PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R Sachdeo

Publications and source records attributed to R Sachdeo.

13 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Oxcarbazepine (Trileptal) as monotherapy in patients with partial seizures.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of oxcarbazepine (OXC) as monotherapy for patients with uncontrolled partial seizures. METHODS: A multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, dose-controlled monotherapy trial compared OXC at 2400 mg/day with OXC at 300 mg/day in patients with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures previously receiving carbamazepine (CBZ) monotherapy. During a 28-day open-label conversion phase, patients were tapered off CBZ and titrated to OXC 2400 mg/day. After a 56-day open-label baseline phase on OXC 2400 mg/day, patients entered a 126-day double-blind treatment phase in which they were randomized to continue OXC at 2400 mg/day or were down titrated over 6 weeks to OXC at 300 mg/day. Patients met the efficacy endpoint by completing the double-blind treatment phase or by meeting one of four predefined exit criteria. The primary efficacy variable was time to meeting one of the exit criteria. The secondary efficacy variable was the percentage of patients meeting one of the exit criteria in each of the two treatment groups. RESULTS: Of the 143 patients enrolled, 96 were randomized in the double-blind treatment phase. Time to meeting an exit criterion was significantly in favor of the OXC 2400 mg/day group (p = 0.0001). The median time to meeting an exit criterion was 68 days for the OXC 2400 mg/day Group and 28 days for the OXC 300 mg/day Group. In addition, the percentage of patients meeting one of the exit criteria was significantly lower for the OXC 2400 mg/day Group (p = 0.0001). Overall, OXC was well tolerated with the most common adverse events consisting of fatigue, nausea, ataxia, and headache. CONCLUSION: This trial demonstrated that OXC at 2400 mg/day is well tolerated and efficacious when administered as monotherapy in patients with uncontrolled partial onset seizures.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Recommendations on the clinical use of oxcarbazepine in the treatment of epilepsy: a consensus view.

Extensive clinical use and a series of clinical trials have shown that oxcarbazepine is a valuable antiepileptic drug for the treatment of adults and children with partial onset seizures both in initial monotherapy, for conversion to monotherapy and as adjunctive therapy. The clinically recommended titration scheme for all forms of therapy in adults is to start with 150 mg/day at night and to increase by 150 mg/day every second day until a target dose of 900-1200 mg/day is reached. If necessary, one can go faster and start with up to 600 mg/day and titrate with weekly increments of up to 600 mg/day. In children, treatment can be initiated with 8-10 mg/kg/day body weight in two to three divided doses. Dosage can be increased by 8-10 mg/kg/day in weekly increments if necessary for seizure control. Hyponatremia (serum sodium <125 mmol/l) can develop gradually during the first months of oxcarbazepine therapy in approximately 3% of patients with a previously normal serum sodium. However, there is no need to measure baseline serum sodium concentrations unless the patient has renal disease, is taking medication which may lower serum sodium levels (such as diuretics, oral contraceptives or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) or--in rare cases--has clinical symptoms of hyponatremia. During oxcarbazepine maintenance therapy measurement of serum sodium levels should also be considered if medications known to decrease sodium levels are added or symptoms of hyponatremia develop. Oxcarbazepine does not appear to have any clinically notable effects on other safety parameters such as renal and liver function or haematological test results. In summary, oxcarbazepine is a safe and well tolerated antiepileptic drug for partial epilepsy.

Anticonvulsants↗
PubMed2000

Adjunctive therapy with oxcarbazepine in children with partial seizures. The Oxcarbazepine Pediatric Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of oxcarbazepine (OXC) as adjunctive therapy in children with inadequately controlled partial seizures on one or two concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). BACKGROUND: OXC has shown antiepileptic activity in several comparative monotherapy trials in newly diagnosed patients with epilepsy, and in a placebo-controlled monotherapy trial in hospitalized patients evaluated for epilepsy surgery. DESIGN: A total of 267 patients were evaluated in a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial consisting of three phases: 1) a 56-day baseline phase (patients maintained on their current AEDs); 2) a 112-day double-blind treatment phase (patients received either OXC 30-46 mg/kg/day orally or placebo); and 3) an open-label extension phase. Data are reported only from the double-blind treatment phase; the open-label extension phase is ongoing. METHODS: Children (3 to 17 years old) with inadequately controlled partial seizures (simple, complex, and partial seizures evolving to secondarily generalized seizures) were enrolled. RESULTS: Patients treated with OXC experienced a significantly greater median percent reduction from baseline in partial seizure frequency than patients treated with placebo (p = 0.0001; 35% versus 9%, respectively). Forty-one percent of patients treated with OXC experienced a > or =50% reduction from baseline in partial seizure frequency per 28 days compared with 22% of patients treated with placebo (p = 0.0005). Ninety-one percent of the group treated with OXC and 82% of the group treated with placebo reported > or =1 adverse event; vomiting, somnolence, dizziness, and nausea occurred more frequently (twofold or greater) in the group treated with OXC. CONCLUSION: OXC adjunctive therapy administered in a dose range of 6 to 51 mg/kg/day (median 31.4 mg/kg/day) is safe, effective, and well tolerated in children with partial seizures.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Challenging our past paradigm in the management of epilepsy.

Trial designs of antiepileptic drugs have been reviewed. Add-on trials that were used to obtain marketing approval for many of the new antiepileptic drugs provide useful information but have definite limitations. The new monotherapy trial designs offer greater promise both in the provision of safety and efficacy information for registration purposes as well as the clinical use of these new agents to physicians.

Anticonvulsants↗
PubMed1999

Coadministration of phenytoin and felbamate: evidence of additional phenytoin dose-reduction requirements based on pharmacokinetics and tolerability with increasing doses of felbamate.

PURPOSE: This open-label study investigated the pharmacokinetic interaction of phenytoin (PHT) and felbamate (FBM). METHODS: Ten subjects with epilepsy receiving PHT monotherapy were administered increasing doses of FBM (1,200, 1,800, 2,400-3,600 mg/day) at 2-week intervals. PHT doses were reduced by 20% on an individual basis when evidence of clinically significant intolerance was present. With intolerance, the PHT dose was reduced before the next incremental FBM dose. Blood samples were analyzed for FBM, PHT, and PHT metabolite 5-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-5-phenylhydantoin (HPPH). RESULTS: Total PHT plasma concentrations increased with coadministered FBM. PHT Cmax increased from 15.9 microg/ml at baseline to 20.9 microg/ml after 1,200 mg/day FBM and to 26.8 microg/ml after 1,800 mg/day FBM. Four subjects required a 20% PHT dose reduction after 1,800 mg/day FBM and six after the administration of 2,400 mg/day FBM. All subjects required further 20% PHT reductions before 3,600 mg/day FBM. FBM Cmax and AUCT were reduced, and apparent clearance increased compared with data from FBM monotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: With the initiation of FBM therapy in subjects receiving PHT, the PHT dosage should be reduced by 20%. Further PHT dose reductions are likely to be necessary if the FBM dose is increased. The requirements for reductions in dose might be predicted by clinical signs of PHT intolerance.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Double-blind randomized trial of tramadol for the treatment of the pain of diabetic neuropathy.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tramadol in treating the pain of diabetic neuropathy. BACKGROUND: The pain of diabetic neuropathy is a major cause of morbidity among these patients and treatment, as with other small-fiber neuropathies, is often unsatisfactory. Tramadol is a centrally acting analgesic for use in treating moderate to moderately severe pain. METHODS: This multicenter, outpatient, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study consisted of a washout/screening phase, during which all analgesics were discontinued, and a 42-day double-blind treatment phase. A total of 131 patients with painful diabetic neuropathy were treated with tramadol (n=65) or placebo (n=66) tramadol, which were administered as identical capsules in divided doses four times daily. The primary efficacy analysis compared the mean pain intensity scores in the tramadol and placebo groups obtained at day 42 of the study or at the time of discontinuation. Secondary efficacy assessments were the pain relief rating scores and a quality of life evaluation based on daily activities and sleep characteristics. RESULTS: Tramadol, at an average dosage of 210 mg/day, was significantly (p < 0.001) more effective than placebo for treating the pain of diabetic neuropathy. Patients in the tramadol group scored significantly better in physical (p=0.02) and social functioning (p=0.04) ratings than patients in the placebo group. No statistically significant treatment effects on sleep were identified. The most frequently occurring adverse events with tramadol were nausea, constipation, headache, and somnolence. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this placebo-controlled trial showed that tramadol was effective and safe in treating the pain of diabetic neuropathy.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed1997

Tolerability and pharmacokinetics of monotherapy felbamate doses of 1,200-6,000 mg/day in subjects with epilepsy.

PURPOSE: Felbamate (FBM) pharmacokinetic parameters, safety and tolerability in the dose range of 1,200-6,000 mg/day were assessed in two open-label studies with similar designs. METHODS: In study A, newly diagnosed subjects with epilepsy receiving FBM monotherapy at a starting dose of 1,200 mg/day (400 mg/three times daily, t.i.d.) and increased 1,200 mg/day, if tolerated, at 14-day intervals to 3,600 mg/day were investigated. In study B, epilepsy subjects with prior FBM monotherapy exposure received ascending FBM doses in five consecutive 14-day periods with a starting dose of 3,600 mg/day (1,200 mg t.i.d.) FBM. In each successive period, if FBM was well tolerated, the dose was increased by 600 mg/day to a maximum of 6,000 mg/day (2,000 mg t.i.d.). RESULTS: The pharmacokinetic parameter estimates maximum observed concentration (Cmax), area under the concentration-time curve (AUCtau) Ctrough, and Cav showed a linear dependence to dose above the 1,200-6,000 mg/day FBM dose range (F-tests; p < 0.0001) with apparent clearance (Cl/kg) and Tmax (time to Cmax) independent of dose. When AUCtau, Cmax and Ctrough were adjusted for dose, there were no significant differences between the dosing periods. CONCLUSIONS: The data establish that plasma concentrations of FBM are linear with respect to dose to 6,000 mg/day. In addition, FBM was safely administered at these doses for periods as long as 14 days to epileptic subjects with prior exposure to FBM. FBM-naive subjects appeared to report more adverse experiences (generally of mild to moderate severity) than did subjects with prior FBM exposure.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1992

Felbamate monotherapy: controlled trial in patients with partial onset seizures.

Felbamate (FBM) monotherapy was evaluated in 44 patients with uncontrolled partial onset seizures in a unique, single-center, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial. During the 56-day baseline period, patients were required to have at least 8 seizures and to be receiving only one standard antiepileptic drug (AED) at a therapeutic level; a second AED was allowed if at a subtherapeutic level. Patients were randomized to valproate (VPA), 15 mg/kg, or to FBM, 3,600 mg/day. In the treatment phase, previous AEDs were discontinued by study day 28 (by one-third decrements on study days 1, 14, and 28). Study end points were completion of 112 study days or the fulfilling of escape criteria. Criteria for escape relative to baseline were: two-fold increase in monthly seizure frequency, two-fold increase in highest 2-day seizure frequency, single generalized tonic-clonic seizure (GTC) if none occurred during baseline, or significant prolongation of GTCs. The predetermined primary efficacy variable was the number of patients escaping in each treatment group. Nineteen patients on VPA and 3 on FBM met escape criteria (p less than 0.001, chi-square test). When overall seizure frequency among study completers was compared with baseline, the FBM group had a 50 to 65% reduction in seizure frequency. FBM adverse experiences were all mild or moderate in severity, and the incidence of adverse experiences was lower in monotherapy. FBM monotherapy was effective in the treatment of partial onset seizures with or without generalization and demonstrated a favorable safety profile.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1989

Magnetic stimulation in the diagnosis of lumbosacral radiculopathy.

Five patients presenting with sensory-motor disturbances consistent with a clinical diagnosis of L5 or S1 radiculopathy were studied. All had conventional nerve conduction tests and electromyography. The lumbosacral roots were stimulated in the lumbosacral region by using the Cadwell MES-10 Magneto-electric stimulator. The compound muscle action potentials were recorded bilaterally by surface electrodes applied to the soleus and tibialis anterior muscles. The latencies to the affected muscles were significantly prolonged. The appropriate root dysfunction was confirmed at operation or by the imaging techniques. It was concluded that surface stimulation of the lumbosacral roots by a magnetic coil is a potentially useful technique for the non-invasive evaluation of the function of the lumbosacral roots.

Aged↗
PubMed1985

Neurophysiologic study of olivopontocerebellar atrophy with or without glutamate dehydrogenase deficiency.

By neurophysiologic investigations, we evaluated 20 patients with olivopontocerebellar atrophy (OPCA), comprising 8 with glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) deficiency and 12 with normal GDH activity. We found sensorimotor, predominantly sensory axonal neuropathy distally in the legs, and peripheral auditory nerve dysfunction (prolonged wave I but normal interpeak latencies in brainstem auditory evoked response) in GDH-deficient patients. These findings seem distinctive enough to serve as the electrophysiologic marker for diagnosis and monitoring of treatment and progression of the disease. The pattern-reversal visual and median nerve somatosensory evoked responses did not differ among the patients and controls.

Aged↗
PubMed1984

Autonomic dysfunction and sleep apnea in olivopontocerebellar degeneration.

We studied ten men with olivopontocerebellar degeneration. Our findings of the autonomic deficits as manifested by orthostatic hypotension, impaired Valsalva's response, abnormal findings on cold pressor and mental arithmetic tests, and plasma renin and norepinephrine abnormalities in some patients with olivopontocerebellar degeneration suggested a defective central control of the sympathetic nervous system. Five patients had sleep apnea. Autonomic dysfunction and sleep apnea in olivopontocerebellar degeneration may result from degenerative lesions in the cerebellum and the brain stem.

Adult↗
PubMed1984

Pathology of olivopontocerebellar atrophy with glutamate dehydrogenase deficiency.

We report the neuropathologic findings in the first patient with recognized glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) deficiency to come to postmortem examination. He had progressive cerebellar ataxia beginning at age 21. He died at age 47 of pulmonary emboli. Postmortem examination revealed pancerebellar, olivary, and mild pontine atrophy, demyelination of the posterior columns, degeneration of anterior horn and dorsal root ganglion cells, and reduction of myelinated fibers in the sural nerve. In addition, there was neuronal storage of lipopigment diffusely throughout the CNS and the autonomic neurons, with cell distention, atrophy, and loss in selected areas.

Atrophy↗