Biomedical subjects

R S Sinatra

Publications and source records attributed to R S Sinatra.

25 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed1979

The effects of acute morphine treatment on the incorporation of [3H]L-lysine by normal and regenerating facial nucleus neurons.

Although opiates significantly alter RNA and protein synthesis in a variety of neuronal cell types, their effect on the biosynthetic activity of regenerating neurons has not been investigated. In the present study, the effect of morphine on the incorporation of [3H]L-lysine into proteins of facial nucleus neurons was examined by light microscopic radioautography. Silver grains present within various compartments of normal and regenerating (3-, 7-, 14- and 21 days post-axotomy) neurons from saline-treated Wistar rats were compared with the amount present in similar cells from animals receiving 40 mg/kg morphine sulfate i.v. At 14- and 21-days post-axotomy, regenerating neurons were larger and the grain count in the emulsion over these cells was greater than that observed in normal (unoperated) neurons. In normal facial neurons, the accumulation of lysine into the nucleus and nucleolus was significantly lower 60 min after morphine administration. However, morphine's inhibition of lysine incorporation was even more pronounced in regenerating neurons. In these cells, nuclear lysine uptake was depressed at 3 and 7 days, while maximum inhibition of cytoplasmic incorporation occurred at 14-days post-axotomy. Morphine administration decreased nucleolar lysine incorporation at all survival intervals.

Animals↗

PubMedDate not supplied

The clinical effectiveness of epidural bupivacaine, bupivacaine with lidocaine, and bupivacaine with fentanyl for labor analgesia.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To examine the efficacy of bupivacaine alone and in combination with lidocaine or fentanyl for epidural analgesia during labor. DESIGN: Randomized, single-blind study. SETTING: Labor and delivery unit at a university medical center. PATIENTS: Forty-five primiparas requesting epidural analgesia. INTERVENTIONS: Following epidural placement at L3-4 interspace, patients received either bupivacaine 0.5% (Group 1, n = 15), bupivacaine 0.25% with lidocaine 1% (Group 2, n = 15), or bupivacaine 0.5% with fentanyl 50 micrograms in 10 ml of saline (Group 3, n = 15). Patients in Groups 1 and 2 received 6 to 10 ml of local anesthetic depending on patient height, while patients in Group 3 received 5 ml of local anesthetic plus 50 micrograms of fentanyl in 10 ml of saline. All solutions contained epinephrine 1:200,000. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients were assessed at regular intervals following administration of the epidural solution. Visual analog scale (VAS) scores were used to measure onset of analgesia, time to complete pain relief, duration of analgesia, and patient satisfaction with therapy. The frequency of shivering and pruritus and the extent of sensory/motor block also were evaluated. There were no intragroup differences in time to complete pain relief or patient satisfaction. However, patients in Group 3 noted the most rapid onset and longest duration of pain relief. Patients in Group 3 also experienced significantly less shivering and had the lowest degree of motor block. Two patients in Group 3 experienced mild pruritus. CONCLUSIONS: Epidurally administered fentanyl safely extended the duration of labor analgesia while reducing bupivacaine dose requirements and magnitude of motor block. In this setting, the combination of bupivacaine and lidocaine offered no clinical advantage over bupivacaine alone.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

The effect of an intermediate dose of labetalol on heart rate and blood pressure responses to laryngoscopy and intubation.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of an intermediate dose of labetalol (0.4 mg/kg) for attenuation of heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) responses to laryngoscopy and intubation. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. SETTING: Inpatient gynecology service at a university medical center. PATIENTS: Two groups of 18 patients each undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received either 0.4 mg/kg of labetalol or an equal volume of normal saline 5 minutes prior to laryngoscopy and intubation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: HR and BP were measured upon arrival in the operating room (OR) (baseline) and at 1 minute intervals thereafter for 4 minutes prior to intubation and through 10 minutes following intubation. The labetalol group had a significantly lower HR from induction through 1 minute following intubation. Intragroup differences in HR were greatest immediately following laryngoscopy and intubation (33% increase above baseline for the placebo group vs 1% for the labetalol group, p less than 0.05). At the same time, a significant increase in mean arterial pressure (MAP) from baseline was noted in both groups (29% for the placebo group vs 23% for the labetalol group), but the difference between the groups was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: An intermediate dose of labetalol blunted the HR response to laryngoscopy and intubation during rapid-sequence induction in healthy patients but had a minimal effect on BP.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

The efficacy of intramuscular ketorolac in combination with intravenous PCA morphine for postoperative pain relief.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To examine the efficacy of intramuscular (IM) ketorolac used in combination with intravenous (IV) patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) morphine for postoperative pain relief following intra-abdominal gynecologic surgery. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. SETTING: Patient care unit at a university medical center. PATIENTS: Thirty-five healthy women undergoing intra-abdominal gynecologic surgery who requested postoperative PCA. INTERVENTIONS: Postoperatively, all patients received IV PCA morphine, with the PCA device programmed to deliver a maximum of 1 mg every 6 minutes (maximum of 30 mg over 4 hours). In addition, patients received one of three regimens: (1) IM saline every 6 hours; (2) IM ketorolac 30 mg while in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), followed by 15 mg every 6 hours; or (3) IM ketorolac 60 mg while in the PACU, followed by 30 mg every 6 hours. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients were assessed at regular intervals. Visual analog scale (VAS) scores were used to assess analgesia and patient satisfaction with therapy. Data on morphine usage were obtained from the PCA device, and the frequency and severity of adverse effects were assessed for the presence or absence of side effects. Cumulative morphine dosages were lower (p less than 0.05) in both ketorolac groups at 12, 18, and 24 hours. VAS scores and the frequency of side effects did not differ significantly among groups. CONCLUSIONS: IM ketorolac significantly decreased PCA morphine requirements. The analgesic effects of the two drugs appear to be additive.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Intravenous ketorolac as an adjunct to patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) for management of postgynecologic surgical pain.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine whether intravenous (IV) doses of ketorolac tromethamine provide safe and effective augmentation of postsurgical analgesia for patients using IV patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with morphine. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-response evaluation. SETTING: Patient care unit at a university medical center. PATIENTS: 62 ASA physical status I-III females recovering from intra-abdominal gynecologic surgery with general anesthesia who requested postoperative PCA. INTERVENTIONS: Following initial pain assessment in the recovery room, patients were randomized to receive either IV saline (placebo) followed by IV saline every 6 hours (Group 1); IV ketorolac 30 mg loading dose followed by IV ketorolac 15 mg every 6 hours (Group 2); or IV ketorolac 60 mg loading dose followed by IV ketorolac 30 mg every 6 hours (Group 3). All patients were provided IV PCA, which was programmed to provide 1.2 mg of morphine with a 6-minute lockout interval. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Visual analog scale (VAS) resting pain and satisfaction scores were measured every 2 to 12 hours. Cumulative PCA with morphine and the frequency and severity of side effects also were assessed. IV ketorolac showed no clinically significant side effects. Group 2 patients experienced significant reductions in VAS resting pain scores (p < 0.05), and a trend toward decreased morphine self-administration in both active groups was noted. Group 2 and Group 3 patients reported greater satisfaction with postsurgical analgesia than Group 1 patients. (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: IV ketorolac used as an analgesic adjunct provided safe and effective augmentation of PCA with morphine in patients recovering from intra-abdominal gynecologic surgery.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Subarachnoid meperidine-morphine combination. An effective perioperative analgesic adjunct for cesarean delivery.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Low-dose subarachnoid morphine provides effective perioperative analgesia but may be associated with a transient period of inadequate pain relief between the regression of local anesthetic block and the onset of morphine's analgesic effect. We hypothesized that this period of suboptimal analgesia could be avoided by adding meperidine, a rapid-acting, intermediate-duration opioid. METHODS: In a double-blind, randomized trial, 49 patients scheduled for elective cesarean delivery received subarachnoid 0.75% bupivacaine, 12 mg in 8.25% dextrose, with either meperidine 10 mg, morphine 0.15 mg, or meperidine 10 mg plus morphine 0.15 mg. Visual analog scale scores for pain and satisfaction were obtained at skin incision, delivery, uterine exteriorization, on arrival in the postanesthesia care unit, and 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 hours after drug administration. Neonatal Apgar scores and adverse effects were also noted. Postoperative intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) requirements were recorded for 24 hours. The data were analyzed by chi-square analysis Fisher's exact test, the Wilcoxon rank sum test, and analysis of variance with Tukey's adjustment for multiple comparisons. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the incidence and severity of side effects, including nausea, vomiting, pruritus, and sedation. Respiratory depression was not observed. Patients treated with morphine alone were least comfortable (P < .006), expressed the lowest satisfaction scores at early observations (P < .002), and required more PCA meperidine (P < .001) than any other group. Patients treated with meperidine alone were comfortable at early observations but required the greatest total amount of PCA meperidine over the first 24 hours (P < .05). Patients in the meperidine-morphine combination group reported the lowest pain scores and highest satisfaction scores at 4-hour and 6-hour observations (P < .03) and required the least total amount of PCA meperidine. CONCLUSION: The subarachnoid combination of meperidine-morphine provided more uniform analgesia, higher satisfaction, and a lower requirement for intravenous narcotic supplementation than either morphine or meperidine alone in patients recovering from cesarean delivery.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Current methods of controlling post-operative pain.

Until recently, the clinical significance of post-surgical pain and its undertreatment were for the most part unappreciated. Recognition that inadequate analgesia adversely affects the patient's cardiovascular, pulmonary, and emotional status has spurred development of new and highly effective methods of controlling pain. With the introduction of spinal opioid and patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) came the realization that, while such forms of therapy provided superior pain relief, they were not without their own unique and occasionally serious side effects. For this reason, both techniques are more safely provided by highly trained members of a dedicated acute/post-surgical pain service. Although spinal opioid (epidural, intrathecal) techniques are invasive and require patient cooperation, they have a high degree of safety in low-risk populations (ASA 1 and 2). The major therapeutic advantage of spinal opioids is their ability to prevent pain from being perceived. PCA permits patients to titrate intravenous opioids in proportion to their particular level of pain intensity. Although PCA provides effective pain "relief," the technique is incapable of preventing pain from being appreciated. A number of studies have observed that pain scores in patients successfully employing PCA were significantly higher than those noted in individuals treated with epidural opioids. Nevertheless, the control gained by self-administration, uniformity of analgesia, and low level of adverse results associated with PCA provides higher patient satisfaction and decreased sedation when compared with traditional intramuscular dosing. The effectiveness of PCA may be improved by adjusting for patient variables, utilizing opioids having rapid onset, the addition of a basal infusion, and supplementation with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents. Interpleural analgesia represents an important therapeutic option in patients sensitive to opioid-induced respiratory depression. The technique is more effective when local anesthetic solutions are continually infused. Analgesic efficacy may be further enhanced by the addition of "low-dose" PCA.

Analgesia, Epidural↗