 6 of 110 cases involved two separate errors. Of these 116 errors, 9 (7.8%) were human errors and 107 (92.2%) were system errors. Attribute control charts demonstrated all indicators, excepting one (fulminant pulmonary edema), to be in statistical control. CONCLUSIONS: The major determinant of our patient care quality is the system through which services are delivered and not the individual anesthesia care provider. Outcome of anesthesia services and perioperative care is in statistical control and therefore stable. A stable system has a measurable, communicable capability that allows description and prediction of the quality of care we provide on a monthly basis.

Aftercare↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Application of the Grieshaber air system to maintain endotracheal tube cuff pressure.

The Grieshaber Air System was designed to maintain intraocular pressure during ophthalmologic surgery. It also has been used to maintain pressure in leaking endotracheal tube cuffs. It is a very useful device, especially if the intubation is difficult or the patient's position precludes replacement of the endotracheal tube. Two patients are presented in whom the system was used to maintain endotracheal tube cuff pressure.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Prolonged neuromuscular blockade following vecuronium infusion.

Administration of vecuronium by infusion is an increasingly common technique, both in the operating room and in the intensive care unit (ICU), for patients requiring prolonged neuromuscular blockade and mechanical ventilation. The major advantage of vecuronium over older neuromuscular blocking agents is its rapid excretion and intermediate duration of action. Prior to the current case report, the longest reported continuous paralysis after the cessation of a vecuronium infusion was 90 hours. A case of an 81-year-old patient with renal failure and subclinical chronic cirrhosis of the liver, who remained paralyzed for 13 days following a vecuronium infusion, is described. Intensive monitoring of neuromuscular function is recommended whenever muscle relaxants are administered by continuous infusion.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Hemodynamic stability and patient satisfaction after anesthetic induction with thiopental sodium, ketamine, thiopental-fentanyl, and ketamine-fentanyl.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To examine three commonly used anesthetic induction regimens (thiopental sodium, ketamine, and thiopental plus fentanyl) and one newly described regimen (ketamine plus fentanyl) with respect to hemodynamic stability and patient satisfaction. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind study. SETTING: University-affiliated Veterans Administration Hospital. PATIENTS: Forty-eight ASA physical status I and II patients (47 males, 1 female) scheduled for surgery requiring general anesthesia. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to one of four groups to receive intravenous injections of thiopental 5 mg/kg (Group 1), ketamine 1.5 mg/kg (Group 2), thiopental 3 mg/kg plus fentanyl 4 to 6 micrograms/kg (Group 3), or ketamine 0.5 mg/kg plus fentanyl 4 to 6 micrograms/kg (Group 4) for induction of anesthesia. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were measured during anesthetic induction. Evaluation of patient satisfaction/dissatisfaction and pleasantness/unpleasantness by the Anesthesia Experience Rating (AER) was carried out the day following surgery. Groups 3 and 4 showed the least increase from their baseline values in both HR and MAP after tracheal intubation, but only Group 4 exhibited no statistically significant change in hemodynamic parameters after induction but before intubation (p < 0.05). AER showed a higher level of pleasantness in Group 3 as compared with Group 2 (p < 0.03) and higher levels of satisfaction in Groups 3 (p < 0.03) and 4 (p < 0.02) as compared with Group 2. CONCLUSION: The combination of ketamine plus fentanyl provides superior hemodynamic stability with excellent patient satisfaction.

Anesthesia, Intravenous↗