PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R S Sandler

Publications and source records attributed to R S Sandler.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Cost-effectiveness analysis of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) versus endoscopic therapy for the prevention of recurrent esophageal variceal bleeding.

For the prevention of recurrent esophageal variceal bleeding, studies show that patients treated with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) have lower rebleeding rates compared with endoscopic therapy. However, TIPS is associated with higher rates of portosystemic encephalopathy and possibly higher costs. The aim of this study was to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing TIPS with endoscopic sclerotherapy and endoscopic ligation for the prevention of recurrent esophageal variceal bleeding. Data for rates of rebleeding, death, complications, and crossover from endoscopy to TIPS were obtained from the literature. Costs for procedures and hospitalizations were obtained from two medical centers. Sensitivity analyses were performed varying probabilities of key variables. The patient population consisted of a hypothetical cohort of cirrhotic patients successfully treated for esophageal variceal bleeding with endoscopic sclerotherapy who received prophylactic sclerotherapy, ligation, or TIPS over 1 year. Endoscopic patients would receive propranolol. Mortality was similar for the three groups. The number of bleeds per patient for sclerotherapy, ligation, and TIPS would be 0.39, 0.32, and 0.07, respectively. The total annual costs per patient for sclerotherapy, ligation, and TIPS were $23,459, $23,111, and $26,275, respectively. The incremental cost per bleed prevented for TIPS compared with sclerotherapy and ligation was $8,803 and $12, 660, respectively. The incremental cost per bleed prevented for TIPS compared with sclerotherapy or ligation was sensitive to the cost of TIPS and the TIPS stenosis rate. Ligation had lower costs and lower recurrent bleeding rates than sclerotherapy. Compared with endoscopic therapy, TIPS leads to lower recurrent variceal bleeding rates and it is more cost effective in the short term for the prevention of recurrent esophageal variceal bleeding.

Cost-Benefit Analysis↗

Interest in genetic testing among first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients.

PURPOSE: The present study examined colorectal cancer screening behaviors, risk perceptions, and willingness to receive genetic testing to determine colorectal cancer susceptibility. METHODS: We recruited 95 first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients, then conducted a brief telephone interview using a structured questionnaire that elicited information on sociodemographics, cancer screening behaviors, risk perceptions, and interest in genetic testing. RESULTS: Among these high-risk individuals who were aged 40 years or older, only 31% reported fecal occult blood testing within the past year and 59% reported undergoing sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy within the past 5 years. The majority of participants believed their relative risk of colorectal cancer was increased (68%). Eighty-four percent of the participants indicated that they would have a genetic test if one were available. Participants who believed that <50% of colorectal cancers were caused by heredity were more likely to be interested in genetic testing than were participants who believed that 50% or more of colorectal cancers were caused by heredity. Referral source, sociodemographic factors, clinical factors, and perceived personal risk were not significantly associated with interest in genetic testing. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the demand for colorectal cancer susceptibility testing may be high among individuals with a family history of colorectal cancer. We also observed that a substantial number of first-degree relatives were not adhering to colorectal cancer screening guidelines. Accurate information on the genetic aspects of colorectal cancer and the benefits and limitations of genetic testing may help relatives of colorectal cancer patients make informed decisions about whether to undergo enhanced screening and genetic testing.

Adolescent↗

Food intake patterns and gallbladder disease in Mexican Americans.

OBJECTIVE: Results of previous studies on diet and gallbladder disease (GBD), defined as having gallstones or having had surgery for gallstones, have been inconsistent. This research examined patterns of food intake in Mexican Americans and their associations with GBD. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SUBJECTS: The study population included 4641 Mexican Americans aged 20-74 years who participated in the 1988-94 third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III). GBD was diagnosed by ultrasound. Food intake patterns were identified by principal components analysis based on food frequency questionnaire responses. Component scores representing the level of intake of each pattern were categorized into quartiles, and prevalence odds ratios (POR) were estimated relative to the lowest quartile along with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: There were four distinct patterns in women (vegetable, high calorie, traditional, fruit) and three in men (vegetable, high calorie, traditional). After age adjustment, none were associated with GBD in women. However, men in the third (POR = 0.42, 95%CI 0.21-0.85) and fourth (POR = 0.53, 95%CI 0.28-1.01) quartiles of the traditional intake pattern were half as likely to have GBD as those in the lowest quartile. CONCLUSIONS: These findings add to a growing literature suggesting dietary intake patterns can provide potentially useful and relevant information on diet-disease associations. Nevertheless, methods to do so require further development and validation.

Adult↗

Abdominal pain, bloating, and diarrhea in the United States: prevalence and impact.

The prevalence and impact of abdominal pain, bloating, and diarrhea in the adult US population are largely unknown. We conducted a national, cross-sectional, telephone survey of US households to provide estimates of the frequency, duration, severity, and impact of specific digestive symptoms during the previous month. A total of 2510 subjects completed interviews (70.7% response rate). Among the respondents, 1017 (40.5%) reported one or more digestive symptoms within the month before the interview, including abdominal pain or discomfort 21.8%, bloating or distension 15.9%, and diarrhea or loose stools 26.9%. Women were more likely than men to report abdominal pain or discomfort (24.4% vs 17.5%) and bloating or distension (19.2% vs 10.5%), but not diarrhea or loose stools (27.1% vs 26.7%). Symptoms were less common among those > or =60 years of age. More than 65% of respondents rated symptoms as moderate or severe in intensity, and the majority reported limitations in daily activities. We conclude that digestive symptoms are more common than previously recognized and have a significant impact.

Abdominal Pain↗

Is there publication bias in the reporting of cancer risk in Barrett's esophagus?

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The published risk of adenocarcinoma in the setting of Barrett's esophagus (BE) varies. Publication bias, the selective reporting of studies featuring positive or extreme results, may result in overestimation of this cancer risk in the literature. The aim of this study was to assess those publications reporting a cancer risk in BE for evidence of publication bias. METHODS: A MEDLINE search for all published estimates between 1966 and 1998 of cancer risk in BE was performed. All studies reporting a cancer risk expressible in cancers per patient-year of follow-up were retrieved. Bibliographies of these studies were surveyed for additional estimates. All publications that required an initial endoscopy with histologic confirmation of BE and any cancer were included. The relationship of reported cancer risk to size of the study was assessed. Multivariable regression controlling for differences in definition of BE, as well as other study characteristics, was performed. The data were also analyzed by means of a funnel diagram, an epidemiologic method to assess publication bias. RESULTS: Five hundred fifty-four abstracts were reviewed. Twenty-seven publications met the stated criteria for inclusion. There was a strong correlation between cancer risk and the size of the study, with small studies reporting much higher risks of cancer than larger studies. This association persisted when differences in the definition of BE, retrospective vs. prospective nature of the study, surveillance interval, and the effect of cancer detected in the first year were considered. The funnel diagram analysis suggested publication bias. CONCLUSIONS: The cancer risk in BE may be overestimated in the literature due to publication bias.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Upper gastrointestinal symptoms in a U.S. national sample of adults with diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Individuals with diabetes may be particularly susceptible to motility-related upper gastrointestinal (UGI) symptoms such as abdominal pain or discomfort, bloating, early satiety, nausea, and vomiting. We estimated the prevalence of UGI symptoms in a population-based sample of individuals with diabetes and determined whether cases and population controls differed in prevalence of UGI symptoms and in symptom features. METHODS: Individuals with diabetes (n = 483) and matched controls (n = 422) were recruited from a prior U.S. national health survey for a telephone interview on UGI symptoms. To confirm self-reported diabetes status, cases provided information on clinical management measures. Subjects were asked about UGI symptoms in the month before interview. Affirmative responses to initial questions triggered detailed questions about symptom frequency, timing, duration, and severity. Differences between cases and controls were evaluated. RESULTS: Cases not only had a significantly (P < 0.05) higher overall prevalence of one or more UGI symptoms in the past month (50%) than controls (38%), but they also reported a significantly greater number of UGI symptoms than controls. Almost 10% of cases reported three or more UGI symptoms in the past month compared with 2% of controls. Our study also identified UGI symptom features that were more relevant to cases and showed that one UGI symptom, heartburn, co-occurred significantly more often with UGI symptoms in cases than in controls. CONCLUSIONS: Upper GI symptoms are common in individuals with diabetes and more prevalent than in controls. The symptoms are non-specific and may reflect disruptions in motility or perception.

Adolescent↗

A second look at the relation between colorectal adenomas and consumption of foods containing partially hydrogenated oils.

The trans fatty acids in partially hydrogenated vegetable oil may cause colorectal neoplasia by interfering with cell membrane function or eicosanoid metabolism. This possibility provided a rationale for looking at the relation between colorectal adenomas and consumption of foods containing partially hydrogenated vegetable oils in 234 cases and 407 controls recruited from referrals for colonoscopy at University of North Carolina Hospitals in Chapel Hill, between 1988 and 1990. Foods containing partially hydrogenated vegetable oils were divided into four groups: sweetened baked goods, chocolate candy, oils and condiments, and french fries and chips. We observed no evidence of increased adenoma prevalence associated with consumption of fries and chips (200+ vs 0 kcals/day: odds ratio (OR) = 0.70; 95% confidence limits (CL) = 0.27, 1.8) or chocolate candy (50+ vs 0 kcals/day: OR = 0.49; 95% CL = 0.23, 1.1). We did, however, find evidence of increased adenoma prevalence associated with consumption of sweetened baked goods (400+ vs < 100 kcals/day: OR = 1.9; 95% CL = 0.95, 3.8) and oils and condiments (200+ vs < 100 kcals/day: OR = 2.4; 95% CL = 1.3, 4.2).

Adenomatous Polyps↗

Effectiveness and economic impact of screening for colorectal cancer by mass fecal occult blood testing.

OBJECTIVES: Fecal occult blood testing has been shown to reduce mortality from colorectal cancer in large randomized, controlled trials conducted in the United States, Denmark, and the United Kingdom, and mathematical simulation modeling found it to be cost-effective relative to other health care services. Before making a concerted effort to implement mass fecal occult blood testing based on this evidence alone, however, we considered it prudent to critically re-evaluate the effectiveness and economic impact of screening in the US population as a whole. METHODS: To assess the effectiveness of screening, we projected published outcomes from each of the three large randomized controlled trials of fecal occult blood testing to the US population, as if each clinical trial had been done in the population as a whole. We then determined the resource costs of detection and treatment that would be associated with the outcomes predicted from each trial. RESULTS: More than 1 million colorectal cancers could be expected to arise over 10 yr in the cohort of US residents eligible to enter a screening program in 1997, and trial outcomes indicate that > or = 60% of these cancers would be fatal. If the 60-67% compliance rate of the population-based randomized controlled trials were achieved, a fecal occult blood testing program would detect 30% of known colorectal cancers and save 100,000 lives over 10 yr. Screening would incur total costs of $3-4 billion over 10 yr, or $2,500 per life-year saved. CONCLUSIONS: Mass fecal occult blood testing is cost-effective, and, although not inexpensive, many would consider the total cost acceptable. Even with a concerted effort to achieve compliance, however, the effectiveness of fecal occult blood testing would be limited to saving the lives of < or = 15% of those who otherwise would die from their cancer in the first 10 yr after beginning mass screening. The limitations of fecal occult blood testing suggest the need to further evaluate the role of endoscopy in screening, and to develop more effective, noninvasive screening tools.

Aged↗

The practices and attitudes of primary care nurse practitioners and physician assistants with respect to colorectal cancer screening.

OBJECTIVES: Although nurse practitioners and physician assistants form a large and growing portion of the primary care workforce, little is known about their colorectal cancer screening practices. The aim of this study was to assess the colorectal cancer screening practices, training, and attitudes of nurse practitioners and physician assistants practicing primary care medicine. METHODS: All nurse practitioners (827) and physician assistants (1178) licensed by the Medical Board of the State of North Carolina were surveyed by mail. Both groups were further divided into primary care versus non-primary care by self-described roles. Self-reported practices, training, and attitudes with respect to colorectal cancer screening were elicited. RESULTS: Response rates were 71.4% and 61.2%, for nurse practitioners and physician assistants respectively. A total of 51.3% of nurse practitioners and 50.3% of physician assistants described themselves as adult primary care providers. No primary care nurse practitioners and only 3.8% of primary care physician assistants performed screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. However, 76% of primary care physician assistants and 69% of primary care nurse practitioners reported recommending screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. A total of 95% primary care physician assistants and 92% of primary care nurse practitioners reported performing fecal occult blood testing. Only 9.4% of physician assistants and 2.8% of nurse practitioners received any formal instruction in flexible sigmoidoscopy while in their training. Additionally, 41.4% of primary care physician assistants and 27.7% of primary care nurse practitioners reported that they would be interested in obtaining formal training in flexible sigmoidoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: Physician assistants and nurse practitioners are motivated, willing and underutilized groups with respect to CRC screening. Efforts to increase education and training of these professionals may improve the availability of CRC screening modalities.

Adult↗

Crohn's disease: does race matter? The Mid-Atlantic Crohn's Disease Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: The severity of Crohn's disease (CD) has been reported to be greater in blacks than in whites. This possible disparity may be due, in part, to differences between these groups in health care utilization and accessibility. To explore these issues, we conducted a multicenter survey of patients with CD. METHODS: One-hundred and forty-five blacks with CD, recruited from four teaching hospitals and five private practices, and identified by medical record review or ICD-9 code, were enrolled and matched to 407 whites with CD (by age, gender, and practice type [teaching vs. private practice setting]). Participants were interviewed regarding medical history, health status, personal health care practices during the preceding 5 yr, and beliefs regarding health care in the general population. RESULTS: Blacks and whites were similar with respect to age of CD onset, lag in time to diagnosis, and number of gastrointestinal (GI)-related hospitalizations and surgeries. Medication usage patterns were also similar in the two groups. Quality of life, measured by SF-36, was lower in all categories for blacks, compared with whites. Blacks were more likely to have had to stop work (p<0.01) and have lost more work days (p<0.01) than were whites. Whites were more likely to have health insurance and be able to identify a regular provider than were blacks. Blacks were more likely to report the following: receiving Medicaid; difficulty affording health care; delaying appointments due to financial concerns; difficulty traveling to their provider's office; and experiencing unreasonable delays at their provider's office. After adjusting for potential confounding variables, we found no differences between the groups, except for the number of days of work lost because of CD. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that black and white patients have similar reported disease presentations and course, and contrast with prior reports suggesting a more severe disease course among black patients. Although the disease itself appears similar, there were numerous reported differences between the races in health care utilization practices and in disease impact upon daily activities. We suggest that apparent disparities in CD according to race are actually due to social and economic factors, and not to the disease itself.

Absenteeism↗

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and cancer prevention.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), including aspirin, appear to have clinically significant anticarcinogenic effects in the gastrointestinal tract. Epidemiological data indicate that use of these drugs is inversely associated with the risk of sporadic colorectal cancer, and clinical trials among patients with familial polyposis coli show that NSAIDs can lead to the regression of large bowel adenomas. Animal studies have reported a similar efficacy of NSAIDs against experimental carcinogenesis. A consistent pattern in this research is that continued long-term use of NSAIDs is required for an anticancer effect--up to 15 or 20 years before a reduced risk of colorectal cancer appears. Epidemiological data also suggest possible protective effects in the stomach and esophagus. The mechanisms underlying any chemopreventive effect of NSAIDs are not clear. Inhibition of cyclooxygenase is one possibility, but pathways independent of cyclooxygenase and prostaglandins are also possible.

Adenoma↗

Country of birth and prevalence of gallbladder disease in Mexican Americans.

OBJECTIVES: This research sought to describe the association between country of birth and gallbladder disease (GBD) in Mexican Americans, identify subgroups at especially high risk, and identify risk factors that may mediate a birthplace-GBD association. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. METHODS: Our study population included 4157 Mexican Americans aged 20-74 who participated in the 1988-94 third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. GBD was diagnosed by ultrasound. Information on country of birth, education, income, and selected GBD risk factors was obtained from interviews. Prevalence odds ratios (POR) for GBD in Mexico- vs. US-born Mexican Americans were estimated by unconditional logistic regression, along with 95% confidence intervals (CI). To evaluate the extent to which GBD risk factors mediated the birthplace-GBD association, PORs for country of birth were compared in models with and without additional covariates. RESULTS: Age-adjusted GBD prevalence was lower in Mexico- than in US-born Mexican-American women (POR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.50, 0.98) and men (POR = 0.63, 95% CI 0.40, 0.97). The difference was especially pronounced among subjects of lower socioeconomic status. Despite substantial differences in GBD risk factor distributions by birthplace, none could completely explain the prevalence difference. CONCLUSIONS: The observation that GBD prevalence is higher among US-born Mexican Americans is consistent with research showing poorer health in this group. Further research is needed to identify strategies for reducing morbidity from GBD in Mexican Americans.

Adult↗

Serum ferritin concentration and recurrence of colorectal adenoma.

Both body iron stores and dietary iron intake have been reported to increase risk of colorectal neoplasms. We assessed whether serum ferritin concentration was associated with recurrence of colorectal adenomas among 733 individuals with baseline determinations of ferritin as part of a multicenter clinical trial of antioxidant supplements for adenoma prevention. All study participants had at least one adenoma removed within 3 months before enrollment, and 269 of them developed one or more adenomas between follow-up colonoscopies conducted 1 and 4 years after enrollment. Baseline serum ferritin concentrations were analyzed both as a log-transformed continuous variable and as a categorical variable, defined as whether iron stores were nonreplete and low (ferritin < or =30 microg/liter), nonreplete and borderline (31-70 microg/liter), replete and adequate (71-160 microg/liter), or replete and high (>160 microg/liter). Analyses were based on multiple logistic regression models, including age, sex, study center, energy, alcohol, fiber, folate, and total fat intake, number of months between colonoscopic examinations, smoking status, and aspirin use. Overall, there was no statistically significant linear association between log ferritin concentration and adenoma recurrence (P = 0.33). Risk of adenoma recurrence was modestly increased among participants with ferritin concentrations >70 microg/liter relative to those with lower ferritin (odds ratio, 1.39; 95% confidence interval, 0.96-2.02). This result seemed more pronounced among women than men. Dietary intake of iron and red meat was inversely associated with adenoma recurrence among participants with replete iron stores but not consistently associated among those with nonreplete stores. Our findings suggest that any role of iron stores and dietary iron in influencing risk of colorectal adenoma recurrence is likely complex.

Adenoma↗

Rectal mucosal proliferation and risk of colorectal adenomas: results from a randomized controlled trial.

Although rectal mucosal labeling index is thought to be a useful surrogate biomarker for colorectal cancer, the ability of the index to predict future neoplasia is unclear. We obtained rectal mucosal biopsies from 333 participants of a randomized controlled chemoprevention trial of calcium supplementation to determine whether labeling index was correlated with concurrent or future colorectal neoplasms. Labeling index was measured using proliferating cell nuclear antigen immunohistochemistry. Adenomas were enumerated at the time of the biopsies (cross-sectional) and 3 years later (prospective). We used logistic regression to test for an association of adenoma occurrence with overall labeling index, the mean proliferative height, and labeling index in the upper 40% of colon crypts. In the cross-sectional analysis, we found indications that higher proliferation was associated with an increase in the prevalence of adenomas. The overall adjusted odds ratios (OR) (95% confidence interval) were 1.14 (0.90-1.45) per % crypt labeling index, OR 1.08 (0.99-1.19) for upper crypt proliferation, and OR 1.07 (1.03-1.12) for proliferative height. In contrast, individuals with higher labeling index at baseline were actually less likely to have adenomas in the prospective analyses: OR 0.80 (0.62-1.02) per % crypt labeling index, OR 0.86 (0.73-1.00) for upper crypt index, and OR 0.97 (0.93-1.01) for proliferative height. Proliferative index does not predict future colorectal neoplasia, although it may be weakly associated with the presence of current adenomas. These results have important implications for the design of future intervention studies. Although it may be attractive to include the measurement of intermediate markers in large controlled trials, until we have more confidence in their performance, we should rely on better proven and more reliable intermediates, such as adenomas.

Adenoma↗

Disposable versus reusable biopsy forceps for colorectal epithelial cell proliferation in humans.

The performance of various measures of rectal mucosal proliferation has been evaluated in the literature, but the performance of the forceps used to obtain the tissue has received little attention. We used data from two large studies of proliferation at a single institution to compare reusable and disposable endoscopic forceps. Endoscopic pinch biopsies were taken 10 cm from the anal verge using either reusable or disposable, oval-cupped, sheathed forceps. The specimens were fixed, embedded, and sectioned, taking care to orient the specimens longitudinally. Five sections were placed on each slide. We determined how many slides did not contain eight scorable crypts (inadequate) and how many sections were necessary to identify eight complete crypts. There were 395 subjects who had biopsies taken with reusable forceps and 185 subjects who had biopsies taken with disposable forceps. The specimens were inadequate in 27.6% of the reusable forceps specimens versus 2.7% of the disposable forceps (P < 0.0001). The mean number of tissue sections necessary to identify eight scorable crypts for the reusable forceps was 3.82 (SD, 0.87) compared with 3.17 (SD, 0.83) for disposable forceps (P = 0.0001). The specimens taken with the disposable forceps were better, probably because the forceps were sharper. We believe that the better quality of the specimens and the sterility justify the higher cost of disposable forceps. We would urge investigators in proliferation studies to evaluate the biopsy equipment as carefully as they evaluate other aspects of their methods.

Biopsy↗

Gastrointestinal symptoms in 3181 volunteers ingesting snack foods containing olestra or triglycerides. A 6-week randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Olestra is a nonabsorbable, energy-free fat substitute. Because it is not absorbed, it may cause digestive symptoms when consumed in large amounts. OBJECTIVE: To compare the frequency and impact of gastrointestinal symptoms in adults and children who freely consume snacks containing olestra or regular snacks in the home. DESIGN: 6-week, double-blind, randomized, parallel, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: General community. PARTICIPANTS: 3181 volunteers 2 to 89 years of age. INTERVENTION: Households received identical packages labeled as containing olestra corn or potato chips. These packages contained either olestra or regular chips (control). MEASUREMENT: Gastrointestinal symptoms and their impact on daily activities were reported in a daily record. RESULTS: At least one gastrointestinal symptom was reported by 619 of 1620 (38.2%) persons in the olestra group and 576 of 1561 (36.9%) controls (difference, 1.3 percentage points [95% CI, -3.6 to 6.2 percentage points]; P = 0.60). In general, the groups did not differ significantly in the proportion of participants who reported individual gastrointestinal symptoms; however, more controls reported nausea (8.4% compared with 5.7%; difference, -2.7 percentage points [CI, -4.9 to -0.4 percentage points]; P = 0.02). The only difference between groups for the mean numbers of days on which symptoms were reported was that participants in the olestra group had 1 more symptom-day of more frequent bowel movements than did controls (3.7 symptom-days compared with 2.8 symptom days; difference, 0.9 symptom-days [CI, 0.1 to 1.8 symptom-days]; P = 0.04). The groups did not differ in the impact of symptoms on daily activities. CONCLUSIONS: Clinically meaningful or bothersome gastrointestinal effects are not associated with unregulated consumption of olestra corn and potato chips in the home.

Abdominal Pain↗

Calcium supplements for the prevention of colorectal adenomas. Calcium Polyp Prevention Study Group.

BACKGROUND AND METHODS: Laboratory, clinical, and epidemiologic evidence suggests that calcium may help prevent colorectal adenomas. We conducted a randomized, double-blind trial of the effect of supplementation with calcium carbonate on the recurrence of colorectal adenomas. We randomly assigned 930 subjects (mean age, 61 years; 72 percent men) with a recent history of colorectal adenomas to receive either calcium carbonate (3 g [1200 mg of elemental calcium] daily) or placebo, with follow-up colonoscopies one and four years after the qualifying examination. The primary end point was the proportion of subjects in whom at least one adenoma was detected after the first follow-up endoscopy but up to (and including) the second follow-up examination. Risk ratios for the recurrence of adenomas were adjusted for age, sex, lifetime number of adenomas before the study, clinical center, and length of the surveillance period. RESULTS: The subjects in the calcium group had a lower risk of recurrent adenomas. Among the 913 subjects who underwent at least one study colonoscopy, the adjusted risk ratio for any recurrence of adenoma with calcium as compared with placebo was 0.85 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.74 to 0.98; P=0.03). The main analysis was based on the 832 subjects (409 in the calcium group and 423 in the placebo group) who completed both follow-up examinations. At least one adenoma was diagnosed between the first and second follow-up endoscopies in 127 subjects in the calcium group (31 percent) and 159 subjects in the placebo group (38 percent); the adjusted risk ratio was 0.81 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.67 to 0.99; P=0.04). The adjusted ratio of the average number of adenomas in the calcium group to that in the placebo group was 0.76 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.60 to 0.96; P=0.02). The effect of calcium was independent of initial dietary fat and calcium intake. CONCLUSIONS: Calcium supplementation is associated with a significant - though moderate - reduction in the risk of recurrent colorectal adenomas.

Adenoma↗